Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Chapter 25 ~ Phylogeny & Systematics Phylogeny: the evolutionary history of a species • Systematics: the study of biological diversity in an evolutionary context • The fossil record: the ordered array of fossils, within layers, or strata, of sedimentary rock The fossil record • Sedimentary rock: rock formed from sand and mud that once settled on the bottom of seas, lakes, and marshes •Dating: •1- Relative~ geologic time scale; sequence of species •2- Absolute~ radiometric dating; age using half-lives of radioactive isotopes Absolute Dating Biogeography: the study of the past and present distribution of species • Pangaea-250 mya √ Permian extinction • Geographic isolation-180 mya √ African/South American reptile fossil similarities √ Australian marsupials Mass extinction • Permian (250 million years ago): 90% of marine animals; Pangea merge • Cretaceous (65 million years ago): death of dinosaurs, 50% of marine species; low angle comet Phylogenetics • The tracing of evolutionary relationships (phylogenetic tree) • Linnaeus • Binomial • Genus, specific epithet • Homo sapiens • Taxon (taxa) Phylogenetic Trees • Cladistic Analysis: taxonomic approach that classifies organisms according to the order in time at which branches arise along a phylogenetic tree (cladogram) • Clade: each evolutionary branch in a cladogram Types: • 1- Monophyletic single ancestor that gives rise to all species in that taxon and to no species in any other taxon; legitimate cladogram • 2- Polyphyletic members of a taxa are derived from 2 or more ancestral forms not common to all members; does not meet cladistic criterion • 3- Paraphyletic lacks the common ancestor that would unite the species; does not meet cladistic criterion Constructing a Cladogram • Sorting homology vs. analogy... • Homology: likenesses attributed to common ancestry • Analogy: likenesses attributed to similar ecological roles and natural selection • Convergent evolution: species from different evolutionary branches that resemble one another due to similar ecological roles A Cladogram Chapter VI Chapter VI Chapter VI …Organs of extreme perfection and complication. -To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree. …Organs of extreme perfection and complication. -To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, abserd in the highest possible degree. …Organs of extreme perfection and complication. -To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, abserd in the highest possible degree. Yet reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a perfect and complex eye to one very imperfect and simple, each grade being useful to its possessor, can be shown to exist; if further, the eye does vary ever so slightly, and the variations be inherited, which is certainly the case; and if any variation or modification in the organ be ever useful to an animal under changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection, though insuperable by our imagination, can hardly be considered real. … Yet reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a perfect and complex eye to one very imperfect and simple, each grade being useful to its possessor, can be shown to exist; if further, the eye does vary ever so slightly, and the variations be inherited, which is certainly the case; and if any variation or modification in the organ be ever useful to an animal under changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection, though insuperible by our imagination, can hardly be considered real. … Yet reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a perfect and complex eye to one very imperfect and simple, each grade being useful to its possesser, can be shown to exist; if further, the eye does vary ever so slightly, and the variations be inherited, which is certainly the case; and if any variation or modification in the organ be ever useful to an animal under changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection, though insuperible by our imagination, can hardly be considered real. … Chapter VI Chapter VI Chapter VI …Organs of extreme perfection and complication. -To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, abserd in the highest possible degree. …Organs of extreme perfection and complication. -To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, abserd in the highest possible degree. Yet reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a perfect and complex eye to one very imperfect and simple, each grade being useful to its possessor, can be shown to exist; if further, the eye does vary ever so slightly, and the variations be inherited, which is certainly the case; and if any variation or modification in the organ be ever useful to an animal under changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection, though insuperable by our imagination, can hardly be considered real. … Yet reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a perfect and complex eye to one very imperfect and simple, each grade being useful to its possessor, can be shown to exist; if further, the eye does vary ever so slightly, and the variations be inherited, which is certainly the case; and if any variation or modification in the organ be ever useful to an animal under changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection, though insuperible by our imagination, can hardly be considered real. … Yet reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a perfect and complex eye to one very imperfect and simple, each grade being useful to its possesser, can be shown to exist; if further, the eye does vary ever so slightly, and the variations be inherited, which is certainly the case; and if any variation or modification in the organ be ever useful to an animal under changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection, though insuperible by our imagination, can hardly be considered real. … …Organs of extreme perfection and complication. -To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, abserd in the highest possible degree. Chapter VI Chapter VI Chapter VI Chapter VI Chapter VI Chapter VI Chapter VI …Organs of extreme perfection and complication. -- To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree. Yet reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a perfect and complex eye to one very imperfect and simple, each grade being useful to its possessor, can be shown to exist; if further, the eye does vary ever so slightly, and the variations be inherited, which is certainly the case; and if any variation or modification in the organ be ever useful to an animal under changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection, though insuperable by our imagination, can hardly be considered real.… Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species • The principle of parsimony states that a theory about nature should be the simplest explanation that is consistent with the facts. • Phylogenetic trees are hypotheses • The strongest phylogenetic hypotheses of all are supported by both the morphological and molecular evidence.