
Construction of regular polygons
... impossible to trisect 60° with compass and straightedge, note that any solution θ must satisfy cos3θ = 4cos3θ – 3cosθ but when x = 2cos20°,this becomes x3 −3x−1 = 0 which is irreducible. Since cos20° is not constructible, 20° is not constructible. It is more difficult to show the impossibility of „s ...
... impossible to trisect 60° with compass and straightedge, note that any solution θ must satisfy cos3θ = 4cos3θ – 3cosθ but when x = 2cos20°,this becomes x3 −3x−1 = 0 which is irreducible. Since cos20° is not constructible, 20° is not constructible. It is more difficult to show the impossibility of „s ...
The Ring of Integers
... Elementary number theory is largely about the ring of integers, denoted by the symbol Z. The integers are an example of an algebraic structure called an integral domain. This means that Z satisfies the following axioms: (a) Z has operations + (addition) and · (multiplication). It is closed under the ...
... Elementary number theory is largely about the ring of integers, denoted by the symbol Z. The integers are an example of an algebraic structure called an integral domain. This means that Z satisfies the following axioms: (a) Z has operations + (addition) and · (multiplication). It is closed under the ...
On Subrecursive Representability of Irrational Numbers Lars Kristiansen
... denote the irrational numbers representable by, respectively, Cauchy sequences, Dedekind cuts and trace functions in S . The naive considerations above indicates that ST ⊂ SD ⊂ SC . These inclusions are strict – and they will be strict for any S which is contained in an efficiently enumerable class ...
... denote the irrational numbers representable by, respectively, Cauchy sequences, Dedekind cuts and trace functions in S . The naive considerations above indicates that ST ⊂ SD ⊂ SC . These inclusions are strict – and they will be strict for any S which is contained in an efficiently enumerable class ...
Dismal Arithmetic
... (Corollary 8). These factorizations are in general not unique. There is a useful process using digit maps for “promoting” a prime from a lower base to a higher base, which enables us to replace the list of all primes by a shorter list of prime “templates” (Table 3). Dismal squares are briefly discu ...
... (Corollary 8). These factorizations are in general not unique. There is a useful process using digit maps for “promoting” a prime from a lower base to a higher base, which enables us to replace the list of all primes by a shorter list of prime “templates” (Table 3). Dismal squares are briefly discu ...
The Period and the Distribution of the Fibonacci
... 5, 8, .... Therefore it is easy to see that it has a period of 60. Theorem 1. Let an = F ( mod m) , then there exists a positive integer s such that (as ,as+1 ) = (1, 1). In particular F ( mod m) has a period. Proof. Since 0 ≤ an < m, there are only m2 possible pairs of residues, and hence there mus ...
... 5, 8, .... Therefore it is easy to see that it has a period of 60. Theorem 1. Let an = F ( mod m) , then there exists a positive integer s such that (as ,as+1 ) = (1, 1). In particular F ( mod m) has a period. Proof. Since 0 ≤ an < m, there are only m2 possible pairs of residues, and hence there mus ...
Chapter 6 Integers and Rational Numbers
... Definition 6.1.4 We define addition and multiplication of integers by the rules [a, b] + [c, d] = [a + c, b + d], [a, b] × [c, d] = [ac + bd, ad + bc], [a, b] < [c, d] ⇔ a + d < b + c. There is some work which has to be done here. The definition of addition, for example, appears to depend on which c ...
... Definition 6.1.4 We define addition and multiplication of integers by the rules [a, b] + [c, d] = [a + c, b + d], [a, b] × [c, d] = [ac + bd, ad + bc], [a, b] < [c, d] ⇔ a + d < b + c. There is some work which has to be done here. The definition of addition, for example, appears to depend on which c ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.