* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Development of a high precision interferometric set-up for the
Dispersion staining wikipedia , lookup
Thomas Young (scientist) wikipedia , lookup
Nonimaging optics wikipedia , lookup
Silicon photonics wikipedia , lookup
Ultrafast laser spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Harold Hopkins (physicist) wikipedia , lookup
Optical amplifier wikipedia , lookup
Ellipsometry wikipedia , lookup
Magnetic circular dichroism wikipedia , lookup
Optical rogue waves wikipedia , lookup
Optical tweezers wikipedia , lookup
Retroreflector wikipedia , lookup
Passive optical network wikipedia , lookup
Ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Nonlinear optics wikipedia , lookup
Optical coherence tomography wikipedia , lookup
Photon scanning microscopy wikipedia , lookup
Optical fiber wikipedia , lookup
Fiber Bragg grating wikipedia , lookup
Development of a high precision interferometric set-up for the measurement of polarization mode dispersion M. Zafrullah, M. Aleem Mirza, M. Waris and M. K. Islam Abstract: — The measurements of different parameters remained always a prime feature of the practical development of any accurate system. In connection with the optical communication, Phenomenon of PMD in single mode optical fibers takes place due to enormous polarization cross couplings throughout a specific length of the fiber and becomes a deteriorating factor for high speed fiber optic networks. We have quantified the benefits of applying different polarization mode dispersion measuring schemes, which leads to the ultimate outcome of the system refinement. A precise optical test set-up is developed in lab, which provides the exact picture of the state of polarization through a certain fiber length. The set-up is used to measure PMD for single mode and hi-bi specialty fibers, thus making the set-up useful for both telecom and sensor applications of optical fibers. Keywords-component; (PMD, high speed optical networks) INTRODUCTION The dispersion is broadly categorized in two major impairments as the Group-Velocity-Dispersion (GVD) and Multipath Interference Dispersion (MPID) [1]. Polarization Mode Dispersion (PMD) falls under the second category of dispersion and occurs due to the asymmetry in refractive index of the optical fiber, a phenomenon known as birefringence. A single mode optical fiber can be modeled as having two orthogonal polarization modes traveling along the two birefringent axes of the fiber. In hi-bi (highly birefringent) fiber, there is a very weak coupling between the two States Of Polarization (SOP) of the light wave traveling through the fiber and PMD is the delay in the two SOP caused by the specific value of the birefringence over a certain length of the fiber. However, in standard single mode fiber, with small and random value of the birefringence, there occurs a strong cross coupling between the two SOP of the traveling light wave. In this case the value of PMD is statistically measured, as the delay caused by the two orthogonal modes is a random function over a certain length of the fiber. Of course, It was no until recently, when the single channel bit rates reached beyond 10 G bit /s, that PMD became interesting to a larger technical community. PMD is now regarded as a M. Zafrullah and M. Aleem Mirza are with University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila, Pakistan. M. Waris is with Univ. College of Engg. & Tech. Mirpur AK, Pakistan. M.K.Islam is heading the Department of Computer Sc. & IT, Mirpur, Univ. of AJ&K, Pakistan. Email: [email protected] major limitation in optical transmission systems in general, and an ultimate limitation for ultra-high speed single channel systems based on standard single mode fibers. In the future, the PMD obstacle could be ultimately solved by using polarization maintaining fibers and polarizers [5]. Dispersion-shifted fibers (DSF) were developed as the solution to the dispersion problem. However, fiber manufacturers had little concern about PMD, and as DSFs have a smaller core area than conventional single-mode fibers, they are more sensitive to core ellipticities. This resulted in fibers with relatively high birefringence and consequently, high PMD. The installation of DSF-links was widespread in he early 1990’s and some of these links are entirely limited by PMD even at a low data-rate of 2.5 G bit /s [6]. As installation of new fiber often represents a major cost in a complete transmission link, particularly in highly populated areas, the utilization of already installed fiber is preferable, especially when a large part of the installed fibers is still not utilized. Therefore, ways to reduce or overcome the PMD obstacle are desirable. One way to reduce the PMD of installed fiber links could be to replace only the parts that have large PMD, but rather, as installed links often consist of many parallel fibers, the traffic could be rerouted in he hubs along the link, so that a low-PMD “path” would be selected by simply switching fiber connectors [5,6]. Techniques for measuring the distribution of PMD along a fiber cable would thus be very useful in encountering the set backs in the high bit rate communication networks, where we have dealt this problem with practical measurements carried out in the lab set up to a high accuracy level. Though there does exist PMD measurement techniques in optical fibers [2,3] like Poincar´e sphere method, Jones matrix method, Fixed analyzer technique, but our focus has been the Interferometric method, which provides direct measurement of PMD in time domain. Over last few years there has been significant work carried out using interferometric method to measure PMD in single mode ordinary optical fiber widely used in telecommunication applications [3,4]. The designed interferometric set-up is not only useful to measure the PMD of standard telecommunication fibers but equally well capable of measuring the birefringence (or beat-length) and PMD of hi-bi (mostly called as Polarization Maintaining) optical fibers. PMD THEORY Differential group delay: PMD is actually the delay caused by the two orthogonal polarization components of the single mode traveling through an optical fiber. The presence of birefringence between these two orthogonal axes creates a time delay (∆τ) between the two degenerated polarization modes, called polarization mode delay. In case of hi-bi fibers, where weak cross coupling occurs between two orthogonal SOP, the weighted average of ∆τ is calculated to find the effective polarization mode delay i.e. differential group delay (DGD) as: = Amplitude cross coupling of E field from polarization axis X to Y. x( ) = Autocorrelation function of light source along polarization axis X. DGD = (P. ∆τ) / P, ------------------- (1) where P is the intensity of the cross-coupled light energy at a particular point in fiber. However in ordinary single mode fiber there is a strong cross coupling between the two polarization modes and fiber can be modeled as succession of randomly oriented birefringent crystals connected in series. The weighted average of ∆τ is calculated through Gaussian fit and the second moment of the Gaussian fit gives differential group delay as: DGD = { (P. ∆τ2) / P}1/2 -----------------(2) PMD coefficient: In case of weak cross coupling between polarization modes, the PMD coefficient is given as DGD per unit length of the fiber, and the typical units are pico second per meter. On the other hand in case of strong polarization cross coupling the coefficient is DGD divided by the square root of the fiber length [3,4]. This is due to the statistical nature of DGD in ordinary single mode fiber and the typical units in this case are pico seconds/√kilo meter. White Light Interferometry: This technique measures ∆τ when the two orthogonal polarization modes are crosscorrelated in time domain. The cross correlation is attained through an analyzer placed at 45° to both the axes (fig.1). The delay is induced in the cross correlator by a scanning mirror of the Michelson interferometer. When the delay caused by the path difference of the scanning mirror is tuned to the ∆τ, the two orthogonal states become coherent and interfere. The intensity of the interference is proportional to the energy coupled from one axis to the other (ε). Fig.1 explains the function of cross correlator for a fiber with weak polarization cross coupling at certain points. The output interferogram thus identifies the precise location of such points and also assists us in evaluating the birefringence and h-parameter of such fiber. In a fiber with strong and random polarization cross coupling the interferogram contains closely spaced fringes and PMD can be calculated through Gaussian fit. The use of broadband source (hypothetically called a white light source) increases the precision, at each point where path difference of interferometer is matched to ∆τ, the image of source auto-correlation function is produced The following expression for the output intensity of scanning white light interferometer (complete derivation provided in the annex-I, handouts), depicts this mechanism: I det = 1 ∆nbl ∆L ∆L + ∆nbl ∆L − ∆nbl Γx (0) + 2εΓx + Γx + εΓx + εΓx 2 c c c c ----------------------------------------(3) where nb = Birefringence of Optical Fiber. l = Distance between point of polarization cross coupling and fiber end. c = Speed of light in free space L = Scan length of WLI from its balance point This also shows that smaller the coherence length of the light source better is the measurement accuracy of the system. PMD MEASUREMENT Design Methodology: The design practicality of the PMD measurement has been standardized by the simulations conducted for the conformity of the results obtained through the careful handling of the interferometry set-up. The flexibility finds much space for the added features of the followed research techniques. The accuracy is the robust trait of this set-up over the techniques discussed earlier. However, the more practical approach, as adapted by many other researchers and test equipment manufacturers in the world, is definitely the interferometry as it measures the PMD directly in time domain. Our choice for this methodology is mainly due to the same particular reason, nevertheless the following specific design features are incorporated in addition to the standard design of white-light interferometer: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Large scan length is possible, thus resulting in successful testing of hi-bi fibers of length upto 1km. Germanium detector is used with pW sensitivity. Signal-to-noise ratio is improved by using the phase modulation technique. Phase modulation is implemented by vibrating the stationary mirror through a piezo actuator. Demodulation is done through a lock-in amplifier, which has sensitivity in µvolts. Further improvement in signal-to-noise ratio is attained through servo controlled highly precise scanning of mirror with an accuracy of 0.1 µm. The whole set-up is operated on a vibration-isolated platform to achieve repeatability of testing. ELED light source (center wavelength at 1310 nm) is used to excite the fiber under test. The coherence length of source is smaller than normal SLD source. This feature is important to measure the low values of PMD in either types of the fiber. In-line fiber optic polarization controller is also used to measure the PMD when input state of polarization (SOP) is changed. EXPERIMENTAL SET-UP The schematic of the set-up established in lab is shown in Fig.2. A broadband ELED source is used with center wavelength at 1.31 µm and FWHM of 70nm. Such broadband source has a coherence length of 24.5 um, thus setting a measurement accuracy of 0.08 ps for our set-up. An all fiber light launch system is used to enhance the measurement accuracy for the cross-coupled intensity signal. This features helps in enhanced contrast of the interferogram. A nonpolarizing pellicle type beam-splitter (BS) with 50:50 splitting ratio is used. Sensitivity of the system is further increased by the use of the critical components as mentioned in design methodology. The servo controlled translational stage can provide a scan length of 50 cm easily, thus making it possible to measure PMD of larger lengths of hi-bi (or PM) fibers. In case of standard single mode fiber with strong cross coupling and large lengths (>2km), the need for input polarization controller and output analyzer is not significant. However for hi-bi fibers or short lengths of ordinary fiber the PMD is dependent on the SOP of input light, which can further be controlled by the polarization controller. Salient Features: Some important features applications of our white-light Interferometry set-up are: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. and The white light interferometric set-up provides direct measurement of P and ∆τ from every point of polarization cross coupling, contrary to other PMD measurement techniques which need post analysis after the measurements. It can measure DGD or effective delay ∆τ as low as 0.1 ps. It has a wide dynamic range for measuring fiber lengths of more than 100 km (ordinary single mode fiber). It can also measure PMD, birefringence and hparameter of hi-bi fibers (upto 1 km length). The set-up can measure the coherence length and thus spectral properties of a light source, and also can determine the cavity length of laser diode and SLD by evaluating its multimodal structure present in interferogram. The set up can measure the polarization cross coupling at the fiber joints e.g., thus making it a good tool to characterize the angular errors in PM fiber splices and fiber pigtails for the sources and devices. Matlab program to calculate PMD in ordinary single mode fiber (SMF) is developed using the statistical techniques [3]. Since the output interferogram of any device under test (DUT) is recorded in PC, an intensive analysis of the results is possible through post processing of the data. this as 1.5 ps/m. The values thus measured are quite comparable to those given by the manufacturer of PM fiber. A few other types of PM fibers are also characterized on this set up and their measured values of PMD and birefringence are also found similar to those mentioned in their specifications. PMD in Ordinary SMF: Single mode fibers are tested through Scanning Interferometer to evaluate their PMD value and PMD coefficient. A software program, using the ITUG650 standard as baseline, has been written to fully automate the measurement of PMD. Fig.4 shows interferometric data used to compute the PMD for a sample length of 25km of SMF. The value measured through our lab set up has also been compared with the values measured by the industrial PMD measurement equipment, and found similar. Quite a number of SMF spools of different lengths are tested, and it is found that accuracy in measuring PMD is again dependent upon the coherence length of light source and also on the accuracy of Scanning (especially for shorter fiber lengths). CONCLUSIONS White light Interferometry set-up developed is a multiple-use instrument for variety of research and development activities in the fields of fiber optic communications and sensors. It has been used to measure PMD for telecommunication grade single mode fiber, and hi-bi polarization maintaining fiber. The latter types of fibers are considered specialty fibers and there is no off-the-shelf equipment available to characterize their birefringence or PMD. The lab based set developed fulfils this purpose also. Successful results have been taken for both ordinary and PM types of single-mode optical fibers. The set up can also be used extensively to characterize the spectral and coherence related properties of light sources, as well as various other fibers and integrated optical devices. REFERENCES [1]. N.M. Breton, G.W. Schinn, “PMD or Multipath interference dispersion: which measurement is of more practical importance”, Journal of Wave Review, EXFO, 2000. [2]. B.L. Heffner, “Single-mode propagation of mutual temporal coherence: equivalence of time and frequency measurements of polarization-mode dispersion”, Optics Letters, Vol.19, No.15, August, 1994. [3]. ITU-T Recommendations G650: Definition and Test Methods for the relevant parameters of single-mode fiber. [4]. TIA/EIA-455-124 Standard, FOTP-124: Polarization-Mode Dispersion Measurement for Single-Mode Optical Fibers by Interferometry, 1999. [5]. C.J.Nielsen, “Influence of polarization mode coupling on the transmission-bandwidth of a single-mode fiber,” J.Opt.Soc.Am., vol.72,pp 1142-1146, 1982. [6]. A.Hasegawa and F.Tappert,‘Transmission of stationary nonlinear optical pulses in dispersive fibers - Anomalous dispersion,”Appl.Phys.Lett.,vol.23, pp.142-144,1973. RESULTS Various measurements are carried out on the white light interferometric set up developed in the lab. The typical interferograms obtained for various tests are shown in Figures 3 and 4. The effect of fiber pigtail with ELED source is also obvious from the interferogram and secondary peaks are accompanying the main autocorrelation function of the light source [1]. PMD in PM Fiber: In order to measure the birefringence, the light is launched into both axes of the PMF and phase delay is measured through Scanning Interferometer. In order to ensure the calculated value of birefringence, tests may be performed on different lengths of same PMF. Fig.3 shows the interferograms to measure birefringence values for 5m and 11m of the fiber lengths. The calculated average value is 4.5x10-4. The PMD value can also be calculated directly from I I ε2I Interference contrast I ε 2I x Analyzer I ε2I y M B 45° M Fig.1. Measurement of ∆τ through an unbalanced Michelson interferometer P ower M e te r D e t e c to r In t e r f e r o m e t e r M o tio n C o n t r o lle r CFP P o la r iz a t io n C o n t r o lle r DUT ELED M2 BS C o llim a t in g O p tic s T .S . C F P : C o ile d F ib e r P o la r iz e r P T : P ie z o T r a n s d u c e r B S : B e a m S p lit t e r D U T : D e v ic e U n d e r T e s t M 1 , M 2 : M ir r o r s T S : T r a n s la t io n S t a g e A / D : A n a lo g t o D ig it a l L o c k - In Amp Ref M1 PT A /D O s c illa t o r C o m p u te r Fig 2. Schematic of white light interferometric set-up 0 0 -5 -5 9 -10 -10 8 -15 -20 -25 -30 -35 -40 7 -20 Interference Signal Interferenc e S ignal (dB) -15 Interferenc e S ignal (dB ) 10 -25 -30 -35 -40 5 4 3 -45 -45 6 2 -50 -50 1 -55 -55 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 Mirror Displacement (mm) 4 4.5 5 Fig.3a : Interferogram For the Birefringence Test of 5m PMF 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 Mirror Displcement (mm) 2 2.5 Fig.3b : Interferogram For the Birefringence Test of 11m PMF 0 1 2 3 4 Interferometer Delay (ps) 5 6 7 Fig.4: Interferogram of 25Km SMF spool, PMD = 0.26 PS/(Km)1/2