Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Undergraduate Category: Physical and Life Sciences Degree Level: Undergraduate Abstract ID#: 1004 DNA Damage Recognition and Tolerance Laboratory Identifying Inhibitors of Y-family Polymerases John Lambert, Nicole Antczak, Emmanuel Zlibut, Brenna Shurtleff, Penny Beuning Abstract Results DNA damage is ubiquitous, occurring on a scale of approximately 100,000 lesions per cell per day. DNA damage can result from exposure to industrial chemicals, ultraviolet light, ionizing radiation, thermal disruption, chemotherapy and other agents. Most damage gets repaired; however, some damage requires specialized DNA polymerases that can copy the damaged DNA in a process called translesion synthesis. These polymerases belong to the Y-family and are conserved in all domains of life. We focus on one of the two E. coli proteins, DinB and its human ortholog polymerase kappa, which is one of several Y-family members in humans. These Y-family DNA polymerases have poor efficiency and accuracy compared to replicative DNA polymerases. Y-family DNA polymerases in bacteria have been implicated in antibiotic resistance, while those in humans are implicated in cancer and decreased efficacy of chemotherapy. A previous molecular modeling screen with a library of compounds found 11 compounds that could be potential inhibitors. Using primer extension assays, preliminary results have shown that most of these compounds require a higher concentration to inhibit polymerase kappa than DinB on both undamaged and damaged DNA. We are currently refining these results and exploring a larger range of concentrations in order to find the IC50 of these compounds for both proteins. We plan to test the accuracy of the polymerases in the presence of these compounds, and test the stability of the proteins in the presence of both DNA and the compounds to measure their binding to the polymerases. 4 of the 11 compounds remain for initial testing. Preliminary results indicate most of the compounds tested so far are more inhibitory to DinB than kappa. Introduction Damage to DNA results in covalent modification of bases, and occurs constantly. Environmental damage comes from a wide variety of agents, which includes chemicals, radiation, and chemotherapy. Translesion synthesis is a mechanism for polymerization of DNA past a lesion. Unlike other systems that act on damaged DNA, translesion synthesis is potentially mutagenic. The polymerases used in this work belong to the Y-family. We focus on Escherichia coli DinB and human DNA polymerase kappa. • Y-family DNA polymerases in bacteria contribute to antibiotic resistance • Humans Y-family polymerases decrease the efficacy of chemotherapy. Pol kappa DinB PDB: 2W7O PDB: 4IR9 Method • Samples are made at with either undamaged DNA or lesioned DNA templates, fluorescent primer DNA, and the polymerase being studied (DinB or polymerase kappa). • The timepoints are added to an electrophoreses gel for 4 hours, then the fluorescence is measured and level of inhibition is analyzed. • At present time, 7 of the 11 compounds identified as potential inhibitors have gone through initial trials. DNA and pol dNTPs Timepoints w/ quench buffer 0 20 60 Analyze by gel electrophoresis Conclusions and future work Fam Fam Compounds: Glycolic Acid, Pamoic Acid, Phenyl Phosphate, 2hydroxy-5-nitrobenzoic acid, aurintricarboxylic acid, D-Galacturonic acid, glycinamide, 3-nitrosalicylic acid, ellagic acid, MK-886 • 4 of the 11 compounds remain for initial testing. Preliminary results indicate most of the compounds tested so far are more inhibitory to DinB than kappa. • The accuracy of the polymerases in the presence of these compounds will be tested, as well as their stability. This will enable us to measure their binding to the polymerases. References: 1. Friedberg, E. C., Walker, G. C., Siede, W., Wood, R. D., Shultz, R. A., and Ellenberger, T. (2006) DNA Repair and Mutagenesis, 2nd Ed, ASM press, Washington DC 2. C. Guo, et al., Cell Mol Life Sci 2009, 66, 2363-2381.