* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download When astronauts are in the space shuttle
Classical mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Equations of motion wikipedia , lookup
Coriolis force wikipedia , lookup
Earth's rotation wikipedia , lookup
Inertial frame of reference wikipedia , lookup
Fundamental interaction wikipedia , lookup
Rigid body dynamics wikipedia , lookup
Newton's theorem of revolving orbits wikipedia , lookup
Seismometer wikipedia , lookup
Fictitious force wikipedia , lookup
Work (physics) wikipedia , lookup
Mass versus weight wikipedia , lookup
Classical central-force problem wikipedia , lookup
Centrifugal force wikipedia , lookup
Centripetal force wikipedia , lookup
When astronauts are in the space shuttle they seem to float? Why is that? Are they so far from Earth that the force of gravity is zero? Or there is another reason? Let’s calculate g at 400 km altitude: W =m g = G ME m/R2 g = G ME/(RE + 400 km)2 = 8.68 m/s2 Compare this to 9.81 m/s2 on the surface of the earth ≈88% - hence, the force of gravity acting on them is not much different But they are orbiting the earth – need a centripetal force – and the force of gravity is that centripetal force!! There are no other forces – the orbiting spaceship along with its crew is falling freely – therefore, there is no contact with a support, no weight, no reaction of the surface WEIGHTLESSNESS mv 2 = mg − N , r mv 2 = mg ⇒ N = 0 r “Dependence” of “g” on the latitude The Earth is rotating – spins on its axis with a frequency of 1/(24 hours)=1.16×10-5 s-1. The “linear” velocity of a point at the equator (where it is maximum) is 2πR/T=465 m/s. The centripetal acceleration required for that is 0.03m/s2. The centripetal force is a result of action of two forces – gravity and reaction of surface, mv2/r=mg-N —> N=mg-mv2/r < mg Weight = -N and in inertial frame is equal mg. The rotating earth is not an completely inertial system, and an “effective” g is getting smaller as we get closer to the equator. At the intermediate latitudes, the weight is not directed to the center of the Earth, but the force of gravity is! Force of Gravity Force of Reaction A net centripetal force Artificial gravity In the previous example, you saw that the frame related to the ground may not always considered to be inertial. g per se, does not depend on latitude, but the weight does! Sometimes it is needed to “mimic” gravity effect, or rather weight. One of the ways is to place an object in a “centrifuge” – a rotating cylinder. Then, to rotate with a cylinder, a centripetal force is needed, and it is supplied by the reaction of the wall. The force pressing on the walls is equivalent to weight, but certainly not the gravity. TIDES Tides are caused by the gravitational force of the moon (and the sun) on the earth. The first (nearer) bulge – is intuitively simple: it is due to simple fact that in the Newton’s gravitational law, the force of gravity is inversely proportional to the square of distance between the objects. Point A in the picture is nearer to the Moon than points C and B. Therefore, the force of gravity acting on the water at a point A is larger than the force of gravity acting on the similar sample of water at points C and B. This difference reduces the relative push of water on the see floor and therefore reduces the reaction force. Hence, point A can support more water – nearer bulge. But where does the second bulge come from? Tides are caused by the gravitational force of the moon (and the sun) on the earth. To understand the whole picture, however, we need to understand the motion of the Moon around the Earth. Forget the Sun for a moment, then the system Earth-Moon is moving uniformly – no external forces. Both Earth and Moon are massive – act on each other with forces of gravity. Why the Moon does not fall on Earth? Because the Moon is revolving and its free fall just supplies the centripetal acceleration. But we can ask the same about the Earth… There must be a symmetry moved only by the difference masses of Earth and Moon: As a result both of them are revolving around an axis located about 4600 km form the Earth’s center. (And as a whole falling on the Sun.) Mary-go-round Inertial frame – ground observer: Trajectory is circular – need a centripetal force What force provides it? – Friction force, f=mv2/r The frame of Mary-go-round – accelerating frame: The object is at rest, but the force of friction is acting towards the center of the circle What compensates the friction force The force of inertia – a toll for using accelerating frame: the acceleration is a=v2/r towards the center, the force of inertia is equal to (–ma). In our case it is equal to mv2/r and directed away from the center. If we add it with the force of friction, we will get a desired zero. This force is called centrifugal. The second (further) bulge Now we can apply our understanding of Mary-goround to tides. Consider motion from the earth’s observer’s reference frame The earth is revolving around a center of What is the centrifugal force acting on 1 kg of water? 1×v2/r, where r is the distance from this water sample and the axis of Earth-Moon revolution. It turns out that it is proportional to the distance from the axis adds to the reaction on water, larger on the far side – can support more water – second bulge BC > CA Pressing forces due to Earth’s g Resultant pressing forces Gravity of the Moon = = + + Inertial forces – revolving Earth - The Earth’s revolution around the Sun and tides The Sun effects on tides as well – if it is aligned with the Moon, the tides are stronger – spring tides, if not, weaker – neap tides Sun’s effect on tides is not as strong than the Moon’s because the Sun is much farther away – the difference in relative distances from the Sun to the near and far side of the Earth is small. However, the effect small as it is proves that the Earth is revolving around the Sun!! Conservation laws Why conservation laws? How do we describe motion? – Kinematics – equation of motion How do we get such equations of motion? – Analysis of forces. Is such analysis always possible? No. For example, if a tennis ball hits a wall, it does not immediately reflect, it stops, flattens, then flexes, and only then reflects. It may be and it usually is quite difficult to follow all forces. Because of this, we may ask a question – are there any quantities that do not change as a result of interaction or conserve? They may change during the interaction in ways we could not follow, but at the end, they would be the same as in the beginning. CONSERVATION LAWS 1. Conservation of Mass: In a closed system, mass is conserved. A. If you weigh components of the system separately, and then together, you are going to observe the same result. B. Chemical reactions – mass balance Einstein generalized mass conservation and energy conservation, principle of equivalence, E=mc2 2. Let us consider the (LINEAR) MOMENTUM that we have introduced before Linear momentum or “momentum” is a product of mass and velocity p=mv Momentum is a vector quantity Units: kg m/s Notation: p Consider two parts, A and B, of one system. If they interact – act on each other with forces, these forces must be equal and opposite according to the third Newton’s law: F = -F A on B Use the B on A 2nd law: ∆ (mv) F= ∆t ∆(mv) B ∆(mv) A =− ∆t ∆t Cancel ∆t and find: ∆(mv) B = −∆(mv) A Or total (mv)before = total (mv)after Total momentum of the closed system is conserved! Applications of momentum conservation law Collisions are such interactions of objects in which the interaction per se can be separated from the initial and final state. Only initial and final states are of interest. If two (several) particles collide, they are all parts of one system, so their total initial momentum is equal to their total final momentum (vector sum). EXAMPLE: Car & Truck A car (1000 kg) moves at 30 m/s hits a truck (4000 kg) at rest, they “stick” together. What is their velocity just after the collision ? Momentum of car: pcar = mcar vcar = (1000 kg) x (30 m/s) = 30,000 kg m/s Momentum of truck: ptruck = 0 Total momentum before: p = pcar+ptruck = (mv)before = 30,000 kg m/s Example continued… total(mv)before = total(mv)after mcar vcar + mtruck vtruck = 30,000 kg m/s = (mtruck + mcar) x vafter 30,000 kg m/s = (1,000 kg + 4,000 kg) x vafter 30,000 kg m/s = 5,000 kg x vafter vafter = 6 m/s in the direction of the car’s motion Completely inelastic collision: no recoil QUESTION: During a collision of two football players, the total momentum of the system can not be zero. 1. False. 2. Correct. The total momentum is the sum of the two individual momenta. If one is directed opposite to the other, but has the same magnitude, they would add up to zero. First exam review Measurement: properties, units, vectors, scalars Kinematics: position, displacement, time, velocity, speed, average, instantaneous, d vs.t, v vs.t, acceleration, free fall, circular motion at a constant speed, uniform motion. Dynamics: inertia, inertial frames, what is relative and what invariant, forces, Newton’s laws, force of gravity, weight, friction (rest and kinetic), free fall, projectile motion, centripetal force, Newton’s law of gravity, orbits, elastic forces, harmonic motion, air resistance, weightlessness, tides, and other examples Conservation laws: mass conservation, momentum conservation, collisions