* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Editorial Assignment Grading Rubric
Esperanto grammar wikipedia , lookup
English clause syntax wikipedia , lookup
Udmurt grammar wikipedia , lookup
Ojibwe grammar wikipedia , lookup
Sanskrit grammar wikipedia , lookup
Ukrainian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Lexical semantics wikipedia , lookup
Navajo grammar wikipedia , lookup
Kannada grammar wikipedia , lookup
Old Irish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Malay grammar wikipedia , lookup
Chinese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Lithuanian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Georgian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Macedonian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Portuguese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Swedish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Modern Greek grammar wikipedia , lookup
Russian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Yiddish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Romanian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Ancient Greek grammar wikipedia , lookup
Italian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Old Norse morphology wikipedia , lookup
French grammar wikipedia , lookup
Japanese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Scottish Gaelic grammar wikipedia , lookup
Turkish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Modern Hebrew grammar wikipedia , lookup
Pipil grammar wikipedia , lookup
Latin syntax wikipedia , lookup
Old English grammar wikipedia , lookup
Polish grammar wikipedia , lookup
EDITORIAL Assignment Grading Rubric Basics Well organized and well developed Demonstrates a clear understanding of audience and purpose Cites in-text sources using APA and has a Reference Page in APA Contains no fallacies and uses logical reasoning. Uses only credible sources Writing Style Sentence Structure Voice/Tone 35 Clear intro, body, conclusion Clear thesis and main points Logical progression from one paragraph to the next Clear transitions, topic sentences The situation or problem is explained in the first 2 or 3 paragraphs An obvious stance in the first few paragraphs Supports claims with all 4 types of evidence: experts, statistics, definition, specific examples, not theoretical examples Acknowledges and refutes the opposition Presents logical solution and/or conclusion Not meandering or repetitive Call to action 15 Evaluative, clear, forceful claims Forceful language Emotionally charged but still reasonable Negative or positive stance is clear Builds a strong case Correct citation involving direct quotations and 10 when incorporating various research, and correct citation involving print and on-line sources Cites all evidence Reference Page is complete and APA Reasoning is clear in terms of inductive, causal, analogical, or deductive Introduces sources properly Shows clear understanding of credibility in print, on-line, and various media sources Verbs are active and vivid Uses one strong verb rather than two or more weak ones Too many verbs per sentence Use strong nouns Too many nouns per sentence Run-on sentences Sentence fragments Matching tenses Singular/plural word forms Consistent 1st, 2nd, 3rd person 15 Passive voice Appropriate apostrophe, quotation mark usage Improper use of prepositions Verb form “to be” Vague pronouns: “it,” “they,” “there,” “this,” etc. Starting a sentence with “it” Hanging quotation marks Wordiness Ending a sentence with a preposition (of, which, to, in, for, etc.) Avoids clichés Spelling and punctuation Subject verb agreement Better word choices other than “thing,” “nice,” “good,” etc. No redundant words, phrases, or ideas Inappropriate capitalization Tight, concise writing