Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Essays of an Information Scientist, Vol:5, p.686-694, 1981-82 Current Contents, #38, p.5-13, September 20, 1982 Since 1816 the John Scott and Other Awarsls Have Recognized “Useful” Philadelphia Scientific Dfssover$es-lames Black and Benjamin Rubfn Head a fM of Recent Distinguished Recipients Number 38 September 20, 1982 $4,000 to the City of Philadelphia. He probably chose Philadelphia because he was a great admirer of Benjamin Frank- If you were to ask the average person to name a scientific award, you would doubtless hear the Nobel Prize named. Besides the Nobel, though, most people would be hard pressed to name many more. In a forthcoming essay on “nonNobel awards,” I will discuss several science awards that are well known to many scientists but are not, perhaps, as famous as they should be. When I first contemplated this essay I had the immediate objective of calling to your attention the work of several award committees on which I have served. The granting of awards is an important part of the reward system of science, but it is not generally known how pervasive a phenomenon it has become. Awards in science come in all sizes and shapes and it would be impossible to name and discuss them all in a reasonable amount of space. A brief discussion of Philadelphia-based science awards follows. I hope it will prove to be an interesting sampling. It also provides me the opportunity to promote our city during its 300th anniversary celebration. 1 Over 100 science awards are given by local and national organizations based in Philadelphia.z Many of them have formidable traditions of their own. One such award is the John Scott Award. It is certainly one of the oldest science awards in the US. John Scott, an Edinburgh chemist, founded the award in 1816 by willing lin. To date about 500 people have received the award, which Scott intended to go to “ingenious men and women who make useful inventions. ” Scott’s endowment was to be invested to create a fund for honoraria. Each award now includes an honorarium of about $5,000 and is given annually by the Philadelphia Board of Directors of City Trusts.s The John Scott Award Advisory Committee consists of Chairman William A. Meehan, president, Board of Directors of City Trusts; Randall M. Whaley, president, University City Science Center; Francis Plowman, former vice president, Scott Paper Co.; Ruth J. Armour, secretary, Board of Directors of City Trusts; C. Marshall Dann, patent attorney; Eugene Garfield, president, ISI”; Charles Price, emeritus professor of chemistry, University of Pennsylvania; Jonathan E. Rhoads, professor of surgery, University of Pennsylvania; Sidney Weinhouse, director, Fels Research Institute, Temple University School of Medicine; and Percy A. Wells, former director, Eastern Regional US Department of Agriculture Laboratory. The committee welcomes carefully documented nominations. The award is not restricted to Philadelphians, or even to Americans. Citizens of many coun- 686 tries have been honored, The list of recipients includes such names as Marie Curie, Orville Wright, Thomas Edison, Guglielmo Marconi, Nikola Tesla, Edwin H. Land, Vannevar Bush, Alexander Fleming, Glenn T. Seaborg, John Bardeen, Jonas Salk, and ISI’S neighbor R. Buckminster Fuller. Many other Scott Award recipients are not as well known. But they certainly fulfilled Scott’s dictum that the award be given to the makers of useful inventions. In 1922, for example, Elwood Haynes received the award for developing stainless steel. Inventor Robert Temple got the award in 1931 for making a dough mixing and kneading device. Paul M. Zoll was the recipient in 1967 for developing the pacemakers Better known to Current Contentsa (CC@ ) readers is Oliver H. Lowry, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, the citation laureate. He received the Scott Award in 1963 for a method for isolating, preparing, weighing, and chemically studying single nerve cells and subcellular particles.d I have already commented in detail about his famous paper on protein determinations which he himself discussed in a Citation C[assic.b A more recent recipient, in 1978, was Bruce N. Ames, University of California, Berkeley, for his test for mutagenicity. The 1981 corecipient of the Scott Award was Sir James Whyte Black. He was given this recognition for work which led to the development of two important drugs. Black was elected to the Royal Society in 1976, and since 1978 has been director of therapeutic research at Wellcome Research Laboratories, UK. He was born in Scotland in 1924 and has lectured at the University of St. Andrews and at the University of Glasgow. He has also been head of the department of pharmacology at Universit y College London, and deputy director of research at SmithKline Corp.3 687 Hlactc was nonorea ror tne lYo4 alscovery of propranolol, a drug used to treat angina, arrhythmia, and hypertension. T (p. 393-4) It has also been shown useful in preventing migraine headaches and in prolonging the lives of heart attack patients.g Marketed in the US by Ayerst Laboratories as Inderal, propranolol is one of a family of drugs known as beta blockers. According to a recent review of the subject, beta blockers are so known because they block the absorption of hormones by sites in the nervous system called beta-receptors. Blocking these receptors causes the heart to slow down so that it uses less oxygen. It also lowers the blood pressure. 10 The idea of beta blockers was conceived in 1906 when H.H. Dale found that involuntary responses of various organs were inhibited by certain afkaloids. This led R.P. Ahlquist and others to investigate different types of receptor cells. However, it was not until 1958 that researchers at Eli Lilly Laboratories were able to block some of the beta responses to isoprenaline, a chemical involved in respiration. 10 Though beta blockers are not new, Black and colleagues were the first to recognize their real clinical potential. to They theorized that anginal pain, which results from lack of oxygen to the heart as it beats faster, might be reduced by blocking the stimulants that increase heart rate. Working with chemist J.S. Stephenson, Black discovered the first clinically useful beta blocker, called pronethalol. But to be effective, pronethalol had to be used in high doses, and these doses seemed to cause cancer in mice. So the researchers went on to develop proprano1o1, a drug ten times stronger than pronethalol. 10 Propranolol does have some side effects. It can cause low blood pressure, fatigue, faintness, bizarre dreams, occa- sional depression, and gastrointestinal problems. But not many patients experience these side effects, and the effects can usually be avoided by taking lower dosages.1~ In addition to those who have benefited from this drug, there are also millions of others who suffer from chronic duodenal ulcer. They should feel, as I do, personally grateful to Black for his other major discovery. His research on H2 antagonists laid the groundwork for cimetidine. Cimetidine is the anti-ulcer drug marketed worldwide by SmithKline. In the US it goes under the trade name Tagamet. 1I Gastric and duodenal ulcers may be caused by excess secretion of gastric acid, or, in some patients, by the inability of the mucosa to absorb nonmal amounts of acid, The secretion of gastric acid is influenced by the hormone histamine. Histamine causes the release of chemicals when it interacts with points along cell walls known as H-receptors. According to a reminiscence by William A.M. Duncan and Michael E. Parsons, two of Black’s colleagues, Black theorized that there are really two types of H-receptors. H, -receptors cause allergic reactions and cold symptoms such as runny eyes and sore throat. Antihistamines suppress those symptoms. But they do not suppress the release of gastric acid, which theoretically occurs when histamine binds with the second type of H-receptor, called the H2-receptor. 12 In 1964, a team of scientists at SmithKline, led by Black, began to search for a way to block that histamine-H2 reaction. They wanted to make a “key” that would fit into the receptor “lock” even better than histamine did, but would not cause gastric acid secretion.lz amide, was not potent enough. In 1971 the team produced metiamide, which is strong enough to be effective in humans. In late 1972, as Black left SmithKline, metiamide turned out to adversely affect laboratory animals. So a new compound had to be found. Cimetidine was made at SmithKline late in 1972, first marketed in the UK in 1976, and approved by the Food and Drug Administration for US use nine months later. While Black did not directly participate in the synthesis of cimetidine, his basic research laid the essential groundwork. 12 Cimetidine is still not perfect. There have been reports that it can cause impotence or low sperm count. 13 Ironically, more recent reports indicate it may also help prevent cancer. 14 More research needs to be done on cimetidine, but there is no doubt that it or other H2 antagonists are the most successful methods now available for combating ulcers. Black’s original paper on H2-receptors has accrued over 1,000 citations. 15 Based on Science Citation Index@ (SCF ) data, onfy about 300 papers have ever achieved this distinction, and only 17 were published between 1972 and 1980. Many of Black’s other papers have been well cited, from about 50 timesl+lq to over 100 times,z@zd Both propranolol and cimetidine are now the subject of intensely active fields of research. Tables 1 and 2 list the titles of the most active research fronts identified in the 1982 ISI/BIOMED’w online file. The literature on these compounds is enormous. In 1981, the John Scott Award Committee also recognized another inventive, large-scale contribution to health. It selected Benjamin A. Rubin, the inventor of the bifurcated needle. The World Health Organization used it in its Black’s team tested about 700 compounds. It didn’t find an effective H2 antagonist until 1970. This drug, burim- global campaign to eradicate smallpox.zs Rubin began working on a way to apply smallpox vaccine in 1961, when he 688 Table 1: fSI/BIOMED on propranolol. research .. . front specialties Researeh Front Name Code Number 79-0932 79-1331 ‘“ Long-term propranolol therapy Plasma concentrations of pr~ pranolol 79-19s0 80-0312 80-1809 8C-2205 80-2234 W-2461 81-1185 81-2078 and hypertension Propranolol in chronic schizophrenia Beta-adrenergic receptor blocklng therapy by propranolol in myncardiaf infarction Propranolol beta-blockhg activity in thyrotoxicosis and hyperthyroid treatment Effects of propranolol on CNS betaadrenergic receptors during .mtihypertensive therapy Propranolol as a beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist in tryptamineinduced behavioral changes in rodents Pharmacokinetics of propranolol Propranolol, chlorpromazine and beta-adrenergic blocking drugs in schizophrenia Propranolol Table 2: ISI/BIOMED on cimetidlne. Cnde Number ‘“ research Research I front specialties Frnm Name 79-0204 Cimetidlne effects on pro factin secretion 79-0538 Cimetidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcer 80-(?563 Cfinical evaluation of cimetidine on gastrointestinal ulcers fu3-0+64 Cimetidine effects on pituitary and gastric secretion 80-1416 Effects of cimetidine and pancreatic enzymes foflowing pancreaticreplacement therapy 80-1701 Cfinical aapects of cimetidine 80-1984 Pharmacology of cimetidhe in treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding 81-0265 Effects of histamine antagonists, cimetidine and ranitidine on H-receptors 81-0347 Effects of cimetidlne 81-0417 T-ceU-response to hstamine 81-0S46 Cirnetidhe for the treatment of gastroesophageal reffux 81-0677 Management of peptic ulcers with cimetidlne and other drugs 81-1007 Cfinical pharmacokinetics of cimetidine 81-1369 Cimetidine and cytopenia 81-1X)7 Dnig interactions with cimetidhe 81-2292 Effects of cimetidlne on calcitonin and calcium transport 689 . . ... . .. . ... wltn I exme couaoorarea Keaamg Machines Company of Pennsylvania, now a division of RockweU International. A new method of freeze-drying vaccine had made the earlier method, using capillary tubes, obsolete, because capillary tubes wasted vaccine. So Rubin tried to design a needle that would hold less vaccine and be easier to use. He ground down the eyes of sewing needles to make pronged forks. These prongs held exactly 1 mg of fluid vaccine. Later, Rubin sharpened the needle so that it could be used to scar as well as puncture the skin, and thus use much less vaccine than older techniques.zb Using Rubin’s modified sewing needle as a prototype, Reading Textile Machines began mass production. The simplicity of the device also allowed a vaccinator to be trained in about 15 minutes. It greatly increased the vaccination success rate. 26 Rubin, born in 1917, has followed a career which encompasses radiology, genetics, endocrinology, chemistry, pathology, and microbiology. A prol~lc author in his many fields, Rubin has published over 135 papers on subjects including gene mutation, 27influenza, 28radiation microbiology,zg steroids,~ immunology and cancer,Jl rabies virus,3z the separation of viral components in zero gravity, 33 and protein synthesis inhibitors.3’t He is now manager of biological product development at Wyeth Laboratories, Radnor, Pennsylvania. The John Scott Award is not, of course, the only prestigious scienttilc award based in Philadelphia. Phdadelphia is not only a large city; it was the original capital of the US. So not surprisingly it has a long tradition of science. There are many other awards but space doesn’t permit me to list them all, Indeed, most of the organizations listed below administer more awards than those that we have the space to name. The following brief overview should give an impression of the variety of individuals and fields recognized in this city. Phdadelphla’s tradition of excellence in the biomedical sciences was demonstrated recently when I described the Wistar Institute.ss Considering the fact that there are five medical schools in Philadelphia, it’s no surprise that there are many prizes in biomedicine. In 1958, for example, the American Colfege of Physicians (ACP), located in Philadelphia since 1923, established the annual ACP Award, with a gold medal, for medical research. The 1982 award went to Daniel Nathans, Johns Hopkins University. Nathans was corecipient of the 1978 Nobel Prize for Physiology or Meditine.Jb He was also among the f ,000 most-cited contemporary scientists.g7 The American Society of Cytology (ASC), based in Philadelphia since 1962, also sponsors several awards. One is named after George Papanicolaou, inventor of the “Pap smear” method to detect uterine cancer. This annual award includes a bronze medal and a $750 honorarium. In 1979, the award went to Torbjom O. Caspersson for his work in cellular physics.~ Caspersson, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, also appeared in our study of 1,000 mostcited contemporary scientists. s7 In 1972, Caspersson received another yearly ASC award, the Guest Lectureship Award on Basic Cell Research in Cytology. Other 1,000 most-cited authors who received it are Paul Eston Lacy ( 1981), Baruj Benacerraf ( 1980), Joseph Louis Melnick ( 1978), Emmanuel Farber ( 1977), Robert Alan Good (1974). Don Wayne Fawcett (1971), Zanvil A. Cohn ( 1970), and Harris Busch ( 1968).s7 The award carries a $500 honorarium. The American Philosophical Society (ApS). founded by Franklin and others in 1743, has a number of awards in the life sciences as well as other fields. One of them is for research in neurobiology. 690 The award is named after its founder, Karl Spencer Lashley, the neurobiologist. It was established in 1957, the year before his death. Among the recipients is Nobelist Roger Wolcott Sperry. He received the Lashley Award in 1976.s9 Included with this annual award is an honorarium of $2,000. The APS also administers the John F. Lewis Prize for “some truth which the Council of the Society shall deem worthy of the award. ”sQ It was established in 1935 with a $10,000 donation by Lewis’s wife, in her husbands memory. This $300 annual award is not restricted to science. The 1979 award, for example, went to Roland Mushat Frye, University of Pennsylvania, for a paper on Milton’s influence on the visual arts.qo But since the award was established in 1935, it has been bestowed on authors of papers dealing with spectroscopy, ql paleontology.42 population biology and economics,~s hummingbirds, A4 the placenta, ~s and the lunar surface. ~bThe 1977 winner was Choh Hao Li, Hormone Research Laboratory, University of California, This pharmacologist, San Francisco. also among the 1,000 most-cited scientists,37 was honored for a paper on pituitary hormones.’rT Yet another APS award falls into the natural sciences category. John Hyacinth de Magellan, descendant of Ferdinand Magellan, donated to the APS funds for an award for the most useful invention in navigation, astronomy, or natural philosophy, Today the award is called the Magellanic Premium, and includes a gold medal.jQ It is bestowed irregularly, The most recent selection neatly combines the fields of navigation and the life sciences. It was given in 1980 to Martin Lindauer, University of Wiirzburg, Federal Republic of Germany, for his studies on animal orientation and flight guidance, ~~ The natural sciences are well represented by the awards of the Academy of card. L.S. B. Leakey, noted for his landmark work in human paleontology, received it in 1964. Appropriately enough, the award has also gone to an astronaut turned geologist, Harrison Schmitt. He is the only scientist so far to walk on the moon, and is now a member of the US Senate. Exploration is also the field for which the Geographical Society of Philadelphia gives honors. Its Elisha Kent Kane Gold Medal was established in 1900. This medaf is named after the Philadelphia native who in the nineteenth century explored the Arctic while on an unsuccessful expedition to rescue another exploration team. Kane spent two years marooned on Greenland before he was rescued in 1855. Kane Medal recipients have included Arctic explorer Robert E. Peary (1902); aviator Richard E. Byrd (1926); William R. Anderson (1959), commander of the nuclear submarine Nauti/us; Jacques-Yves Cousteau ( 1961); John H. Glenn, Jr. (1%2), another astronaut turned senator; and astronaut M. Scott Carpenter ( 1968).54 The medal is awarded irregularly. Physical sciences are well covered by Philadelphia-based awards. The Franklin Institute sponsors many of them. The Franklin Medal, for instance, is a gold medal given annually to physical science or technology workers who have done the most to advance or apply physicaf knowledge. Stephen W. Hawking, the well-known British astrophysicist, received the award in 1981 for his revolutionary work on cosmology, relativity, and black holes, 55 Natural Sciences. The academy was founded in Philadelphia in 1812. The Joseph Leidy Medal is given every three years, for publication or exploration in natural science.@ Leidy (1823-1891) was a physician noted for his work on parasitology and paleontology. The award inchrdes a bronze medal and a $500 honorarium. The Leidy Medal was given in 1979 to Edward O. Wilson, Harvard for his research on the University, classification of ants. Wilson, of course, is better known to the public as the founder of the controversial field of sociobiology.~ Other recipients have been Henry A. Pilsbry (1928), known for research on shellfish, sl and Ernst Mayr (1946), noted for his work on evolution. 52 The academy also has an award for research in geology and paleontology. It’s called the Hayden Memorial Geological Award. A bronze medal and $500 comes with it. It was founded in 1888 by Emma W. Hayden, in honor of her husband, who was an early director of the American Geological Survey. One of the earliest recipients of the award was Thomas Huxley, in 1893. The most recent recipient is Daniel Isaac Axelrod, University of California, Davis. He got the award in 1979. He too is known for hw research on evolution.ss This prize is awarded every three years. The academy’s Gold Medal, though not specifically for science, is another noteworthy natural science award. It was founded in 1980 to honor artists who deal with natural sciences subjects. It has been given to both Ansel Adams and Roger Tory Peterson.@ The Academy of Natural Sciences also presents an occasional award for exploration in the natural sciences. This prize, the Richard Hopper Day Memorial Medal, was established in 1960 by Margaret Day Dilks, in honor of her grandfather.ag One of the first recipients was famed deep-sea diver Jacques Pic- Another sciences Franklin award, the Institute John Price physicaf Wetherill Medal, is a gold medaf bestowed in recognition of new physics discoveries, or for new combinations of older principles and methods. In 1981, the award went to five IBM researchers for their work on the physics of transistors. The recipients were Frank Fang, Afan Fowler, Web- 691 abstracting and mdextng. Keclplents deliver the Miles Conrad Lecture. The annual award is named after my close friend and colleague. Miles was also the first president of NFAIS. The 1980 lecture, by Carlos A. Cuadra, Cuadra Associates, Inc., considered how and whether publishers may survive the technology explosion of the 1980s.58 The 1981 lecture, by Russell J. Rowlett, Jr,, Chemical Abstracts Service, dealt with the changing role of the abstract. sg Rowlett retires this year and will be missed by all his friends, The 1982 lecture, by Saul Hemer, Hemer and Co,, dealt with the business and science aspects of abstracting and indexing services.~ My association with Herner goes back to 1951 when we were both affiliated with Johns Hopkins University. I am certain that most award committees, including the ones I serve on, are glad to receive suggestions for candidates, especially those who have not been adequately recognized in the past. Too often suggestions are received naming scientists who have been widely and amply recognized for their accomplishments. As our studies have repeatedly stressed, the world of science is large and blessed with an incredible number of brilliant people. The democracy of science demands that more of them be recognized publicly. In Philadelphia, at least, we are trying to be a little bit more systematic about it. ster Howard, Frank Stem, and Philip Stiles. Another Franklin award, the Albert A. Michelson Medal, goes to contributors to the field of optics. The 1982 Michelson Medal was given to Hermann P. Haken, University of Stuttgart, Federal Republic of Germany, for his work in quantum optics and laser theory .55 Theoretical and applied mathematics are also recognized by Philadelphiabased awards. The Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), founded in 1952, sponsors several such awards. sb The Norbert Weiner Prize was established in 1967 for contributions to applied mathematics, It is awarded every five years and carries an honoranum of S300. It is cosponsored by the American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island. Three of the four recipients—Richard Ernest Bellman, University of Southern California; Peter David Lax, New York University; and Tosio Kate, University of California, Berkeley—appeared on our list of mostcited mathematicians. Three recipients of the John von Neumann Lecture Award also appeared on our list, That yearly award was established in 1960 to recognize a lecturer who shows how pure mathematics contributes to applied math. The most-cited math list recipients were Lars Valerian Ahlfors ( 1960), and Garrett Birkhoff Lax (1968), (1981).s7 Naturally, I’m happy to report that information science is represented. The National Federation of Abstracting and Information Services (NFAIS), founded in Philadelphia in 1958, offers the Miles Conrad Memorial Award to recognize outstanding contributors to the field of ***** My thanks to Sue Klingler, Thomas Marcinko, Dorothy Silver, and Amy Stone for their help in the preparation of this essay. 0,%2tsl REFERENCES 1. Garflekf E. You’re invited to hMIOriCPhdadelphia for the tercen(ennial. Current Con/enls ( 11:5-13, 4 January 1982. 2. Wmaemnm P, ed. A wards, honors& prize~. Detroit, MI: Ga[e Research, 3. Board of DfrecIora 4. Lowry O H. 01 City TrusIs. The chemical John Scott Medal study of single neurons. 692 fund. IJnpublished 1978. report, Harvey .Lecf 58: I-19, 1973. Vol. 1981.8 1. p. 5. Garfield E. Citation frequency as a measure of research activity and performance. .Essa,us of an information $cientis/. Phdadelphm: 1S1 Press, 1977. Vol. 1, p. 406-8, (Reprinted from: LOW O H. Citation Current Classic. Corrten/s (5):5-7, 31 January 1973. ) Commentary on /. Biol Cftem. 193:265, 1951. Currerrl Confents (1):7, 3 January 1977. 7, Jmsdbacher K J, Adams R D, Brmmwald E, Petersdorf R G & Wffson J D. Principles of internal McGraw-Hill, 1980. 2 vols. medicine. New York: 8. Heart drug approved for migraine headaches. Chem. Week 124( 10):35, 1979. 9, KoJata G B. Drug found to help heart attack survivors. Science 214:774-5, 1981. 10. Le Count D J. Atenolol. (Bindra J S & Lednicer D, eds. ) Cffmnic[e$ of drug discovery. New York: Wiley, 1982. Vol. 1, p. 113-32. 11, Gmffeld E. Aff about ulcers, antacids, and how little we know. Emay.r of an irrformdiotr Philadelphia: 1S1 Press, 1981. Vol. 4, p. 666-73. mientist, (Reprinted from: Current Confenfs (45):5-12, 10 November 1980.) 12, Duncan W A M & Pmsnns M E. R eministences of the development of cimetidine. Ga$moertterology 78:62@5, 1980. 13. Van ThJeJ D H, Gavaler J S, Smith W I & Paul G. Hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal dysfunction in men using cimetidine, N. Engl. J. hfed, 3@3: 1012-5, 1979. 14. Ulcer drug may fight cancer... .$ci. IVewJ 119:326, 1981. 15. Bfack J W, Duncan W A M, Durant G J, Ganelffn C R & Parsons M E. Definition and antagonism of histamine H2-receptors. Nature 236:385-90, 1972. 16, Bfack J W, CrowtJrer A F, .%anks R G, %.dth L H & Dornborat A C. A new adrenergic betareceptor antagonist. L4ncet 1: I08C-1, 1964, 17. WyfJJcJ H, EaJdJng W D P, Hesaelbo T & Black J W. Inhibition of gsatric secretion in man by metiamide: a new, orally active histamine H2-receptor antagonist, Gut 14:424, 1973. 18. Bfack J W, Dumstt G 1, Emmett J C & Ganefffn C R. Sulphur-methylene isnsterism in the development of metiamide, a new histamine H2-receptor antagonist. Narure 248:6$7, 1974. 19. Black J W, Owen D A A & Parsons M E. An analysis of the depressor responses to h~tamine in the cat and dog: involvement of both H ~- and H2-receptors. Bn”t. J. Pharntacol, 54:319-24, 1975. 20. Bfack J W & Stephenson J S. Pharmacology of a new adrenergic beta-receptor-blncking compound (Nethalide). Luncet 2:311-4, 1%2. 21. Bhck J W, Dmtcan W A M & Shanks R G. Comparison of some properties of pronethalol and propranolol. JJriI. J Pfrurmacol. 25:577-91, 1965, 22, Wylffe J H, Hasselbo T & Bfack J W. Effects in man of histamine H2-receptor blockade by burimamide, Lancet 2:1117-20, 1972. 23. Bfack J W, Duncan W AM, Emmett J C, Ganelffu C R, Hesselbo T, Parsons M E & Wyfffe J H. Metiamid+an omlly active histamine H2-receptor antagonist. 6. Agent. 24, Action. 3:133-7, 1973. Dumnt G J, Pmsnm M E & Bbck J W. Potential hislamine Na.g”any~itamine. J. Med. Chent. 18:83@3. 1975 H2-receptor antagonists. 2. 25, NamJn R, Murthy S S & SmJIymmrayMa Rso D L. Results of a B.C.G. vaccination with the bifurcated needle. Indian J. Med. Res 62: 15%605, 1974. of the bifurcated needle for smallpox vaccination. 26, Rubfo B A. A note on the development WHO Chrnn. 34: 18@l, 1980, 27. ---------------- Detection of the mutagenic effect of transmutation, Genefic~ 33:62&7, 1948. 28. Rubfn B A & GJarman N J. The therapy of experimental influenza in mice with antibiotic Iactoncs and related compounds. Yole J. Biol. Med. 19:1017-22, 1947. problems and procedures, N.cleonicf 7(3):5-20. 19X3. 29. Rublu B A. Radiation microbiology: 30. Mancem O, Zaffaronf A, Rubfm B A, Sondbefmer F, Rnaenkranz G & Djerasaf C. Letter to ed]tor. (Steroids XX XVII, A ten step conversion of progesterone to cortison e.) J. Amer. Chem. Sot. 74:3711-2, 1952. 31. Rubfn B A. Review of “Immunology and cancer” by O.V. St, Whitelnck, F.N. Fumess, PA. Sturgeon & I.T. Syverton, eds. Amer. J. Public Health 48:1S51. 1958. antigens originating from 32. Neuratb A R & Rubfn B A. Separation of “soluble” isnmunoprecipitating rabks virus infected cells by chromatography on Ecteols cellulose and by gel filtration. Expen”entia 33. 23:872-3, 1%7. Rubfn B A. The ques( for absolute spectil referance tn cancer purity viruses. of vaccine Unpublished antigens and zero speech presented gm vity techniques to the Eurospace with Conference. 22-25 May 1972, San Francisco, CA. 34. Levner M, Wiener F P & Rubkn B A. Induction of Escherichia co/i and Vibn”o cho[erne enterotoxins by an inhibitor of protein synthesis. [nfec. Immunity 15:132-7, 1977, scientist, musician, and friend. 35. Garfkld E. A tribute to Hilary Koprowski: Currenf Contents (29):5-10, 19 July 1982. 36. Amerfcast Coffege of Pbysfckans. Linking research, education and pmc(ice. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians. (Brochure. ) 1982. 8p. 37, Guffeld E. The 1,(H3Ocontemporary scientists most-cited 1%5-1978. Part 1, The bssic lit and introduction. Current Contents (41 ):5-14, 12 October 1981. 693 .38. Amerfcan of Cytology. Papanicoloou Society Program of the Philadelphia: 29th Annual American A wani Scientific Society Meeting, of Cytology, of the American 6 November Society 1981, of Cytology. St. Louis, MO. 1981. Anrerkrm PJMosophkaf SocJety. Year book 1980. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1981. p. 93-103. 40. Frye R M. Milton’s Paradise .LOJI and the visual arts, f+oc. Amer. Phil. Soc 120:233-44, 19~6. 41, Dempster A. New methods in mass spectroscopy. Proc Amer. Phil. Sot. 75:755-67, 1935. paleontology in North America. 42. SImpaon G G. The beginnirigs of vertebrate 39. Proc. 43. Proc. 44, Amer. Greenewah Proc. 45. Phil. Amer Soc Spengler J 1. Economic Ramsey Proc 86: 133-M, 1943. factors in the development Pht[. Sot. 95:2&53, of densely populated C H, Bmndt W & f%fel D D. The iridescent Amer. Phil Sot. 104:249-S3, colors of hummingbird E M. New appraiaal of an old organ: the placenta. Phil, Amer Sot. 113:296-304, 1969. Gold Rev. 49. W. 51. 52. 53. feathers, 1960. T, The nature of the lunar surface: recent evidence. Proc. Amer. Phil. Sot. 115:7+82, 1971. 47. L1 C H. Hormones of the adenohypophysis. Proc Amer Phil, Sot. of animals, 48, Lfodauer M. Spatial and temporal orientation 46. areas. 19S1, Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 85:1-62, 116:365-82, 1972. 1979. Academy of Natural ScJmrces. “The Leidy Medal, Hayden Memorial Geological Award, Richard Hopper Day Memorial Medal, the Gold Medal.” (Brochure. I 1982.4 p, Wffson E O. Sociobiology: the new synthe$is. Cambridge, MA: Harvard LJniversity Press, 1975. b97 p. PJJabry H A. Cafulogue of the marine mrdlu$k~ of Japan Detroit, Ml: Frederick Steams, 1895. 1% p Mayr E. Adaptation and selection. Biol. Zb/. 101(2): 161-74, 1982. Axefrod D I. Holocene climatic changes in relation to vegetation disjunction and speciation. Amer. Naturalist 117:847-70, 1981. Stafford M P. Geogmphical Society of Philadelphia 1891-1960. PhiJadelphh: Lyon& Armor, 19&l, p. 86-92, 55. Physicists win six medals from Franklin Institute. Phy$. Today 35(3):71-3. 1982. 56. Society for f❑dustrfsd and App4fed MatJrematJca. “SIAM prizes and awards, ” (Brochure.) 1982. 3p. S7, Garfield E. The lfx3 “p”re” mathematicians most cited in 1978 and 1979, and their most-cited ~. publications. 58. Crmdm and Current C A. Surviving users. NFAIS 59. Rowlett R L Abstracts, 60. Henrer S. Abstracting NFAIS h’eWSktf. Contenf~ the eighties: Newdetl. (36):5-14, new 22(2):23-39, roles 6 September for publishers, 1982. information service 1980 who needs them? NFAfS New.rfeu 23(2 }:2+36, 1981. and indexing services: the business and the science. 24(2):29-35, 1982. 694 organizations,