Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
1e. Chapter 11 Followers in Work Groups and Work Teams Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook Chapter Objectives After completing this chapter, you should be able to: Differentiate between a work group and a work team. Describe and critically evaluate the theories of team development. Articulate how group norms and group cohesiveness exert influence on individual followers and on group behavior. Critically analyze and understand theories of group learning. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–2 Chapter Objectives (cont’d) After completing this chapter, you should be able to: Explain the paradoxes associated with team-based work and how those paradoxes affect leader– follower dynamics. Describe key methods a team leader can employ to create an effective work team. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–3 Assumptions about Teams—True or False? • Individual, group, and organizational goals can all be integrated into common team goals. • The work–team ideology downplays the importance of leadership by suggesting that high-performing teams can dispense with or ignore leadership. • The team environment drives out psychologically impoverishing work and conflict, which divert workers from doing their work efficiently. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–4 Why Study Work Groups • Working in groups and teams has become a significant feature of North American and European organizational life. • Research consistently and persuasively demonstrates that individual followers act differently in a work group than they do when working independently. • Understanding the nature and dynamics of groups is an important aspect of understanding followership. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–5 Distinguishing Work Groups and Work Teams • Psychological Group Individuals who perceive themselves to be in a group, who have a shared sense of collective identity, and who relate to each other in a meaningful way. • Work Group Two or more people who are in a face-to-face interaction, aware of their membership in the group, and striving together to accomplish assigned tasks. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–6 Distinguishing Work Groups and Work Teams (cont’d) • Formal Work Group Work groups or teams created by organizational leaders to permit collective action on assigned organizational tasks. • Informal Work Group Groups of employees, not established by leaders, that emerge from the social interaction of followers; they act to fulfill social needs of their members for affiliation and supportive relationships. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–7 Distinguishing Work Groups and Work Teams (cont’d) • Team A small number of employees with complementary skills who work cooperatively, share a common purpose, performance goals, and approach for which they hold themselves mutually accountable. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–8 Distinguishing Work Groups and Work Teams (cont’d) • Self-Managed Work Team (SMWT) A long-term group of employees who are highly interdependent and collectively accountable for managing and performing technical tasks that result in a product or service being delivered to an internal or external customer. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–9 Reflective Questions ▼ • You have probably experienced working in a group as part of your management program. Did your group have a leader? Why or why not? Did each member of the group contribute equally to completing the assignment? What specific behaviors exhibited during the group sessions were helpful to the group? What specific behaviors exhibited were detrimental to the group? Why? Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–10 Theories of Work Groups • Classical Management Theory (F.W. Taylor) Takes a control-oriented approach (Team Taylorism) to work teams entailing the use of information systems. • Human Relations Theory Emphasized the importance of social relations within work groups and the need for followers to be engaged in decision making related to their work—by enabling followers to satisfy higher order needs, leaders could improve productivity. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–11 Theories of Work Groups (cont’d) • Sociotechnical Systems Theory Proposed that the labor process could be better understood in terms of two systems: The technical system (i.e., machinery and equipment) The social system of relationships and other interactions among the followers The systems that can be redesigned to “enrich” jobs. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–12 Theories of Work Groups (cont’d) • Job Enrichment Theory Refers to a number of different ways of rotating, enlarging, and aggregating tasks. Increases the range of tasks and skills of followers, as well as the control followers have over the way they work, either individually or in teams. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–13 Theories of Work Groups (cont’d) • Job Characteristics Model Suggests a causal relationship between five core job characteristics and the follower’s psychological state. The five core job characteristics are: Skill variety, task identity, task significance, autonomy, feedback The higher a job scores on the five core job characteristics, the greater its motivating potential. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–14 The Three Dimensions of Job Design: Technical, Governance, and Sociocultural Figure 11.2 Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–15 Classification of Work Teams Figure 11.3 Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–16 Group Dynamics • Group Dynamics Is the study of followers’ behavior in groups. Is concerned with the nature of groups, group development, and interrelations between individual followers and groups. Emphasizes changes in the patterns of activities, the subjective perceptions of individual group members, and their active involvement in group life. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–17 Group Dynamics (cont’d) • Group Processes Task-oriented activities Are aimed at accomplishing goals, or “getting the job done.” Maintenance-oriented activities Involve the subjective perceptions of group members and their active interest in maintaining acceptable standards of behavior and a general state of well-being within the group. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–18 A Model of Group Dynamics Figure 11.4 Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–19 Factors Affecting Group Dynamics • Group Context The aspects of the organization—organizational and job design, organizational control systems, and organizational resources—that constrain the operations of the group. • Group Structure Structure is the stable pattern of relationships among differentiated elements in the group that is affected by variables such as size, roles, status, and leadership. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–20 The Incremental Effects of Group Size on Relationships Figure 11.5 Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–21 Factors Affecting Group Dynamics (cont’d) • Group Formation Developmental stages for groups: Forming: setting ground rules Storming: developing roles and responsibilities Norming: acceptance of roles and differences Performing: high cohesion and productivity Adjourning: disbandment of the group Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–22 Factors Affecting Group Dynamics (cont’d) • Group Norms Expected patterns of behavior established and shared by the group’s members that inform followers of proper group behavior (group socialization). • Group Cohesiveness Is the complex forces that give rise to followers’ perceptions of group identity and the attractiveness of group membership. Can help or harm organizational performance depending upon whether or not the group’s goals are aligned with organizational goals. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–23 Reflective Question ▼ • A commonly held view, long studied by sociologists, is that relationships formed in groups shape people’s behavior. Think about your experience working in a group. What norms and values did the group exhibit? Did any individual member challenge a particular norm? If so, how did the other group members respond to the challenge? If not, why not? Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–24 Factors Affecting Group Dynamics (cont’d) • Disadvantages of Highly Cohesive Groups A small group is likely to control individual members completely. Groups of individuals are likely to follow the directions of appointed authority figures. The pressure to maintain a group’s consensus can lead to groupthink and harm its decision making process. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–25 Factors Affecting Group Dynamics (cont’d) • Group Outcomes Task performance: groups that are highly cohesive and have performance norms supportive of organizational goals will have high productivity. Decision making: the decision-making ability of a cohesive work group can be significantly greater than the sum of all members’ individual capabilities (synergy). Conflict: Intergroup conflict can be an outcome of group-based work structure. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–26 Factors Affecting Group Dynamics (cont’d) • Intergroup Conflict Social identity theory Argues that followers use group membership as a source of pride and self-worth. Functional theory Assumes that conflict is the result of one group’s perceiving another group as a threat Interactionist view Conflicts at an “optimal level” in organizations and work groups are productive and can increase rather than decrease performance. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–27 Group Learning • Group Development In order for a group or team to make relatively permanent changes in behavior, individual members of the group must be able to learn— that is, to share and build on their individual knowledge. Team learning: a social process in which a group creates knowledge for members, for itself, and others in the organization Fragmented learning Pooled learning Synergistic learning Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–28 Group Cohesiveness, Norms, and Task Performance Figure 11.6 Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–29 Team-Learning Conditions, Processes, Modes, and Outcomes Source: Adapted from Kasl, E, Marsick, V., and Dechant, K. (1997). “Teams as Learners,” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 3 (2), pp. 227–246. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. Figure 11.7 11–30 View CD • Go to the CD-ROM and click on Focus on Followers; then choose the leadership and learning button. What are the implications for leadership practitioners when an organization becomes a “learning organization”? What role do leaders play in facilitating group learning? Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–31 Determinants of Group Learning Group’s Belief System Past Experiences Group Learning Self-Esteem Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. Job Design 11–32 The Determinants of Group Learning • Past Experiences Followers learn from their personal pasts and from their observations of others in similar contexts. • Group’s Belief System The group’s understanding of its task, of itself as a group, and of its organizational and external environment as it experiences it. • Job Design High-quality informal learning is contingent on high-quality job design. • Self-Esteem Beliefs about individual capabilities affect the ability to learn. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–33 Teams: Paradoxes and Prescriptions • Positives • Negatives Dignity and selfworth Intensifies management control Commitment Increases the intensity of work Synergy Expands skills Empowers Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. Increases peer pressure 11–34 How to Lead Work Teams • Determine if teams are necessary to accomplish the organization’s goals. • Provide adequate resources for the team to accomplish its tasks. • Ensure that all team members know and understand the team’s goals. • Design work structures that provide flexibility and autonomy. • Provide training for team leaders so that they can play a supportive role. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–35 How to Lead Work Teams (cont’d) • Take careful account of the knowledge and skills that each follower brings to the team. • Provide regular feedback to team members regarding their performance. • Design a compensation system that encourages followers to contribute to the overall performance of the team. Copyright © 2005 South-Western. All rights reserved. 11–36