* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Scientific Notation
Bra–ket notation wikipedia , lookup
Vincent's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Abuse of notation wikipedia , lookup
History of mathematical notation wikipedia , lookup
Musical notation wikipedia , lookup
Big O notation wikipedia , lookup
Location arithmetic wikipedia , lookup
Real number wikipedia , lookup
Positional notation wikipedia , lookup
Scientific Notation Remember…. Scientific notation is a single digit coefficient times a power of ten. Standard scientific 430, 000 4.3 * 105 0.0000057 5.7 * 10-6 Positive exponent for large numbers Negative exponent for small numbers To convert from scientific notation to standard (regular number) look at the power of ten. The exponent tells you which direction to move the decimal, and how far. Negative exponent moves the decimal to the left so the number gets smaller Positive exponent moves the decimal to the right so the number gets larger You try! Convert each number to the missing form Standard Form 1,230,000,000 Scientific Notation 7.459 * 10-5 2 * 108 .0000009 8.05 * 107 -0.0034 63,910,000 3.331 * 10-4 -2.081 * 105 .0000147 Rewrite the following numbers in scientific notation a. 56.8 * 10-5 b. 0.123 * 108 c. 60 * 10-3 d. 802 * 106 Multiplying and Dividing in Scientific Notation Multiplying: (1.5 * 105) (8 * 107) Using the commutative property of multiplication, we can rearrange the factors in the problem like: 1.5 * 8 * 105 * 107 Then, using the associative property we can the group the numbers and simplify like: (1.5 * 8 ) (105 * 107) = 12 * (10 * 10* 10* 10* 10)( 10* 10* 10* 10* 10* 10* 10) = 12 * 1012 Since this is not scientific notation we must rewrite it as a single digit times a power of ten; This is most easily done by changing the number to standard notation and then back to scientific notation. 12,000,000,000,000 1.2 * 1013 Dividing: 16∗105 4∗ 102 First, we can rewrite the problem as two fractions like: Then simplify each fraction (division): 4* Make sure your answer is in scientific notation! 16 4 ∗ 10∗10∗10∗10∗10 10∗10 4 * 103 You try! Make sure all answers are in scientific notation! (3.5 * 105) (4 * 103) (2 * 107) (4 * 104) 30∗1012 48∗1015 3∗ 104 12∗ 1012 105 102 Rational vs. Irrational Numbers Remember….. A rational number is any number that can be written as a fraction. This is the majority of numbers! An irrational number is a real number that can NOT be written as a fraction. The most common examples of this are pi (3.14….) and the square root of non perfect squares like √41. There are some strange numbers that are not real and we can’t place on a number line. Examples of this are the square root of a negative number, and dividing by 0. 1) Are all square roots irrational? Provide examples to explain your thinking. 2) Write multiple irrational numbers between 3 and 4. 3) Identify if each number is rational, irrational, or not real. -4 3 √−8 7 0 78% 0.057 1 83 -3.02 13 7 √150 −√64 √−1 pi Square Roots Remember, When taking the square root of a number, there are TWO roots! √64 = 8 because 8 * 8 = 64 √64 = −8 because -8 * -8 = 64 When estimation non perfect square roots you can “surround” it with perfect squares. Then on a number line you can estimate which two integers the square root is between. You can tell which half of the number line to estimate on based on which perfect square it is closer to. 1) List out the perfect SQUARES 1 -20. 2)Can you take the square root of a negative number? Why or why not? 2) What are the two square roots of the following numbers? 25 121 225 3)Estimate the following square roots to the nearest tenth. √207 √178 √3 √109 √300 Cube Roots A cube root is the side length of a cube given the volume. 3 √27 = 3 because 3 * 3 * 3 = 27 When estimation non perfect cube roots you can “surround” it with perfect cubes. Then on a number line you can estimate which two integers the cube root is between. You can then tell which half of the number line to estimate on based on which perfect cube it is closer to. 1) List out the first ten perfect CUBES on your notecard for the quiz. 2) Can you take the cube root of a negative number? Why or why not? 3) Estimate the following cube roots to the nearest tenth. 3 √900 3 √234 3 √20 3 √150 3 √9 3 √612 Order of Operations Examples: 18 ÷ 32 • √16 + 4 • 52 = 18 ÷ 9 • 4 + 4 • 25 (#3 exponents) = 2 • 4 + 4 • 25 (#4- division) = 8 + 4 • 25 (#4-multiplication) = 8 + 100 (#4-multiplication) = 108 (#5-addition) Simplify the expressions using Order of Operations 1) √5 + 11 2) 3√32 + 32 3) 13 – 2 √9 4) √1 + (12 · 4) 5) √(6 − 2) ∗ 52 6) 72 ÷ 9(4) ÷ 5√4 7) (√81 – 8)3 + 3 • 24 + 0 • 52 Graphing Numbers on Number Lines Number lines are usually marked with rational numbers. On simple number lines, we 1 count by integers. More complex number lines may count by 2’s or tenths. The way the number line is divided up will depend on the numbers you are plotting on the number line. No matter how the number line is set up, you will need the rational approximation of an irrational number to graph it on the number line. Change each number to a decimal and approximate its position on the number line. 1) Graph the following numbers on a number line then order from least to greatest. √9 , 1.5 , 7 16 3 5 , , and √16 16 Order: ____________________________________________________________________ 2) Comparing Numbers You can compare two numbers written in scientific notation by looking at their greater power of 10 (exponent). The number with the greater power of 10 will be the greater number. If two numbers have the same power of 10, then compare the coefficient to determine the greater number. Compare: 8.43×106 and 2.38X108 Because the exponents are different, you know that the number with the greater exponent is the greater number. 8 is greater than 6. Therefore 8.43×106 < 2.38X108 Compare: 3.2×10-10 and 1.2×10-9 Even though the exponents are negative, because they are different you still know that the number with the greater exponent is the greater number. -9 is greater than -10. Therefore 3.2×10-10 < 1.2×10-9 Compare: 5.65×105 and 5.56×105 Because the exponents are the same, you will have to compare the coefficient to determine the greater number. 5.65 is greater than 5.56. Therefore 5.65×105 > 5.56×105 As always, a negative number (negative coefficient) will always be smaller than a positive number. Changing numbers into standard notation is another option. When in doubt, expand it out! Compare the following. Write <, >, or = for each blank 3.3×102__________ 3.1×103 5.5×106 _________ 5.51× 106 7.2×10-4__________ 8.9×10-5 8.71×10-3_________4.16×10-3 5.5×106 _________ -5.51× 108 Order from least to greatest: 9.2×1010, 6.4×1015, 2.1×1020, 1.7×1015 5.63×10-5, 4.16×10-3, 3.42×10-6, 8.71×10-3