Download Ch-3

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Icarus paradox wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Objectives
Corporate and division strategic planing
 Business unit planning
 The marketing process
 Product level planning
 The marketing plan

©2000 Prentice Hall
Market-Oriented Strategic
Planning
©2000 Prentice Hall
Objectives
Resources
Skills
Opportunities
Market-Oriented Strategic
Planning
Objectives
Resources
Profit
and
Growth
Skills
©2000 Prentice Hall
Opportunities
Corporate Headquarters
Planning
Define the corporate mission
 Establish strategic business units
(SBUs)
 Assign resources to SBUs
 Plan new business, downsize older
businesses

©2000 Prentice Hall
Strategic-Planning, Implementation,
and Control Process
Planning
Corporate
planning
Implementation
Organizing
Division
planning
Business
planning
Product
planning
©2000 Prentice Hall
Control
Measuring
results
Diagnosing
results
Implementing
Taking
corrective
action
Good Mission Statements:
Limited number of goals
Stress major policies & values
Define competitive scopes
©2000 Prentice Hall
Market Growth Rate
The Boston Consulting Group’s
Growth-Share Matrix
20%18%16%14%12%10%8%6%4%2%0
Stars
4
3
5
?2
?
1
Dogs
Cash cow
8
6
10x
©2000 Prentice Hall
Question marks
7
4x
2x 1.5x
1x
.5x .4x .3x .2x .1x
Relative Market Share
MARKET ATTRACTIVENESS
Low Medium High
Market Attractiveness: CompetitivePosition Portfolio Classification
Strong
BUSINESS STRENGTH
Medium
5.00
5.00
3.67
2.33
Weak
1.00
Joints
Aerospace
fittings
Hydraulic
pumps
3.67
Clutches
2.33
Flexible
diaphragms
Fuel
pumps
Relief
valve
1.00
Invest/grow
©2000 Prentice Hall
Selectivity/earnings
Harvest/divest
The Strategic-Planning Gap
Desired
sales
Diversification growth
Strategicplanning
gap
Sales
Integrative growth
Intensive growth
Current
portfolio
0
©2000 Prentice Hall
5
Time (years)
10
Three Intensive Growth Strategies:
Ansoff’s Product/Market Expansion Grid
Existing
products
Existing
markets
1. Market
penetration
New
markets
2. Market
development
©2000 Prentice Hall
New
products
3. Product
development
4. Diversification
Opportunity Matrix
Attractiveness
Success Probability
High
Low
High
1
2
Low
3
4
©2000 Prentice Hall
Opportunities
1. Company develops a more
powerful lighting system
2. Company develops a
device for measuring the
energy efficiency of any
lighting system
3. Company develops a
device for measuring
illumination level
4. Company develops a
software program to teach
lighting fundamentals to TV
studio personnel
Threat Matrix
Seriousness
Probability of Occurrence
High
Low
High
1
2
Low
3
4
©2000 Prentice Hall
Threats
1. Competitor develops a
superior lighting system
2. Major prolonged
economic depression
3. Higher costs
4. Legislation to reduce
number of TV studio
licenses
The McKinsey 7-S Framework
Structure
Strategy
Systems
Shared
values
Skills
Style
Staff
©2000 Prentice Hall
The Value-Delivery Process
(a) Traditional physical process sequence
Make the product
Design Procure Make
product
Sell the product
Price Sell Advertise/
promote Distribute Service
(b) Value creation & delivery sequence
Choose the Value Provide the Value Communicate the Value
Strategic marketing
©2000 Prentice Hall
Tactical marketing
The Marketing Plan
Executive Summary & Table of Contents
Current Marketing Situation
Opportunity & Issue Analysis
Objectives
Marketing Strategy
Action Programs
Projected Profit-and-loss
Controls
©2000 Prentice Hall
Factors Influencing Company
Marketing Marketing Strategy
intermediaries
Demographic/
economic
environment
Technical/
physical
environment
Product
Suppliers
Place
Target Price
customers
Publics
Promotion
Political/
legal
environment
©2000 Prentice Hall
Social/
cultural
environment
Competitors
Review
Corporate and division strategic planing
 Business unit planning
 The marketing process
 Product level planning
 The marketing plan

©2000 Prentice Hall