Download Summary of excerpt from Blumer’s “Society as Symbolic Interaction” interaction:

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Structuration theory wikipedia , lookup

Labeling theory wikipedia , lookup

Network society wikipedia , lookup

Social constructionism wikipedia , lookup

Social network analysis wikipedia , lookup

History of sociology wikipedia , lookup

Social exclusion wikipedia , lookup

Social norm wikipedia , lookup

Differentiation (sociology) wikipedia , lookup

Social group wikipedia , lookup

Sociology of culture wikipedia , lookup

Structural functionalism wikipedia , lookup

Social rule system theory wikipedia , lookup

Sociology of knowledge wikipedia , lookup

Social development theory wikipedia , lookup

Sociological theory wikipedia , lookup

Sociology of terrorism wikipedia , lookup

George Herbert Mead wikipedia , lookup

The Theory of Communicative Action wikipedia , lookup

The Social Construction of Reality wikipedia , lookup

Symbolic interactionism wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Summary of excerpt from Blumer’s
“Society as Symbolic Interaction”
There are three essential features to Mead’s analysis of symbolic
interaction:
1. Human beings have selves. By this Mead meant that they can be
objects of their own actions and indicate things to themselves.
Making indications to oneself is important because indicating
something involves giving it meaning, i.e., making it an “object.”
2. Action is constructed, i.e., built up step by step through selfindication.
“The individual notes things, assesses them, gives them a meaning,
and decides to act on the basis of the meaning.”
3. Collective action consists of fitting together individual actions,
brought about by interpreting each other’s actions.
Most sociology does not treat society as symbolic interaction.
1. Sociologists don’t treat people as though they have selves. Instead,
they treat people as though they just respond to forces which play upon
them.
2. Action is treated not as a construction, but as the expression of forces
playing on people.
3. Collective action is treated as an expression of the action of society.
Symbolic interactionism also treats social organization differently than
these other sociological models:
1. Social organization is the framework within which social action takes
place. It shapes situations and provides symbols used to interpret them.
2. Social organization is the product of people acting in it.