* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Difference Analysis of Liaoning Province’s Regional Financial Development
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
M & D FORUM Difference Analysis of Liaoning Province’s Regional Financial Development ZHAO Fulu, LI Haihua School of Business Administration, Liaoning Technical University, Huludao, China, 125105 [email protected] Abstract: According to the method of Theil indexes, the text analyses Liaoning Province’s regional financial development difference from 1978 to 2008, and decomposes the total difference. The results indicate that total difference of regional financial development mainly comes from difference in the areas, while the difference of financial development among the areas only forms a small part of the overall difference. As far as the contribution to total difference, Intra-region is far greater than Inter-region. From the point of view in the region, the economic zone in central city group contributes greater to total difference, compared with Western Liaoning coastal economic zone, the Liaodong Peninsula coastal economic zone. The characteristics of regional financial development difference presented above correlate tightly with the development difference of regional economy, the deepening of the market-based reform, the involvement of the local government in the financial development and the coordinated development policies implemented by central authorities. Keywords: Regional finance, Theil indexes, Development difference 1 Introduction In the theory of financial development, the Gurley and Shaw (1955), Goldsmith (1969), McKinnon (1973), etc. made the pioneering contributions. They regarded the financial market as an economic activity center. According to their point of view, the quantity and quality of financial services may partly explain the economic growth. For the analysis of the financial structure, financial repression, financial deepening and liberalization of financial, they had made people aware of the role of finance and further explored the ways to financial development. A groundbreaking international research, by Goldsmith (1969), shows that financial development and economic growth are closely related by using the economic data of 35 countries from 1860 to 1963. Levine (1997) used 80 countries’ economic data from 1960 to 1989, controlled other important factors of affect economic growth, inspected the effects of financial development on economic growth, and the results shows that there are significant positive correlation between the financial deepening and economic growth, and the financial development is a predictor of the future economic growth. Kul B. Luintel and Mosahid Khan (1999) studied the relationship of financial development and economic growth by using VAR (Vector autoregression) and Cointegration (Cointegration) method. And the results shows that financial development and economic growth has the two-way causality. The China's regional financial development and economic growth (1978-2000), wrote by domestic scholars Zhou Li(2004), studied the various regions of China’s financial development and economic growth during the 1978-2000, revealed the relationship between China's financial development and the economic growth, and the path of the financial development promote economic growth. Zhang Jie, by comparing and analyzing "neo-classical equilibrium hypothesis", "cause and effect cycle accumulation theory" and "Williamson's inverted U hypothesis", thought that regional differences in economic structure would lead to the regional differences of financial institutional arrangements and financial structure, and described the phenomenon of the regional convergence of the financial structure and the thinking of the regional finance showing a similar economic development’s "Williamson's inverted U hypothesis". He also believed that in China regional financial development difference will be relatively flat by the convergence of government policy, and proposed that we should actively promote the "divergence" process, rather than inhibiting this process in the institutional change. Jin Xuejun and so on 106 M & D FORUM empirically analyzed the financial growth differences from 1978 to 2003, concluded that the financial growth differences will objectively exist in the long term, and that there is not the inverted U-shaped curve in the regional financial growth between 1978 and 2003, but shows three curves posture. Zhang junzhou and Yin Desheng, Xiao Shunxi all analyzed and researched ‘the regional finance" as their topic, and explored the development situation and development strategy of the region's financial. Zhao Wei and Ma Ruiyong analyzed China’s regional financial growth differences from 1978 to 2001, and decomposed the total difference. Despite the different conclusions of different scholars, but it is certain that between the financial development and economic growth exists the positive and close contact. However, by these documents it can be found that regional financial, that has the leading role in regional economic development, especially inter-province and even intra-province, has not been paid sufficiently attention to. Focusing on Liaoning Province’s financial development of city economic zones, the paper uses the data from 1978 to 2008, analyzes and decomposed the financial development, lays the foundation for further theoretical research and local government economic development policy. 2 Analysis of Difference 2.1 Selection of indicators In the measure of financial growth indicators, Goldsmith proposes “ Financial International Ratio-FIR” index, which is defined as the value of all financial assets to all physical assets (national wealth), which is the broadest indicators of a measure of the relative size of the financial upper structure. McKinnon uses the ratio of the money stock (M2) to the gross national product as a yardstick in the measure of a country's financial growth, when he studies the financial repression and financial deepening in developing countries. Therefore, people generally use the ratio of M2 to GDP to measure a country's degree of monetization of the economy. Because China lacks the statistical data of regions financial assets and M2, the domestic academic community generally uses the ratio of the sum of bank’s deposits and loans to gross domestic product in the calculation of related financial ratios. This is because of that China's major financial assets are concentrated in bank and the bank's most important assets are deposits and loans. This paper also chooses to aggregate deposits and loans in the calculation of financial assets. 2.2 Methods of measurement In order to accurately reflect the degree of regional financial growth differences among the economic zones and in the economic zones, the share of among three economic zones (economic zones in central city group, the Liaodong Peninsula coastal economic zones and Western Liaoning coastal economic zones) in the total difference, and the share of in economic zones in the total difference, we use Theil index. Because it has the broken properties between the sub-samples, we can break the overall regional differences into in regional differences and among regional differences by this feature. Therefore, it is more in line with requirements to compare with bikini coefficient, Atkinson describes and so on in describing the differences between regions (or unequal degrees) indicators. Let E, M, W, respectively, the Liaodong Peninsula coastal economic zones, economic zones in central I I I city group, western Liaoning coastal economic zones, E , M , W , respectively, Theil index indicators of the Liaodong Peninsula coastal economic zones, economic zones in central city group, western Liaoning coastal economic zone, representing financial growth differences of the three economic areas, according to the Theil index definition and formula as: IE = IM = å å E Yi log(Yi / Fi ) M Yi log(Yi / Fi ) 107 M & D FORUM IW = å W Yi log(Yi / Fi ) Fi represents the total deposits and loans of the i-th city where the proportion of the total Y economic zone, i represents the i-th city’s GDP accounts for the i-th economic zone where the Where proportion of total GDP, for the city's for the i-th economic zone where the proportion of total GDP. FE , FM , FW , Representing the total deposits and loans of the Liaodong Peninsula coastal economic zones, economic zones in central city group, western Liaoning coastal economic zone in the province's Y Y Y proportion of total deposits and loans, E , M , W , representing the Liaodong Peninsula coastal economic zones, economic zones in central city group, western Liaoning coast Economic Area's GDP accounted for the proportion of the province's total GDP. If the economic zones with a weight of total GDP, We can have the indicators of inter-regional differences: I D = YE log(YE / FE ) + YM log(YM / FM ) + YW log(YW / FW ) Theil index can be broken down in among zones and in zones, that is, the overall differences is equal to the differences in the region and among regional differences, this is the Theil index’s decomposition and be added properties. Therefore, If the economic zones with a weight of total GDP, We can also have the indicators of overall differences: IT = I D + YE I E + YM I M + YW IW The size of the Theil index shows that all regions within the scope of the study changes in the financial growth of the size of the gap, and we can clearly see the change gap between the year in the dynamic process by the use of Theil index time series, this paper expressed this dynamic process by Index Line. According to the results, in 1978-2008 years, the maximum value of the total financial growth gap in 1982, the Theil index is 0.029125 (Table 1), the minimum occurred at 1998, the Theil index is 0.006175. The reason is mainly that intra-regional disparities in the total gap played a role in the absolute, while inter-regional disparities are very small. This can further be seen by the contribution rates of intra-regional disparities and inter-regional disparity to the total. After 1981, in the whole, western Liaoning coastal economic zones is generally higher than economic zones in central city group in the financial growth gap, and economic zones in central city group is also generally higher than the Liaodong Peninsula coastal economic zones. It can further be seen that the dynamic process in the three major regional financial gap growth (Figure 1). Central City Coastal western Liaoning Liaodong Peninsula 0.06 0.04 0.02 Figure 1 20 08 20 06 20 04 20 02 20 00 19 98 19 96 19 94 19 92 19 90 19 88 19 86 19 84 19 82 19 80 19 78 0.00 Liaoning’s financial differences within the three major economic zones In 1978 to 1981, western Liaoning coastal economic zone shows the upward trend in the financial growth gap, and then a downward trend, in 1984 reached its lowest point, then began to rise. And financial growth gap shows a downward trend after 2000. Economic zones in central city group show the downward trend before 2000, then a upward trend, and a downward trend after 2005. The Liaodong 108 M & D FORUM Peninsula coastal economic zone is relatively stable in the whole. Between 1978 and 2008, the inter-regional financial disparities was overall relatively stable, the Theil index value largely remains at 0.008 or less (Figure 2), starting slightly upward after 2002. Intra-regional disparities from 1978 to 1989, a downward trend, after a slow rise , and reached the maximum in the 2001, then gradually began to shrink, as a whole showed a similar economic development, "Williamson inverted U hypothesis" feature. Because the vast majority of the overall difference comes from the Intra-regional gap, the trend is almost the same as Intra-regional disparities, in 2001 reached the maximum, and then the gap began to decline. Overall, the convergence trends emerged from the financial gaps among the region and in the region, toward convergence direction, future cross possible. Inter-region Intra-region T he total 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 19 78 19 80 19 82 19 84 19 86 19 88 19 90 19 92 19 94 19 96 19 98 20 00 20 02 20 04 20 06 20 08 0.00 Figure 2 Liaoning’s financial comparisons within inter-regional and intra-regional differences Table 1 The overall decomposition of the regional financial growth gap in Liaoning Province between 1978 and 2008 Central Cities Coastal Western Liaoning Liaodong Peninsula Inter-group Intra-group The Total Year IM IW IE ID IT - I D IT 1978 0.045047 0.007796 0.000491 0.001579 0.026081 0.027660 1979 0.036606 0.025434 0.000240 0.001242 0.024408 0.025650 1980 0.030145 0.021089 0.007328 0.005926 0.022221 0.028147 1981 0.024435 0.036525 0.009897 0.002161 0.022426 0.024587 1982 0.024899 0.034730 0.006468 0.006990 0.022135 0.029125 1983 0.015719 0.030836 0.006302 0.007810 0.016400 0.024210 1984 0.015269 0.001041 0.009619 0.006894 0.011089 0.017983 1985 0.014891 0.010672 0.011507 0.005760 0.013174 0.018934 1986 0.009784 0.008593 0.000405 0.006099 0.007082 0.013182 1987 0.008029 0.012116 0.000366 0.005475 0.006764 0.012239 1988 0.008151 0.007181 0.000073 0.003028 0.005681 0.008710 1989 0.008035 0.006337 0.000056 0.001491 0.005495 0.006986 1990 0.010521 0.005873 0.000160 0.001151 0.006749 0.007900 1991 0.011290 0.004285 0.001822 0.003108 0.007191 0.010299 1992 0.006891 0.007548 0.004308 0.003243 0.006312 0.009555 1993 0.010574 0.012701 0.005078 0.002693 0.009461 0.012154 1994 0.009179 0.019067 0.004912 0.001594 0.009950 0.011544 109 M & D FORUM 1995 0.007578 0.015643 0.004640 0.002081 0.008358 0.010439 1996 0.005441 0.020099 0.001534 0.000929 0.007190 0.008119 1997 0.006791 0.023381 0.017697 0.000148 0.013432 0.013580 1998 0.004315 0.020046 0.000054 0.000186 0.005988 0.006175 1999 0.005736 0.024315 0.000272 0.000045 0.007385 0.007430 2000 0.013840 0.040410 0.000709 0.000143 0.014508 0.014650 2001 0.018563 0.028196 0.000787 0.000097 0.014614 0.014711 2002 0.014360 0.023584 0.000676 0.000067 0.011538 0.011605 2003 0.017157 0.019902 0.001001 0.000297 0.012373 0.012670 2004 0.018624 0.017289 0.001555 0.000420 0.012811 0.013230 2005 0.020537 0.014852 0.004696 0.001168 0.014414 0.015582 2006 0.015660 0.014562 0.004898 0.001178 0.011935 0.013113 2007 0.011353 0.009892 0.004834 0.001571 0.008976 0.010548 2008 0.012235 0.009978 0.005805 0.001903 0.009740 0.011643 Further examine the contribution that the growth gaps among regions and in regions to the overall gap. From: IT = I D + YE I E + YM I M + YW IW 1 = I D / IT + YE I E / IT + YM I M / IT + YW IW / IT Then I D / IT is the contribution ratio of inter-regional financial disparities to the overall gap. YE I E / IT , YM I M / IT , YW IW / IT representing intra-regional disparities of the Liaodong Peninsula Where coastal economic zones, economic zones in central city group, western Liaoning coastal economic zone to the overall gap. The sum of these three statistics is the contribution ratio of intra-regional disparities to overall. It reflects the impact extent on the overall gap. The intra-regional contribution reaches the maximum, 99.43%, in 2002. Before 1986, it overall shows downward trend in the contribution rate, then gradually began to rise, reached the maximum in 2002, then begin to decline, which is due to the inter-regional gap gradually decreased until 2002, started to rise after that (Table 2 ). The inter-regional contribution reaches the minimum, 0.57%, in 2002. Its contribution rate trend is the opposite with the intra-regional. After 2002, it began to rise gradually. From the point of view in the region, economic zones in central city group contributes great to total difference, compared with Western Liaoning coastal economic zones, the Liaodong Peninsula coastal economic zones. The average contributions to overall, economic zones in central city group, Western Liaoning coastal economic zones and the Liaodong Peninsula coastal economic zones, are 51.48%, 24.44%, and 7.41%. Although the intra-regional contribution is declining, and the inter-regional contribution on the rise, the intra-regional contribution is still much larger than the inter-regional. Year 1978 Table 2 The contribution of among and in three regions to the overall gap Contribution of Contribution of Intra-regional Inter-regional Contribution of Coastal Western the Liaodong Contribution Contribution the Central City Liaoning Peninsula 89.40 4.36 0.53 94.29 5.71 1979 78.80 16.09 0.27 95.16 4.84 1980 57.03 14.94 6.98 78.95 21.05 110 M & D FORUM 1981 53.06 29.42 10.79 93.27 8.79 1982 46.13 24.14 5.73 76.00 24.00 1983 35.69 25.55 6.50 67.74 32.26 1984 47.32 1.13 13.21 61.66 38.34 1985 42.80 11.79 14.99 69.58 30.42 1986 39.80 13.12 0.81 53.73 46.27 1987 35.30 19.16 0.80 55.26 44.74 1988 49.67 15.32 0.24 65.23 34.77 1989 60.42 18.01 0.22 78.66 21.34 1990 69.77 15.12 0.55 85.43 14.57 1991 56.14 8.80 4.89 69.82 30.18 1992 36.82 16.71 12.54 66.06 33.94 1993 44.00 21.98 11.87 77.84 22.16 1994 39.64 33.96 12.59 86.19 13.81 1995 35.76 30.92 13.38 80.06 19.94 1996 33.11 49.68 5.77 88.56 11.44 1997 24.69 33.87 40.35 98.91 1.09 1998 34.43 62.28 0.28 96.99 3.01 1999 38.49 59.73 1.17 99.39 0.61 2000 47.48 50.02 1.53 99.03 0.97 2001 63.58 34.06 1.70 99.34 0.66 2002 62.46 35.09 1.88 99.43 0.57 2003 68.19 26.90 2.57 97.66 2.34 2004 71.00 21.98 3.85 96.83 3.17 2005 66.61 16.07 9.83 92.50 7.50 2006 60.25 18.47 12.30 91.01 8.99 2007 54.90 15.15 15.05 85.10 14.90 2008 53.27 13.87 16.51 83.65 16.35 3 The Basic Conclusion According to the method of Theil indexes, the text analyses Liaoning Province’s regionally financial development difference among 1978-2008, and decomposition the total difference. We can draw the following basic conclusions: 1. The dividing point of Liaoning urban economic gap in the overall financial development difference is 1982 year. Before this year, the financial growth difference increased rapidly, after beginning to show a downward trend, and showed a similar economic development of the "inverted U Williamson hypothesis "feature. 2. It can be seen, by decomposition of Liaoning urban economic gap in the overall financial development difference, that total difference mainly comes from difference in the areas, while the difference among the areas only forms a small part of the overall difference. 3. As far as the contribution to total difference, the contribution from in the areas is far greater than the contribution among the areas. From the point of view in the region, economic zones in central city group 111 M & D FORUM contributes great to total difference, compared with Western Liaoning coastal economic zones, the Liaodong Peninsula coastal economic zones. 4. The characteristics of regionally financial development difference presented above correlate tightly with the development difference of regional economy, the deepening of the market-based reform, the involvement of the local government in the financial development and the coordinated development policies implemented by central authorities. References [1]. Zhou Li, Hu Angang. The regional gap analysis of China's financial development: 1978-1999 [J]. Tsinghua University (Social Science Edition), 2002, (2) (in Chinese) [2]. Zhao Wei, Ma Ruiyong. Difference of China's regional financial development - based on the method of Theil indexs. Economic Geography, 26 No. 1 January 2006 (in Chinese) [3]. Liu xiaming, Wei Yingqi, Li Guoping. Convergence or Divergence? Review of the literature of China's regional economic development debates. Economic Research, 2004, (7) (in Chinese) [4]. Ma Ruiyong. Empirical analysis of China Regional Financial Development and Economic Growth. Financial Teaching and Research, 2006, (2) (in Chinese) [5]. Jin Xuejun, Tian Lin. The situation of China's regional financial development differences: 1978-2003 [J]. Economic Theory and Economic Management, 2004, (8) (in Chinese) [6]. Deng Xiang. Decomposition and Enlightenment of China’s regional disparities [J]. Sichuan University (Social Science), 2002, (2) (in Chinese) [7]. Xie Ping. the structure analysis of China’s financial assets [J]. Economic Research, 1992, (11) (in Chinese) [8]. Shen Li. The theory and Empirical research of Regional financial development and Regional economic growth. Productivity Research, 2007.8(in Chinese) 112