Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Variable-frequency drive wikipedia , lookup
Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Utility frequency wikipedia , lookup
Stepper motor wikipedia , lookup
Electromagnetic compatibility wikipedia , lookup
Automatic test equipment wikipedia , lookup
Alternating current wikipedia , lookup
Portable appliance testing wikipedia , lookup
Mains electricity wikipedia , lookup
Rectiverter wikipedia , lookup
Superheterodyne receiver wikipedia , lookup
RTCA SC-135 and EUROCAE WG-14 Change Proposal Form (One major comment per form. Shaded blocks for committee use only.) SC-135 Paper Number: Date: DO-160E/ED-14E Section: Rev F #093B 17 March 2006 18 Author’s Name, Affiliation, and E-mail: Paragraph: Page: John Birkland, Rockwell Collins Inc. 18.3.3 18-4 [email protected] Reason for Change: Have received several calls that Section 18 dwell times are too long. This proposal adds an option to shorten the total test time without compromising the purpose of the long dwells. Proposal Disposition: Accepted As Written Accepted As Modified Withdrawn X Rejected X Other Rejection Reason: Proposal Deferred To: For further consideration by WG-14, and RTCA Section 16 working Group RTCA SC-135 Concurrence EUROCAE WG-14 Concurrence Proposal Disposition By: Date: Revise From: No text is change or removed. Only an addition to the existing text is made. The location of the addition is at the end of 18.3.3 It is assumed that the existing text has been corrected based in the previous proposal (author’s file Section 18 2006_03_17 (01).doc). Revise To: As an option, the applicant may step per Table 18-1, or sweep per table 18-2. The dwell time for each step shall be the longer of 3 seconds or the equipment response time. At each step record both applied interference voltage and resulting ac current into the EUT. Divide the applied interference voltage by the resulting ac current to generate an equivalent impedance. In addition, a 5 minute dwell is required at each step or frequency where the equivalent impedance goes through a minima Table 18.1 Step Sizes Logarithmically spaced steps (fo is the test frequency) Proposal Page Number: 1 of 4 SC-135/ED-14 Change Proposal Form Rev E Frequency Range Max Step Size Steps / decade Min. # Steps in range Total Step Dwell Time 10 Hz - 100 Hz 0.05 fo 49 49 2.5 min 100 Hz - 1 kHz 0.05 fo 49 49 2.5 min 1 kHz - 10 kHz 0.05 fo 49 49 2.5 min 10 kHz - 100 kHz 0.05 fo 49 49 2.5 min 100 kHz - 150 kHz 0.05 fo 49 10 0.5 min Table 18.2 Sweep Rates Analog (Continuous) sweeps Proposal Page Number: 2 of 4 SC-135/ED-14 Change Proposal Form Rev E Frequency Range Analog Maximum Scan Rate Actual Scan Time 10 Hz - 100 Hz 0.333 Hz/sec 4.5 min 100 Hz - 1 kHz 3.33 Hz/sec 4.5 min 1 kHz - 10 kHz 33.3 Hz/sec 4.5 min 10 kHz - 100 kHz 333 Hz/sec 4.5 min 100 kHz - 150 kHz 3.33 kHz/sec 0.3 min NOTE: If the system response time (Equipment under test and monitoring test equipment) exceeds 3 seconds, than the dwell time must be increased to ensure the response is detected. The analog scan rates must be adjusted accordingly. This can be achieved by multiplying the rates (table above) by the factor (3 seconds / tr) where / tr is the response time in seconds. For example, if tr is 30 seconds, (3 seconds / tr) is 0.1. The rate for the 1 kHz to 10 kHz range becomes 3.33 Hz/sec. The other ranges are handled in the same way. Proposal Page Number: 3 of 4 SC-135/ED-14 Change Proposal Form Rev E As Modified Text: The dwell time based on power limit is not acceptable. It needs to be based on current peaks (inflection points) Roll comments from section 20 into this test. Paul is suggesting that the dwell occur at each inflection point of the input current, not at the power limit. Problems can occur at injection levels below the power limit. Note: An inflection point is a point on a curve at which the sign of the curvature (i.e., the concavity) changes. Paul is also suggesting a compromise that this is an option for single phase and dc equipment, not three phase. John has asked Kamiar to provide documentation on why the test can not be done with the proposed new test method. Proposal Page Number: 4 of 4 SC-135/ED-14 Change Proposal Form Rev E