* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Document
Lithuanian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Ukrainian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Malay grammar wikipedia , lookup
Germanic strong verb wikipedia , lookup
Esperanto grammar wikipedia , lookup
Navajo grammar wikipedia , lookup
French grammar wikipedia , lookup
Kannada grammar wikipedia , lookup
Ancient Greek grammar wikipedia , lookup
Macedonian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Georgian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Portuguese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Old English grammar wikipedia , lookup
Modern Hebrew grammar wikipedia , lookup
Italian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Scottish Gaelic grammar wikipedia , lookup
Japanese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Swedish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Turkish grammar wikipedia , lookup
English clause syntax wikipedia , lookup
Antisymmetry wikipedia , lookup
Russian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Chinese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Preposition and postposition wikipedia , lookup
Serbo-Croatian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Polish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Latin syntax wikipedia , lookup
Yiddish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Lexical semantics wikipedia , lookup
Spanish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Syntax IV November 20, 2009 Wrap-up • Let’s check out the remaining practice sentences… • One note on syntactic abbreviations: • The triangle notation Check This Out 1. A phrase structure rule for NPs looks like: • NP Det N’ • (Det = the Specifier) 2. And a PP can be a complement of a head noun: • N’ N PP 3. And an NP can be a complement of a prepositional phrase: • • PP (Deg) P’ • P’ P NP Where can this combination of rules take us? Whoa, Nellie • There is a possibility for infinite recursion. • NP Det N PP • NP Det N P NP • NP Det N P Det N PP • NP Det N P Det N P NP • NP Det N P Det N P Det N PP, etc. • Example: the book from the library in the city near the airport beside the apartment complex with the playground of the children from the school behind the train tracks... • The fact that our grammar can generate phrases like this is why we need to know patterns of patterns. More Patterns of Patterns • Awhile back, we heard about potentially infinite sentences that sounded like: • Jean knows that Charlie said that Sue suspects that Bill thinks that Beth hopes that Barry is a genius. • • Or: In order to understand the (potentially infinite) structure of sentences like these, we need to know more about: 1. Sentence structure 2. Verb complements Sentences • The basic phrase types include: • NP, VP, AP, PP • A basic sentence is an “inflectional phrase” (IP). • The head of the IP is the tense of the verb. • I = INFL = inflection = [past], [future], [present], etc. • The specifier of the IP is the subject NP. • The complement of the I is a VP. • If that complement is an NP, then it is called the object of the verb. • Note: verbs have lots of different complement options. IP Det Sentence Structure NP I’ N’ I VP N [+past] V’ the NP coach Note: the V in the VP must agree in tense with the I tense marker. V Det dropped the N’ N ball IP Det Sentence Structure NP I’ N’ I VP N will V’ the NP coach • Note: Auxiliaries show up in the I slot. • (Verbs after auxiliaries don’t display tense) V Det drop the N’ N ball A Note on Tenses • There are only two tenses in English that are marked without an auxiliary preceding the verb: • past [+past] • = dropped, ran, sang, watched, lost, etc. • present [-past] • = drop/drops, run/runs, sing/sings, watch/watches, etc. • For this class, if there is an auxiliary verb in the I slot, it is not necessary to put an explicit tense marker there. • Otherwise, choose between [+past] and [-past]. IP Det Sentence Terminology NP I’ N’ I VP N will V’ the NP coach V • The subject of a sentence (in drop English) is: • the NP specifier of the sentence IP. Det N’ the N ball IP Det Sentence Terminology NP I’ N’ I VP N will V’ the NP coach • The object of a sentence (in English) is: • an NP complement of the main VP. V Det drop the N’ N ball English Case Marking • The form of some English pronouns changes, depending on whether they are subjects or objects. • For Example: I know you. You know me. He knows them. They know him. We know her. She knows us. • But word order is still constrained: *Her know we. *Them knows he. Subject/Object Marking • In other languages, subjects and objects are specified by morphological inflections on nouns. • Example: Russian case marking ja tita-ju I knig-u read-1st pers-sing. book-object alternate order : ja knig-u tita-ju alternate order: knig-u ja tita-ju • knig-a byla v book-subject was in komnat-e room-object “The book was in the room.” “I read the book.” Potential Problems • There are some limitations on the extent to which the syntactic rules can ignore the specific words that fit into each phrase. • Example (from last week’s Quick Write): • Is it possible to “dance a horse”? Sub-categorization • It turns out that it is necessary to break lexical categories down further, into sub-categories. • For instance, some verbs must be followed by a noun phrase: I devoured the sandwich. *I devoured. I met the teacher. *I met. • Other verbs must not be followed by a noun phrase: I sprinted. *I sprinted the ball. I slept. *I slept the dog. I danced. *I danced the horse. Verb Sub-Category #1 • Intransitive Verbs (Vi): must not be followed by an NP • = they do not take an object NP as a complement. • VP Vi • *VP Vi NP • Examples: sneeze, sprint, fall, elapse, snorkel • Good: The boy slept. • Bad: *The boy slept the dog. • Good: The girl fell. • Bad: *The girl fell the dog. Verb Sub-Category #2 • Transitive Verbs (Vt): must be followed by an NP • = they must take an object NP as a complement. • VP Vt NP • *VP Vt • Examples: devour, defy, harm, invite • Good: The children harmed the dog. • Bad: *The children harmed. • Good: The zombies invited the vampires. • Bad: *The zombies invited. Verb Sub-Category #3 • Ditransitive Verbs (Vdt): must be followed by two objects • = either two NPs or a combination of {NP, PP}. • VP Vdt NP NP • *VP Vt • Examples: give, sell, send, put • Good: The boy gave the dog a bone. • Bad: *?The boy gave the dog. • Good: The students sold the professor a chew toy. • Bad: *?The students sold the professor. • Alternative: The students sold a chew toy to the professor. A + N Sub-categories • Adjectives and nouns can have complement requirements, too--often for particular PPs: Mary is fond of John. *Mary is fond. *Mary is fond by John. • Some nouns require specific prepositional phrases: George talked about our reliance on oil. *George talked about our reliance. *George talked about our reliance for oil. • This information has to be included in the lexicon for each word. Verb Sub-Category #4 • Sentential Verbs (Vs): • = include a sentence in their complement. • Examples: know, believe, wonder, think… • Marge thinks that [Homer ate the cake]IP. • Don wondered whether [Sidney scored a goal]IP. • Phoebe believed that [Chandler married Monika]IP. • Gandalf knew if [Frodo had the ring]IP. • Notice that the sentence in the VP complement is always preceded by a funny kind of word: • that, whether, if… Complementizer Phrases • New lexical category: complementizers (C). • Ex: if, that, whether • Complementizers function as the heads of complementizer phrases. (CPs) • The complement of the CP is another IP (sentence). • Ex: Marge thinks [that [Homer ate the cake]IP]CP. • Matrix clause = highest-level sentence • “Marge thinks…” • Complement, or embedded clause = within the CP • “Homer ate the cake.” matrix clause IP NP I’ Marge I [-past] VP V’ CP V C’ thinks C that embedded clause IP NP I’ Homer I VP [+past] V’ CP Example V NP ate the cake Infinite Recursion, part 2 • It is possible to create infinitely long sentences by embedding complementizer clauses within complementizer clauses… • John said [that Mary thought [that Robin knew [that Angela hoped [that Quinton wished [that Bronwen believed that…]]]]] • VP V CP V CP • CP C IP V C IP • IP NP VP V C NP VP • VP V CP V C NP V CP • etc. Infinite Recursion, part 3 • There is one other (very boring) way to produce inifinitely long sentences in language: • I like baseball and basketball and hockey and football and soccer and rugby and cricket and ultimate frisbee and polo and lacrosse…. • Sentences like this take advantage of the syntactic phenomenon of coordination. • Coordination combines phrases or words of the same type with a conjunction (and, but, or…) • to create a phrase or word of the same type. • General coordination rule: Xn Xn Con Xn Coordination Examples • NP NP and NP NP The fat man and the little boy • VP VP or VP VP fish or cut bait • IP IP but IP IP Ringo plays drums but Paul plays bass. • Coordination of individual words works the same way: • P P and P • She went [[above]P and [beyond]P]P the call of duty. Ambiguity • Coordination can lead to a very simple kind of structural ambiguity. • I like green eggs and ham. • Interpretation #1: just the eggs are green. • I like [[green eggs]NP and [ham]NP]NP. • Interpretation #2: both the eggs and ham are green. • I like [green [[eggs]N’ and [ham]N’]NP. • Let’s check out the trees… Interpretation #1 • Only the eggs are green: IP I’ NP Pro I I VP [-past] V’ V NP like NP Con NP AP N’ and ham green N eggs Interpretation #2 • Both the eggs and ham are green: IP I’ NP Pro I I VP [-past] V’ V like NP AP N’ green N’ Con N’ N and N eggs ham Further Ambiguity • Let’s try another one: • The police shot the terrorists with rifles. • Why is this sentence is ambiguous? • (How can you describe the ambiguity, structurally?) • Interpretation #1: the terrorists have rifles. • [with rifles] is a PP embedded in the object NP. • Interpretation #2: the police have rifles. • [with rifles] is a PP that modifies the main VP. • Let’s check out some more trees… Interpretation #1 IP I’ NP the police I VP [+past] V’ V shot NP the In this one, the terrorists have the rifles. N’ Det N PP terrorists P’ P NP with rifles Interpretation #2 IP I’ NP the police I VP [+past] V’ V shot In this one, the police are using the rifles to shoot the terrorists. PP P’ NP Det N’ P NP the N with rifles terrorists The PP is a modifier of the VP here, not a complement. = it’s not required by the verb.