Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
--- The analysis is done --- Energy+ Goals and Objectives Support transformational change to achieve universal access to sustainable energy and avoid greenhouse gas emissions Scaling-up access to renewable energy sources and increased energy efficiency Test and pilot sectoral market mechanism – future carbon markets: Inform and be informed by UNFCCC ”Green Climate Fund – readiness” 3 Design Principles – Energy+ Country-driven, sectoral approach Public funding to leverage commercial investments, risk mitigation, capacity building: Energy sector investment ready (”Green Climate Fund-ready”) Phased introduction of results-based aid : “Cash on delivery” Indicators to measure performance: Access and avoided/reduced emissions - MRV Initially policies and measures Use existing programs and institutions Social and environmental standards 4 Phased Country Approach –Flexibly Applied Readiness Phase National Energy-Climate Strategies or Action Plans Implementation - “Energizing” - Phase Capacity building, Institutions, Subsidy, Credit Lines, MRV, Registry Performance Payments Phase Results-based Aid and Carbon Resources to Access to Energy and Emission Avoidance 5 Energy+ - Results-Based Incentives at the Sectoral Level Results-based aid (RBA) $ Results-based financing (RBF) menu Feed in tariff (FiT) Credit lines Tax exemption $ $ National authorities Energy+ Off take guarantee Auctions/ tender MRV Access Avoided emissions ….. others 6 Results Chain for Energy+ Impacts Outcomes Phase 3 Outputs Phase 2 Inputs Phase 1 Processes Implementation of Results-Based Support Tailored to country context and capacity Targeted to the energy (sub)-sector supported Phased in over time Initial payment(s) to ‘kick-start’ – down payment: Enabling framework (capacity, institutions, MRV, registry etc.) Interim -Triggers: Policies and measures, MRV, institutions, registry Proxies for increased access and avoided/reduced emissions Long-term: Independently verified results – access and emissions 8 Energy+ Support in Various Phases - Examples First phase – preparation and planning: Support to prepare LEDS/energy plan Initial institutional framework – MRV systems, reference level – BAU Second phase – “energizing”: Results-based aid: enabling environment, policy development, legal reform, MRV systems, registry etc Funding on the basis of deliverables – enabling policies and measures Proxies for increased access and avoided emissions Third phase – results-based payments: Performance: increase in access and/or avoided emissions Sourced and targeted to leverage commercial investments Payments from (future) carbon markets and climate finance (GCF) 9 Market Constraints– Implications for Energy+ No standard approach to identify or remove barriers across all countries: • • • • • • Political stability Regulatory barriers Cost of capital Access to capital Competition with fossil fuels Enabling infrastructure Energy+ - framework to incentivize actors to take action to create market opportunities: Energy sector investment ready Cost of doing business reduced 10 IRR Expectations – Developed – Developing Countries Source: DB Climate Change Advisors Private/Commercial Sector – Areas of Support Developing a national energy/climate strategy: Information for investment decisions and design: Finance up-front studies – FS, resource mapping Climate registry - matches financing and technical needs with public and private resources Regulatory framework for investments and contracts: Clearly defined goals and policy levers One stop shop or fast tracking for project approval, permits, licenses Standardized PPAs Financing models – close RE viability gap: Zero-interest, extended maturity loans ; Reverse seed investments Results-based financing menu 12 Improve Coordination and Cooperation I – Existing funds and mechanisms EUEI REEEP UNEnergy UNDP CTF GEF SREP Carbon funds MDBs GEEREF IFC Donors Energy+ Partnership at country level $ Results-based aid EnDev II – New resources Carbon markets, private sector, Green Climate Fund, etc.. Business opportunities Partnership* and the Way Forward Durban Abu Dhabi Rio+20 Oslo *Partners at the launch 10. October 2011. Open to all interested actors High-level political commitment Modalities to be agreed upon Institutional arrangements? Technical Working Group The Partnership - Aimed at Serious Results Open to all Focus - action and results on the ground Partners’ offer depends on national/regional setting Support to country action High-level political commitment required Technical Working Group – comprised of partners: Developing the methodological framework Partners invited to participate in the development of Energy+ 15 SE4ALL and Energy+ Share the same objectives: Universal access Doubling of improvement in energy efficiency Doubling of the share of renewable energy Energy+: Access to energy in developing countries through the use of RE and EE Explicit climate change objective Results-based support Sectoral approach Carbon market Energy+ recognized as an innovative initiative 16 SE4ALL and Energy+: Rio +20 Agreement of goals SE4ALL – global action plan Framework for Action - UN institutional structure Energy+: Methodological framework Partnership – modalities Country programs: South African Renewables Initiative India – renewable fund Energy+ country programs in Ethiopia, Kenya, Maldives and Liberia – Norway takes the lead Other partners – develop programs in other countries Private/commercial sector focus - consultations 17 Summary: Results Chain and RBA/RBF Country Cases Ethiopia • Climate Resilient Green Economy (CRGE) • Energy+: • Increased access to RE and EE in rural areas • Initial focus on Fuel-Efficient Stoves • Reduce the consumption of fuelwood – largest source of rural energy – and decrease GHG emissions related to forest degradation by 51 Mt CO2e annually in 2030 or about 20% of the total abatement potential identified • Long term (2030) deploying 31 million fuelwoodefficient stoves in rural and urban areas, in the short term (2015), 9 million stoves in rural areas. • Abatement potential of 14 Mt CO2e between2012 and 2015 (~USD 2.5 per tonne mitigated) • Total support NOK 500 million (2012-2016) • SREP pilot country • • • • 85 million people Biomass 88% 13% access to electricity 4 TWH in 2010 Kenya • Clim Liberia • Cl India • Cl Maldives • Carbon netural by 2030 • SREP pilot country • 93% access – not reliable service • Emissions1,3 MtCO2e in 2009, about1 MtCO2e from energy • Fuel bill $260 million – 16% of GDP • RE – 60% from solar • EE public buildings and resorts • PV – outer islands • 400 000 people • 199 inhabitated islands • About 100 resorts South Africa • South African Renewables Initiative (SARi) • UK, Switzerland, Germany, Norway, Denmark, EIB • The aim SARi is enable the ambitious scaling up of renewable energy in South Africa, as envisaged in the Integrated Resource Plan for electricity. • 19 GW of renewables • $36 billion of investment needs to be mobilised • Creation of 35-40,000 job • Emission reductions amounting to 7% of the emission reductions needed to meet South Africa’s Cancun Accord commitment by 2025. • 910mn t by 2044 or 46Mt per annum at full ramp-up. Further information: [email protected]