* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download O A RIGINAL RTICLES
Survey
Document related concepts
Superconductivity wikipedia , lookup
Spin (physics) wikipedia , lookup
Introduction to gauge theory wikipedia , lookup
Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup
Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
Time in physics wikipedia , lookup
Photon polarization wikipedia , lookup
Anti-gravity wikipedia , lookup
Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup
Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Old quantum theory wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
1854 Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 9(3): 1854-1874, 2013 ISSN 1819-544X This is a refereed journal and all articles are professionally screened and reviewed ORIGINAL ARTICLES Graphene Transistor 1 Aziz N. Mina and 2Adel H. Phillips 1 2 Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt Faculty of Engineering, Ain-Shams University, Cairo, Egypt ABSTRACT This review on graphene, a one-atom thick, two-dimensional sheet of carbon atoms, starts with a general description of the graphene electronic structure. The winning quality of graphene is a unique nature of charge carriers in graphene. Its charge carriers mimic relativistic particles and are easier and more natural to describe starting with the Dirac equation rather than the Schrodinger equation. This determines a number of unique phenomena observed in graphene, ranging from the absence of localization to new type of quantum Hall Effect (QHE). These exceptional properties make graphene a promising candidate for future electronic devices such as ballistic and single electron transistors, and spin-valve and ultra-sensitive gas sensors. The graphene transistor could play a role in post CMOS devices that are expected to be able to compute at much faster speeds than today’s devices. Consequently, we explore the characteristics of graphene quantum dots, graphene field effect transistor for rf-applications, field emission from graphene nanoribbons transistor. Also, applications of graphene in the field of optoelectronics are explored in this review. Graphene may be promising for thermoelectric applications. Key words: Graphene field effect transistor (GFET), quantum Hall Effect (QHE), graphene nanoribbons (GNR), graphene quantum dots, Spintronics, Thermoelectric effect, radio-frequency-graphene field effect transistor (RF-GFET). Introduction Nanotechnology can be understood as a technology of design, fabrication, and applications of nanostructures and nanomaterials. Nanotechnology also includes fundamental understanding of physical properties and phenomena of nanomaterials and nanostructures. Study on the fundamental relationships between physical properties and phenomena and material dimensions in the nanometer scale, is also referred to as nanoscience. The current fever of nanotechnology is driven at least partly by the ever shrinking of devices in the semiconductor industry and in the nanometer level. The continued decrease in device dimensions has followed the well-known Moore’s law predicted in 1965 and illustrated in figure 1(Riordan, M., L. Hoddeson, 1998). The figure shows that the dimension of a device halves approximately every eighteen months and today’s transistors have fallen well in the nanometer range. Fig. 1: “Moore’s Law” plot of transistor size versus year. The trend line illustrates the fact that the transistor size has decreased by a factor of two every 18 months since 1950. Nanotechnology involves the characterization, fabrication and/ or manipulation of structures, devices or materials that have at least one dimension (or contain components with at least one dimension) that is approximately 1–100 nm in length. When particle size is reduced below this threshold, the resulting material exhibits physical and chemical properties that are significantly different from the properties of macroscale materials composed of the same substance. In nanometer scale structures in a crystal, the motion of an electron can be confined in one or more directions in space. When only one dimension is restricted while the other two remain free, we talk about a quantum well; when two dimensions are restricted, we talk about a quantum wire; Corresponding Author: Aziz N. Mina, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt E-mail: [email protected] & [email protected] 1855 J. Appl. Sci. Res., 9(3): 1854-1874, 2013 and when the motion in all three dimensions is confined, and we talk about a quantum dot. In solid state engineering, these are commonly called low dimensional quantum structures. Carbon demonstrates unusually complicated behavior, forming a number of very different structures. However, only three-dimensional (diamond, graphite), one-dimensional (carbon nanotubes), two-dimensional (graphene) and zero dimensional (fullerenes) allotropes of carbon were known. Materials in nanometer scale may exhibit unique physical properties and have been explored for various applications. Bandgap-engineered quantum devices, such as lasers and heterojunction bipolar transistors, have been developed with unusual electronic transport and optical effects (Capasso, F., 1987). The discovery of synthetic materials, such as carbon fullerenes (Krastchmer, W., et al., 1990) carbon nanotubes (Iijima, S., 1991), graphen (Novoselov, K.S., et al., 2004) and ordered mesoporous materials (Kresge, C.T., et al., 1992) has further fueled the research in nanotechnology and nanomaterials. The invention and development of scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) in the early 1980’s (Binnig, G., et al., 1982) and subsequently other scanning probe microscopy (SPM) such as atomic force microscopy (AFM) (Binnig, G., et al., 1986) have opened up new possibilities for the characterization, measurement, and manipulation of nanostructures and nanomaterials. Combining with other well-developed characterization and measurement techniques such as transmission electron microscopy (TEM), it is possible to study and manipulate the nanostructures and nanomaterials in great detail and often down to the atomic level. Graphene is a one-atom-thick sheet of carbon whose strength, flexibility, and electrical conductivity have opened new horizons for fundamental physics, together with technological innovations in electronic, optical, and energy sectors (Wu, J., et al., 2007). The production of high quality graphene remains one of the greatest challenges, in particular when it comes to maintaining the material properties and performance upon up-scaling, which includes mass production for material/energy oriented applications and wafer-scale integration. Potential electronic applications of graphene include high-frequency devices and RF communications, touch screens, flexible and wearable electronics, as well as ultrasensitive sensors, NEMS, super-dense data storage, or photonic devices. In the energy field, potential applications include batteries and supercapacitors to store and transit electrical power, and highly efficient solar cells. Some of graphene’s most appealing potential lies in its ability to transmit light as well as electricity, offering improved performances of light emitting diodes and aid in the production of next-generation devices like flexible touch screens, photodetectors, and ultrafast lasers. New horizons have also been opened from the demonstration of high- speed graphene circuits offering highbandwidth suitable for the next generation of low-cost smart phone and television displays. Graphene is promising as addictive for composite materials, thin films and conducting inks. In this chapter we shall pay an attention on graphene: its electronic properties and potential of its application in field of nanodevices. Hybridization in a carbon atom: Carbon-based materials, clusters and molecules are unique in many ways (Harris, F., 1999). One distinction related to the many possible configurations of the electronic states of carbon atom, which is known as the hybridization of atomic orbitals. Carbon is sixth element of the periodic table and is listed at the top of the column IV. Each carbon atom has six electrons which occupy 1s2,2s2 ,2p2 atomic orbitals. The 1s2 orbital contains two strongly bound electrons and they are called core electrons. Four electrons occupy the 2s2 2p2 orbitals and these more weakly bound electrons are called valence electrons. In the crystalline phase the valence electron give rise to 2s, 2px , 2py and 2pz orbitals which are important in forming covalent bonds in carbon materials. Since the energy difference between the upper 2p energy levels and the lower 2s level in carbon is small compared with the binding energy of the chemical bonds; the electronic wave function for these four electrons can readily mix with each other, thereby changing the occupation of the 2s and three 2p atomic orbitals so as to enhance the binding energy of the carbon atom with its neighboring atom. This mixing of 2s and 2p atomic orbitals is called hybridization, whereas the mixing of a single 2s-electron with n=1,2 ,3-2p electrons is spn hybridization. In carbon, three possible hybridization occur: sp, sp2 and sp3. Electronic Characteristics of Graphene: Graphene is composed of sp2-bonded carbon atoms arranged in a two-dimensional honeycomb lattice as shown in figure 2. The lattice can be seen as consisting of two interpenetrated triangular sub-lattices, for which the atoms of one sub-lattice are at the center of the triangles defined by the other with a carbon-to-carbon interatomic length, aC–C, of 1.42Å. The unit cell comprises two carbon atoms and is invariant under a rotation of 1200 around any atom. Each atom has one s orbital and two in-plane p orbitals contributing to the mechanical stability of the carbon sheet. The remaining p orbital, perpendicularly oriented to the molecular plane, hybridizes to form πthe π* (conduction) and π (valence) bands, which dominate the planar conduction phenomena (Kelly, B.T., 1981; Mina, A.N., et al., 2012). The energies of those bands depend on the momentum of the charge carriers within the Brillouin zone. In the low- 1856 J. Appl. Sci. Res., 9(3): 1854-1874, 2013 energy regime, i.e. in the vicinity of the K and K’ points, those two bands meet each other producing conicalshaped valleys, as shown in figure 3. Fig. 2: A hexagonal lattice with the lattice vectors a1 and a2, the grey area corresponds to one choice of unit cell, rA and rB points to the two atoms in the unit cell. (Mina, A.N., et al., 2012; Geim, A.K and A.H. MacDonald, 2007). The lattice constant, a, is given as: a = a1 = a 2 = 1.42 A 0 x 3 = 2.46 A 0 (1) The curve below (figure 4) is a slice of figure 3 between the symmetry points. The upper half of the energy dispersion relation curves is called π* or the antibonding band and π is the bonding band. It is seen that the two bands are degenerated at the K and Ќ points where they attain the same value. This is also the energy of the Fermi energy EF . We have two atoms per unit cell and therefore two π electrons per unit cell so the electrons fully occupy the lower π-band leaving the π* antibonding band empty. A density of states calculation shows that the density of states at the Fermi surface is zero making graphene a zero-gap semiconductor or semi-metal (Mina, A.N., et al., 2012). Fig. 3: π–π* band structure of graphene [Adapted from (Mina, A.N., et al., 2012)] 1857 J. Appl. Sci. Res., 9(3): 1854-1874, 2013 Fig. 4: [Adapted from (Mina, A.N., et al., 2012)] In this low-energy limit, the energy–momentum dispersion relation is linear (relativistic Dirac’s equation) and carriers are seen as zero-rest mass relativistic particles with an effective speed ,vF ≅ 106 m/s. The peculiar local electronic structure, thus allows the observations of numerous phenomena which are typical of a twodimensional Dirac fermions gas (Geim, A.K and A.H. MacDonald, 2007). One of the most interesting aspects of the graphene is its highly unusual nature of charge carriers, which behave as massless relativistic particles (Dirac fermions). Dirac fermions behavior is very abnormal compared to electrons when subjected to magnetic fields for example, the anomalous integer quantum Hall effect (QHE) (Zhang, Y.B., et al., 2005; Novoselov, K.S., et al., 2005). Quantum Hall effect: The charge particles behave as massless Dirac fermion in a 2D lattice which exhibit interesting effect on energy spectrum of the landau levels produced in the presence of magnetic field perpendicular to the graphene sheets. The Landau level energies are given by En = (n + 0.5 e B) me (1) where n=0,1,2,3,…. and represents the indices for the Landau index, ħ is the reduced Planck’s constant, and e & me are the electronic charge and its mass respectively. Due to disorder, the Hall conductivity, σxy, of the 2 2DEG shows the plateaus at n 2eB and is quantized, can be expressed 2e h σ xy = ± n which leads to integer quantum Hall Effect (IQHE). In contrast to 2DEG, the energy of Landau levels for graphene is given by the following equation: E n = ± v F 2eB n Where n = 0,1,2,3,... (2) is the Landau index and B is the magnetic field applied perpendicular to the graphene plane. Since, the Landau levels are doubly degenerated for the K & K’ points at n=0, these levels are shared equally between electrons and holes. This leads to the anomalous IQHE, where the Hall conductivity is given by: 2 σ xy = ± 4 (n + 0.5) e h (3) The Hall conductivity for the single layer graphene shows a plateau when plotted as a function of carrier concentration at a fixed magnetic field. Novoselov et al., have first observed anomalous IQHE (shown in Figure 5), measured at B = 14 T and temperature of 4 K (Novoselov, K.S., et al., 2005; 2005). 1858 J. Appl. Sci. Res., 9(3): 1854-1874, 2013 Fig. 5: QHE for massless Dirac fermions in single layer graphene (Novoselov, K.S., et al., 2005; 2005).. Graphene nanoribbons: Graphene nanoribbons (see Figure 6), in contrast to bulk graphene, exhibit an effective energy gap, overcoming the gapless band structure of graphene. High electron mobility and long coherence length make graphene a subject of great interest for nanoscale electronic applications, even for the realization of room-temperature ballistic (dissipation-free) electronics. However, a major setback in the development of graphene-based field-effect transistors is the inability to electrostatically confine electrons in graphene, because a single layer of graphite remains metallic even at the charge neutrality point. In order to overcome this problem, a way to open a gap in the electronic structure of graphene has to be found. A straightforward solution is to pattern the graphene sheet into narrow ribbons. Thanks to recent progresses in preparing single graphite layers on conventional device setups, graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) with varying widths have been synthesized and characterized experimentally (Han, M.Y., et al., 2007). Graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) are elongated strips of graphene with a finite width that can be obtained by cutting a graphene sheet along a certain direction. Due to the honeycomb structure of graphene, two prototypical shapes are possible for the edges, namely the armchair edge (Figure 6b) and the zigzag edge (Figure 6c), with a difference of 300 between the two edge orientations. Depending on the cutting direction, the edges of the GNRs may thus exhibit either one of these two “ideal” shapes or more complex geometries composed of a mixture of armchair and zigzag shaped fragments. Graphene nanoribbons, including graphene nano-constrictions show an overall semiconducting ambipolar behavior, which makes these quasi- 1-D graphene nanostructures promising candidates for the fabrication of nanoscale graphene transistors (Han, M.Y., et al., 2007; Liao, L., et al., 2010), tunnel barriers, single electron transistors (Stampfer, C., et al., 2008; Stampfer, C., et al., 2009), quantum dots (Ponomarenko, L.A., et al., 2008; Schnez, S., et al., 2009), and double quantum dot devices (Molitor, F., et al., 2009; Liu, X.L., et al., 2010). (a) (b) (c) Fig. 6: Honeycomb lattice of graphene (a) with both the zigzag (red) and the armchair (green) directions. Graphene nanoribbons cut in the ideal sheet along these two highly symmetric directions are called aGNRs (b) and zGNRs (c), respectively. (Han, M.Y., et al., 2007). 1859 J. Appl. Sci. Res., 9(3): 1854-1874, 2013 Authors (Sols, F., et al., 2007) found the geometrical dependence of the energy gap of the graphene nanoribbons, that is, energy gape, Eg, depends on the constriction width, w, as illustrated by the following formula: E g ( w) = α w . exp(− β w) (4) where α= 2 eV.nm and β= 0.026 nm-1. Eq.(4) was found in good agreement with results of Han et al. (2007), that is, the energy gap, Eg decreases with increasing the constriction width, w,. Figure 7 shows the mechanism behind the formation of charged islands and quantum dots in graphene nanoribbons (Molitor, F., et al., 2010). Graphene nanoribbon etched out of a two dimensional graphene flake (as illustrated on the very top). A disorder potential (arising from both intrinsic and extrinsic effects) leads to the formation of electron and hole puddles in the near vicinity of the charge neutrality point (thus, at low-carrier densities). Since graphene has no band gap and carriers mimic relativistic particles Klein tunneling and related phenomena make the boundary between electron and hole puddles reasonably transparent. The finite width w introduces a confinement gap (see the black line in the central panel), which isolates individual charge islands or quantum dots. Due to the confinement gap Klein tunneling gets substituted by real tunneling as highlighted by the lower panel. Fig. 7: 5a.Graphene quantum dots: Quantum dots (Kouwenhoven, L.P., et al., 2001) are small man-made structures in a solid, typically with sizes ranging from nanometers to a few microns, consisting of 103–109 atoms where the number of free electrons can be tuned over a wide range. The zero dimension confinement of the electrons in all three spatial directions results in a quantized energy spectrum and quantum dots are therefore regarded as artificial atoms. It has been shown recently that cutting out nanostructures from 2-D graphene allows to structurally confine electrons (Schnez, S., et al., 2002; Guttinger, J., et al., 2008; Stampfer, C., et al., 2008; Todd, K., et al., 2009). Actually, the functionality of graphene nanodevices can be engineered by designing the structure of the graphene flake (see Figure 8a). This will be shown with four different examples, discussing (i) a graphene single electron transistor based on a width-modulated graphene nanoribbon, (ii) graphene single-electron transistor device with a nearby graphene nanoribbon acting as charge detector, (iii) by discussing a graphene nanodevice small enough so that quantum confinement effects start to play an important role, and (iv) by a graphene double quantum dot device. 1860 J. Appl. Sci. Res., 9(3): 1854-1874, 2013 Fig. 8: (a) Schematic illustration of an etched graphene quantum dot, highlighting the formation of tunneling barriers and the charged island (similar to Fig. 9). (b) Illustration of energy levels in Coulomb blockade regime (off resonance). (c) By aligning an energy level of the island with the transport window the device is in resonance and transport becomes possible. (i) Graphene single electron transistor Single electron transistors (SETs) (Atallah, A.S., et al., 2006; Phillips, A.H., et al., 2007; Phillips, A.H., et al., 2008), in general, consist of a semiconducting island connected by tunneling barriers to two conducting leads [see Figure 8(a)] and (at least one) capacitively coupled gate to tune the potential on the island. Electronic transport through such devices (from source to drain) can be completely blocked by Coulomb interaction for temperatures and bias voltages lower than the characteristic energy required on adding an electron to the island (Atallah, A.S., et al., 2006; Phillips, A.H., et al., 2007; 2008; Heinzel, T., 2003; Ihn, T., 2004). This is shown in Figure 8(b). Since no energy level of the island lies inside the transport window (see dashed horizontal lines), the device is out of resonance and transport (i.e., current) is suppressed by the so-called Coulomb blockade. Here, temperature and bias (eVb) are significantly smaller than the charging energy Ec. Additionally, it is assumed that the tunneling resistance of the two tunneling barriers is significantly larger than e2/h, such that the island energy level broadening can be neglected (Ihn, T., 2004). By changing the gate potential, we can tune the single electron transistor into resonance, such that an island energy level is aligned within the transport window and carriers can resonantly hop from source to drain, as shown in Figure 8(c). Now, concerning graphene nanoribbons, figure 8(a), shows a tailored (i.e., etched) graphene flake providing the functionality of a graphene single electron transistor (Guttinger, J., et al., 2008; Stampfer, C., et al., 2008). The width modulated graphene nanostructure shown in figure 9(a) consists of a central island, two spatially separated constrictions, which act as effective tunnel barriers and three lateral graphene gates (the plunger gate PG and the barrier gates BG1 and BG2) are for full electrostatic tunability. It is crucial that narrow graphene constrictions (nanoribbons) have been found to exhibit an effective transport gap (Han, M.Y., et al., 2007; Sols, F., et al., 2007; Li, X., et al., 2008) enabling effective tunable tunneling barrier. Although the transport gap is not a clean energy gap and is likely to be formed by a series of local quantum dots inside the nanoconstriction (Molitor, F., et al., 2009; Liu, X.L., et al., 2009), the overall energy gap behavior can be modeled by Eq. 4 , as shown above. Thus, the exact shape of the effective energy gap, Eg(x) (x is the transport direction) is given mainly by the lateral confinement, that is, by the variation of the width w(x) along the device [see Figure 8(a)]. By assuming that electron–hole symmetry holds in the confined geometry, we can extract the effective conduction band edge at +Eg(x)/2, and an effective valence band edge at −Eg(x)/2. Indeed, in this respect we can think of graphene band gap engineering by tailoring the graphene sheet width (Han, M.Y., et al., 2007). An alternative approach for realizing graphene single electron transistors is based on etched graphene nanoribbons and top gates for defining the actual charged islands, as shown and illustrated in figures 9(b) and (c). The flake rests on approximately 300 nm SiO2 and the highly doped Si substrate is used as a back gate to adjust the overall Fermi level. In figure 9(d) a low bias source-drain back gate characteristic of this device (see Figure 9(a)) is shown. The transport gap of strongly suppressed current (–25 V < Vbg < –12 V) separates the region of hole (left side; see also inset) and electron (right side) transport. 1861 J. Appl. Sci. Res., 9(3): 1854-1874, 2013 Fig. 9: scanning force microscope images of an investigated graphene nanodevice and experimental results (Liu, X.L., et al., 2009). This transport characteristic is dominated by the two narrow constrictions. Fixing the back gate voltage (i.e., the Fermi level) to a value inside the transport gap, single electron transport phenomena can be investigated. Results show current resonances which can be understood as Coulomb blockade resonances of isolated charge islands inside the corresponding graphene constrictions forming the effective tunneling barrier (Schnez, S., et al., 2009; Todd, K., et al., 2009). These resonances are therefore attributed to states localized on the island between the barriers. The authors (Myoung, N., G. Ihm and S.J. Lee, 2010) studied the tunneling of Dirac fermions through magnetic barriers in armchair graphene nanoribbons (AGNRs). The conductance as a function of incident energy shows a step-like increase by the height of 4e2/ h; which reflects the number of transverse modes in AGNRs, superimposed upon characteristic oscillations associated with magnetic barriers. The results suggest us that the present investigated model with magnetic barrier structures can be used as building block for single electron tunneling devices or spin-polarized tunneling devices (will be mentioned below). (ii) Nanoribbon based charge detection on SETs: In this section we illustrate an integrated graphene device consisting of a graphene single electron transistor with a nearby graphene nanoribbon acting as a quantum point-contact like charge detector. Charge detection techniques (van der Wiel, W.G., et al., 2003) have been shown to extend the experimental possibilities with single electron devices significantly. They are, powerful for detecting individual charging events and spin–qubit states (Petta, J.R., et al., 2005; Elzerman, J.M., et al., 2004) and molecular states in coupled quantum dots (DiCarlo, L., et al., 2004). Furthermore, charge detectors have been successfully used to investigate shot noise on the single electron level, and full counting statistics (Gustavsson, S., et al., 2006). This makes charge detection also interesting for advanced investigation of graphene quantum dots and graphene nanodevices in general. Figure 10(a) shows a SFM image of an integrated graphene device consisting of a graphene single electron transistor with a graphene nanoribbon nearby. The single electron transistor device consists of two 25– 30 nm wide and 75-nm long graphene constrictions separating source (S) and drain (D) contacts from the graphene quantum dot (QD). The diameter of the Graphene Island is approximately 100 nm. The constrictions and the island are electrostatically tuned independently again by two barrier gates (BG1 and BG2) and a central gate (CG), respectively. The highly doped silicon back gate (BG) allows again adjusting the overall Fermi level. In addition, it is placed a 30 nm wide graphene nanoribbon approximately 35 nm next to the island, which acts as a charge detector. Fig. 10: (a) SFM image of the graphene quantum dot device with charge detector. The dashed lines highlight the contour of the graphene regions, and results (Stampfer, C., et al., 2009). In figure 10(b) the main capacitive coupling involved in the measurements. Figure 10 (c) back gate characteristics of the single electron transistor upper panel and the charge detector lower panel (see figure 10 1862 J. Appl. Sci. Res., 9(3): 1854-1874, 2013 (d). The measurements were performed at a source–drain bias voltage of Vb,SET = 2 mV and Vb,cd = 0.5 mV at T ≈ 4 K. (iii) Electron–hole crossover in graphene quantum dots: For the detection of quantum confinement effects and the identification of individual orbital quantum states in graphene quantum dots, smaller system sizes and lower temperatures will be considered. Here we discuss a graphene quantum dot device (see inset of figure 11(a)) consisting of a roughly 50-nm-wide and 80-nm-long quantum dot which is connected to source (S) and drain (D) via two 25 nm wide and 10-nm-long constrictions, acting as tunneling barriers. The dot and the leads can be tuned by an in-plane graphene plunger gate (PG) and the highly doped silicon substrate is used as a back gate (BG) to adjust the overall Fermi level. Fig. 11: [Adapted from Ref.20]. Figure 11 (a) shows the Coulomb blockade resonances of the graphene quantum as function of plunger gate voltage VPG at Vbg = −0.9 V (Guttinger, J., et al., 2009) The conductance has been measured at constant bias of Vb = 100 μV . The studied graphene quantum dot is shown in the inset. The scale bar corresponds to 100 nm. While figure 11(b) Coulomb diamonds, i.e. finite-bias measurement of the QDs differential conductance GQD = dI/dVb as function of Vb and VPG at B = 0. Note the rich excited state spectra and in particular the different vertical distances between the diamond edge and the diagonal structures inside the Coulomb-blockaded region for positive Vb (Guttinger, J., et al., 2009). (iv) Graphene double quantum dots: Beside of graphene single electron transistors and single quantum dot devices more recently also graphene double quantum dots (Molitor, F., et al., 2009; Molitor, F., et al., 2010; Liu, X.L., et al., 2010) have been demonstrated successfully. Such coupled double quantum dots have been proven to be particularly interesting candidates for the successful implementation of solid-state spin qubits (Trauzettel, B., et al., 2007). In figure 12 we show two different realizations of a serial graphene double quantum dot (Molitor, F., et al., 2009; Trauzettel, B., et al., 2007). Figure 12(a) shows a SFM image of a device where the double quantum dot structure has been defined by the dry etching based “paper cutting” technique. The left (L) and the right (R) quantum dot, both having a diameter of ≈ 90 nm, are connected by a 30 nm wide constriction and two additional 20 nm wide constrictions connect the two dots to the source (S) and drain (D) lead. In total five lateral in-planes graphene gates and a global back gate can be used to tune the device. In figure 12(b) we show a different graphene double quantum dot device based on a single graphene nanoribbon (see dark dashed lines) and three top gates (G1, G2 and G3) for tuning the device into different transport regime. Fig. 12: [Adapted from Ref.48]. 6. Field Emission from Graphene Nanoribbons (GNR) Transistor: The field emission is a unique quantum mechanical effect of electron emission for electrons tunneling from a condensed matter into the vacuum. This phenomenon occurs in high electric fields (107–108 V/cm) because the high electric fields narrow the potential barrier and ensure a significant probability of tunneling from the condensed matter into the vacuum. And a tip with the apex radius of curvature ranging from tens of angstroms to several microns can ensure a high electric field. Field emission can be applied into vacuum microelectronics, 1863 J. Appl. Sci. Res., 9(3): 1854-1874, 2013 fine-resolution electron microscopy, and the modern high-current electronics (Fursey, G.N., 2003). The most outstanding and widespread application is the production of flat low-voltage displays of high brightness and high resolution based on field emission arrays (Fursey, G.N., 2003). We know that the average electron energy in a graphene nanoribbon increases with decreasing width of nanometer, especially when the width is a few nanometers because electrons in graphene nanoribbons obey the unique properties of band structure (Mao, L.F., 2009). This means that electrons in graphene nanoribbons with a linear energy-momentum relation may have a higher average electron energy compared to those with a parabolic energy-momentum relation. Recently, it is reported finite size effects on the thermionic emission in metal- graphene nanoribbon contacts (Mao, L.F., et al., 2010). The field-emission current density of a graphene nanoribbon has been investigated by the author (Mao, L.F., 2011). His results show that field-emission current density at a given external field decreases with decreasing width of graphene nanoribbon and an increase in the turn-on electric field. 7. Field-effect transistor: A FET is an electronic device with at least three terminals where the conductivity between two terminals, the source and drain, is modulated by the electric field created by the third gate terminal(s). This gate control enables the use of a FET as switch which conducts high current when it is on and very low current when it is off. Physically this control is achieved by gate modulation of the free carrier density in the channel between the source and drain contacts beneath the gate, from a high value in the ON state to a low value in OFF state. The ratio of current in the ON state and that in OFF sate, referred to as a ON/OFF ratio, is a very important performance metric of digital switches, and the larger the better. The large on current, Ion, allows quick charging of a capacitive load, which typically includes the gates of one or more subsequent transistors as well at the metallic, interconnects. Considering only gate capacitance, the switching time becomes approximately CgV/Ion, where Cg is the gate capacitance and V is the supply voltage. Large on currents can be achieved by improving carrier velocities via carrier mobility and thermal velocity improvements. There are a range of methods that are employed for this purpose including channel material choice, straining the channel material, modulation doping, etc. as an example of typical CMOS logic circuit (see for more details Ref. 54). The semiconductor industry has been scaling the FETs to improve the performance metrics for logic device such as speed of operation, low voltage and low power operation. Scaling of the gate length to smaller values results in degradation of gate control on electrostatic profile in the channel. Although this can be countered by increasing the doping density of channel, this approach leads to mobility reduction due to increased impurity scattering. Another approach is to use (ultra)thin body channel FETs like structures. In fact according to the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) such structures will continue the scaling trend for the next 10 years or so (International Technology Roadmap For Semiconductors (2009 edn)). However, it is becoming increasingly difficult to scale the devices further due to fundamental physical limitations. Due to very high mobility and Fermi velocities of electrons in graphene, it offers advantage as a channel material for FETs for very high frequency circuit applications. Also to counter the loss of electrostatic control and short channel effects as a result of scaling, thin body or SOI devices are being used, and due to 2D nature of graphene, it is the ultimate realization of a thin body channel material. However, due to a lack of a band gap, the minimum channel conductivity in FETs with wide graphene sheet channels is large resulting in poor ON/OFF ratios which are particularly problematic for CMOS logic applications. Also, poor contacts can still be an issue and, even relatively more so because of the high channel conductivities possible with graphene. In principle, a band gap can be opened in graphene by lateral confinement of electrons. In other words, one can use a narrow ribbon of graphene, which can be semiconductor or metallic, as channel material (Han, M.Y., et al., 2007;Li, X., et al., 2008). Such ribbons must be only a few nanometers in width to open band gaps of practical interest, which leads to substantial lithography challenges. And, as we narrow the ribbon and increase the band gap, conductivity is intrinsically degraded due to an associated decrease in the Fermi velocity of Dirac Fermions charge carriers, and extrinsically degraded due to factors such as disorder at the edges of these nanoribbons. Another approach is to use a bilayer of graphene which has an interesting property that its band gap can be tuned by creating a potential difference between the layers (McCann, E., et al., 2007; Zhang, Y., et al., 2009). However, this requires large displacement field between the layers up to and order of 2 to 3V per nm, and only moderate gaps on the scale of 200 meV are possible (Zhang, Y., et al., 2009). Yet another approach is to uniaxially strain the graphene along the transport direction, but this requires strains up to 20% to actually create band gaps (versus simply moving the band edges in k-space) (Pereira, V.M., et al., 2009). 7.1 Graphene transistor fabrication: Fabrication of a graphene field-effect transistor (GFET) involves the following three major steps: • Preparation of a substrate with graphene on it (graphene–substrate), • Deposition of gate dielectric in case of top-gated FETs (graphene–dielectric), 1864 J. Appl. Sci. Res., 9(3): 1854-1874, 2013 • Forming the contacts to graphene (metal–graphene). The above three steps also represent the three critical interfaces in a GFET. Good quality of these interfaces is necessary for realizing a high performance FET. The following lists the three major approaches for obtaining high quality mono- and few layer graphene sheets. (1) Mechanical exfoliation of highly oriented pyrolytic graphene (HOPG) using an adhesive tape (Novoselov, K.S., et al., 2004; Geim, A.K. and K.S. Novoselov, 2007). (2) Epitaxial growth on SiC substrate by desorption of Si (Berger, C., et al., 2004; Berger, C., et al., 2006). (3) Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) by catalytic decomposition of a gaseous precursor on transition metal substrates such as nickel (Reina, A., et al., 2008) and copper (Li Xuesong, et al., 2009). 7.2 GFETS for RF applications: Graphene has extraordinary electronic transport properties like high mobility and high saturation velocity also make it attractive for radio frequency (RF) electronics applications. The first experimental demonstration of rf GFET was a 500 nm channel length top-gated FET fabricated using exfoliated graphene (Meric, I., et al., 2008). The device had current gain up to 14.7 GHz. Recently RF graphene FETs with wide channels showing cutoff frequencies in GHz range were demonstrated by IBM with an estimated fT of 100 GHz for a 240 nm channel length device (Lin, Y-M., et al., 2010). The device also showed power gain up to 10 GHz. Graphene was epitaxially grown on Si terminated SiC wafers in ultra-high vacuum. The graphitized substrate was then used for the fabrication of 30μm wide top-gated FETs with a gate dielectric stack of 10 nm polymer followed by a 10 nm hafnium dioxide. Other applications using the ambipolar characteristics of GFET is a single transistorbased frequency-multiplier demonstrated by (Wang et al from MIT in 2009). Back gated FETs fabricated on exfoliated graphene on SiO2 substrate. When the device is biased to operate near the flat-band, a small signal applied to the gate results in output signal at the drain which has double the frequency of input signal. The frequency doubling functionality is usually achieved using complicated frequency doubling circuitry. We can understand the frequency doubling as follows: For low drain-to-source bias, an ideal graphene FET is expected to have a linear transfer characteristic which results in a full wave rectification of the input signal with 74% spectral purity. However, most experimental graphene FETs have a non-linear characteristic near flat-band. In fact the observed near 90% spectral purity seems to suggest a significant quadratic current–voltage characteristic, which can explain the frequency doubling with high spectral purity. Using the same principle of operation, a single transistor based mixer was also demonstrated by (Wang et al in 2010). Scaling down the channel length plays a critically important role in boosting the RF performance of a field-effect transistor (FET). Fabrication of graphene transistors with a projected cut-off frequency of 300 GHz for a 140 nm channel (Liao, L., et al., 2010) and 100 GHz for a 240 nm channel (Lin, Y-M., et al., 2010). Recently, the authors (Jyotsna Chauhan and Jing Guo, 2011) studied channel length scaling and assessed RF performance limits of graphene FETs in the sub-100 nm channel length regime by using self-consistent ballistic quantum transport simulations. The simulated intrinsic cut-off frequency is about 640 GHz at a channel length of 100 nm and increases to about 3.7 THz at channel length equals 20 nm for various gate insulator thickness values. 7.3 Functional Circuits: Building more complicated circuits beyond just a single transistor is the next step in utilizing graphene in practical RF applications. AC voltage amplifiers and audio amplification are both simple uses for RF transistors (Han, SJ., et al., 2011; Guerriero, E., et al., 2012). Frequency multipliers are a bit more complex, but also an important component in many communications applications. They are used to output harmonic frequencies of an input frequency, which is useful in generating signals using nonlinear circuit design. Frequency multipliers based on Schottky diodes and conventional FETs have been popular, with operation as high as 1 THz for the former. Both have limitations in signal amplification and efficiency respectively. Additionally, these devices suffer from degraded output signals that need to be further processed and filtered to obtain the desired frequency (Wang, H., et al., 2009). The ambipolar nature of graphene makes for unique FETs that can enable novel applications. The “V” shape of the Id – Vg curve behaves like a full-wave rectifier by itself. With an alternating gate voltage centered at the charge neutrality point, the output current at the drain of the device will result in full-wave rectification, alternating between electron and hole conduction. In this way, much simpler frequency doublers can be realized. This ability is not new, but graphene field effect transistors offer a far less complicated design and potentially superior performance for rectifier devices (Palacios, T., et al., 2010). Efforts have been made to integrate these graphene-based devices into higher functioning circuits. (Lin, Y.M., et al., 2011; Habibpour, O., et al., 2012; Yang, X., et al., 2010). Frequency mixers are useful circuits designed for signal processing, turning two frequencies into the sum or difference of the inputs. An RF signal, f RF and a local oscillator signal, f LO are applied to the gate and the drain, modulating the GFET, resulting in an output of the mixed, summed, and 1865 J. Appl. Sci. Res., 9(3): 1854-1874, 2013 differenced (intermediate) frequencies. An inductor placed between the input and gate contacts removes the parasitic capacitances through resonance, while another works as a low-pass filter between the drain and the output. With the achievement of high extrinsic fT in the self-aligned graphene transistors, GFET-based RF circuits operating in the gigahertz regime can be readily configured (e.g., a frequency doubler as shown in figure 13a-c). Importantly, RF characterization of the circuit shows a clear doubling signal at 2.1 GHz with the input signal frequency at 1.05 GHz. Spectrum analysis shows that the frequency-doubler device exhibits a high spectral purity in the output RF signal, with 90% of the output RF energy at the doubling frequency of 2.1 GHz. This study clearly demonstrates that a single graphene transistor based frequency doubler can operate in the gigahertz regime with high-output spectral purity. Similarly, a single graphene transistor-based RF mixer has also been demonstrated. The two-tone signals with adjacent frequencies are applied to the gate through a power combiner to manipulate the transistor channel resistance. With an RF input f RF = 6.72 GHz and local oscillator f LO = 2.98 GHz, the output spectrum shows clear RF mixing function at intermediate frequency (IF) f IF = f RF − f LO = 3.74 GHz and f IF = f RF + f LO = 9.70 GHz. The above RF circuits were obtained by interconnecting different elements together. For eventual application, it is highly desired to incorporate all functional components directly on the chip to achieve a fully integrated RF circuits. To this end, IBM scientists have fabricated such devices using EG on SiC with inductors integrated on chip (Figure 13 d–g) (Liao, L., et al., 2012). The frequency spectrum of the mixer output with inputs of 3.8 GHz and 4 GHz shows the 200 MHz and 7.8 GHz outputs. The drain inductor weakens the higher frequency tone, and lowers its amplitude. Power signals of f IF are proportional to the signal with expected high linearity and conversion loss of about − 27 dBm. Fig. 13: Circuit designs for a GFET-based frequency doubler (a) and mixer (d). b) Oscilloscope readout of input (top) and output (bottom). c) Frequency spectrum of the frequency doubler. e) Schematic of a frequency mixer device and components. f) Optical micrograph of the fabricated device on a SiC substrate. g) Output frequency spectrum of the mixer. a–c)[ Adapted from (Liao, L., et al., 2012), (d,f,g) (Lin, Y.M., et al., 2011) and e (Lin, Y.M., et al., 2011). 8. Spintronics: A novel approach to logic-based devices utilizes particle spin as an extra degree of freedom for signal processing and propagation, called spintronics. First emerging with the discovery of the giant magnetoresistance effect, the concept of spintronics is not unique to graphene (Fert, A., Origin, 2008). The long spin-relaxation time and low spin-orbit coupling in graphene makes it an attractive material for use in spin valves (Hill, E.W., et al., 2006; Cho, S., et al., 2007) (filters that only let one spin variant through the barrier) and other components necessary for practical spintronic circuits. Edges can have a significant impact on magnetotransport properties (Yazyev, O.V. and M.I. Katsnelson, 2008; Wimmer, M., et al., 2008) and nanoribbons have been proposed for spintronic applications, with unique spin states in zigzag (Son, Y –W., et al., 2006) (Figure 14 a) or armchair (Saffarzadeh, A., and R. Farghadan, 2011) edges with tunable edge passivation (Hod, O., et al., 2007). Transverse electric fields can polarize spin in ZGNRs without the need for magnetic contacts for spin filters or spin FETs (Saffarzadeh, A., and R. Farghadan, 2011; Zhang, Y.T., et al., 2010). Simulations of spin caloritronic devices show a thermally induced spin current of opposite sign in opposite directions: a spin Seebeck effect in magnetized ZGNRs (Zeng, M., et al., 2011). Nanoconstriction GFETs are capable of sensing single molecular magnets on the surface of its graphene channel (Candini, A., et al., 2011). For bulk graphene, figure 14 b–d shows a four-point device and nonlocal magnetoresistance measurements to separate the voltage and current probes with ferromagnetic electrodes of varying dimensions; the magnetic polarity of each can be switched sequentially (Tombros, N., et al., 2007). Antiparallel states will have a higher resistance as precession of spin polarized electrons needs to be inverted. Spin injection (flow of spin polarized current into graphene, usually from a magnetized electrode) through both transparent (in direct contact with the electrode) (Han, W., et al., 2009) and tunneling (through a thin dielectric barrier to improve polarization) (Han, W., et al., 2010) is 1866 J. Appl. Sci. Res., 9(3): 1854-1874, 2013 effective, with an asymmetry observed between electron and hole conduction (Han, W., et al., 2009). The robust spin polarization in graphene is ideal for spin current channels (Shiraishi, M., et al., 2009). Analogous to normal spintronics, which uses the standard quantum mechanical spin of electrons, pseudospintronics has been theorized as a way to instill logic operations through unconventional means. Similarly, proposed valleytronics utilizes the charge carriers distinct position in the K or K ′ valleys (Rycerz, A., et al., 2007). The valley isospin is a more robust form of information, as it takes a larger (on the order of inverse lattice spacing) momentum to scatter compared to pseudospin (Mohiuddin, T.M.G., et al., 2009). Creating a pseudospin or isospin valve can be as simple as distorting graphene in a controllable way. A narrow constriction neck (Rycerz, A., et al., 2007) or asymmetric bilayer interfaces (Schomerus, H., 2010)] that break symmetry are potential valley filter designs. Other proposed structures for pseudospin filters and valves utilize line defects (Gunlycke, D and C.T. White, 2011) in monolayers or by alternating perpendicular electric fields in bilayers (San-Jose, P., et al., 2009). Switching the applied field reverses the pseudospin direction creating a tunable filter (Figure 14 e). A digital logic bilayer pseudospin FET has been theorized to use ultralow power (Reddy, D., et al., 2010). Strain engineering and subsequent pseudomagnetic fields have a clear link with this pseudospin polarization, and could be used as a mechanism for valley filtration (Low, T. and F. Guinea, 2010; Fujita, T., et al., 2010; Zhai, F., et al., 2010; Chaves, A., et al., 2010; Soodchomshom, B., and P. Chantngarm, 2011; Soodchomshom, B., 2011; Feng, Z., et al., 2011). These proposed devices have yet to be realized, but potentially add a whole new dimension to logic devices. Fig. 14: Spintronics. a) Half-metallicity of ZGNRs. DOS schematics show a polarized spin at the edges (left). With an in-plane electric fi eld applied, the DOS shifts to remove the bandgap (right). b,c) SEM image and schematic of four-terminal spin injection measurements. d) Schematic of the diffusion and precession of spin-polarized currents in the four-terminal device when electrode magnetization is aligned parallel or antiparallel. e) Schematic of a proposed valley valve using perpendicular electric fields applied to bilayer graphene to polarize pseudospin.(Adapted from (a) (Son, Y –W., et al., 2004), ( b–d) (Tombros, N., et al., 2007) and (e) (San-Jose, P., et al., 2009). The authors (Asham, M.D., et al., 2012) investigated Spin dependent transport characteristics through normal graphene/ ferromagnetic graphene/ normal graphene junction. The spin polarization of the Dirac fermions tunneled through such junction is pumped by the influence of an AC-field of wide range of frequencies. The graphene-based such device is modeled as follows: Spin transport in normal graphene/ ferromagnetic graphene/ normal graphene mesoscopic junction is shown in figure 15. Graphene can be converted into ferromagnetic state by depositing the magnetic insulator EuO on top of it (Asham, M.D., et al., 2012; Haugen, H., et al., 2008) (see region IV) and a metallic gate. While regions I, II III and V are normal graphene. On the top of region II, together with the metallic gate, there is a ferromagnetic vector potential barrier. With such construction of spintronic device, we can inject and manipulate spins of Dirac fermions. Fig. 15: The proposed device model [Adapted from (Asham, M.D., et al., 2012). The calculations of spin polarization and giant magneto-resistance show that these parameters could be modified by the barrier height and the angle of incidence of electrons on the corresponding region of the investigated device (Asham, M.D., et al., 2012). Quantum pumping by induction of external photons could enhance spin transport mechanism through such investigated device. Also results show that the cut-off 1867 J. Appl. Sci. Res., 9(3): 1854-1874, 2013 frequency for both parallel and anti-parallel spin alignments varies strongly in a wide range of frequencies (Asham, M.D., et al., 2012). 9. Photonics: (a) Photodetectors: Photodetectors convert light signals or optical power into electrical current and are a key component for optoelectronic devices: absorbed light creates excitons that separate to form a photocurrent. Conventional photodetectors are mostly based on conventional semiconductor materials; their performance is limited by two factors arising from intrinsic material properties. The first limitation is cutoff wavelength, which depends on the bandgap. Photons with energy below the gap will not be absorbed, resulting in a maximal detectable wavelength (1100 nm for silicon and 2600 nm for InGaAs. Long wavelength transparency limits the far-infrared application for semiconductor photodetectors. The second limitation is operation speed, which is mainly ruled by charge carrier mobility and lifetime. In contrast with traditional semiconductors, graphene has no bandgap, leading to broader wavelength absorption (up to 6 μ m) for broadband detection. Additionally, the exceptionally high carrier mobility makes graphene ideally suited for ultrafast photodetectors. Absorbing only 2.3% of light per layer may limit the photocurrent responsivity, but means photodetectors could be built into transparent electronics. Recent pump-probe measurements demonstrate that graphene photodetectors can exhibit intrinsically high response speeds up to the terahertz regime (Prechtel, L., et al., 2012). With the same metal on both electrodes in the metal-graphene-metal device, the potential profile is symmetric within the channel with opposite photocurrent at each end, leading to a zero total current if the entire device is illuminated. To break the mirror band structure, asymmetric metal electrode design to allow observation of an overall photocurrent with titanium and palladium contacts. This multifinger design can greatly enhance the active area that exists in one focused laser spot and thus increasing the responsivity. These designs can reach a photocurrent as high as 6.1 mA/W and were successfully implemented in a 10 Gbit/s data link (Mueller, T., et al., 2010). (b) Mode-Locked Lasers: Mode-locking is a technique widely used in lasers to produce a periodic train of ultrashort pulses, usually on the order of picoseconds to femtoseconds. Saturable absorbers are the most commonly used passive material for mode-locking techniques, which behave as a nonlinear, intensity-dependent filter. An ideal saturable absorber should absorb light at low intensity and become transparent when the light is intense enough. The key features are speed, optical bandwidth and saturation intensity. Conventional semiconductors are widely used in mode-locked lasers; however, they are limited by small optical bandwidths of only tens of nanometers. Saturable absorption can be achieved in graphene due to Pauli blocking. At high incident laser intensity, the concentration of electron-hole pairs increases too much and fills all the states near the conduction or valance bands, obstructing further absorption. The ultrahigh Fermi velocity and large optical bandwidth make graphene an ideal material to be integrated into mode-locked laser devices. Bao et al (2009) and Sun et al. (2010) demonstrated graphene-based lasers, easily integrated into fiber systems. (c) Optical Modulators: Optical modulators are used to modulate a beam of light. They are commonly used in on-chip optical interconnects and have become increasingly important as electrical interconnects face limitations such as high loss, crosstalk, and limited speed. Key features such as high speed, large optical bandwidth, and small footprint are desirable for optical modulators and their on-chip integration. However, the field-effect based optical modulation (e.g., Franz–Keldysh, Kerr and Pockels effects) in silicon-based devices is usually rather weak, resulting in a millimeter scale footprint. This increases the insertion loss and hinders high-speed performance. An alternative solution to reduce this footprint is via integration with resonant structures. Unfortunately, devices with this kind of structure tend to work over very narrow bandwidths (less than 1 nm), thus greatly reducing the fabrication and environmental tolerance. Compared with contemporary semiconducting materials graphene shows many advantages in addition to its high carrier mobility and large optical bandwidth, such as its compatibility with current CMOS processing, low cost, and strong modulation ability, which are all essential features for high-performance optical modulators. Importantly, a graphene-based optical modulator was recently demonstrated with an operation frequency up to 1 GHz (Liu, M., et al., 2011). The footprint is only 25 μ m and the optical bandwidth range demonstrated is from 1.35 μ m to 1.6 μ m, far from exceeding the ability of current modulators. In this device, silicon waveguides are used to couple in and couple out light, with thin dielectric layers (7 nm) of Al2 O3 CVD graphene is physically transferred on top of the silicon waveguide as the 1868 J. Appl. Sci. Res., 9(3): 1854-1874, 2013 absorption layer. While tuning the gate voltage, the absorption of graphene will change due to the rather strong electro-absorption effect, resulting in the modulation of light transmission. (d) Polarizers: A polarizer converts unpolarized light into well-polarized light, and has broad applications in areas ranging from optical circuits to car mirrors and sunglasses. In-line fiber-based polarizers that use an evanescent field substrate processing technology, allow fabrication directly onto the fiber itself. Compared with traditional absorption or beam-splitting polarizers, this technique shows great advantages in device integration with most optical systems. However, the current in-line fiber polarizers are made with materials such as metals or crystals, which limit their optical bandwidth, as well as cause difficulty in changing between transverse electric (TE) and transverse magnetic (TM) pass modes. Graphene can function as an efficient polarizing material by selective attenuation of one polarization mode. It can select which mode to pass and which mode to damp by simply changing its Fermi level, in contrast to metal-based polarizers. Additionally, graphene can be used for polarizers in an ultra-wide range of wavelengths, from ultraviolet to far-IR. The broadband graphene polarizer demonstrated by Bao et al. shows the apparent advantages over traditional devices (Bao, Q., et al., 2011). This simple structure easily integrates graphene within the fiber and works well in a wavelength range from 800 nm to 1650 nm. A strong s-polarization extinction ratio up to 27 dB is comparable with metal structures. The TE and TM modes can easily be tuned by changing the gate voltage ( | μ | < ħ ω /2 to support TE mode and | μ | > ħ ω /2 to support TM mode), resulting in a low-cost, broadband, mode-tunable polarizer. 10. Thermoelectric transport of Dirac particles in graphene: The Seebeck effect, discovered in 1821 by Thomas Seebeck (Seebeck, T., 1926), is the conversion of a temperature gradient into an electrical voltage and can be utilized to create thermocouples for temperature measurements. Thermopower (Seebeck coefficient) has been used as a powerful tool to probe transport mechanisms in metals and semiconductors. Often the measurement of conductivity is inadequate in distinguishing among different scattering mechanisms and the thermopower can then be used as a sensitive probe of transport properties since it provides complementary information to conductivity. Recently, the thermoelectric properties of graphene sheets and ribbons have attracted experimental as well as theoretical attention. Theoretical studies on graphene thermopower use linear response theory incorporating the energy dependence of various transport scattering times (Hwang, E.H., et al., 2009) or atomistic simulations based on the non-equilibrium Green’s function formalism (Ouyang, Y and J. Guo, 2009). Experimentally (Zuev, Y.M., et al., 2009; Wei, P., et al., 2009; Checkelsky, J and N. Ong, 2009), the expected change of sign in the thermopower is found across the charge neutral point as the majority carriers change from electrons to holes. Away from the charge neutral region the thermopower behaves as 1 n where is the carrier density, and exhibits linear temperature dependence in agreement with the semiclassical Mott’s formula (Cutler, M and N.F. Mott, 1969). The Mott’s formula derived mathematically through the Sommerfeld expansion, is only valid at very low temperatures T 1, TF where TF = EF kB is the Fermi temperature, EF is the Fermi energy and kB is Boltzmann constant.. As the temperature increases deviations from Mott’s formula have been observed (Zuev, Y.M., et al., 2009; Wei, P., et al., 2009; Checkelsky, J and N. Ong, 2009). For thermoelectric energy conversion, however, a low thermal conductance is required to increase the efficiency of a thermoelectric device. The efficiency is characterized by the figure of merit ZT. The performance of thermoelectric materials is measured through a unitless parameter, ZT, which is called thermoelectric figure of merit and is defined as GS 2T , where G is the electrical conductance, S is the Seebeck coefficient (or thermopower), K = Ke+Kph is the Κ thermal conductance including both electron and phonon contributions, and T is the temperature. The authors (Yonghong Yan, et al., 2012) investigated the thermoelectric properties of a range of graphene nanoribbons in the presence of two constrictions (See Figure 16). Thus, the structure can be also viewed as a hexagonal graphene quantum dot connected to two leads. Results show that with decreasing widths of the constrictions, the thermal conductance of a nanoribbon can be reduced largely while S2G (power factor) remains still high as compared with the results for the pristine nanoribbon. As a result, the thermoelectric figure of merit of the nanoribbon can be enhanced greatly. In the presence of narrowest constrictions, the ZT values of the zigzag quantum dots can exceed one (or even be up to two) while the ZT values of the armchair quantum dots can be 1869 J. Appl. Sci. Res., 9(3): 1854-1874, 2013 close to one, depending on the size of the dot. These results indicate that quantum confined structure of graphene may be promising for thermoelectric applications. Fig. 16: Schematic of graphene nanoribbons with two narrowest constrictions. (a) shows a nanoribbon with zigzag edges while (b) shows a nanoribbon with armchair edges. The left and the right regions are semi-infinite pristine nanoribbons acting as leads. The number of atom pairs (Nc ) in the box indicates the width of the constrictions. The Nernst effect describes the Hall voltage that arises when a temperature gradient and a perpendicular magnetic field are present in a conductive medium. Normal to the temperature gradient and magnetic field, an electrical field will then be induced (Behnia, K., 2009). The authors (Yanxia Xing, et al., 2009) investigated the Nernst and Seebeck effects, in graphene nanoribbon. Results show that due to the electron-hole symmetry, the Nernst coefficient NC is an even function while the Seebeck coefficient SC is an odd function of the Fermi energy EF. NC and SC show peaks when EF crosses the Landau levels at high magnetic fields or crosses the transverse sub-bands at the zero magnetic fields. In the strong magnetic field, due to the fact that high degenerated Landau levels dominate transport processes the Nernst and Seebeck coefficients are similar for different chirality ribbons. The peak height of NC and SC , respectively, are [ln 2/|n|] and [ln 2/n] with the peak number n, except for n = 0. For zeroth peak, it is abnormal. Its peak height is[2 ln 2] for the Nernst effect and it disappears for the Seebeck effect. While in zero magnetic field, Nernst effect is absent and the Seebeck effect is strongly dependent on the chirality of the ribbon. For the zigzag edge ribbon, the peaks of SC are equidistance, but they are irregularly distributed for armchair edge ribbon. Surprisingly, for the insulating armchair edge ribbon, the Seebeck coefficient SC can be very large near the Dirac point due to the energy gap. When the magnetic field increases from zero to high values, the irregularly or regularly distributed peaks of SC in different chiral ribbons gradually tends to be the same. In addition, the nonzero values of the Nernst coefficient NC appear first near the Dirac point and then gradually in the whole energy region. It is remarkable that for certain crossed ribbons, the Nernst coefficient NC at weak magnetic fields can be much larger than that in the strong magnetic field due to small transmission coefficient in the transverse terminals. Memory Devices: Graphene-related materials have also been widely explored in memory devices (Zheng, Y., et al., 2009). It was demonstrated theoretically by Gunlycke et al. that when the graphene nanostrips are under non-equilibrium state, e.g., in the presence of a ballistic current, both spin polarized and spin-unpolarized nanostrip states exist, which could be switched through the applied bias in a binary memory device. After that, extensive experimental investigations on graphene related memory devices were carried out, based on pristine graphene(Zheng, Y., et al., 2009), graphene oxide (GO), (Wang, S., et al., 2010; He, C.L., et al., 2005) graphene–Au hybrid systems, (Myung, S., et al., 2010) graphene–polymer composites, (Zhuang, X.D., et al., 2010) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO)-electrodes. (Liu, J.Q., et al., 2010; Liu, J.Q., et al., 2010). Reference Asham, M.D., W.A. Zein and A.H. Phillips, 2012. Quantum Pumping Driven by an AC-field in Graphene Field Effect Transistor. Journal of American Science, 8(7): 374. Atallah, A.S., A.H. Phillips, A.F. Amin and M.A. Semary, 2006. Photon-assisted transport characteristics through quantum dot coupled to superconducting reservoirs. NANO, 1(3): 259. Bao, Q., H. Zhang, B. Wang, Z. Ni, C.H.Y.X. Lim, Y. Wang, D.Y. Tang and K.P. Loh, 2011. Broadband graphene polarizer. Nature Photonics, 5: 411. Bao, Q., H. Zhang, Y. Wang, Z. Ni, Y. Yan, Z.X. Shen, K.P. Loh and D.Y. Tang, 2009. Atomic-Layer Graphene as a Saturable Absorber for Ultrafast Pulsed Lasers. Advanced Functional Materials, 19: 3077. Behnia, K., 2009. The Nernst effect and the boundaries of the Fermi liquid picture. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 21: 113101. 1870 J. Appl. Sci. Res., 9(3): 1854-1874, 2013 Berger, C., Z. Song, T. Li, X. Li, A.Y. Ogbazghi, R. Feng, Z. Dai, A.N. Marchenkov, E.H. Conrad, P. N. First and de W.A. Heer, 2004. Ultrathin epitaxial graphite: 2D electron gas properties and a route toward graphene-based nanoelectronics. Journal of Physical Chemistry, B 108: 19912-6. Berger, C., Z. Song, X. Li, X. Wu, N. Brown, C. Naud, D. Mayou, T. Li, J. Hass, A.N. Marchenkov, E.H. Conrad, P.N. First and de W.A. Heer, 2006. Electronic confinement and coherence in patterned epitaxial graphene. Science, 312: 1191-6. Binnig, G., C.F. Quate and C.h. Gerber, 1986. Atomic Force Microscope Physical Review Letters, 56: 930933. Binnig, G., H. Rohrer, C. Gerber and E. Weibel, 1982. Surface Studies by Scanning Tunneling Microscopy. Physical Review Letters, 49: 57-61. Candini, A., S. Klyatskaya, M. Ruben, W. Wernsdorfer and M. Affronte, 2011. Graphene Spintronic Devices with Molecular Nanomagnets. Nano Letters, 11: 2634. Capasso, F., 1987. Band-Gap Engineering: From Physics and Materials to New Semiconductor Devices. Science, 235: 172. Chaves, A., L. Covaci, K.Y. Rakhimov, G.A. Farias and F.M. Peeters, 2010. Wave-packet dynamics and valley filter in strained graphene. Physical Review, B 82: 205430. Checkelsky, J and N. Ong, 2009. Thermopower and Nernst effect in graphene in a magnetic field. Physical Review, B 80: 081413(R). Cho, S., Y-F. Chen and M.S. Fuhrer, 2007. Gate-tunable graphene spin valve. Applied Physics Letters, 91: 123105. Cutler, M and N.F. Mott, 1969. Observation of Anderson Localization in an Electron Gas. Physical Review, B181: 1336-1340. DiCarlo, L., H. Lynch, A. Johnson, L. Childress, K. Crockett, C. Marcus, M. Hanson and A.C. Gossard, 2004. Differential Charge Sensing and Charge Delocalization in a Tunable Double Quantum Dot. Physical Review Letters, 92(22): 226801. Elzerman, J.M., R. Hanson, Willems van L.H. Beveren, B. Witkamp, L.M.K. Vandersypen and L.P. Kouwenhoven, 2004. Single-shot read-out of an individual electron spin in a quantum dot. Nature, 430(6998): 431-435. Feng, Z., M. Yanling and Z.A. Ying-Tao, 2011. valley-filtering switch based on strained graphene. Journal Physics: Condensed Matter, 23: 385302. Fert, A., Origin, 2008. Development, and Future of Spintronics (Nobel Lecture). Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 47: 5956. Fujita, T., M.B.A. Jalil and S.G. Tan, 2010. Valley filter in strain engineered graphene. Applied Physics Letters, 97: 043508. Fursey, G.N., 2003. Field emission in vacuum micro-electronics. Applied Surface Science, 215(1): 113-134. Geim, A.K and A.H. MacDonald, 2007. Graphene: exploring carbon flatland. Physics Today, 60(8): 35-41. Geim, A.K. and K.S. Novoselov, 2007. The rise of graphene Nature Material, 6: 183-91. Guerriero, E., L. Polloni, L.G. Rizzi, M. Bianchi, G. Mondello and R. Sordan, 2012. Graphene: Graphene Audio Voltage Amplifier. Small., 8: 356. Gunlycke, D and C.T. White, 2011. Graphene Valley Filter Using a Line Defect. Physical Review Letters, 106: 136806. Gunlycke, D., D.A. Areshkin, J. Li, J.W. Mintmire and C.T. White, 2007. Graphene Nanostrip Digital Memory Device. Nano Letters, 7: 3608. Gustavsson, S., R. Leturcq, B. Simovic, R. Schleser, T. Ihn, P. Studerus, K. Ensslin, D.C. Driscoll and A.C. Gossard, 2006. Counting Statistics of Single Electron Transport in a Quantum Dot. Physical Review Letters, 96(7): 076605. Guttinger, J., C. Stampfer, S. Hellm¨uller, F. Molitor, T. Ihn and K. Ensslin, 2008. Charge detection in graphene quatum dots. Applied Physics Letters, 93(21): 212102. Guttinger, J., C. Stampfer, T. Frey, T. Ihn and K. Ensslin, 2009. Graphene quantum dots in perpendicular magnetic fields. Physica Status Solidi., 246(11–12): 2553-2557. Habibpour, O., S. Cherednichenko, J. Vukusic, K. Yhland and J.A. Stake, 2012. Subharmonic Graphene FET Mixer. IEEE Electron Device Letters, 33: 71. Han, M.Y., B. Ozylmaz, Y. Zhang and P. Kim, 2007. Energy Band-Gap Engineering of Graphene Nanoribbons. Physical Review Letters, 98: 206805. Han, SJ., K.A. Jenkins, A. Valdes Garcia, A.D. Franklin, A.A. Bol and W. Haensch, 2011. Nano Lett., 11: 3690. Han, W., K. Pi, K.M. McCreary, Y. Li, J.I.I. Wong, A.G. Swartz and R.K. Kawakami, 2010. Tunneling Spin Injection into Single Layer Graphene. Physical Review Letters, 105: 167202. Han, W., K. Pi, W. Bao, K.M. McCreary, Y. Li, W.H. Wang, C.N. Lau and R.K. Kawakami, 2009. Electrical detection of spin precession in single layer graphene spin valves with transparent contacts. Applied Physical Letters, 94: 222109. 1871 J. Appl. Sci. Res., 9(3): 1854-1874, 2013 Han, W., W.H. Wang, K. Pi, K.M. McCreary, W. Bao, Y. Li, F. Miao, C.N. Lau and R.K. Kawakami, 2009. Electron-Hole Asymmetry of Spin Injection and Transport in Single-Layer Graphene. Physical. Review Letters, 102: 137205 . Harris, F., 1999. Carbon Nanotubes and related structures, Cambridge University Press. Haugen, H., D. Huertas-Hernando and A. Brataas, 2008. Spin transport in proximity-induced ferromagnetic graphene. Physical Review, B 77: 115406. He, C.L., F. Zhuge, X.F. Zhou, M. Li, G.C. Zhou, Y.W. Liu, J.Z. Wang, B. Chen, W.J. Su, Z.P. Liu, Y. H. Wu, P. Cui and R.W. Li, 2009. Nonvolatile resistive switching in graphene oxide thin films. Applied Physics Letters, 95: 232101. Heinzel, T., 2003. Mesoscopic Electronics in Solid State Nanostructures, Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. Hill, E.W., A.K. Geim, K. Novoselov, F. Schedin and P. Blake, 2006. Graphene Spin Valve Devices. IEEE Transaction on Magnetism, 42: 2694. Hod, O., V. Barone, J.E. Peralta and G.E. Scuseria, 2007. Enhanced Half-Metallicity in Edge-Oxidized Zigzag Graphene Nanoribbons. Nano Letters, 7: 2295. Hwang, E.H., E. Rossi and S. Das Sarma, 2009. Screening-induced temperature-dependent transport in twodimensional graphene. Physical Review, B 80: 165404. Ihn, T., 2004. Springer Tracts in Modern Physics, 192: 102. Iijima, S., 1991. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature, 354: 56-8. International Technology Roadmap For Semiconductors (2009 edn) Available: http://www.itrs.net. Jyotsna Chauhan and Jing Guo, 2011. Assessment of High-Frequency Performance Limits of Graphene FieldEffect Transistors. Nano Research, 4(6): 571-579. Kelly, B.T., 1981. Physics of graphite. London: Applied Science Publishers. Kouwenhoven, L.P., D.G. Austing and S. Tarucha, 2001. Few-electron quantum dots. Reports on Progress in Physics, 64(6): 701. Krastchmer, W., L.D. Lamb, K. Fostiropoulos and D.R. Huffman, D.R. Solid, 1990. C60: a new form of carbon. Nature, 347: 354-358. Kresge, C.T., M.E. Leonowicz, W.J. Roth, J.C. Vartulli and J.S. Beck, 1992. Ordered mesoporous molecular sieves synthesized by a liquid-crystal template mechanism. Nature, 359: 710-712. Li Xuesong, Cai Weiwei, An Jinho, Kim Seyoung, Nah Junghyo, Yang Dongxing, Piner Richard, Velamakanni Aruna, Jung Inhwa, Tutuc Emanuel, Banerjee Sanjay K, Colombo Luigi and S. Ruoff Rodney, 2009. Large-area synthesis of high-quality and uniform graphene films on copper foils. Science, 324: 1312. Li, X., X. Wang, L. Zhang, S. Lee and H. Dai, 2008. Chemically Derived, Ultrasmooth Graphene Nanoribbon Semiconductors. Science, 319(5867): 1229-1232. Li, X., X. Wang, L. Zhang, S. Lee and H. Dai, 2008. Chemically derived, ultrasmooth graphene nanoribbon semiconductors. Science, 319: 1229-32. Liao, L., J. Bai, R. Cheng, H. Zhou, L. Liu, Y. Liu, Y. Huang and X. Duan, 2012. Scalable Fabrication of SelfAligned Graphene Transistors and Circuits on Glass. Nano Letters, 12: 2653. Liao, L., J. Bai, R. Cheng, Y –C. Lin, S. Jiang, Y. Huang and X. Duan, 2010. Top-Gated Graphene Nanoribbon Transistors with Ultrathin High-k Dielectrics. Nano Letters, 10(5): 1917-1921. Liao, L., Y.C. Lin, M.Q. Bao, R. Chen, J.W. Bai, Y. Liu, Y.Q. Qu, K.L. Wang, Y. Huang and X.F. Duan, 2010. High-speed graphene transistors with a self-aligned nanowire gate. Nature, 467: 305-308. Lin, Y.M., A. Valdes-Garcia, S.J. Han, D.B. Farmer, I. Meric, Y. Sun, Y. Wu, C. Dimitrakopoulos, A. Grill, P. Avouris and K.A. Jenkins, 2011. Wafer-Scale Graphene Integrated Circuit. Science, 332: 1294. Lin, Y-M., C. Dimitrakopoulos, K.A. Jenkins, D.B. Farmer, H-Y. Chiu, A. Grill and P. Avouris, 2010. 100-GHz Transistors from wafer-scale epitaxial graphene. Science, 327: 662. Liu, J.Q., Z.Y. Yin, X.H. Cao, F. Zhao, A. Lin, L. Xie, Q. Fan, F. Boey, H. Zhang and W. Huang, 2010. Bulk Heterojunction Polymer Memory Devices with Reduced Graphene Oxide as Electrodes. ACS Nano, 4: 3987. Liu, M., X. Yin, E. Ulin-Avila, B. Geng, T. Zentgraf, L. Ju, F. Wang and X. Zhang, 2011. A graphene-based broadband optical modulator. Nature, 474: 64. Liu, J.Q., Z. Lin, T. Liu, Z.Y. Yin, Z.X. Zhou, S. Chen, L. Xie, F. Boey, H. Zhang and W. Huang, 2010. Multilayer Stacked Low-Temperature-Reduced Graphene Oxide Films: Preparation, Characterization, and Application in Polymer Memory Devices. Small., 6: 1536. Liu, X.L., D. Hug and L. Vandersypen, 2010. Gate-defined graphene double quantum dot and excited state spectroscopy. Nano Letters, 10(5): 1623-1627. Liu, X.L., D. Hug and L. Vandersypen, 2010. Gate-defined graphene double quantum dot and excited state spectroscopy. Nano Letters, 10(5): 1623. Liu, X.L., J. Oostinga, A. Morpurgo and L. Vandersypen, 2009. Electrostatic confinement of electrons in graphene nanoribbons. Physical Review, 80(12): 121407. 1872 J. Appl. Sci. Res., 9(3): 1854-1874, 2013 Low, T. and F. Guinea, 2010. Strain-Induced Pseudomagnetic Field for Novel Graphene Electronics. Nano Letters, 10: 3551. Mao, L.F., 2009. Finite size effects on the gate leakage current in graphene nanoribbon field-effect transistors. Nanotechnology, 20(27): 275203-1-4. Mao, L.F., 2011. A theoretical analysis of field emission from graphene nanoribbons, CARBON, 9: 2709-2714. Mao, L.F., X.j. Li, C.Y. Zhu, Z.O. Wang, Z.H. Lu, J.F. Yang, H.W. Zhu, Y.S. Liu and J.Y. Wang, 2010. Finite size effects on the thermionic emission in metal-graphene nanoribbon contacts. IEEE Electron Device Letters, 31(5): 491-3. McCann, E., D.S.L. Abergel and V.I. Fal’ko, 2007. Electrons in bilayer graphene. Solid State Communications, 143: 110-5. Meric, I., N. Baklitskaya, P. Kim and K.L. Shepard, 2008. RF performance of top-gated, zero-bandgap graphene field-effect transistors. IEEE International. Electronic Devices Meeting (San Francisco, CA, 15–17 Dec 2008) Technical Digest pp: 513-6. Mina, A.N., A.A. Awadallah, A.H. Phillips and R.R. Ahmed, 2012. Simulation of the band structure of graphene and carbon nanotube. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 343: 012076. Mohiuddin, T.M.G., A. Lombardo, R.R. Nair, A. Bonetti, G. Savini, R. Jalil, N. Bonini, D.M. Basko, C. Galiotis, N. Marzari, K.S. Novoselov, A.K. Geim and A.C. Ferrari, 2009. Uniaxial strain in graphene by Raman spectroscopy: G peak splitting, Grüneisen parameters, and sample orientation. Physical Review, B 79: 205433. Molitor, F., A. Jacobsen, C. Stampfer, J. Guttinger, T. Ihn and K. Ensslin, 2009. Transport gap in side-gated graphene constrictions. Physical Review, 79(7): 075426. Molitor, F., C. Stampfer, J. G¨uttinger, A. Jacobsen, T. Ihn and K. Ensslin, 2010. Energy and transport gaps in etched graphene nanoribbons. Semiconductor Science and Technology, 25(3): 034002. Molitor, F., H. Knowles, S. Droscher, U. Gasser, T. Choi, P. Roulleau, J. Guttinger, A. Jacobson, C. Stampfer, K. Ensslin and T. Ihn, 2010. Observation of excited states in a graphene double quantum dot. Europhysics Letters, 89(6): 67005. Molitor, F., S. Dr¨oscher, J. G¨uttinger, A. Jacobson, C. Stampfer, T. Ihn and K. Ensslin, 2009. Transport through graphene double dots. Applied Physics Letters, 94(22): 222107. Molitor, F., S. Droscher, J. Guttinger, A. Jacobson, C. Stampfer, T. Ihn and K. Ensslin, 2009. Transport through graphene double dots. Applied Physics Letters, 94(22): 222107. Mueller, T., F. Xia and P.h. Avouris, 2010. Graphene photodetectors for high-speed optical communications. Nature Photonics, 4: 297-301. Myoung, N., G. Ihm and S.J. Lee, 2010. Transport in armchair graphene nanoribbons modulated by magnetic barriers. Physica, 42: 2808-2811. Myung, S., J. Park, H. Lee, K.S. Kim and S. Hong, 2010. Ambipolar Memory Devices Based on Reduced Graphene Oxide and Nanoparticles. Advanced Materials, 22: 2045. Novoselov, K.S., A.K. Geim, S.V. Morozov, D. Jiang, M.I. Katsnelson, I.V. Grigorieva, S.V. Dubonos and A.A. Firsov, 2005. Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature, 438: 197. Novoselov, K.S., A.K. Geim, S.V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S.V. Dubonos, I.V. Grigorieva and A.A. Firsov, 2004. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science, 306: 666-669. Novoselov, K.S., D. Jiang, F. Schedin, T.J. Booth, V.V. Khotkevich, S.V. Morozov, et al., 2005. Twodimensional atomic crystals. Proceeding National Academy Science USA., 102: 10451. Ouyang, Y and J. Guo, 2009. A theoretical study on thermoelectric properties of graphene nanoribbons. Applied Physical Letters, 94: 263107. Palacios, T., A. Hsu and H. Wang, 2010. Applications of graphene devices in RF communications. IEEE Communication Magazine, 48: 122-128. Pereira, V.M., A.H. Castro Neto and N.M.R. Peres, 2009. Tight-binding approach to uniaxial strain in graphene. Physical Review, B 80: 045401. Petta, J.R., A.C. Johnson, J.M. Taylor, E.A. Laird, A. Yacoby, M.D. Lukin, C.M. Marcus, M.P. Hanson and A.C. Gossard, 2005. Coherent Manipulation of Coupled Electron Spins in Semiconductor Quantum Dots. Science, 309(5744): 2180-2184. Phillips, A.H., A.N. Mina, M.S. Sobhy and E.A. Fouad, 2007. Responsivity of quantum dot photodetector at terahertz detection frequencies. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 4(1): 174. Phillips, A.H., N.A.I. Aly, K. Kirah and H.E. El-Sayes, 2008. Transport characteristics of mesoscopic RF-single electron transistor. Chinese Physics Letters, 25(1): 250. Ponomarenko, L.A., F. Schedin, M.I. Katsnelson, R. Yang, E.H. Hill, K.S. Novoselov and A.K. Geim, 2008. Chaotic Dirac Billiard in Graphene Quantum Dots. Science, 320(5874): 356-358. Prechtel, L., L. Song, D. Schuh, P. Ajayan, W. Wegscheider and A.W. Holleitner, 2012. Time-resolved ultrafast photocurrents and terahertz generation in freely suspended graphene. Nature Communications, 3: 646. 1873 J. Appl. Sci. Res., 9(3): 1854-1874, 2013 Reddy, D., L.F. Register, E. Tutuc and S.K. Banerjee, 2010. Bilayer Pseudospin Field-Effect Transistor: Applications to Boolean Logic. IEEE Transaction Electronic Devices., 57: 755. Reina, A., X. Jia, J. Ho, D. Nezich, H. Son, V. Bulovic, M.S. Dresselhaus and J. Kong, 2008. Large area. fewlayer graphene films on arbitrary substrates by chemical vapor deposition. Nano Letters, 9: 305. Riordan, M., L. Hoddeson, 1998. Crystal Fire: The Invention of the Transistor and the Birth of the Information Age; W.W. Norton and Company, New York. Rycerz, A., J. Tworzydlo and C.W.J. Beenakker, 2007. Valley filter and valley valve in graphene. Nature Physics, 3: 172. Saffarzadeh, A., and R. Farghadan, 2011. A spin-filter device based on armchair graphene nanoribbons. Applied Physics Letters, 98: 023106. San-Jose, P., E. Prada, E. McCann and H. Schomerus, 2009. Pseudospin Valve in Bilayer Graphene: Towards Graphene-Based Pseudospintronics. Physical Review Letters, 102: 247204. Schnez, S., F. Molitor, C. Stampfer, J. Guttinger, I. Shorubalko, T. Ihn and K. Ensslin, 2009. Observation of excited states in a graphene quantum dot. Applied Physics Letters, 94(1): 012107. Schomerus, H., 2010. Helical scattering and valleytronics in bilayer graphene. Physical Review, B 82: 164309. Seebeck, T., 1926. Uber die magnetische Polarisation der Metalle und Erze durch Temperatur-Differens. Annal de Physik, 2: 287-292. Shiraishi, M., M. Ohishi, R. Nouchi, N. Mitoma, T. Nozaki, T. Shinjo and Y. Suzuki, 2009. Robustness of Spin Polarization in Graphene-Based Spin Valves. Advanced Functional Materials., 19: 3711. Sols, F., F. Guinea and AH. Castro Neto, 2007. Coulomb Blockade in Graphene Nanoribbons. Physical Review Letters, 99(16): 166803. Son, Y –W., M.L. Cohen, and S.G. Louie, 2006. Half-metallic graphene nanoribbons. Nature, 444: 347. Soodchomshom, B., 2011. Strain-induced switching of magnetoresistance and perfect spin-valley filtering in graphene. Physica E: Low Dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, 44: 579. Soodchomshom, B., and P. Chantngarm, 2011. Control of spin valley current in strain engineered graphene magntic junction. Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism., 24: 1885. Stampfer, C., E. Schurtenberger, F. Molitor, J. G¨uttinger, T. Ihn and K. Ensslin, 2009. Transparency of narrow constrictions in a graphene single electron transistor. International Journal of Modern Physics. B, 23(12– 13): 2647. Stampfer, C., E. Schurtenberger, F. Molitor, J. Guttinger, T. Ihn and K. Ensslin, 2008. Tunable graphene single electron transistor. Nano Letters, 8(8): 2378-2383. Stampfer, C., J. Guttinger, F. Molitor, D. Graf, T. Ihn and K. Ensslin, 2008. Tunable Coulomb blockade in nanostructured graphene. Applied Physics Letters, 92(1): 012102. Sun, Z., T. Hasan, F. Torrisi, D. Popa, G. Privitera, F. Wang, F. Bonaccorso, D.M. Basko and A.C. Ferrari, 2010. Graphene Mode-Locked Ultrafast Laser. ACS Nano, 4: 803. Sze, S.M. and K.K. Ng, 2006. Physics of semiconductor devices. John Wiley & Sons. Todd, K., H.T. Chou, S. Amasha and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, 2009. Quantum Dot Behavior in Graphene Nanoconstrictions. Nano Letters, 9(1): 416-421. Tombros, N., C. Jozsa, M. Popinciuc, H.T. Jonkman and v. B.J. Wees, 2007. Electronic spin transport and spin precession in single graphene layers at room temperature. Nature, 448: 571. Trauzettel, B., D.V. Bulaev, D. Loss and G. Burkard, 2007. Spin qubits in graphene quantum dots. Nature Physics, 3(3): 192-196. van der Wiel, W.G., S. De Franceschi, J. Elzerman, T. Fujisawa and S. Tarucha, 2003. Electron transport through double quantum dots. Review of Modern Physics, 75(1): 1-22. Wang, H., A. Hsu, J. Wu, J. Kong and T. Palacios, 2010. Graphene-based ambipolar RF mixers. IEEE Electron Device Letters, 31: 906-8. Wang, H., D. Nezich, J. Kong and T. Palacios, 2009. Graphene frequency multipliers. IEEE Electron Device Letters, 30: 547-9. Wang, H., D. Nezich, J. Kong and T. Palacios, 2009. Graphene Frequency Multipliers. IEEE Electron Device Letters, 30: 547. Wang, S., J. Pu, D.S.H. Chan, B.J. Cho and K.P. Loh, 2010. Wide memory window in graphene oxide charge storage nodes. Applied Physics Letters, 96: 143109. Wei, P., W.Z. Bao, Y. Pu, C.N. Lau and J. Shi, 2009. Anomalous thermoelectric transport of dirac particles in graphene. Physical Review Letters, 102: 166808. Wimmer, M., I. Adagideli, S. Berber, D. Tomanek and K. Richter, 2008. Spin Currents in Rough Graphene Nanoribbons: Universal Fluctuations and Spin Injection. Physical Review Letters, 100: 177207. Wu, J., W. Pisula and K. Mullen, 2007. Graphenes as potential material for electronics. Chemical Review, 107: 718. Yang, X., G. Liu, A.A. Balandin and K. Mohanram, 2010. Triple-Mode Single-Transistor Graphene Amplifier and Its Applications. ACS Nano, 4: 5532. 1874 J. Appl. Sci. Res., 9(3): 1854-1874, 2013 Yanxia Xing, Qing-feng Sun, and Jian Wang. Nernst and Seebeck, 2009. effect in a graphene nanoribbon. Physical Review, B80: 235411. Yazyev, O.V. and M.I. Katsnelson, 2008. Magnetic Correlations at Graphene Edges: Basis for Novel Spintronics Devices. Physical Review Letters, 100: 047209. Yonghong Yan, Qi-Feng Liang, Hui Zhao and Chang-Qin Wu, 2012. Thermoelectric properties of hexagonal graphene quantum dots. Physics Letters, A 376: 1154-1158. Zeng, M., Y. Feng and G. Liang, 2011. Graphene-based Spin Caloritronics. Nano Letters, 11: 1369. Zhai, F., X. Zhao, K. Chang and H.Q. Xu, 2010. Magnetic barrier on strained graphene: A possible valley filter. Physical Review, B 82: 115442. Zhang, Y.T., H. Jiang, Q–F. Sun and X.C. Xie, 2010. Spin polarization and giant magnetoresistance effect induced by magnetization in zigzag graphene nanoribbons. Physical Review, B 81: 165404. Zhang, Y., T-T. Tang, C. Girit, Z. Hao, M.C. Martin, A. Zettl, M.F. Crommie, Y.R. Shen and F. Wang, 2009. Direct observation of a widely tunable bandgap in bilayer graphene. Nature, 459: 820-3. Zhang, Y.B., Y.W. Tan, H.L. Stormer, P. Kim, 2005. Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry’s phase in graphene. Nature, 438: 201. Zheng, Y., G.X. Ni, C.T. Toh, M.G. Zeng, S.T. Chen, K. Yao and B. Ozyilmaz, 2009. Gate-controlled nonvolatile graphene-ferroelectric memory. Applied Physical Letters, 94: 163505. Zhuang, X.D., Y. Chen, G. Liu, P.P. Li, C.X. Zhu, E.T. Kang, K. Noeh, B. Zhang, J.H. Zhu and Y.X. Li, 2010. Conjugated-Polymer-Functionalized Graphene Oxide: Synthesis and Nonvolatile Rewritable Memory Effect. Advanced Materials, 22: 1731. Zuev, Y.M., W. Chang and P. Kim, 2009. Thermoelectric and magneto-thermoelectric transport measurements of graphene. Physical Review Letters, 102: 096807.