* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Trophic ecology of meiofauna: Francisco J.A. Nascimento
Survey
Document related concepts
Biodiversity action plan wikipedia , lookup
Ecosystem services wikipedia , lookup
Overexploitation wikipedia , lookup
Conservation agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project wikipedia , lookup
Ecological fitting wikipedia , lookup
Restoration ecology wikipedia , lookup
Ecological resilience wikipedia , lookup
Marine conservation wikipedia , lookup
Agroecology wikipedia , lookup
Ecology of the San Francisco Estuary wikipedia , lookup
Regenerative agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Trophic ecology of meiofauna: Response to sedimentation of phytoplankton blooms in the Baltic Sea Francisco J.A. Nascimento Department of Systems Ecology Stockholm University 1 Doctoral thesis in Marine Ecology, 2010 Francisco Nascimento, [email protected] Department of Systems Ecology SE- 106 91Stockholm Sweden © Francisco Nascimento, Stockholm 2010 ISBN 978-91-7447-083-3 Printed by US-AB, Stockholm, Sweden Cover artwork by Guro Stugu and Fredrik Pettersson 2 ABSTRACT Marine soft sediments are the second largest habitat on Earth. How animal communities in this habitat are structured and their abundance and diversity regulated is a central issue in marine ecology. Food is an important limiting factor for many benthic populations, and since the great majority of aquatic soft bottoms are in waters below the photic zone, settling organic matter from phytoplankton blooms is of vital importance to them. The mineralization of this settled organic matter is a basic benthic ecosystem process, and critical for sustaining aquatic primary production. This thesis discusses the effects of settling phytoplankton blooms on benthic meiofaunal populations in the Baltic Sea and how biotic interactions between meiofauna, macrofauna and microbes affect the fate of settled organic matter. Eutrophication in the Baltic Sea has altered phytoplankton community dynamics and thus the quantity and quality of settling of organic matter reaching the benthos, with indications that toxin-producing cyanobacterial blooms may now reach the benthos in greater quantity than previously. Paper I found that meiofauna can feed on settled cyanobacteria at rates similar to what other studies have found for diatoms, yet suffer no apparent increase in mortality. However, growth of meiofauna is significantly slower on a diet of cyanobacteria than when fed spring bloom diatoms, indicating that the studied cyanobacteria are nutritionally poor and, even if assimilated, do not much improve growth (Paper II). Still, cyanobacteria may provide critical maintenance energy for some meiofaunal populations during periods of the year when high quality food is unavailable. Paper III highlights how biotic interactions between macrofauna and meiofauna can determine how settled phytoplankton blooms are processed by meiofauna. We found that the presence of macrofauna reduces the access of meiofauna to settled organic matter from phytoplankton, presumably through interference competition. Spatial niche differentiation between macrofauna species is likely to reduce the sediment volume in which meiofauna can feed undisturbed by larger competitors, suggesting that interference increases when several macrofauna species are present. We also found that meiofaunal populations influence the provision of ecosystem services by benthic microbes. Although the direct meiofaunal contribution to benthic mineralization and contaminant degradation can be considered small, our results indicate that microbial activity and species composition is top-down controlled by meiofauna. Paper IV shows that when meiofauna is abundant, mineralization of organic matter is positively affected, presumably through facilitation mechanisms. In contrast, paper V reports that degradation of the contaminant naphtalene decreases significantly at high meiofauna abundance, due to higher grazing pressure on the naphthalene-degrading bacteria. In conclusion, this thesis shows that type and quality of organic matter available, as well as competition from macrofauna, affect how meiofauna grow and incorporate nutrients. Furthermore we found meiofauna to be an important functional component of the benthic ecosystem, with marked effects on ecosystem processes such as nutrient regeneration and contaminant degradation. 3 1. LIST OF PAPERS 5 2. INTRODUCTION 6 2.1. B ENTHIC PELAGIC COUPLING 2.2. B ENTHIC INVERTEBRATES AND M EIOFAUNA 2.3. E UTROPHICATION AND EFFECTS ON SETTLING ORGANIC MATTER 2.4. Q UALITY OF ORGANIC MATTER AND BENTHIC GROWTH 2.5. C OMPETITION IN BENTHOS AND ACCESS TO ORGANIC MATTER 2.6. B ENTHIC ECOSYSTEM PROCESSES 7 8 10 11 12 13 3. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH 14 3.1. S TUDY SYSTEM : THE B ALTIC S EA 3.2. I SOTOPE TRACERS IN FOOD - WEB STUDIES 3.3. B IOCHEMICAL TOOLS 15 15 16 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 16 4.1 C HANGING PHYTOPLANKTON COMMUNITY DYNAMICS AND EFFECTS ON MEIOFAUNAL POPULATIONS 17 4.2. I NTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION IN SOFT SEDIMENTS 18 4.3 H OW ARE BENTHIC ECOSYSTEM PROCESSES AFFECTED BY MEIOFAUNA ? 19 5. CONCLUDING REMARKS AND FUTURE STUDIES 20 6. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 21 7. REFERENCES 24 4 1. LIST OF PAPERS This thesis is based on the following five papers, referred to in the text by their Roman numerals. I Nascimento FJA., Karlson AML., Elmgren R. (2008) Settling blooms of filamentous cyanobacteria as food for meiofauna assemblages. Limnology & Oceanography 53(6): 2636-2643 II Nascimento FJA., Karlson AML., Näslund J., Gorokhova E. (2009) Settling cyanobacterial blooms do not improve growth conditions for soft bottom meiofauna. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 368: 138146. III Nascimento FJA., Karlson AML., Näslund J., Elmgren R. Diversity of larger consumers enhances interference competition effects on smaller competitors. (Submitted manuscript). IV Nascimento FJA, Näslund J, Elmgren R. Meiofauna enhances organic matter mineralization in soft sediment ecosystems (Manuscript). V Näslund J., Nascimento FJA., Gunnarsson JS. (in press) Meiofauna reduces bacterial mineralization of naphthalene in marine sediment. ISME Journal My contributions to the papers: (I) –Major part in experimental design and execution, all meiofauna sorting analyses and data processing, major part in writing. (II) – Major part in experimental design and execution, all meiofauna sorting, preparation of samples for RNA/DNA quantification, data processing, major part in writing. (III) – Major part in experimental design and execution, all meiofauna sorting and preparation of samples for stable isotope analysis, data processing, writing (IV) – Major part in experimental design and execution, all meiofauna sorting, analyses and data processing, major part in writing. (V) – Major part in experimental design and execution, meiofauna community analysis, participated in data processing, contributed in writing. Additional papers by the author of this thesis: Boyra, A., Nascimento, F.J.A., Tuya, F., Sanchez-Jerez, P., Haroun, R.J., 2004. Impact of sea-cage fish farms on intertidal macrobenthic assemblages. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the U.K. 84, 665-668. Karlson AML, Nascimento FJA, Elmgren R (2008). Incorporation and burial of carbon from settling cyanobacterial blooms by deposit-feeding macrofauna. Limnology & Oceanography 53(6): 2754-2758. Karlson AML, Nascimento FJA, Näslund J, Elmgren R. In press Higher diversity of deposit-feeding macrofauna enhances phytodetritus processing. Ecology 5 2. INTRODUCTION One of the fundamental goals of ecology is to understand the processes that determine the abundance and distribution of species, and hence the composition of biological communities. As soft bottoms cover 70% of our planet’s surface, regulation of animal communities in these habitats is a central question for marine ecology. Due to the complexity of aquatic soft bottoms, the usual generalisations about how communities are structured are hard to use for benthic assemblages (Wilson 1990). Soft bottoms have unique characteristics, such as their three-dimensional spatial structure and the ability of animals to rapidly rework the sediment and change the physical and chemical conditions of their habitats (Meysman et al. 2006). The community structure of benthic invertebrates is determined by several interacting factors, one of the most important being how individuals acquire nutrients. Most of ocean bottoms are situated below the photic zone, which mean that animals living in these sediments have to depend on inputs of allochthonous organic matter for food (Graf 1989). A large part of the organic matter that reaches ocean bottoms comes from settling phytoplankton blooms. How benthic animals use this vital limiting resource is, therefore, a determining factor for benthic communities (Graf 1992). This phytoplankton material is usually either remineralized back to the water column via microbial decomposition and metazoan grazing and respiration, or permanently buried in the sediments (Sellner 1997). Thus, animals living in soft sediments have an important role in global biogeochemical cycles, by influencing how much carbon is sequestered into the geosphere (Van Cappellen 2003) and how remineralized nutrients are returned to the water-column, to drive primary production (Webb and Montagna 1993). The aim of this thesis was to examine the response of Baltic soft-bottom meiofauna to phytoplankton sedimentation and the trophic interactions with the other two components of the benthic system, macrofauna and prokaryotes, mediate the fate of settled blooms. Baltic plankton production is strongly pulsed, with a succession of phytoplankton blooms of different species composition (Andersson et al. 1996; Höglander et al. 2004). The spring bloom has been considered the most important bloom event, 6 providing most of the annual new production and input to the benthos (Elmgren 1978; Lignell et al. 1993). Cyanobacterial summer blooms are considered to have increased in frequency and biomass in recent decades, likely as a consequence of eutrophication (Finni et al. 2001; Poutanen and Nikkilä 2001) The first part of this thesis deals with how cyanobacterial organic matter is processed by meiofauna in the benthic food web and how it affects the survival and growth of meiofauna assemblages in the Baltic Sea (Paper I and II). In the second part I studied how biological interactions such as competition, grazing and facilitation between meiofauna, macrofauna and microbial communities determine the fate of organic matter in Baltic Sea soft sediments (Paper III and IV and V). Fig.1 – Simplified illustration of benthic-pelagic coupling with focus on the processes studied in this thesis. 2.1. Benthic pelagic coupling Benthic communities in the aphotic zone are food limited for considerable periods of the year (Rudnick 1989). Settling organic matter therefore greatly affects the metabolism and population dynamics of benthic communities (Elmgren 1978; Graf 1992; Gullberg et al. 1997) and many species in benthic assemblages exhibit life- 7 history characteristics adapted to seasonal inputs of settling organic matter (Boon 1998; Ólafsson and Elmgren 1997). The sheer amount of organic matter derived from phytoplankton blooms that reaches aquatic sediments every year makes them a globally important reservoir of organic matter. The mineralization of this organic matter in marine sediments is driven mainly by microbial processes with bacteria as the primary mediators (Gage and Tyler 1991; Marinelli and Waldbusser 2005). However, meio- and macrofauna have been shown to influence mineralization, both directly and indirectly. The activity of depositfeeding benthic fauna facilitates the access of the bacterial community to the organic matter present in the sediment, by enhancing the vertical and horizontal mixing of the sediment (Boon 1998; Diaz et al. 1994; Osinga et al. 1997; Vanduyl and Kop 1994; Webb and Montagna 1993; Yingst and Rhoads 1980). In addition, other ecological processes connected to benthic fauna activity, like bioturbation control important environmental parameters that promote mineralization of organic matter in sediments, such as exchange of nutrients, oxygen and other metabolites between the sediment and the overlying water (Aller and Aller 1992; Boon 1998; Meysman et al. 2006). All these processes help stimulate bacterial metabolism and organic matter degradation. In addition, bioturbation may bury a significant fraction of settled phytoplankton blooms into deeper sediment layers, where rates of decomposition are much slower (Andersen 1996; Blair et al. 1996; Kristensen et al. 1995; van de Bund et al. 2001). Such buried phytodetritus have the potential to feed soft bottom communities during the many months when fresh organic matter is not available (Josefson and Hansen 2003; Rudnick and Oviatt 1986). If not used, this buried organic matter will eventually be permanently sequestered, and removed from the biosphere, with impact on the global carbon cycle. 2.2. B enthic invertebrates and Meiofauna Benthic invertebrates have traditionally been grouped by size into macro- and meiofauna (Schwinghamer 1981; Warwick 1984). The size boundaries of macro- and meiofauna are based on the methodology used in benthic studies, and correspond to the size mesh of the sieves used during sorting (Warwick et al. 2006). As a result, organisms retained on 0.5 or 1 mm mesh are classified as macrofauna, and those 8 passing through this mesh, but retained on a 40 µm mesh, as meiofauna (Giere 2009). As the focus of this thesis is on the trophic ecology of Baltic meiofauna, we followed the recommendations for meiobenthic studies in the Baltic Sea (Elmgren and Radziejewska 1989) and used 1000 and 40 µm mesh as the upper and lower limit for meiofauna. Fig. 2- Illustration of the heads and bucal cavity of some of the nematode taxa studied in Paper I a) Paracanthoncus sp. b) Axonulaimus spinosus. c) Desmolaimus sp. d) Sabatiera pulchra Meiobenthic metazoans differ from macrofauna not only in size but also in a number of biological characteristics (Warwick 1984), such as having direct benthic development with adult dispersion, and often short generation times and continuous reproductive activity. Regarding feeding adaptations they are motile organisms seeking food particles in discriminating manner (Giere 2009). They inhabit a wide variety of aquatic habitats, both freshwater and marine, from the surface to the greatest depths and are found in all types of sediments (Coull 1988). Meiofauna are more abundant and species-rich than macrofauna and include phylogenetic representatives from most animal phyla; 22 of the 33 metazoan phyla have at least one meiobenthic taxa (Coull 1999). On average one can expect to find numbers in the order of 106 ind. m-2 of sediment surface and a standing stock of dry weight biomass of 0.75-2 g m-2 in water above 100 meters depth (Coull 1988; Coull and Bell 1979; Giere 2009). In soft sediments, nematodes (Fig. 2) are generally the most abundant group, encompassing 60-90% of the total meiofauna abundance, with harpaticoid copepods (Fig.3) usually the second most abundant group, at 10-40% (Coull 1999). In the Baltic Sea the salinity and the temperature gradients are limiting factors for many meiofauna species, leading to a lower species diversity than in fully marine or freshwater systems (Elmgren 1978; Elmgren 1984; Rumohr 1996). In 1991, only 67 species had been reported from sediments below the photic zone in the inner Baltic 9 proper (Ólafsson and Elmgren 1991). As is the case globally, meiofaunal assemblages in the Baltic are usually dominated by nematodes, with more than 50% of the total meiofauna abundance. Other common groups are harpacticoid copepods and ostracods (Fig. 3), with the latter constituting the major part of meiofauna biomass in some areas of the Baltic Sea (Ólafsson and Elmgren 1997). Due to its low number of species and trophic links, the Baltic Sea has been considered particularly suitable for studies of food webs and ecological couplings (Elmgren and Hill 1997). 2.3. Eutrophication and effects on settling organic matter Human activities have profoundly changed the delivery of inorganic nutrients to aquatic ecosystems (Galloway et al. 2003) and eutrophication is today acknowledged as one of the main environmental problems affecting coastal areas (Rabalais et al. 2002). Today approximately 85 million people live in the Baltic drainage area, with considerable impact on the quantities of inorganic nutrients released to the Baltic ecosystem. The most striking ecological effect of excess inputs of nitrogen and phosphorus to aquatic ecosystems is the stimulation of algal growth and consequent degradation of water quality (Rabalais et al. 2002). In the Baltic Sea, the anthropogenic input of nitrogen and phosphorous (Larsson et al. 1985), primary production and resulting sedimentation of organic matter has increased markedly in the last half-century (Jonsson and Carman 1994). Furthermore, the phytoplankton bloom dynamics have changed in recent years, with indications that nitrogen-fixing 10 and potentially toxic cyanobacterial blooms (Fig. 4) have increased in size and frequency (Finni et al. 2001). Initially, it was thought that these cyanobacterial blooms were almost entirely decomposed and mineralized by bacteria and flagellates in the water column, causing little sedimentation of organic matter (Hoppe 1981; Kononen et al. 1992; Sellner 1997). However, a number of studies provide indications that the sedimentation caused by these cyanobacterial blooms and consequent organic input to Baltic Sea sediments may be larger than previously believed (Bianchi et al. 2000; Bianchi et al. 2002; Gustafsson et al. 2004; Heiskanen 1998). The effects of the sedimentation of these blooms on benthic organism are still largely unknown. Regarding the meiofauna, ostracods can utilize newly settled cyanobacterial Aphanizomenon sp. blooms, (Limén and Ólafsson 2002), but there is still a lack of understanding of how and to what extent these organic matter inputs are utilized as food by meiofauna. Additionally, there is little information on how toxins produced by cyanobacteria can influence the meiofauna after ingestion. Paper I attempts to contribute to clarify these issues. Fig. 4- Summer bloom of the diazotrophic, nitrogen-fixing Nodularia spumigena, in the Baltic Sea proper. 2.4. Quality of organic matter and benthic growth How primary consumers use nutrients is related to both quantity and quality of the food consumed. A number of studies have shown that secondary production can be largely determined by food quality (Gulati and DeMott 1997; Vargas et al. 2006; Vrede et al. 2002), with animal growth rates decreasing when the food has too low concentrations of essential nutrients (Boersma and Kreutzer 2002) 11 The low quantity of limiting nutrients, such as organic nitrogen, available in sediments below the photic zone is a difficult challenge for deposit-feeding animals. As a result, food quality can be an important structuring factor for communities of benthic invertebrates. A number of biological parameters such as meiofaunal community composition and abundance (Ólafsson and Elmgren 1997), macrofaunal growth (Goedkoop et al. 2007), feeding preferences (Johnson 1987) and lipid contents (Gardner et al. 1985; Richoux et al. 2004) are influenced by the quantity and nutritional quality of settling phytoplankton and phytodetritus. The quality of the OM that reaches aphotic sediments depends largely on seasonal variations in phytoplankton production and community composition. In the Baltic Sea, the spring bloom, which is generally dominated by diatoms, has been considered the most important organic matter input to the benthos, providing the largest part of the annual new production of both macro –and meiofauna (Lehtonen and Andersin 1998; Ólafsson and Elmgren 1997), likely due to their high content of lipids and polyunsaturated fatty acids (Ahlgren et al. 1992). As mentioned previously, blooms of nitrogen-fixing bacteria now often dominate the summer phytoplankton community in much of the Baltic Sea. Cyanobacteria are often seen as unsuitable food for aquatic invertebrates due to a morphology that restricts ingestion, as well as their toxicity and nutritional inadequacy (DeMott and Moxter 1991; Engström-Öst et al. 2002). After finding in Paper I that meiofauna could utilize settled blooms of N. spumigena and Aphanizomenon sp as food, it was important to asses the quality of freshly settled cyanobacteria as food for the benthos, when compared to the spring bloom. Paper II provides relevant information on this subject. 2.5. Competition in benthos and access to organic matter Most habitats have a limited supply of food and/or space and therefore competition between species for these resources is likely to be an important structuring factor of populations (Wilson 1990). In this thesis we use the definition of interspecific competition in Begon et al. (1990) that states that interspecific competition occurs when “individuals of one species suffer a reduction in fecundity, survivorship or growth as a result of resource exploitation or interference by individuals of another 12 species”. Competition between species can occur through exploitative competition, where negative interactions arise from the removal of a shared resource, or through interference competition, where one species reduces the capacity of other species to utilize a resource through behavioral mechanisms (Amarasekare 2002; Begon et al. 1990). Of these two, interference competition has received less attention even though interference competition is likely to have strong impacts on evolution and community structure of marine animals (Branch 1984 ). The larger size of macrofaunal species when compared to meiofauna gives macrofauna the potential to physically modulate several factors that structure meiofaunal populations (Austen and Widdicombe 1998; Austen et al. 1998; Schratzberger and Warwick 1999), including access to limiting resources such as freshly deposited organic matter (Modig et al. 2000; Ólafsson et al. 2005). Therefore, how interspecific competition from macrofauna regulates the use of fresh organic matter by meiofaunal deposit-feeders is important for understanding the patterns of coexistence between these two faunal groups in benthic ecosystems. This is the focus of Paper III. 2.6. Benthic ecosystem processes Benthic ecosystems provide several vital ecological services, including the production of seafood and maintenance of life-supporting processes such as storage and cycling of materials, nutrients, and degradation of pollutants (Snelgrove 1999). As anthropogenic activities have altered benthic habitats, anoxic bottoms have become more widespread globally, sometimes with severe consequences for benthic biodiversity, abundance and species distributions (Diaz and Rosenberg 2008). Since the loss of species may hamper certain ecosystem processes, understanding the sources and mechanisms of variability in ecosystem functioning, and the conditions under which different species can influence ecosystem processes is a vital focus of ecological research (Solan et al. 2004). Some ecosystems processes in benthic marine habitats, such as organic matter mineralization and biodegradation of anthropogenic contaminants are driven mainly by the action of prokaryotes (Gage and Tyler 1991; Marinelli and Waldbusser 2005). However, biological interactions such as facilitation and predation between these 13 microorganisms and benthic animals have the potential to play an important role in these ecosystem processes. Interactions between infauna and the microbial community in soft sediments are complex. Animals can increase sediment fluxes of solutes and oxygen and remove toxic metabolites from sediments stimulating microbial activity (Kristensen and Mikkelsen 2003). In addition, the activity of infauna can also increase prokaryote metabolism by the disaggregation of particles, which facilitates microbial access to organic matter (Rice 1986), and through grazing or gardening that keeps bacterial populations growing at exponential growth rates (Kemp 1987). On the other hand, the feeding activities of benthic fauna can compete directly with the microbial community by removing organic matter otherwise available for decomposition (Kristensen and Mikkelsen 2003; Tenore et al. 1982). Therefore infauna has the potential to either stimulate or compete with microbial communities. While interactions between macrofauna and microbial communities in marine sediments are relatively well studied (Heilskov and Holmer 2001; Herman et al. 1999; Holmer et al. 1997; Josefson et al. 2002; Kristensen et al. 1992; Kristensen and Mikkelsen 2003), how meiofauna interacts with the microbial component of the benthic ecosystem is still poorly understood, despite meiofauna being by far the most abundant and diverse metazoan group in most benthic habitats. Several studies have, however, provided evidence that meiofauna can stimulate microbial activity (Findlay and Tenore 1982; Gerlach 1978; Rieper 1978; Rysgaard et al. 2000; Tenore et al. 1977; Tietjen 1980). Papers IV and V focus on these questions and study the effects of meiofauna on organic matter mineralization and on biodegradation of an anthropogenic pollutant. 3. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH In this thesis I studied the effect of settling phytoplankton blooms on Baltic meiofauna and how benthic fauna influences the fate of the phytodetritus. This was done through a series of controlled experimental studies that used isotopes as tracers to follow the fate of the added organic matter. 14 3.1. Study system: the Baltic Sea The Baltic Sea is one of the largest brackish water bodies in the world and presents a number of unique characteristics. Perhaps the most important one is the steady salinity gradient from North to South, with salinity as high as 15 ppt in the Southwestern Baltic Sea and as low as 3 ppt in the Northern Baltic Sea. A salinity stratification is also present vertically, since the denser water that flows in from the North Sea mixes only partially with the lower salinity water already in the Baltic Sea, and therefore accumulates in deeper areas (Reid and Orlova 2002). Thus, a halocline is formed, usually at a depth of 50 to 70 m (Melvasalo et al. 1981), separating the upper layer from the weakly stratified deep water. This salinity gradient is paralleled by a temperature gradient. Temperature affects layering during the summer when a less dense, typically 10-20m thick, warm layer forms on the surface. This thermocline divides low salinity waters into two layers: a well mixed surface layer down to a depth of 10–25 m, and a deeper, colder layer extending down to the sea-bed or to the halocline (Weaver 2003). These gradients in salinity and temperature restrict the distribution of many species in the Baltic Sea, leading to a biological community with unique ecological characteristics, with a mixture of marine and freshwater species able to tolerate brackish conditions and true brackish water-adapted species (Elmgren and Hill, 1997). 3.2. Isotope tracers in food-web studies Isotopes are atoms of the same element that have equal numbers of protons but differ in their number of neutrons in the nucleus. The difference between the various isotopes in the number of neutrons of an element means that they have the same charge but different masses (Jardine et al. 2003; Kendall et al. 1995). Isotopes can be either, stable and non-stable. When the nuclei of the isotope does not decay to other isotopes, but may themselves be produced by the decay of radioactive isotopes, the isotope is classified as stable (Schimel 1993). Isotopes are commonly used as natural tracers in ecological studies (Fry 2006), both at the single organism level and at the ecosystem level, to trace food webs and biogeochemical cycles. With the advantages of simple and straightforward collection techniques and relatively inexpensive analysis costs (eg Michener and Schell 1994), 15 isotope tracing is a powerful technique for looking at the processes, connections and energy flows in aquatic systems (Lajtha and Michener 1994). 3.3. Biochemical tools Biochemical indicators, such as nucleic acid indices, have been used with some success as an alternative to the classical methods of evaluating growth rates. One of the most widely used indices in marine ecology is the RNA:DNA ratio. This index is based on the assumption that the quantity of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in a somatic cell is approximately constant, while the amount of ribosomal ribonucleic acid (RNA), which associated with protein synthesis, is affected by the nutritional state of the organism (Bremer and Dennis 1996). A number of studies have found nucleic acid indices to respond to the quantity and quality of available food (Gorokhova 2003; Wagner et al. 2001), demonstrating that this ratio can be used as a proxy for assessing individual growth rate and nutritional status of individuals (Menge 2000; Norkko et al. 2005). 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION How nutrients are incorporated in biological communities play an important role in regulating community structure and ecological interactions between organisms. In this thesis I focused on a number of the factors that affect how carbon and nitrogen from settling phytoplankton blooms are acquired by meiofauna and how meiofauna nutrient incorporation affects and is affected by the other members of the benthic community, macrofauna and prokaryotes. Papers I and II study the effects of cyanobacteria, an increasingly important phytoplankton group in the Baltic Sea, on meiofauna carbon incorporation and growth. Paper III looks on how competition by macrofauna regulates meiofauna incorporation of nitrogen and carbon from a settling phytoplankton bloom, while Paper IV and V focus on how the trophic interaction between meio- and microfauna determine ecosystem processes performed by benthic microorganisms. 16 4.1 Changing phytoplankton community dynamics and effects on meiofaunal populations Organic matter type and quality is especially important for benthic communities living below the photic zone, which are generally considered to be almost entirely dependent on sedimenting allochthonous organic matter, mainly from the pelagic zone (Goedkoop and Johnson 1996; Graf 1992). In the Baltic Sea, the spring bloom, which is generally dominated by diatoms, has been considered to provide the most important annual input of organic matter to the benthos (Graf 1992; Ólafsson and Elmgren 1997). However, the biomass of the spring bloom has been decreasing in recent years in certain parts of the Baltic Sea (Raateoja et al. 2005; Wasmund et al. 1998), with summer blooms of diazotrophic, toxin-producing cyanobacteria increasing in intensity and frequency, with possible consequences for the benthic community. The results of Paper I show that a number of meiofaunal species can incorporate freshly deposited carbon from cyanobacterial blooms without increased mortality. Furthermore, we found that some meiofauna groups assimilate carbon from settling cyanobacterial blooms in considerable quantities. Comparing the results of Paper I with those of Ólafsson et al. (1999) that studied meiofaunal incorporation of carbon from a diatom bloom, we find that meiofauna taxa that assimilated carbon from diatoms showed similar uptake of carbon as from cyanobacteria in our experiment. The findings of Paper I suggest that cyanobacteria can be an important food source for benthic animals. The results in paper II show that meiofauna feeding on cyanobacteria exhibited comparatively low growth, when compared to meiofauna that were fed diatoms. This trend was consistent for all species tested in Paper II. The low meiofaunal growth found in sediments with added cyanobacteria agrees with other studies that found cyanobacteria to be of low nutritional value for both planktonic crustaceans (Engström et al. 2000; Engström-Öst et al. 2002; Koski et al. 2002) and benthic species (Korpinen et al. 2006; Svensen et al. 2005). Paper II found cyanobacteria to be relatively poor in available aminoacids and polyunsaturated fatty acids, suggesting that the low growth of meiofauna that fed on cyanobacteria was due to their poor nutritional quality. In addition, Fewer et al. (2009) recently reported that N. spumigena produces a cocktail of enzyme inhibitors, including spumigins, that 17 have the potential to hinder the growth of crustacean grazers and may explain in part the ecological success of this cyanobacterium in brackish water bodies worldwide. Nevertheless, several experimental studies have shown that aquatic crustaceans are able to survive and grow on a diet of Baltic cyanobacteria (Engström et al. 2000; Koski et al. 2002). It is possible that the settling of summer blooms of cyanobacteria provide these sediments with a much-needed food source at a critical time, when the availability of fresh organic matter is low, after the spring bloom input to the sediments has been exhausted. Although poor in unsaturated fatty acids they may contain other elements that are important for the diet of grazers (Ahlgren et al. 1992).Thus, at least for animals with relatively short life cycles and high energy requirements, such as harpacticoid copepods and to a lower degree the ostracod C. neglecta, organic matter from cyanobacteria seems to be a useful summer food as Paper I demonstrates. Nevertheless, Paper II indicates that meiofaunal growth seems to be critically coupled spring bloom sedimentation, which is supported by the observation that peaks of abundances of meiofauna in the Baltic Sea are related to the input of detritus from the spring bloom (Ólafsson and Elmgren 1997). 4.2. Interspecific competition in soft sediments Paper III found that the rate of incorporation of fresh organic matter by meiofauna was lower in the presence of macrofauna, presumably because of interference competition. In fact, the incorporation of labelled carbon and nitrogen was influenced by both species identity of macrofauna, and the number of macrofauna species present in the treatment, with meiofauna uptake being lowest in the treatment with all three native deposit-feeding macrofaunal species (Monoporeia affinis, Macoma balthica and Pontoporeia femorata). This increased interference at higher macrofaunal species richness is probably related to the different bioturbation activities of the three macrofaunal species hindering ostracod feeding on freshly deposited nitrogen and carbon in complementary ways. The amphipods M. affinis and P. femorata, for example, demonstrate spatial niche segregation with P. femorata feeding at deeper layers of the sediment when in sympatry with M. affinis (Byrén et al. 2006; Hill and Elmgren 1987). Through this spatial segregation macrofauna reduces the sediment volume in which meiofauna can avoid the disturbance caused by macrofaunal 18 activity. The addition of the sediment reworking activities of M. balthica to the disturbance caused by the amphipods will further increase the physical disruption of the sediment and explain why the lowest incorporation of labelled nitrogen and carbon by meiofauna is found at the highest macrofauna diversity. The results in Paper III suggest that macrofaunal interference can force meiofauna to reduce their foraging activity when faced with high frequency of amphipod and bivalve disturbance both at and below the surface. The more time meiofauna individuals spend on avoiding contact with macrofauna, the less time it will have available for feeding, thus, reducing the access of meiofauna to freshly deposited organic matter. This interaction could play an important role in soft sediment community dynamics. A consistent pattern in benthic ecosystems is the faster decrease with water depth of abundance and biomass of macrofaunal species, when compared to meiofauna (Rex et al. 2006; Thiel 1975). This transition to a meiofauna-dominated system is related to a number of factors including to lower food availability (Rex et al. 2006; Thiel 1975). Such a meiofauna-dominated, low energy ecosystem is also seen in the northern Baltic Sea where meiofaunal biomass exceeds that of macrofauna in the Bothnian Bay (Elmgren et al. 1984). As meiofauna in general have lower energy requirements and higher feeding efficiency than macrofauna (Elmgren 1978; Thiel 1975; Warwick 1984), their biomass and abundance decreases at a slower rate with depth, as they are less affected by the low food availability. Our results suggest that meiofauna also benefit from the release from interspecific competition by macrofauna in such low energy ecosystems. With lower abundance and diversity of macrofauna, meiofauna will have better access to the food available, and this will partly counterbalance the lower food availability in deeper ecosystems. 4.3 How are benthic ecosystem processes affected by meiofauna? Papers IV and V clearly show that meiofauna are important for ecosystem processes in benthic systems. Through interactions with the microbial community meiofauna have an impact on the mineralization of phytoplankton material, as well as on the degradation of an anthropogenic pollutant. The direction of this impact was, however, different for the two studied processes. Paper IV shows that meiofauna grazing 19 pressure had a clear positive effect on the rate of mineralization of organic matter, presumably by stimulating the bacterial populations to maintain high growth rates. Furthermore, bioturbation by meiofauna increases nutrient and oxygen fluxes and thus stimulates aerobic degradation of organic matter. Additionally we found that mineralization in sediments with high meiofauna abundance did not increase further when macrofauna was present. This suggests that the meiofauna community can drive organic matter mineralization in sediments with reduced macrofauna abundance, thus increasing resilience of benthic systems regarding the recycling of nutrients. On the other hand, in Paper V we found that the presence of high numbers of meiofauna significantly decreased the degradation of PAH, probably by feeding on PAHdegrading bacteria, thus explaining their reduced numbers in out test sediments. These results improve our understanding of the fate of contaminants in aquatic ecosystems and should be taken into account in bioremediation measures. Paper IV and V taken together highlight the multi-faceted impact of meiofauna on benthic ecosystem processes. Interestingly, we found grazing pressure on microbes to have positive effects on a broad ecosystem function such as degradation of organic matter, which can be performed by a large number of bacterial species. Conversely, this same grazing pressure may be detrimental to ecological processes mediated by fewer, more specialized bacteria, as found in Paper V. 5. CONCLUDING REMARKS AND FUTURE STUDIES This thesis shows that both the type and quality of organic matter that reaches the sediments affect the efficiency of resource utilization by meiofaunal populations. The native Baltic deposit-feeding meiofauna seems to be critically dependent on spring bloom input for growth, even though the amounts of cyanobacterial carbon assimilated by meiofauna suggest that summer bloom of cyanobacteria can provide some additional and perhaps important energy at times of low food availability. As meiofauna also are food for benthic predators (Aarnio 2000; Aarnio et al. 1996), an interesting future research questions is whether the type and quality of settling organic matter has an impact on the nutritional value of meiofauna as prey. A logical continuation of our experimental work in this area would be to confirm with field data the importance of cyanobacteria as a food source for the different meiobenthic groups 20 and to test if meiofauna accumulate cyanotoxins and are transfer vector to higher trophic levels. However, the detection limits of a variety of biochemical techniques constitute an obstacle that will need good equipment and planning to overcome. Biological interactions are extremely important in mediating the fate of organic matter in aquatic sediments. In this thesis we show that interference competition from macrofauna greatly reduces the incorporation of nutrients by meiofauna. In addition, increased macrofaunal species richness also reduced incorporation of bloom material by meiofauna, possibly due to the complementarity in spatial niche use between macrofaunal species that reduce the availability of food for meiofauna. This interaction may help explain how the relation between macrofauna and meiofauna is regulated in soft sediment habitats. Since not all benthic species seem to depend on fresh organic matter for food, an interesting future study area would be to determine how interspecific competition can affect the use of older organic matter present in sediments. It is possible that some meiofauna groups can switch to a higher reliance on older organic matter when faced with strong interference competition by macrofauna. Meiofauna interactions with the microbial community in sediments clearly influence the benthic ecosystem processes studied in my thesis. Meiofauna has a crucial role in benthic ecosystems mediated both through facilitation processes and grazing pressure. These results show that meiofauna has to be taken into account when studying benthic ecosystem processes. It would be interesting to test how these biological interactions depend on the type and quality of settling organic matter. In addition, since top-down effects are a pervasive force in marine systems it would relevant to test how the presence of benthic predators affect the dynamics of use of settling blooms by benthic macro-, meio- and microfauna. 6. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS During the past five years I had the luck and pleasure to work with a number of people which contribution and support made this thesis possible. Foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor Ragnar Elmgren for taking a chance on an unknown student from Madeira. Ragnar is an invaluable source of wisdom and scientific 21 knowledge that spurred many inspiring discussions, not always only about science. His guidance has allowed me to develop greatly as person and given me what I feel is a great foundation for a career within science. Thanks also to Agnes Karlson, my closest partner in this rollercoaster! Agnes’s alertness, constant problem anticipation and readiness to press the panic button have been an excellent complement to my southern European approach to life. Thank you Agnes for being my sister in arms! The “mud gang” was never complete before Johan Näslund joined us. Thanks Johan for all the good food, music and humor that have brightened these past five years. Your (sometimes annoying) ability to always be right, and talent to quickly solve any problem have been a great help! But most of all, thank you both for all the laughs and friendship! I gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the Fundação de Ciência e Tecnologia. I am also very grateful to my assistant supervisor Clare Bradshaw and my coauthors Elena Gorokhova and Jonas Gunnarsson for a great collaboration and all the insightful comments that have helped shape my work. Thank you Jonas for your contagious enthusiasm for ecotoxicology! I am thankful to Emil Ólafsson for all the support at the start of this adventure. I would like to also acknowledge the many people that have assisted me in my experiments: Julia Stempa Tocca, Agnes Simon, Erland Karlson, Elke Mogner and Hanna Axemar. Thank you Satu Viitasalo and Sanna Suikannen for good collaboration in Finland. Thanks to all the PhD students at the department for the joyful environment and the camaraderie. Many thanks to the football gang for good fun every Friday and for their attempt to disguise their disappointment for my painful lack of talent despite my Portuguese genes. Thank you to Katta and Julia for listening (most of the times) patiently to all my moaning and to all my Swedish friends for warming cold Sweden for me. A big “obrigado” to my friends in Portugal that never stopped caring and supporting me despite the distance. I am very grateful Carlos Andrade and Natacha Nogueira (there is no space for your full name!) for your infectious passion for marine science that inspired me to get here. Thank you Tava for all the laughs and for carrying me through my frequent downswings. A special thank you to Lena for being our “family away from home” and proving that quality is more important than quantity. Thank you for being a great aunt, sister and 22 friend! Thanks to Anita, Annika and Lars for welcoming with open arms into their life and making me one of them. Não tenho espaco para mencionar tudo o que devo aos meus pais. Principalmente quero agradecer-lhes a coragem que me deram para perseguir a minha felecidade. Obrigado também pelo infinito apoio que nem a um continente de distância deixou de ser sentido. Obrigado tambem Carolina e Pedro por todo o incentivo. And finally thanks to the two most important people in my life: Åsa and Sofia. Sofia meu amor. Obrigado pela alegria e orgulho que sinto cada vez que olho para ti. Åsa you were the spark that started this journey and the fire that kept it going. None of this would have been possible without your love and constant support. It is an undying privilege to walk this life by your side! 23 7. REFERENCES Aarnio K (2000) Experimental evidence of predation by juvenile flounder Platichthys flesus, on a shallow water meiobenthic community. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 246:125-138 Aarnio K, Bonsdorff E, Rosenback N (1996) Food and feeding habits of juvenile flounder Platichthys flesus (L), and turbot Scophthalmus maximus L in the Aland archipelago northern Baltic Sea. Journal of Sea Research 36:311-320 Ahlgren G, Gustafsson IB, Boberg M (1992) Fatty-acid content and chemical composition of fresh-water microalgae. J. Phycol. 28:37-50 Aller RC, Aller JY (1992) Meiofauna and solute transport in marine muds. Limnol. Oceanogr. 37:1018-1033 Amarasekare P (2002) Interference competition and species coexistence. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269:2541-2550 Andersen FO (1996) Fate of organic carbon added as diatom cells to oxic and anoxic marine sediment microcosms. Marine Ecology-Progress Series 134:225-233 Andersson A, Hajdu S, Haecky P, Kuparinen J, Wikner J (1996) Succession and growth limitation of phytoplankton in the Gulf of Bothnia (Baltic Sea). Marine Biology 126:791-801 Austen MC, Widdicombe S (1998) Experimental evidence of effects of the heart urchin Brissopsis lyrifera on associated subtidal meiobenthic nematode communities. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 222:219-238 Austen MC, Widdicombe S, Villano-Pitacco N (1998) Effects of biological disturbance on diversity and structure of meiobenthic nematode communities. Mar. EcolProg. Ser. 174:233-246 Begon M, Harper J, Townsend C (1990) Ecology: individuals, populations, and communities. Blackwell Scientific Publication, Oxford Bianchi TS, Johansson B, Elmgren R (2000) Breakdown of phytoplankton pigments in Baltic sediments: effects of anoxia and loss of deposit-feeding macrofauna. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 251:161-183 Bianchi TS, Rolff C, Widbom B, Elmgren R (2002) Phytoplankton pigments in Baltic Sea seston and sediments: Seasonal variability, fluxes, and transformations. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 55:369-383 Blair NE, Levin LA, DeMaster DJ, Plaia G (1996) The short-term fate of fresh algal carbon in continental slope sediments. Limnology and Oceanography 41:1208-1219 Boersma M, Kreutzer C (2002) Life at the edge: Is food quality really of minor importance at low quantities? Ecology 83:2552-2561 Boon AR (1998) Benthic-pelagic coupling: the nature and fate of labile organic matter in the benthic environment of the North Sea. In, vol. PhD Thesis. University of Groningen, p 117 Branch GM (1984 ) Competition between marine organisms: ecological and evolutionary implications. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev. 22:429-593 24 Bremer H, Dennis PP (1996) Modulation of chemical composition and other parameters of the cell by growth rate. In: al Ne (ed) Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology 2nd edn. ASM Press, Washington, D.C, pp 1553-1569 Byrén L, Ejdung G, Elmgren R (2006) Uptake of sedimentary organic matter by the deposit-feeding Baltic amphipods Monoporeia affinis and Pontoporeia femorata. Mar. EcolProg. Ser. 313:135-143 Coull BC (1988) Ecology of Marine Meiofauna. In: Higgins RP, Thiel, H. (ed) Introduction to the study of meiofauna. Smithsonian Institution Press, London, pp 19-38 Coull BC (1999) Role of meiofauna in estuarine soft-bottom habitats. Australian Journal of Ecology 24:327-343 Coull BC, Bell SS (1979) Perspectives of Marine Meiofaunal Ecology. In: Livingston LH, Cowell RR (eds) Estuarine Microbial Ecology. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, pp 189-216 DeMott WR, Moxter F (1991) Foraging on cyanobacteria by copepods - Responses to chemichal defenses and resource abundance. Ecology 72:1820-1834 Diaz RJ, Cutter GR, Rhoads DC (1994) The Importance of Bioturbation to Continental-Slope Sediment Structure and Benthic Processes Off Cape-Hatteras, NorthCarolina. Deep-Sea Research Part II-Topical Studies in Oceanography 41:719-& Diaz RJ, Rosenberg R (2008) Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems. Science 321:926-929 Elmgren R (1978) Structure and dynamics of Balthic benthos communities, with particular reference to the relationship between macro- and meiofauna. Kieler Meeresforsch, Sonderh 4:1-22 Elmgren R (1984) Trophic dynamics of the enclosed, brackish Baltic Sea. In: Mer PVRCIE (ed), pp 152-169 Elmgren R, Hill C (1997) Ecosystem Function at Low Biodiversity - The Baltic Example. In: Ormond RFG, J. G, M. A (eds) Marine Biodiversity: Patterns and Processes. Cambridge University Press Cambridge pp 319-336 Elmgren R, Radziejewska T (1989) Recommendations for Quantitative Benthic Meiofauna Studies in the Baltic. Academy of Agriculture, Poland Elmgren R et al. (1984) Benthic Macro- and Meiofauna in the Gulf of Bothnia (Northern Baltic) Finn. Mar. Res. 250:3-18 Engström J, Koski M, Viitasalo M, Reinikainen M, Repka S, Sivonen K (2000) Feeding interactions of the copepods Eurytemora affinis and Acartia bifilosa with the cyanobacteria Nodularia sp. J Plankton Res 22:1403-1409 Engström-Öst J et al. (2002) Effects of toxic cyanobacteria on plankton assemblage: community development during decay of Nodularia spumigena. Marine Ecology-Progress Series 232:1-14 Fewer DP et al. (2009) The non-ribosomal assembly and frequent occurrence of the protease inhibitors spumigins in the bloom-forming cyanobacterium Nodularia spumigena. Mol. Microb. 73:924-937 Findlay S, Tenore KR (1982) Effect of a freee-living nematode (Diplolaimella chitwoodi) on detrital carbon mineralization. Mar. Ecol-Prog. Ser. 8:161-166 Finni T, Kononen K, Olsonen R, Wallström K (2001) The history of cyanobacterial blooms in the Baltic Sea. Ambio 30:172-178 Fry B (2006) Stable Isotope Ecology. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC, New York 25 Gage JD, Tyler PA (1991) Deep-Sea Biology: A Natural History of Organisms at the Deep Sea Floor. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Galloway JN et al. (2003) The nitrogen cascade. Bioscience 53:341-356 Gardner WS, Nalepa TF, Frez WA, Cichocki EA, Landrum PF (1985) Seasonal patterns in lipid-content of Lake-Michigan macroinvertebrates. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 42:1827-1832 Gerlach SA (1978) Food-Chain Relationships in Subtidal Silty Sand MarineSediments and Role of Meiofauna in Stimulating Bacterial Productivity. Oecologia 33:55-69 Giere O (2009) Meiobenthology: The microscopic motile fauna of aquatic sediments, Second edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg Goedkoop W, Demandt M, Ahlgren G (2007) Interactions between food quantity and quality (long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid concentrations) effects on growth and development of Chironomus riparius. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 64:425-436 Goedkoop W, Johnson RK (1996) Pelagic-benthic coupling: Profundal benthic community response to spring diatom deposition in mesotrophic Lake Erken. Limnol Oceanogr 41:636-647 Gorokhova E (2003) Relationships between nucleic acid levels and egg production rates in Acartia bifilosa: implications for growth assessment of copepods in situ. Mar. EcolProg. Ser. 262:163-172 Graf G (1989) Benthic pelagic coupling in a deep-sea benthic community Nature 341:437-439 Graf G (1992) Benthic-pelagic coupling - a benthic view. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev. 30:149-190 Gulati RD, DeMott WR (1997) The role of food quality for zooplankton: remarks on the state-of-the-art, perspectives and priorities. Freshwater Biol. 38:753-768 Gullberg KR, Goedkoop W, Johnson RK (1997) The fate of diatom carbon within a freshwater benthic community - a microcosm study. Limnol. Ocean. 42:452-460 Gustafsson O et al. (2004) Evaluation of the collection efficiency of upper ocean subphotic-layer sediment traps: a 24-month in situ calibration in the open Baltic Sea using Th234. Limol. Oceanogr: Meth 2:62-74 Heilskov AC, Holmer M (2001) Effects of benthic fauna on organic matter mineralization in fish-farm sediments: importance of size and abundance. Ices J. Mar. Sci. 58:427-434 Heiskanen AS (1998) Factors governing sedimentation and pelagic nutrient cycles in the northern Baltic Sea. In, vol. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Helsinki Herman PMJ, Middelburg JJ, Van de Koppel J, Heip CHR (1999) Ecology of estuarine macrobenthos. In: Advances in Ecological Research, Vol 29, vol 29, pp 195-240 Hill C, Elmgren R (1987) Vertical distribution in the sediment in the cooccuring benthic amphipods Pontoporeia affinis and Pontoporeia femorata. Oikos 49:221-229 Höglander H, Larsson U, Hajdu S (2004) Vertical distribution and settling of spring phytoplankton in the offshore NW Baltic Sea proper. Mar. Ecol-Prog. Ser. 283:15-27 Holmer M, Forbes VE, Forbes TL (1997) Impact of the polychaete Capitella sp. I on microbial activity in an organic-rich marine sediment contaminated with the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon fluoranthene. Mar. Biol. 128:679-688 Hoppe HG (1981) Blue-green algae agglomeration in surface water: a microbiotope of high bacterial activity. Kieler Meeresforsch. Sonderh 5 291-303. 26 Jardine TD, McGeachy SA, Paton CM, Savoie M, Cunjak RA (2003) Stable isotopes in aquatic systems: sample preparation, analysis, and interpretation. In: Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Johnson RK (1987) Seasonal variation in diet of Chironomus plumosus (L) and Chironomus anthracinus Zett (Diptera, Chironomidae) in mesotrophic Lake Erken. Freshwater Biol. 17:525-532 Jonsson P, Carman R (1994) Changes in deposition of organic matter and nutirents in the Baltic Sea during the 20th century Marine Pollution Bulletin 28:417-426 Josefson AB, Forbes TL, Rosenberg R (2002) Fate of phytodetritus in marine sediments: functional importance of macrofaunal community. Mar. Ecol-Prog. Ser. 230:71-85 Josefson AB, Hansen JLS (2003) Quantifying plant pigments and live diatoms in aphotic sediments of Scandinavian coastal waters confirms a major route in the pelagicbenthic coupling. Mar. Biol. 142:649-658 Kemp PF (1987) Potential impact on bacteria of grazing by a macrofaunal depositfeeder, and the fate of bacterial production. Mar. Ecol-Prog. Ser. 36:151-161 Kendall C, Sklash MG, Bullen TD (1995) Isotope Tracers of Water and Solute Sources in Catchments. In: Trudgill ST (ed) Solute Modelling in Catchment Systems,. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, New York, pp 261-303 Kononen K, Nommann S, Hansen G, Hansen R, Breuel G, Gupalo E (1992) Spatial Heterogeneity and Dynamics of Vernal Phytoplankton Species in the Baltic Sea in April May 1986. J. Plankton Res. 14:107-125 Korpinen S, Karjalainen M, Viitasalo M (2006) Effects of cyanobacteria on survival and reproduction of the littoral crustacean Gammarus zaddachi (Amphipoda). Hydrobiologia 559:285-295 Koski M et al. (2002) Calanoid copepods feed and produce eggs in the presence of toxic cyanobacteria Nodularia spumigena. Limnol Oceanogr 47:878-885 Kristensen E, Ahmed SI, Devol AH (1995) Aerobic and anaerobic decomposition of organic matter in marine sediment: Which is fastest? Limnology and Oceanography 40:14301437 Kristensen E, Andersen FO, Blackburn TH (1992) Effects of benthic macrofauna and temperature on degradation of macroalgal detritus- The fate of organic carbon Limnol. Ocean. 37:1404-1419 Kristensen E, Mikkelsen OL (2003) Impact of the burrow-dwelling polychaete Nereis diversicolor on the degradation of fresh and aged macroalgal detritus in a coastal marine sediment. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 265:141-153 Lajtha K, Michener R (1994) Stable Isotopes in Ecology and Environmental Science. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Ltd., England, Oxford Larsson U, Elmgren R, Wulff F (1985) Eutrophication and the Baltic Sea- Causes and consequences. Ambio 14:9-14 Lehtonen KK, Andersin AB (1998) Population dynamics, response to sedimentation and role in benthic metabolism of the amphipod Monoporeia affinis in an open-sea area of the northern Baltic Sea. Mar. Ecol-Prog. Ser. 168:71-85 Lignell R et al. (1993) Fate of a phytoplankton spring bloom- Sedimentation and carbon flow in the planktonic food web in the Northern Baltic. Mar. Ecol-Prog. Ser. 94:239252 27 Limén H, Ólafsson E (2002) Ostracod species-specific utilisation of sediment detritus and newly settled cyanobacteria, Aphanizomenon sp., in the Baltic Sea: evidence from stable carbon isotopes. Mar Biol 140:733-738 Marinelli RL, Waldbusser GG (2005) Plant-Animal-Microbe Interactions in Coastal Sediments: Closing the Ecological Loop In: E. K, Hease RH, Kostka JE (eds) Interactions Between Macro- and Microorganisms in Marine Sediments., vol 60. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C, pp 233-249 Melvasalo T, Pawlak J, Grasshoff K, Thorell L, Tsiban A (1981) Assessment of the effects of pollution on the natural resources of the Baltic Sea, 1980. In: Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings No. 5 B. Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission Menge BA (2000) Top-down and bottom-up community regulation in marine rocky intertidal habitats. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 250:257-289 Meysman FJR, Middelburg JJ, Heip CHR (2006) Bioturbation: a fresh look at Darwin's last idea. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21:688-695 Michener R, Schell DM (1994) Stable isotope ratios as tracers in marine aquatic food webs. In: Lajtha K, Michener R (eds) Stable Isotopes in Ecology and Environmental Science. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Ltd., England, Oxford Modig H, van de Bund WJ, Ólafsson E (2000) Uptake of phytodetritus by three ostracod species from the Baltic Sea: effects of amphipod disturbance and ostracod density. Mar. Ecol-Prog. Ser. 202:125-134 Norkko J, Norkko A, Thrush SF, Cummings VJ (2005) Detecting growth under environmental extremes: Spatial and temporal patterns in nucleic acid ratios in two Antarctic bivalves. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 326:144-156 Ólafsson E, Elmgren R (1991) Effects of biological disturbance by benthic amphipods Monoporeia affinis on meiobenthic community structure - a laboratory approach. Mar. Ecol-Prog. Ser. 74:99-107 Ólafsson E, Elmgren R (1997) Seasonal dynamics of sublittoral meiobenthos in relation to phytoplankton sedimentation in the Baltic Sea. Est. Coast. Shelf Sci. 45:149-164 Ólafsson E, Ullberg J, Arroyo NL (2005) The clam Macoma balthica prevents in situ growth of microalgal mats: implications for meiofaunal assemblages. Mar. Ecol-Prog. Ser. 298:179-188 Osinga R, Kop AJ, Malschaert JFP, VanDuyl FC (1997) Effects of the sea urchin Echinocardium cordatum on bacterial production and carbon flow in experimental benthic systems under increasing organic loading. J. Sea Res. 37:109-121 Poutanen EL, Nikkilä K (2001) Carotenoid pigments as tracers of cyanobacterial blooms in recent and post-glacial sediments of the Baltic Sea. Ambio 30:179-183 Raateoja M, Seppala J, Kuosa H, Myrberg K (2005) Recent changes in trophic state of the Baltic Sea along SW coast of Finland. Ambio 34:188-191 Rabalais NN, Turner RE, Wiseman WJ (2002) Gulf of Mexico hypoxia, aka "The dead zone". Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33:235-263 Reid D, Orlova M (2002) Geological and evolutionary underpinnings for the success of Ponto-Caspian species invasions in the Baltic Sea and North American Great Lakes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59:1144-1158 Rex MA et al. (2006) Global bathymetric patterns of standing stock and body size in the deep-sea benthos. Mar. Ecol-Prog. Ser. 317:1-8 28 Rice DL (1986) Early diagenesis in bioadvective sediments- Relationships between the diagenesis of Beryllium-7, sediment reworking rates, and the abundance of the conveyor belt deposit feeders. J. Mar. Res. 44:149-184 Richoux NB, Thompson RJ, Delbel D, Parrish CC (2004) Seasonal and developmental variation in the lipids of Acanthostepheia malmgreni (Amphipoda) from the hyperbenthos of a cold-ocean environment (Conception Bay, Newfoundland). J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 84:1189-1197 Rieper M (1978) Bacteria as Food for Marine Harpacticoid Copepods. Mar. Biol. 45:337-345 Rudnick DT (1989) Time lasgs between the deposition and meiobenthic assimilation of phytodetritus. Mar. Ecol-Prog. Ser. 50:231-240 Rudnick DT, Oviatt CA (1986) Seasonal lags between organic carbon deposition and mineralization in marine sediments. J. Mar. Res. 44:815-837 Rumohr H (1996) Monitoring the marine environment with imaging methods (vol 59, pg 129, 1995). Scientia Marina 60:U4-U4 Rysgaard S, Christensen PB, Sorensen MV, Funch P, Berg P (2000) Marine meiofauna, carbon and nitrogen mineralization in sandy and soft sediments of Disko Bay, West Greenland. Aquat. Microbi. Ecol. 21:59-71 Schimel DS (1993) Theory and Application of Tracers. CA: Academic, San Diego Schratzberger M, Warwick RM (1999) Impact of predation and sediment disturbance by Carcinus maenas (L.) on free-living nematode community structure. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 235:255-271 Schwinghamer P (1981) Characteristic size distribuition of integral benthic communities Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38:1255-1263 Sellner KG (1997) Physiology, ecology, and toxic properties of marine cyanobacteria blooms. Limnol. and Oceanogr. 42:1089-1104. Snelgrove PVR (1999) Getting to the bottom of marine biodiversity: Sedimentary habitats - Ocean bottoms are the most widespread habitat on Earth and support high biodiversity and key ecosystem services. Bioscience 49:129-138 Solan M, Cardinale BJ, Downing AL, Engelhardt KAM, Ruesink JL, Srivastava DS (2004) Extinction and ecosystem function in the marine benthos. Science 306:1177-1180 Svensen C et al. (2005) Reduction of cyanobacterial toxins through coprophagy in Mytilus edulis. Harmful Algae 4:329-336 Tenore KR, Cammen L, Findlay SEG, Phillips N (1982) Perpectives of research on detritus- Do factors controlloing the availability of detritus to macro-consumers depend on its source J. Mar. Res. 40:473-490 Tenore KR, Tietjen JH, Lee JJ (1977) Effect of Meiofauna on Incorporation of Aged Eelgrass, Zostera-Marina, Detritus by Polychaete Nephthys-Incisa. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 34:563-567 Thiel H (1975) The size structure of the deep-sea benthos. Int Rev Ges Hydrobio 60:575-606 Tietjen JH (1980) Population-Structure and Species Composition of the Free-Living Nematodes Inhabiting Sands of the New-York Bight Apex. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 10:6173 Van Cappellen P (2003) Biomineralization and global biogeochemical cycles. In: Dove PM, DeYoreo JJ, Weiner S (eds) Biomineralization, vol 54, pp 357-381 29 van de Bund WJ, Ólafsson E, Modig H, Elmgren R (2001) Effects of the coexisting Baltic amphipods Monoporeia affinis and Pontoporeia femorata on the fate of a simulated spring diatom bloom. Marine Ecology-Progress Series 212:107-115 Vanduyl FC, Kop AJ (1994) Bacterial Production in North-Sea Sediments - Clues to Seasonal and Spatial Variations. Mar. Biol. 120:323-337 Vargas CA, Escribano R, Poulet S (2006) Phytoplankton food quality determines time windows for successful zooplankton reproductive pulses. Ecology 87:2992-2999 Vrede T, Persson J, Aronsen G (2002) The influence of food quality (P : C ratio) on RNA : DNA ratio and somatic growth rate of Daphnia. Limnol. Oceanogr. 47:487-494 Wagner MM, Campbell RG, Boudreau CA, Durbin EG (2001) Nucleic acids and growth of Calanus finmarchicus in the laboratory under different food and temperature conditions. Mar. Ecol-Prog. Ser. 221:185-197 Warwick RM (1984) Species size distribution in marine benthic communities Oecologia 61:32-40 Warwick RM, Dashfield SL, Somerfield PJ (2006) The integral structure of a benthic infaunal assemblage. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 330:12-18 Wasmund N, Nausch G, Matthaus W (1998) Phytoplankton spring blooms in the southern Baltic Sea - spatio-temporal development and long-term trends. J. Plankton Res. 20:1099-1117 Weaver F (ed) (2003) The Baltic Marine Environment 1999-2002. Helcom Webb DG, Montagna PA (1993) Initial Burial and Subsequent Degradation of Sedimented Phytoplankton - Relative Impact of Macrobenthos and Meiobenthos. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 166:151-163 Wilson WH (1990) Competition and predation in marine soft-sediment communities. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21:221-241 Yingst JY, Rhoads DC (1980) The role of bioturbation in the enhancement of baterial growth rates in marine sediments. In: Tenore KR, Coull BC (eds) Marine Benthic Dynamics. University South Carolina Press, , Columbia, pp 407-421. 30