Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Lesson 11 George Herbert Mead Robert Wonser SOC 368 – Classical Sociological Theory Spring 2014 George Herbert Mead Born in South Hadley, Massachusetts on Feb 27, 1863 Studied philosophy and its application to social psychology Studied at Harvard and Universities of Berlin Leipzig. Never received any graduate degrees. 1894 – At John Dewey’s request moved to University of Chicago. 2 In 1900 he began teaching a course whose stenographic notes became the basis for Mind, Self and Society. Enormous difficulty writing which troubled him. Also believed science could be used to deal with social problems. Involved in social reform and research at the University of Chicago Settlement House which was modeled after the Hull House. Intellectual Influences Three traditions of thought were particularly important for the development of Meads’ ideas: Pragmatism Behaviorism Darwinism 4 Pragmatism the idea of an “objective reality” is turned into a major question individuals create their own world what the world is how it is interpreted interpretations and actions are pragmatic or “practical” Science is seen as optimum way to solve social problems. Pragmatists reject absolute truths. 5 Two Types of Pragmatism One of the primary debates during Mead’s time: Nominalist pragmatism (structure) vs. philosophical realism (agency) Nominalists: societal phenomena exist but not independently of people and don’t determine individual consciousness and behavior Social realists emphasize society’s controlling of individuals’ mental processes. Mead has elements of both and they’re reciprocal, the dialectic strikes again! 6 Social Realism: the social environment is primary emergent properties provide a context for the development of human beings Psychological Nominalism: individual action is primary individuals are active in the construction of their own world Is Mead a social realist or a psychological nominalist? He calls himself a social behaviorist. 7 Pragmatism’s influence on Mead Truth doesn’t exist ‘out there’ but is instead ‘actively created’ People remember their past and use what proved useful before. People define ‘objects’ that they encounter in terms of their use for them. In order to understand actors, we must base our understanding of what they actually do in the real world. Behaviorism Broadest sense: “simply an approach to the study of the experience of the individual from the point of view of his conduct.” Individual behavior and thought is the product of stimulus-response conditioning Individuals come to like something when they are rewarded Individuals dislike something when they are punished 9 Behaviorism… John B. Watson, one of Mead’s students, (1924) wrote: “Give me a dozen healthy infants, well-formed, and my own specified world to bring them up in and I'll guarantee to take any one at random and train him to become any type of specialist I might select--doctor, lawyer, artist, merchant- chief, and yes, even beggar man and thief, regardless of his talents, penchants, tendencies, abilities, vocations, and race of his ancestors" 10 Behaviorism Watson: people are little more than “organic machines” Applied animal psychology to humans with no regard for our obvious mental abilities difference with animals. According to Mead, “John B. Watson’s attitude was that of the Queen in Alice in Wonderland—’Off with their heads!’” (1934/1962:2-3) Darwinism human beings are animals all animals adapt and adjust to their environment human beings have an adaptive mechanism that makes them distinct: conscious thought 12 The Theories of George H. Mead Instead of studying the mind introspectively, Mead focuses on the act, or if others are involved, the social act. This is a modification of behaviorism’s stimulus-response model. What does he include that Watson omits? The theory of the act: Impulse perception manipulation consummation 13 The Theory of the Act Impulse: involves “immediate sensuous stimulation” and the actor’s reaction to the stimulation, the need to do something about it Perception: actor searches for, and reacts to], stimuli that relate to the impulse (eg hunger) Manipulation: after impulse has manifest and perceived, taking action with regard to it Consummation: the taking of action satisfies the original impulse Gestures The gesture is the basic mechanism in the social act and social process more generally. Gestures are “movements of the first organism which act as specific stimuli calling forth the (socially) appropriate responses of the second organism” “Significant” gestures (only humans are capable of; require thought before reaction to) vs “nonsignificant” gestures (like in boxing) Social Acts Two types of social acts: 1) “conversations of gestures” Ex: The clucking of chickens Ex: The barking of dogs 2) interaction through “significant symbols” 16 Significant Symbols Significant symbol – “that which calls out the same response in the receiver as it does in the sender” Significant symbols make possible: conscious thought meaning shared meaning symbolic interaction and ultimately, society itself 17 Mead and Meaning Mead argues that meaning can only be produced through significant symbols is the product of social interaction must involve conscious reflection and is the product of role-taking (taking-the-role-of-the-other) In conversation of gestures, only the gestures themselves are communicated, with language, their gestures and meanings are conveyed. 18 Thinking as “simply internalized or implicit conversation of the individual with himself by means of such gestures.” “thinking is the same talking to other people” Thinking involves talking to oneself Significant symbols make possible symbolic interaction Intelligence People are different than animals in that intelligence makes possible mutual adjustment of acts of organisms. Conscious thought through significant symbols, particularly language, intervenes between the stimulus and the response (to inhibit action temporarily or to delay reactions to a stimulus). Makes possible: Delayed reactions Mentally test out different courses of action Ability to choose amongst best stimuli, not simply first available. Triadic Matrix The Triadic Matrix (basic unit of interaction): 1. emission 2. response 3. adjustment 21 Mead expanded Cooley’s ideas about the development of the self. Mead also believed that the self was created through social interaction and that this process started in childhood (that children began to develop a sense of self at about the same time that they began to learn language). The acquisition of language skills coincides with the growth of mental capacities, including the ability to think of ourselves as separate and distinct, and to see ourselves in relationship to others. Child Development 24 Development of the Self: Play and Game Stage Play 1 significant other at a time Game several significant others Generalized other a whole community of attitudes The Generalized Other The Generalized Other: - Mead’s term referring to a conception of the attitudes and expectations held in common by the members of the organized groups with whom they interact. When we imagine what the group expects of us, we are taking the role of the generalized other. Mead and the Self The self is the ability to take oneself as an object For Mead, the self is a product of social interaction. The self is both: a social process a “social structure” How does the self develop? Mead’s simple answer: “by acquiring the ability to take the role of the other.” 27 The Self and Self Control In order to have a self one must be a member of a community. Whereas play requires only pieces of selves, the game requires a coherent self. Self makes possible coordinated activities, group activities, and ultimately society. Phases of the Self: I and Me “I” (the self in action): self in process, in the moment the impulsive, spontaneous, and indeterminate part of the self non-reflective the part of the self that produces individuality “Me” (the self as an object in the world): the structured and determinate part of the self a product of interaction and conscious reflection we know the “I” only through the “me” the result of “reflected appraisals” 29 “I” and “Me” 1) 2) 3) I is most important for Mead: Key source of novelty in the social process Our most important values reside in the “I” “I” constitutes something we all seek— realization of the self. The I permits the development of a definite personality. 4) Evolutionary process at work: primitive societies dominated by the “Me” where in modern societies there’s a greater component of “I.” “I” and the “Me” “I” reacts against the “Me” which is the “organized set of attitudes of others which one himself assumes” The “Me” is the adoption of the generalized other. People are conscious of the “Me”, it involves conscious responsibility. It’s a conventional, habitual individual. Conformists are dominated by the “Me” It is through the “Me” that society dominates the individual. Social control then is the dominance of the expression of the “me” over the expression of the “I” “And thus it is that social control, as operating in terms of selfcriticism, exerts itself so intimately and extensively over individual behavior or conduct, serving to integrate the individual and his actions with reference to the organized social process of experience and behavior in which he is implicated. The physiological mechanism of the human individual's central nervous system makes it possible for him to take the attitudes of other individuals' and the attitudes of the organized social group of which he and they are members, toward himself, in terms of his integrated social relations to them and to the group as a whole; so that the general social process of experience and behavior which the group is carrying on is directly presented to him in his own experience, and so that he is thereby able to govern and direct his conduct consciously and critically, with reference to his relations both to the social group as a whole and to its other individual members, in terms of this social process. Thus he becomes not only self-conscious but also selfcritical; and thus, through self-criticism, social control over individual behavior or conduct operates by virtue of the social origin and basis of such criticism. That is to say, self-criticism is essentially social criticism, and behavior controlled by self-criticism is essentially behavior controlled socially. Hence social control, so far from tending to crush out the human individual or to obliterate his selfconscious individuality, is, on the contrary, actually constitutive of and inextricably associated with that individuality” (Mead, 1934/1962: 255) Mead and the Mind For Mead, once the self is created as an object in the world it is possible to “talk to one’s self.” Defines the mind in functional rather than idealist terms. I.e. what it does, the role it plays in the act, rather than some transcendental, subjective phenomenon. Mead describes the mind as: an internalized conversation an “imaginative rehearsal” a process of self-reflection an internal process of role-taking 33 Mead and Society Society – the ongoing social process that precedes both mind and the self. The weakest part of Mead’s theory, though it is clear that society must exist before both selves and minds. However, society cannot exist without either selves or minds. 34 Social structures exist as the “common response of the community” Culture exists as a “generalized other” Since society is represented by the “me” we carry society with us wherever we go, giving us the ability through self-criticism, to control themselves. The Priority of the Social Not mind and then society, but society first and then minds arising with that society (Faris). “We are not, in social psychology, building up the behavior of the social group in terms of the behavior of the separate individuals composing it …We attempt, that is, to explain the conduct of the individual in terms of the organized conduct of the social group, rather than to account for the organized conduct of the social group in terms of the conduct of the separate individuals belonging to it. For social psychology, the whole (society) is prior to the part (the individual), not the part to the whole; and the part is explained in terms of the whole, not the whole in terms of the part or parts.” (Mead, 1934/1962:7 italics added) 36 Criticisms Little emphasis on macro level of society. Some vague and fuzzy concepts Inconsistent definition of concepts (eg intelligence) Difficulty in clearly distinguishing one concept from another Lack of concern for emotional and unconscious aspects of human conduct Only source of social change appears to be through the individual, the “I”