Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Embodied cognitive science wikipedia , lookup
Technological singularity wikipedia , lookup
Multiple instance learning wikipedia , lookup
Formal concept analysis wikipedia , lookup
Pattern recognition wikipedia , lookup
Machine learning wikipedia , lookup
Philosophy of artificial intelligence wikipedia , lookup
Ethics of artificial intelligence wikipedia , lookup
Intelligence explosion wikipedia , lookup
History of artificial intelligence wikipedia , lookup
Existential risk from artificial general intelligence wikipedia , lookup
Chapter 17 Learning 323-670 Artificial Intelligence ดร.วิภาดา เวทย์ ประสิทธิ์ ภาควิชาวิทยาการคอมพิวเตอร์ คณะวิทยาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยสงขลานครินทร์ Learning 1. Rote learning 2. Learning by taking advice 3. Learning by problem solving Parameter adjustment Macro-Operators 4. Learning from examples Induction : Winston’s learning program p.458 Version Spaces : Candidate eliminate algorithm Decision tree 5. Explanation-based learning p 482 6. Formal learning theory 323-670 Artificial Intelligence Lecture23-30 Page 2 Winston’s learning program Concept : P.459 1. Begin with a structural description of one known instance of the concept. Call the description the concept definition. 2. Examine descriptions of other known instances of the concepts. Generalize the definition to include them. 3. Examine descriptions of near misses of concept, Restrict the definition to exclude these. 323-670 Artificial Intelligence Lecture23-30 Page 3 Winston’s learning program p.458 Block world concept : Figure 17.2 p. 459 Structure description : Figure 17.3 p. 460 The comparison of two arches : Figure 17.4 p. 461 The arch description after two examples : Figure 17.5 p. 462 The arch “description after a near miss : Figure 17.6 p. 463 use semantic networks to describe block structures use matching process to detect similarities and differences between structures use isa hierarchy to describe relationship among already known objects 323-670 Artificial Intelligence Lecture23-30 Page 4 Version Spaces The goal : to produce a description that is consistent with all positive examples but no negative examples in the training set. use frame representing concept for car see Figure 17.7 p. 463 Features/Slots : { value1, value2,...,valueN } – origin : { Japan, USA, Britain } Variables : X1, X2, X3 concept space : see Figure 17.11 Concept of Version Spaces p. 466 variables target concept all training instance 323-670 Artificial Intelligence Lecture23-30 Page 5 Version Spaces version space = current hypothesis = subset of concept space = largest collection of descriptions that is consistent with all the training examples seen so far. concept space = G or S G = contain the most general descriptions consistent with the training example seen so far. S = contain the most specific descriptions consistent with training exaples positive example (+) move S to more specific negative example (-) move G to more specific if G and S sets converge the hypothesis is a single concept description 323-670 Artificial Intelligence Lecture23-30 Page 6 Version Spaces Candidate Eliminate Algorithm p.466-467 algorithm that use to narrow down the version space by remove any descriptions that are inconsistent with set G and set S Car Example – Figure 17.7 Concept Car : p. 463 – Figure 17.8 Representation language for car : p. 464 – Figure 17.9 The concept Japanese car : p. 464 – Figure 17.10 Partial ordering of concepts : p. 465 – Figure 17.12 Positive and negative examples of car : p. 467 323-670 Artificial Intelligence Lecture23-30 Page 7 Version Spaces We want “Japanese economy car” From Figure 17.12 Positive and negative examples of car : p. 467 [origin = X1, manufacture = X2, color = X3, decade = X4, type = X5] GET EX1 (+) G = {(X1, X2, X3, X4, X5)} S = {(Japan,Honda, Blue,1980,Economy}) =Figure 17.12 in EX1 GET EX2 (-) G = {(X1, Honda, X3, X4, X5), (X1, X2, Blue, X4, X5) , (X1, X2, X3, 1980, X5), (X1, X2, X3, X4, Economy)} S = {(Japan,Honda, Blue,1980,Economy}) ** the same because (-) example GET EX3 (+) check G first, G = {(X1, X2, Blue, X4, X5) ,(X1, X2, X3, X4, Economy)} S = {(Japan,X2, Blue,X4,Economy}) GET EX4 (-) check G first, G = {(Japan, X2, Blue, X4, X5) ,(Japan, X2, X3, X4, Economy)} S = {(Japan,X2, Blue,X4,Economy}) ** the same because (-) example GET EX5 (+) check G first, G = {(Japan, X2, X3, X4, Economy)} 323-670 Artificial Intelligence Lecture23-30 Page 8 S = {(Japan,X2, X3,X4, Economy}) Version Spaces Note : The algorithm is least commitment algorithm : produce as little as possible at each step Problems – 1.) S and G may not converge to a single hypothesis – 2. ) if there is a noise (inconsistent data) the algorithm will be premature, we may prune the target concept too fast * For example if the data number three given the negative sign (-) instance of positive sign (+) ... no matter how much the data is we can not find the concept.... * How to fix this problem is to maintain several G and S sets BUT it is costly and may have the bounded inconsistency problem – 3.) We can not use OR in the questions ask 323-670 Artificial Intelligence Lecture23-30 Page 9 * For example : Italian sport car or German luxury car” Decision Tree ID3 Program = to classify a particular input, we start at the top of the tree and answer questions until we reach a leaf, where the classification is stored. See Figure 17.13 Decision tree p. 470 1. Choose window = random subset of training examples to train 2. Outside window = use to test the decision tree 3. Use empirical evidence (iterative method) to build up decision tree 4. Building a node = choosing some attribute to divide training instance into subset consider (+) sign Can use with OR .... just change (-) sign into (+) sign Problems : noisy input, attribute value may be unknown, may have l;arge decision tree and hard to understand relationship See Figure 17.13 323-670 Artificial Intelligence Lecture23-30 Page 10 Explanation-Based Learning provide explanation depend on domain theory/ domain knowledge 323-670 Artificial Intelligence Lecture23-30 Page 11 Formal Learning Theory Given positive and negative examples produce algorithm that will classify future examples correctly with probability 1/h Complexity of learning : – the error tolerance (h) – the number of binary features present in the examples (t) – the size of the rule necessary to make the discrimination (f) 323-670 Artificial Intelligence Lecture23-30 Page 12 Formal Learning Theory if the number of training examples required is polynomial in h,t, and f then the concept is learnable. few training examples are needed learnable we restrict the learner to the positive examples only. See Figure 12.22 Concept of elephant P. 483 elephant = “gray, mammal, large” 323-670 Artificial Intelligence Lecture23-30 Page 13 Induction induction : A method of reasoning by which one infers a generalization from a series of instances. emphasis to all BEANS : all instances Inductive syllogisms are of the following form: • • • 1. These beans are from this bag. (and these beans..., and these beans..., etc.) 2. These beans are (all) white. # 3 Therefore, all beans from this bag are white. In a much broader sense, induction can be thought to include various other forms of reasoning including analogical reasoning, inference to cause form symptoms, and confirmation of laws and theories. 1 323-670 Artificial Intelligence 2 Lecture23-30 Page 14 Deduction deduction - A method of reasoning by which one infers a conclusion from a set of sentences by employing the axioms and rules of inference for a given logical system. Use the term 'deduction' in a general sense to denote the fact that a conclusion follows necessarily from the premises. Deductive syllogisms in quantificational predicate calculus are of the 1 following form: » » 1. All beans from this bag are white.... 2. These beans are from this bag. » #4 Therefore, these beans are white..... 323-670 Artificial Intelligence emphasis to one BEAN : one instance Lecture23-30 2 Page 15 Abduction abduction -A method of reasoning by which one infers to the ......best explanation..... - A heuristic procedure that reasons inductively from available empirical evidence to the discovery of the probable hypotheses that would best explain its occurrence. Abductive syllogisms are of the following form: #3 All beans from this bag are white #4 These beans are white. 323-670 Artificial Intelligence Lecture23-30 Page 16