* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download PowerPoint: The Schenk Case and its historical implications
Australian contribution to the Allied Intervention in Russia 1918–1919 wikipedia , lookup
History of the United Kingdom during the First World War wikipedia , lookup
German Phosgene attack (19 December 1915) wikipedia , lookup
World War I in popular culture wikipedia , lookup
Allied intervention in the Russian Civil War wikipedia , lookup
Technology during World War I wikipedia , lookup
History of Germany during World War I wikipedia , lookup
TIPS PRESENTATION “THE SCHENK CASE” and its historical implications in American History. Presented by-Teachers of CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS H.S. Content Objectives • 1: To understand the needs of a total war • 2: To understand the impact of technology on World War I • 3: To understand the differences between World War I and previous wars • 4: To understand the complex problems that have evolved between individual and constitutional rights and the needs of a country involved in total war • 5: To understand the complexities of the Schenk Case Behavioral Objectives • STUDENTS WILL BE ABLE TO: • 1: Become proficient using the “TIPS” website and the evaluation of Supreme Court Decisions • 2: Revaluate and synthesize new knowledge with previous held beliefs • 3: Crossover knowledge of American History and “TIPS “skills to ENGLISH composition • 4: Gain independence in decision making and independence in research techniques • 5: Become proficient in using the internet for research and web quests THE BACKGROUND • America entered World War I with grand intentions to make the world safe for democracy and to promote self-determination of oppressed nations. Millions participated in the war effort. It was the first technological and total war in which survival would be determined by its outcome. The industrial revolution had unleashed a potential holocaust for which few were prepared. Previously, wars ended with a treaty, a hand shake and back to business. Not so with this new technology, alliance systems and manic imperialism. Back YOUR TASK • 1} Observe the primary source documents in this presentation. 2} based upon these sources and your knowledge of World War I decide upon the VALIDITY of the following statement. Be sure you have evidence for your choice. Back to Thanks THE STATEMENT • “CRITICISM OF THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE ELIMINATED IN TIMES OF WAR” SOLDIERS OFF TO WAR 1917 War requires complete sacrifice and dedication AMERICAN OVERSEAS TRADE 1914-1917 2500 2000 1500 Major Allie d Pow e rs 1000 Major Ce ntral Pow e rs 500 0 1914 1915 1916 ALLIES—ENGLAND , FRANCE CENTRAL POWERS-GERMANY-AUSTRIA HUNGARY FRANCE--1917 WORLD WAR I DESTROYED MOST OF EUROPE NEW WEAPONS-POISON GAS Its eerie green color belied the pain and suffering this new gas warfare brought upon American troops. THE REALITIES OF WAR “Those at home cannot calculate the intensity of suffering….This is a war to end all wars” Woodrow Wilson CASUALTIES OF A TECHNOLOGICAL WAR “A total war requires total commitment in the field and on the home front” Herbert Hoover 1918 PATRIOTISM CROSSES ETHNIC LINES • JEWS, POLES, ITALAINS, BLACKS, NATIVE AMERICANS, SWEDES, IRISH, GERMANS ET AL WERE ALL SOLDIERS INVOLVED IN WAR CONSCRIPTION-1917 AMERICAN MEN VOLUNTEERED AND WERE DRAFTED INTO SERVICE FOR THEIR COUNTRY. WITHOUT LOYAL AMERICANS THE WAR WOULD BE LOST COURAGE • VOLUNTEERS MADE UP A GOOD PART OF THE MARINES. THEIR VALOR AND DEDICATION WAS UNQUESTIONED. TECHNOLOGY SPEEDS SOLDIERS TO HE FRONT The question asked by the author of this photo was: “WILL THEY EVER RETURN ?” 1917 MEATLESS MONDAYS, FUELESS FRIDAYS WERE JUST SOME OF THE SACRIFICES CITIZENS AT HOME SHOW THEIR SUPPORT AND DEDICATION IN THEIR EVERYDAY LIVES. A TOTAL PARTICIPATIONWOMAN IN WORLD WAR I – WOMAN LEFT THEIR HOMES AND FAMILIES TO FORM A UNITED FRONT IN SUPPORT OF THEIR BRAVE MEN. MANY TOOK FACTORY JOBS… IT WAS NOT ALL MEN FINANCIAL SACRIFICE WAS ESSENTIAL FOR VICTORY IN WORLD WAR I THE ALTERNATIVE TO LOSING WAS UNTHINKABLE FREEDOM MUST BE DEFENDED…IT IS NOT WITHOUT SACRIFICE AMERICAN LEADERS REQUIRE UNQUESTIONED ALLEGIANCE…THEIR SOLDIERS FOLLOWED THEM TO FRANCE AND BEYOND BURYING THE DEAD AFTER THE SINKING OF THE LUSITANIA WAR PROFESSES NO JUSTICE—The innocent die the same death as belligerents The Threat of the U-Boat