* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Aalseth-icpms - Berkeley Cosmology Group
Survey
Document related concepts
Isotopic labeling wikipedia , lookup
Atomic absorption spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Particle-size distribution wikipedia , lookup
Scanning tunneling spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Vibrational analysis with scanning probe microscopy wikipedia , lookup
Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup
Chemical imaging wikipedia , lookup
Physical organic chemistry wikipedia , lookup
Rutherford backscattering spectrometry wikipedia , lookup
Ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
X-ray fluorescence wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Materials Assay & ICPMS for DUSEL R&D Starting Points • 238U and 232Th chains are primary concerns – Are not always in equilibrium with progeny • Other backgrounds are also important – Surface contamination, cosmogenics • Next-generation experiments require a range of materials purity levels, but the most stringent are <1 uBq/kg • Full range of assay techniques will be needed – alpha, beta, gamma spectroscopy, mass spectroscopy, radiochemistry, neutron-activation analysis Scope • Look at examples favoring and disfavoring gamma spectroscopy vs ICPMS • Simple look at what favors – Gamma spectroscopy – ICPMS • ICPMS Detection and Overview • Challenges for direct measurement • R&D implications Easy Example: Cable • Desired budget for cable was a count/year (full spectrum) • Initial assay (above-ground, lowbackground gamma spectrometer) of 500foot spool of cleaned cable gave limits of <45 uBq/foot (<36 mBq/kg) • Analysis of experiment efficiency showed this would contribute <1.0 count/year • Done! Start using cable…(IGEX) Hard Example: Electroformed Cu • Stringent limits of <0.1 uBq/kg desired • Best gamma spectrometry limits <6-8 uBq/kg – 90-day count, Homestake or LNGS, ~10-kg sample • Developed dissolution and Th tracer chemistry for Cu • Developed adsorbent (column) chemistry to partition Cu from Th • Used radiochemistry as front-end to ICPMS • Electroformed copper sample result of 0.7 ± 0.6 uBq/kg – (1-g sample, few-hour measurement, 7-fold replicate, 1 week of setup for campaign) – Many months of radiochemistry R&D to enable measurement • Not there yet, work continues! But already better than previous best gamma result. End in sight. Unfinished Example: Resistor • Desired radiopurity ~1 ppb 238U, 10 ppb 232Th • Using LNGS screening detector (one of world’s best) as example, this would require 1 kg of material and a 100-day count • Cost of 1 kg of chip resistors (about 1.7e6 units) would be $1.7M! • Conclusion: Turn toward clean chemistry for chip resistors, FET ($27M/kg), etc. as front-end to ICPMS • ICPMS will require <1g of material for assay View from another angle… What Favors Gamma Spectroscopy? • Assembled commercial items (heterogeneous) – Cables, electronic components, valves, etc. • Used in small quantities = only moderate radiopurity limits – Means many can be assayed for better limits per item • Cheap and available – Can afford to buy many more than needed to support assay of large quantities • Modest volumes – Needed to allow usable efficiency for reasonable number of items What Favors ICPMS? • Easy dissolution chemistry – Can “dilute-’n-shoot” when only moderate limits needed • Simple elements or compounds – Best when radiochemistry is already developed for the system – Existence of appropriate isotopic tracers – Complex systems can be analyzed, but requires significant chemistry development ICP-MS DETECTION RANGES Aqueous Standards 238U WEIGHT PREFIX ATOMS/ml 10-3 (ppt) Milli 2.53x1018 10-6 (ppm) Micro 2.53x1015 10-9 (ppb) Nano 2.53x1012 10-12 (ppt) Pico 2.53x109 10-15 (ppq) Femto 2.53x106 10-18 (pp?) Atto 2530 10-21 (pp??) Zepto 2.53 10-24 (pp???) Guaca 0.00253 NORMAL ICP-MS RANGE ULTRA TRACE Direct Atto-gram/mL Detection 1E4 250 ag/mL Np-237 1 .8 E+ 0 5 1E3 25000 MHz/ppm Response (cps) 1 .2 E+ 0 4 1E2 1 .2 E+ 0 3 1E1 2 .0 E+ 0 2 2 .5 E+ 0 2 1 .0 E+ 0 2 4 .0 E+ 0 1 7 .2 E+ 0 1 4 .6 E+ 0 1 2 .2 E+ 0 1 2 .9 E+ 0 1 1 .9 E+ 0 1 1E0 5 .6 E+ 0 1 2 .7 E+ 0 1 1E-1 1E-2 230 232 234 236 amu 238 240 242 244 ICPMS Generalities • Elements/Isotopes in the environment that are not naturally occurring, easy to detect at instrument and method detection limits – Pu239,240,242,242, Am241, Np237, Th230,229, Tc99, I129 • However elements like Th and U are problematic – Th and U at ppm levels in dirt – Ultra-pure acids, reagents, lab supplies – Sample introduction system of ICP/MS Challenges for Direct Measurement • Cosmogenics, e.g. 60Co in Cu, Ge – Background limits more stringent than U, Th chains – Each system has different challenges and opportunity for purification, e.g. electrochemistry for Cu, zone refinement for Ge – May have to depend on measured production rates and process knowledge • Disequilibrium in Th, U chains – Hard to measure at necessary levels – May have to depend on higher-level validation of equilibrium behavior for a particular system, then process knowledge Common Theme: Radiochemistry • Opportunity to sample larger masses, get sensitive results from smaller masses – Ability to count atoms with MS – Higher efficiencies for radiometric counting • Alpha, beta measurement • Requires – Dissolution chemistry for system – Tracer chemistry (radio or stable) – Separation chemistry for system • Challenge – Clean chemistry – Reproducible yielding – Extremely high partition between analyte of interest and matrix R&D Issues • Newest instruments have plenty of raw sensitivity • Radiochemistry for specific systems is needed (and requires significant effort) – Dissolution – Tracers – Separation Conclusions • Gamma spectrometry when possible – Inexpensive, non-destructive, nominal sample preparation, detailed information when signal is seen • Radiochemistry when necessary (R&D priority) – Front-end to ICPMS – Front-end to LSC or direct alpha/beta – In combination with NAA