Download A1990CG38700001

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

DESY wikipedia , lookup

Field electron emission wikipedia , lookup

Bremsstrahlung wikipedia , lookup

Lepton wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Introduction to quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Photoelectric effect wikipedia , lookup

Electron wikipedia , lookup

Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Electron scattering wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
This Week’s Citation Classic®
1
~
PowelI C J. Attenuation lengths of low-energy electrons in solids.
Surf, Sci. 44:29-46, 1974.
[National Bureau of Standards. Washington, DC]
The paper gives a compilation of measured attenuation lengths of low-energy electrons in the energy
range (40 to 2000 eV) normally employed in X-ray
photoelectron spectroscopy and Auger-electron spectroscopy. An approximate formula was also derived
to enable estimates to be made ofattenuation lengths
in materials for which no measurements had been
made. [The SC!® indicates that this paper has been
cited in over 515 publications.]
4.
pendence of the inelastic scattering probability on
electron energy and material since this information
is needed for quantitative surface analyses by AES
and XPS. A measure of the surface sensitivity is the
electron attenuation length (AL), which is inversely
related to the inelastic scattering probability. For
common conditions in LEED, AES, and XPS, the Al.
is typically between 0.3 and 5 nm, that is, about 1
to 20 atom spacings.
My 1974 paper contained a summary ofthe avail.
able AL data, an analysis ofthe several measurement
—
techniques, and anapproximate formula for predicting Alt. The paper has been highly cited because AE5
and XPS have come into widespread use for surface
The Surface Sensitivity
analyses in catalysis, corrosion and wear, and semiof Electron Spectroscopies
conductor and thin-film devices. By coincidence, two
other papers were published in 1974 that analyzed
C.). Powell
AL data from other2 perspectives, and these have
been heavily cited.’ All three of the 1974 papers
Surface Science Division
National Institute of Standards and
have been largely superseded by a 1979 compilation
3
Technology (NIST)
of AL data by M.P. Seah and WA. Dench, who also
US Department of Commerce
developed equations to describe the data.
Gaithersburg, MD 20899
Early measurements of electron Alt for different
materials appeared to cluster about a common curve
September 20, 1989 when plotted versus kinetic energy This curve became known as the “universal curve” and wasa useDuring the 1960s several types of instruments be- ful guide, even though there was no physical justificame commercially available for surface character- cation for universality. It was clear by 1974 that
ization. The first of these was low-energy electron
there was considerable scatter (up to about a factor
diffraction ([EEl)), in which electrons with energy of two) about this curve, part of the scatter being
in the range 20-300 eV bombarded a single-crystal associated with substantial errors of measurement
surface at normal incidence and the pattern of and part associated with expected material differback-diffracted electrons was observed on a fluores- ences. A review article has recently been published
cent screen. The visual pattern and the changes of
that gives an assessment of measured Alt and of the
spot intensities with electron energy could be aria- available formulas.4
lyzed to deduce the structures of atoms in the outDue tothe difficulties in making AL measurements
ermost layers of the crystal. Next came Auger-elec- with the desired accuracy, calculations have been
tron spectroscopy (AES) and X-ray photoelectron madeof a closely relatedquantity, the inelastic mean
spectroscopy (XPS) (also referred to as electron
free path (IMFP). My NIST colleague David It. Penn
spectroscopy for chemical analysis [ESCAD. These recently developed an improved algorithm for caltwo techniques gave information about the chemi- culating IMFPs that makes
use of available experi5
cal composition of the outermost layers of a materi- mental optical data. About that time, Shigeo
al from measurements of the kinetic energies of Tanuma from the Nippon Mining Company was
Auger electrons (AES) or photoelectrons (XPS) emit- working as a guest scientist in my laboratory. We
ted following excitation with electron or X-ray have collaborated on an extensive series of IMFP calbeams, respectively. The useful range of electron en- culations in over 30 materials.’ Although there are
ergies forAES and XPS was about 40-2000eV to span approximations in the Penn algorithm, we have been
most elements ofthe periodic table and for optimum able to determine more precisely how the IMFP varsurface sensitivity.
ies with electron energy and with certain material
A key question, then and also now, concerns the parameters. The initial calculations’ were for elecactual surface sensitivity of LEED, AES, and XPS, trons with energies between 200 and 2000 eV, but
which is directly related to the probability of inelastic recent work has extended the analysis down to
electron scaftering if electrons scatter inelastically 50 eV. The general formula we have derived for prein the target material, they will not be measured in dicting IMFP values should also bea useful (but more
the signal of interest. A related question is the de- approximate) guide for Alt.
1. Brundle C It. The application of electron spectroscopy to surface studies. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 11:212-24, 1974.
(Cited 310 times.) ISee also: Brundle C R. Citation Classic. (Thackray A, comp.) Conrempomniy clatsics in physical,
chemical. and earth sciences. Philadelphia: 1St Press, 1986. p. 243.]
2. Undau I & Spicer W E. The probing depth in photoetnission and Auger’eleceron spestrosnopy. 1. EJection Spectrvsc.
Relar. Ph. 3:409-13, 1974. (Cited 360 times.)
3. Seab M P & Death W A. Quantitative electron spectroscopy of surfaces: a standard data base for electron inelastic mean
free paths in solids. Surf. Interface Anal. 1:2-lI, 1979. (Cited 900 times.)
4. Powell C J. The quest for universal curves to desctibe the surface sensitivity of electron spectroscopies. I. Electron
Specrrosc. Relat. Ph. 47:197-214, 1988.
5. Penn D R. Electron mean-free-path calculations using a model dielecmc function. Ptsys. Rev. B—Condensed Matter
35:482-6, 1987. (Cited 13 times.)
6. Tanuma S. Powell C J & Penn 0 It. Calculations of electron inelastic mean free paths for 31 o..~erials.Surf. Interfacr
Anal. 11:577-89, 1988.
14
/
—‘~1
©1990 by ISP®
CURRENT CONTENTS ®