Download Vertical to horizontal wheel type top

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Escapement wikipedia , lookup

Kinematics wikipedia , lookup

Equations of motion wikipedia , lookup

Classical central-force problem wikipedia , lookup

Newton's laws of motion wikipedia , lookup

Mitsubishi AWC wikipedia , lookup

Rolling resistance wikipedia , lookup

Anti-lock braking system wikipedia , lookup

Rigid body dynamics wikipedia , lookup

Seismometer wikipedia , lookup

Centripetal force wikipedia , lookup

Precession wikipedia , lookup

Differential (mechanical device) wikipedia , lookup

Rotating locomotion in living systems wikipedia , lookup

Hunting oscillation wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
1
Detail on Mechanical logic
Bismillah A-rahman A-raheem
Regeneration
One point agenda
This description is written to prove the strength of the purposed research
against believes of perpetual motion. Accordingly, regeneration of mechanical
force through displacement, a very basic point is discussed in it. All work is built
on this base, proving this one point decides existence of fuel free engine.
Explanation of normal motion
Mechanical logic Description
Vertical to horizontal wheel type
/ Key points review
Parts of Assembly
Adjustment and Working of parts
FAQ’s
A Basic move of Fuel Free Engine
Fuel Free Engine ………is using a new kind of motion in physics. There is no
combustion or alternative energy source is processed in this Engine.
As we know that whenever a research is in initial stages it has only some points to
follow and we always consider these strong points to resolve our confusions.
“Where” ---- is the first question that is asked? All sub-atomic particles have a
property called Spin. Spinning entirely depends on physical properties of particles and
happens in relative interaction of particles. It is thought as infinitely going motion in
nuclear physics but we don’t know anything like in classical physics. So, where it is…..?
2
Detail on Mechanical logic
For this we have to get to the core place of Engine from where motion is
generated, there we have a mechanical logic. Word mechanical logic not only stands for
collective work of more than one mechanical body but it also assure their logical working
in mechanical nature.
In mechanical logic parts are such adjusted with each other that they have only
two options rotate or not, and in situation here if it moves it obviously achieves goal. So,
we have to preferably calculate and not to guess motion. To calculate motion we just
have to sum all vectors acting on body. Once motion is calculated status of hypothesis
turns in to theory.
Explanation of normal motion
top
For calculating motion we shall use way of description which will be tried on
normal motion first. Moreover we shall simplify many details in diagram whose working
and existence is out of question and they are not subject issue.
In diagrams no. (1.1) page (1)
Motion of a body is discussed. At first it is forced by somebody to move. Input
force is denoted by vector ‘X’ and ‘Z’ is representing all the resisting forces as inertia,
friction etc. Here X > 0 (zero) and Z < X. under these conditions body will move in
direction of vector ‘X’ but magnitude of X vector will decrease to ( X – Z ). Here initial
momentum of body is shown byM1. Body will travel some displacement which is shown
by path of line.
We know that when a body displaces from one point to next point it is considered
as motion. A line has infinite divisions of points. Way of analyzing motion through
displacement is that we can analyze forces relationship acting on body on all points of
displacement and calculate motion. So, if on every point condition remains same than we
shall say that body will travel from starting point to end point.
Second thing should be notified is that only on starting point momentum M1 is
maximum because here it has taken energy input, and then second bigger is M2 and after
that M3 until it stops. If we want to start from anywhere after M1 point on path there will
be no motion. So, touch with dynamic body gives motion in way of force and motion is
generated from there.
Note: these two underlined points are telling the method by which motion will be
analyzed. Purposing something and analyzing on basis of vision is inconvenient.
3
Detail on Mechanical logic
Mechanical logic Description
top
Surah Al-anbia Verse 31… (A verse in Quran)
This verse is telling stages before life, ‘Rataka’ when constituents were bounded or
motion less for each other, 'Fatak’ when they were opened, mean freed to show there
hidden qualities. ’Fatak’ made a base, as activation for life, as constituents of a bounded
unit opened. The intention of opening bounds is also clear, as process does not reverse.
There are two types of an equilibrium state when sum of all forces on a body
equals zero. One is static when two bodies are at rest with respect to each other. While in
Muftk’s industrial application we achieve this condition that both bodies gain rotation in
equilibrium. Both bodies e.g. wheels centers are forced towards each other. You know
pushing centers never rotates wheel it is there shape that does it.
In fact I have given a new theory of force that initial motion of two bodies can be
generated by the unbalancing property they share in their relationship. As they do not
balance each other they do not calm. While kept related they keep movement, because
they will remain imbalance due to their physical properties. This same feature is told in
this ayah that made me name this motion ‘Muftk’.
Vertical to horizontal wheel type
top
You have seen a heavy stone placed on land. If it is placed over rubber for long
time it will decrease its elasticity. It means that in this condition stone didn’t stopped
working on rubber….. Stone travels towards earth with the force of gravitation. This force
does not quit working and needs no continuous input to keep its state. It is nature but
when we come in mechanics there are lot more profile based mechanicals which can
increase force of this state enormously. For example put two plastic rings between nut
and bolt and then start screwing nut, as nut will press rings they will start moving toward
each other, tighten a bit more and the increase in force will press both rings to their
elasticity limit. Keep screwing and you will break rings. This force is so powerful that nut
and bolt can also get damage. One can say it is the force we put in the system. But it is a
lot more than gravitational and force do we need force to continue this pressure? .........in
4
Detail on Mechanical logic
a sense the difference between gravitation and mechanical pressure does not matter here,
because both forces in mechanics provide force in unit Newton per area on body. The
difference is that we can increase this force in mechanics. For example design some
mechanical to compress a car wheel on platform. Do we need to use a weight of a
container to compress it? No simple and lighter than motor cycle hydraulic can squash it
mechanically first its shock will be bent and then its tires will burst and collapse........ bolt
this equipment and leave it for years no energy is needed to run continuous input
pressure ……. in description when diagrams are simplified I have ignored detail of third
body (casing) which actually clings both bodies (wheels) and provides ground for
compression tool (hydraulic etc.). So what we see…..
In the Diagram (1.2) page (2)
.....shown is that that two wheels are held together tightly in equilibrium. It means
both wheel centers are moved towards each other with pressure. They get a compression
force trapped in them (‘Rataka’) but there is no rotation. It is like a wheel of heavy truck
standing motionless on leveled road. To rotate wheels we shall not be driving them by
rotating them.
In the Diagram (1.3) page (2)
It is shown that wheels are acting on one and another indirectly through a link.
(Almost as heavy truck standing on sloping surface) both wheels will rotate to move that
link out. There we can see formation of triangular force relationship between wheels is
rotating wheel. This is the simplest key to justify this motion. To use this out- ward
motion of link in a better way we are in need to include some more details in features of
wheels. In this way we will get series of progressing triangular force relations for ‘Muftk
motion’.
Parts of Assembly
top
In the Diagram (1.4) page (3)
It is named as vertical wheel because it works vertically in on horizontal wheel’s
surface in system. It has balled tip rollers on uniform distance along circumference line.
5
Detail on Mechanical logic
It is almost like tip of ball point pen, this idea is not good against very high pressure and
not strong but this roller can move all 360° degrees and is simple. For these rollers their
path ‘Huda’ has a groove to run only on that path. This wheel has an axle. Holding this
axle mechanism will press wheel on horizontal wheel.
In the Diagram (1.5) page (4)
Shown wheel is named Horizontal wheel (H.W) because it works horizontally in
system. It has wedges on one surface side, spread around on a uniform distance. Wedges
are attached on H.W upright at 90° degree with respect to its surface. In this set up
higher portion of wedge is directed towards center of H.W and they are located on radius
line correctly.
In the Diagram (1.6) page (4)
….Detail of wedge parts is given. The path Huda was inclining, to hold this path
semi triangular structure wedge is formed. Hypotenuse of this wedge is not straight it has
curve and it is named ‘Huda’, path of vertical wheel’s roller to run on horizontal wheel’s
surface. Here groove present on wedge adds in to feature of horizontal wheel. Whenever
roller will try to move tangentially engaging groove, groove will stop that movement and
will rotate horizontal wheel with it, and if roller tries to move along radius line it rolls in
groove and gives no rotation to horizontal wheel. This feature can be seen in diagram
(1.8) page (6) and in diagram (1.9) page (7) clearly.
Huda is the path which is meeting path of both wheels during rotation.
Displacement is base of that semi triangular structure wedge telling distance traveled,
sometimes we need to work with displacement when curving wedge. Perpendicular of
this wedge is height and its increase by travelling on path shows gain in height. It is not
practical to show wedge working in these diagrams. Therefore, we shall be drawing
section of height only. This section shows that both wheels are touching each-other on
that height in a side view, whereas movement will be shown as travelling from any lower
height point section to higher height point section on displacement in both side and
upper view. While from upper view we can see displacement along radius line and where
operating point is junction of both wheels bisection.
6
Detail on Mechanical logic
So generally these two things are happening at a time, one roller of V.W is
pushing wedge of H.W to rotate and as it rotates roller rolls to displace along radius line
on Huda, and these things are not happening one by one both these things are
happening together in same time.
Adjustment and Working of parts
top
In the Diagram (1.7) page (5) Adjustment of wheels is shown in side view.
Vertical wheel (V.W) is fixed vertically here. Restriction is a feature in casing that
is slit or a clinging body restricting vertical wheel so it can rotate and move vertically
downward or upward. (This up or down movement is not during working of logic). There
is no ply in wheels and any such thing which is malfunctioning is not considered during
machine working order.
Roller has engaged lower part of wedge on point ‘C’ on path ‘Huda’ which is
shown by section of height ‘h’. Horizontal wheel is fixed from center and free to rotate,
its indication of rotation is movement of ‘h’ section in direction of ‘Z’ vector.
Most interesting thing you can see in side view and upper view and with both
horizontal and vertical wheels is non-zero adjustment or non-static position. Look
vertical wheel is pressed down ward with force shown by vector X, but horizontal wheel
is not touching against center of wheel to oppose force equally. This non-zero result can
be calculated to know result of strains on vertical wheel. Here magnitude of vector X is
bigger than vector Z i.e. X >Z, here value of X is bigger than zero (X ≥ 1). ‘Z’ is opposing
force vector representing system inertia friction and utility work and it emerges to resist
rotation of horizontal wheel.
We can resolve components of the force which is acting on vertical wheel. ‘Cx’ is a
component of that force which is acting towards center of vertical wheel. Here ‘Cx’ is
opposed equally against input pressure also restrictions preventing sideways movement
of vertical wheel so ‘Cx’ becomes zero and center of wheel cannot move. At 90° to ‘Cx’
‘Cy’ is located it is tending to rotate vertical wheel. ‘h’ height section has two works on it
by vertical wheel one it is pressing it downward where there is no way, secondly it is
7
Detail on Mechanical logic
moving ‘h’ away in process of rotation. So, ‘h’ shall be moved away reversing vector ‘Z’
and rotating horizontal wheel.
We conclude from the diagram (1.7) that vertical wheel is tending to rotate for one
point and moving ‘h’ section away.
In the Diagram (1.8) page (6) rotation of horizontal wheel is shown
This is upper view of horizontal wheel surface. In side view section of wedge ‘h’
was shown with height here section of wedge is shown as a point on base or
displacement of wedge bisecting vertical wheel. In this diagram vector X is pointing
towards a point on wedge this is section ‘h’ on wedge. Rotation of vertical wheel will
empower ‘X’, let’s see whether horizontal wheel is also clear for rotation. ‘Cx’ is resolved
vector of ‘X’ which is acting towards center of horizontal wheel. Here horizontal wheel is
fixed and its center cannot move. Second ‘Cy’ is acting tangent to horizontal wheel, as
horizontal wheel is free to rotate so all magnitude shall be delivered to rotate horizontal
wheel. So, from diagram (1.8) we conclude that horizontal wheel will rotate for a point
and move ‘h’ section away.
Now it is obvious that non-zero adjustment is present in this mechanical logic.
And whenever horizontal and vertical wheel will interact they will rotate for a point.
Difference from one point to another can be in nanometers. Now we will proceed to
know that how this one point rotation will become displacement.
In diagram (1.9) page (7)
…..we will have a close look on rotation of vertical wheel in detail. Height section
‘h’ of wedge will move away and vertical wheel will rotate for one point. In process roller
of vertical wheel will gain more height with respect to horizontal wheel. As it is also
rolling in groove it will engage next height point on wedge (it is not gain in height of
wheel but height is touched as a result of rotation). During this rotation vertical wheel
angle with ‘h’ section changes and groove will be modified accordingly. It will cup to
support roller on next ‘h’ section with changed angle. On very next point ‘h’ section of
increased height will be exposed. How it will happen? We shall see in next drawing
detail. But here we can see that travel from one point to another has become a
8
Detail on Mechanical logic
displacement of one wheel over another during rotation. Here some persons get in to
confusion that if vertical wheel will drop down then it will push wedge section away for
rotation of horizontal wheel. It is something that they say on the base of their view and it
will be clear when analyzed.
Consider that this section of wedge is a needle slim and vertical wheel is engaging
on tip of it. When pressure on vertical wheel center will overcome inertia and rotate
section will be pushed away with it horizontal wheel will rotate also, after that vertical
wheel will drop on horizontal wheel surface …..doubtless! ….. And secondly if there is no
wedge like triangular structure and there is plain straight groove along radius line of
horizontal wheel. In this case tip of vertical wheel will run in groove while both wheels
are rotating. In end vertical wheel will drop on horizontal’s surface and rotation will
stop……... No person should have confusion in these two cases, they are practically known
simple moves. We can combine results from these moves to analyze new and claimed
motion.
In first case when vertical wheel is pushing needle like section we should be clear
about what is the motion happening here. For this consider all possibilities. There is no
option that one wheel rotates and other remains stationary because they are connected if
one moves it has to take another with it. So whether both wheels will stop or both will
rotate, and force relationship evaluation gives green signal for rotation. Considering
further minutely we see that when vertical wheel is pushing section on horizontal’s
surface it cannot move with it because vertical wheel’s center cannot move horizontal in
direction with or along vector Z (see in diagram 1.7), here its center axle is restricted to
move up and down only. On diagram 1.9 again, here now we have concluded starting
from position one (P1) vertical wheel will rotate and its very next position will be P2. To
see what are possibilities here consider approach of vertical wheel on horizontal wheel in
diagrams (1.8) and (1.10). Look at the angle of vertical wheel with wedge or groove on
radius line. From diagram (1.10) it is obvious that if position one ‘P1’ is on point ‘a’ and
both wheels rotate after that then ‘P2’ will be on some point like ‘b’, more close to
horizontal wheel’s center than point ‘b’. Both wheels are heading to meet there.
9
Detail on Mechanical logic
In diagram (1.9) on position P2 we can see situation. When vertical wheel rotated
it pushed section of wedge away as a result it is lifted on P2. So we say that roller of
vertical wheel is taking higher portion of wedge in act of rotation……. or by getting there.
This is not movement of vertical wheel to height against any force. If vertical wheel is
gaining height then its center needs to be lifted against vector X but vertical wheel is just
rotating pushing every new point that is given to it under same circumstances. Wedge is
only providing ground for rotation. This is crucial point for which I have given such
lengthy description. That vertical wheel has no way but to rotate and when it rotates
roller is lifted on P2. Now here we just have to provide precise length underneath to stay
there. In case very next point is of same length as previous then we should not think that
roller will get a lift and then will drop down. But here at this place if roller is not picked
up center of vertical wheel will drop consequently, and this will be in act of rotation too.
Only for this time center of rotation will be the points where roller meet horizontal
wheel’s wedge groove. Then why center of vertical wheel will come straight down and
not in curve if it is rotating. The answer is there is start of a new rotation after every
point. look that in diagram (1.7) both wheels are meeting on point ‘C’ if center of vertical
wheel drops down consequently next meeting point will be C1, C2 and like that. What’s
new is that on every point moment arm is changed so rotation starts over again and again
as center comes down.
From above discussion we proved that during this rotation vertical wheel center
will not be moving down-ward in direction of applied force because increased height will
support vertical wheel from underneath.
In diagram (1.10) page (7)
Upper view is showing details of horizontal wheel rotation. We already know that
higher part of semi-triangular structure wedge is faced towards center of horizontal
wheel and lower part is touching circumference line. As vertical wheel will push ‘h’
section on point ‘a’ it will move it away both wheels will rotate. By rotation we can see
that moved wedge will reach under vertical wheel on very next point ‘b’. Although we
have assumed that very next point will be nanometers like close but this diagram is made
to give you a clear view that by rotation of both wheels vertical wheel roller reaches on a
10
Detail on Mechanical logic
new point ‘b’ to engage a new section of wedge of horizontal wheel. This is the feature
which makes this specific arrangement of wheels a mechanical logic every time a part of
wedge is pushed new section gets set for the same rotation.
It is also obvious that ‘b’ point on wedge has a relatively higher portion of section
‘h’. This section ‘h’ is designed so gradually precise that it does not let vertical wheel drop
even a bit. There you can also see feasibility that higher portion of wedge is present at
right side of vertical wheel, if it is higher than vertical wheel, even then it has reasonable
place to occur there and then roll under vertical wheel to other side. So, from diagrams
(1.9) and (1.10) we learned that increase in wedge height and its rolling under vertical
wheel is feasible.
In the Diagram (1.11) page (8)
Side view of vertical wheel working is shown. When vertical wheel is touching
horizontal wheel at point ‘a’ angle formed is ‘aog’ in same way ‘bog’ and ‘cog’ angles are
formed during rotation. In all these triangles base of triangle from ‘o’ to ‘g’ remain same.
It shows that there is no distance change between center of vertical wheel to surface of
horizontal wheel during rotation of both wheels although vertical wheel is pressed in this
direction. And this is the most important thing to keep in mind that force is a vector
quantity. Force is applied in a certain direction and if there is no progress of
displacement in this direction mechanical potential energy will remain preserved. The
thing happening to the force here is that we apply force on center of wheel to move it but
result is rotation due to both wheels specific interaction……. Displacement is occurring
on second wheel which is giving this mechanical force platform to stay on every point of
displacement with same distance between wheels. It is obvious that from ‘a’ point to
point ‘c’ where ever vertical and horizontal wheel have met they have shown rotation
without changing difference between them.
This diagram (1.11) shows that force relationship between two wheels is giving
green signal for rotation of both wheels from ’a’ point to ‘c’ and any point between them
so, rotation will occur. Secondly force is applied to move wheel and mechanical logic is
rotating wheel which is the reason we can regenerate mechanical kinetic energy.
11
Detail on Mechanical logic
In the Diagram (1.12) page no (9)
The upper view of horizontal wheel working is shown. Same promising view as
last diagram (1.11) vertical wheel is pushing through points ‘a’, ‘b’ and ‘c’ rotating
horizontal wheel. Most important there is no opposing force or body against shown
motion. When wedge is pushed forward by a force as a reaction with same force groove is
forced under roller. From where it pushes it has lifted brinks of groove there and to
reaction it shows its channel of groove. We also can see another feature of this
mechanical logic that it is limited. Fourth part of vertical and horizontal wheel is its last
possible limit. If any wheel of them completes 90° rotation period is over. To complete
rotation of 360° we are in need to time next roller with next wedge after one pair is done.
They move to get aligned when one pair is working.
This mechanical logic is enough to be seen from two side view and upper view,
each view tells a wheel. In both diagrams (1.11 & 1.12) it is obvious that all points from ‘a’
to ‘c’ hold feasibility to rotate both wheel and keep mechanical potential energy same
through displacement. Clearly if mechanical potential will remain constant through
displacement mechanical kinetic energy will remain same also.
It is to be noticed in that rotation we can start from any point between ‘a’ and ‘c’.
On every point vertical wheel/ vector X is in touch to provide motion which is not
ordinarily found in mechanicals. Where as in ordinary motion that we have already
discussed in diagram (1.1) page (1) we can start from first point only, after that a body who
has given it momentum is left behind. If we want to start motion after first strike point
we cannot get motion from there.
It is not a facility that we can start from anywhere and it is not normal that wheel
has rotated / has worked and did not lose mechanical potential energy or its position in
direction of applied force, and if you have strength to believe it is not mystery. This
exceptional mechanical logic has capability of regenerating motion on each point of
displacement. This feature shows this motion discreet (regenerating same momentum
value on each point of displacement) and gives reason that this mechanical logic has
capability of regenerating motion during rotation of both wheels on each point. It simply
happens when motion starts again and again from strike point.
12
Detail on Mechanical logic
FAQ’s
top
I rely on these last two underlined points to move further in this research. Proving
these points puts status of my work in logic. These points are not to be ignored because I
base all my work on mechanical logic. Questioning and analyzing in any other context
disregarding ground situation of this research will be useless for reviewer.
What a critic will be doing after realizing it perpetual motion. Will hurry to know
force apply its formula and then thinks that wheels will rotate a limit and then will stop.
Then in next turn one realizes that if wheel rotates, then its rotation is without loss of
mechanical potential energy this is still not normal and acceptable result for him. So,
ultimately he will try to discover that motion will not happen. For this one should know
some equally opposite force, mass or simply he has to prove that vector X is opposing its
own force applied in system.
Here, base of this motion rotation for one point is already out of question, an
accepted fact. And according to analyzing method if one point is clear for motion all
similar points are clear for motion and displacement is there. This method is so strong
that it cannot be questioned. Now at this stage many start assuming, because there is
another problem which I have seen with many people. When they look at diagram (1.11)
they say that how clever you are. You have proved that we will push a wheel downward it
will rotate and move something else away from beneath and will not come down. These
persons are facing illusion here. Look in diagram (1.11) vertical wheel is touching
horizontal wheel on point ‘a’ this same point of vertical wheel travelled through ‘b’
reached ‘c’. During this period keep relationship of two points in mind one center of
vertical wheel and second the point on circumference which is travelling. And see the
comparison of this motion with an ordinary one.
In diagram no (1.13) there are multiple figures. On left there is shown motion of
muftk with vertical wheel as in diagram (1.11). On right side there are three figures
showing roll of a wheel down from stair. First see in muftk motion center of wheel is
stationary but circumference point is travelling up in first figure it is on ‘a’ then it comes
up on ‘b’ and at last on ‘c’. Now note in figures showing wheel rolling center of wheel is
13
Detail on Mechanical logic
acting down ward. So, wheel will roll in this direction as it rolls down circumference
point remains intact with stair edge but center of wheel will travel down ward first on
point ‘a’ then down on ‘b’ and at last on ‘c’.
Here, one motion seems mirror image of another. In one type circumference point
is travelling upward and in second center is travelling downward. This comparison shows
that Muftk motion is not alien in our world. Just changed coordinates and unbelievable
results confuse people. Otherwise it is lot similar wheel cannot push stair away so it
moves its center to get down while vertical wheel cannot move its center so in a sense it
moves wedge aside to get down….. It is mechanical logic that away movement of wedge
brings another same wedge below to repeat period. Just movement on wedge makes
muftk ‘spinning’ and wheel’s motion is a simple ‘rotation’.
We can check our view here. If there is no height in wedge and groove is flat on
H.W surface. When compression will be applied V.W will push to rotate horizontal
wheel and roller will roll over Huda of wedge from one end to another end and here V.W
will show a loss in difference between H.W and itself. It is clearly mechanical potential
energy loss. Results of this motion are simple and known, but this assembly proves that
rotation will happen for one point at least. And this is enough to prove full rotation over
triangular Huda because if one point is clear for motion all points through displacement
are clear for motion.
In physics there are two techniques to tackle perpetual motion, Perpetual type one
and perpetual type two. First is not applicable, when force is applied on wheel center by
vector X wheel rotates as a result despite of dislocating in direction of force. This
different behavior needs different definition. Body is regenerated with same force on
each point so if there is friction it does not slow motion down through displacement.
Type two (entropy) says that we cannot get more energy out of any system than we put
in. Carefully see that this system has different input concept. We just operate balance of
forces between wheels to put them in running condition. Here amount of devised
stationary input pressure remains unchanged after motion (for detailed studies see
complete article/thesis on www.muftk.com).
14
Detail on Mechanical logic
Regeneration is technically not a creation of energy. It seems motion without
energy. But it is like taking specimen of mechanical force and keeping its regeneration on
starting point in form of rotation. Mechanical logic is an exception which is not denying
any known practically proven scientific theory. So it should not be justified against these
theories, it has its own place.
We should not be afraid of perpetual motion so much that it ceases our thinking
and believing capacity. I have seen no idea in history of perpetual motion being proven
mathematically so powerful. And math is present here in its vector resolution and
addition or subtraction. Whereas, profile is completely feasible Very important is to
know that this mechanical logic is explained on base of already known facts not a single
disputed reasoning that is we cannot classify it simply as perpetual motion. After all that
as a research worker I want to say that I if I were analyzing something like that I will
never throw it for assumptions.
………………………………………………………………
15
Detail on Mechanical logic
RELATIVE MECHANICAL MOTION IN A SYSTEM
Key points review
top
This motion is generated by mechanical logic during collision.
 Mechanical logic is intra-mechanical behavior between specifically shaped
mechanical parts in a system.
 In mechanical logic we discuss shape of mechanical bodies, adjustment and
working system.
Way of explanation and analysis.
 Diagrams are non-calculated and simplified.
 Displacement is considered as motion from one point to another on path.
 Possibility of motion can be checked on any point of path by force relation ship
between bodies.
Parts, shape, adjustment and working.
 Vertical wheel (V.W) shape, restriction status and placement.
 Horizontal wheel (H.W) shape, restriction status and placement.
□ Vertical wheel is acted by horizontal wheel away from center.
□ Horizontal wheel is acted by vertical wheel away from center.
 Whenever vertical wheel or horizontal wheel is acted and moved by mechanical
force away from center it rotates and if center is moved wheel dislocates.
□ In this mechanical setup we are converting mechanical displacement in to
mechanical rotation.
□ Vertical wheel is forced to rotate from one point and forces acting on center are
canceling each other.
□ Horizontal wheel is forced to rotate from one point and forces acting on center are
canceling each other.
(Motion on any point through path is proving motion on all points)…..
16
Detail on Mechanical logic
 Rotational motion in system results displacement of vertical wheel on radius line
of horizontal wheel.
□ Profile of wedge is restricting motion of vertical wheel along radius line. – so –
□ Vertical wheel will push horizontal wheel for rotation. – when
□ Vertical wheel will be covering displacement on horizontal wheel.…...
□ The circumference point of vertical wheel which is engaging horizontal wheel is in
rotation. – so –
□ The point of vertical wheel can gain next gradual height point on wedge of
horizontal wheel.
□ Next height point of wedge of horizontal wheel can meet vertical wheel without
entangling with it.
 Motion is due to development of triangular relationship between wheels so where
ever it develops it generates rotational motion in both wheels. — so –
□ Vertical wheels path on height of wedge is achievable.
□ Center of vertical wheel remains locked during mechanical motion and both
bodies remain in touch with each other. — so –
□ Vertical wheels path on hypotenuse of wedge is achievable.
□ There is no distance change between centers of vertical wheel and horizontal
wheel.
□ Both wheels are rotating on their place and vertical wheel is not rolling to gain
height. – actually –
□ Ground of both wheels is changing ( in ignition) its position – because –
□ Ground situation beneath wheels move because it is situated non-equilibrated
away from the line where applied forces of both bodies cancel each other.
Observations---
top
 A wheel center is pushed in a mechanical system to get rotation, but it rotated on
its place. There is no distance change of wheel center in direction of applied force
during rotation is observed, so kinetic energy in form of rotation is produced
without loss of mechanical potential energy (pressure)during conservation of
energy in this system.
17
Detail on Mechanical logic
Collision concept--
top
 Collision state is a barrier before and after conversation of energy, during collision
state...
□ Relative speed between bodies is zero (or negligible) and relative mechanical
potential energy between bodies reaches maximum.
□ Collision can be justified by relative distance change between bodies. It ends when
contact between bodies’ ends.
□ In this mechanical motion triangular relationship or indirect relationship between
bodies controls distance change between wheels.
□ Gaining height of vertical wheel on wedge consequently extends triangle made
between mechanical bodies when vertical wheel is making displacement on
horizontal wheel.
–so—
Extension in triangles freezes distance change between mechanical bodies on every
displacement point. So observation is…
□ While we are forcing two mechanical bodies’ centers on each other during
collision we have predicted rotational motion in bodies.
Conclusion…
top
□ In Free State by displacement potential energy changes to kinetic energy, but in
collision state potential energy remains constant through displacement. As a
result kinetic energy produced remains unchanged on every point of displacement
for a limited period. This is regeneration of mechanical kinetic potential through
displacement in Muftk motion.
□ Muftk motion is an exception and it doesn’t fall against practical science.
-------------------------------------------