* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download PolUKR - domeczek
Zulu grammar wikipedia , lookup
Portuguese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Sanskrit grammar wikipedia , lookup
Comparison (grammar) wikipedia , lookup
Modern Greek grammar wikipedia , lookup
Spanish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Old English grammar wikipedia , lookup
Udmurt grammar wikipedia , lookup
Kannada grammar wikipedia , lookup
Pipil grammar wikipedia , lookup
Latin syntax wikipedia , lookup
Archaic Dutch declension wikipedia , lookup
Swedish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Grammatical number wikipedia , lookup
Grammatical case wikipedia , lookup
Literary Welsh morphology wikipedia , lookup
Italian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Old Irish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Turkish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Old Norse morphology wikipedia , lookup
Russian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Arabic grammar wikipedia , lookup
Lithuanian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Esperanto grammar wikipedia , lookup
Romanian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Latvian declension wikipedia , lookup
Romanian nouns wikipedia , lookup
Ancient Greek grammar wikipedia , lookup
Scottish Gaelic grammar wikipedia , lookup
Yiddish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Ukrainian grammar wikipedia , lookup
French grammar wikipedia , lookup
Principles of organizing a common morphological tagset and a search engine for PolUKR (Polish-Ukrainian Parallel Corpus) Польсько-Український паралельний корпус Polsko-Ukraiński Korpus Równoległy http://corpus.domeczek.pl Natalia Kotsyba, Institute of Slavic Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences Olga Shypnivska, ULIF, Ukrainian Academy of Sciences Magdalena Turska, Warsaw University Main objectives and expected applications • • • • at least 3 mln tokens ; representative sentence-level alignment morphological annotation with a common tagset public access; user-friendly • linguistic material for – (independent) language learning – bilingual dictionaries – research on grammar and lexis • translation memory for humans and machines Statistics (prototype version) total Polish part Ukrainian part texts 70 35 35 tokens 359 926 179 087 180 120 characters 3 863 564 1 449 376 2 407 034 Kb 3941 1492 2439 Search (present) • based on PERL regular expressions • any searched chain has to be “embraced” by “/”. E.g. /Холодна війна/ • special characters: І alternative; ) end of subchain [ i ] beginning and end of a defined character class ? 1 or 0 appearances; * 0 or more appearances + 1 or more appearances \s any empty character \w any letter, digit, underlining sign \b end of word, \ escape Examples of search formulae /jako/ „jako” /jako\s/ „jako, niejako, dwojako” /\bjako/ „jakość’ /norma\./ „norma” before a dot Sources of morphological information • Polish: IPI PAN corpus + … • Ukrainian: - grammatical dictionary by ULIF, UAS (Igor Shevchenko) lemma <> wordform - morphological analyzer (information is slightly different, built for homonymy disambiguation) - no lemmatization (so far) Types of tagsets SYMBOLS: encoding all possible grammatical characteristics of a wordform in one symbol English (BNC), Ukrainian - takes little machine memory but requires too much of the human one CHAINS: contain codes corresponding to particular grammatical categories and/or their values; morphological characteristics of a wordform is represented by a sequence of such codes can be even more economic than symbols, if a query concerns morphological categories owned by several lexico-grammatical classes • positional Czech every category (and its values) have a fixed position in a chain • flexemic Polish, Russian every category has its own subtagset Multext-East tagset for En Ro Sl Cz Bg Et Hu Hr Sr Re • chain-like; criticised • 14 PoS: N10, V15, A12, P(ron)17, Det10, T(he)6, adveRb6, S(adposition)4, C(onj)7, nuMeral12, Intjn2, X(residual), Yabbr5, Qparticle3 • only Bg and Hu do not have modal verbs and copulas • En Ro have determiners, Ro Hu Re have articles, Bg – has neither (analitism, segmentation); • Is a Bg noun formally indefinite if the article is attached to the adj? (cf. agglutinativity of Pl być) • negation as morphological category • Cz transgresivity (adverbial participle) Treatment of participles • Polish (no aspectual characteristics) (Here and further cited by: Adam Przepiórkowski i Marcin Woliński A Flexemic Tagset for Polish.) • Ukrainian (aspect and tense) Дієслово, дієприслівник, доконаний вид, минулий час, активний стан VW прочитавши Дієслово, дієприслівник, недоконаний вид, теперішній час, активний стан UQ читаючи (Here and further cited by: Широков В.А et al. Корпусна лінгвістика.) • PolUKR participle I (doing/having done) characterised by aspect Treatment of pronouns • notorious Slavonic pronoun problem: 296 unique tags for 309 pronouns • Polish: division into 1-2 p, 3p and siebie (ów, jak?) • Ukrainian: pro-noun, pro-adjective • Russian: also pro-predicative and pro-adverb • Czech: many subcategories on the level of SubPoS • PolUKR: Ua approach and Pl division into 1-2 and 3 person Treatment of predicatives • Polish: adverbs with modal semantics like można, trzeba (it is) allowed/one can, (it is) necessary, ?to • Ukrainian (code X0) includes adverbs of state like жарко, шкода, жаль (it is) hot, (it is) a pity • PolUKR moving the category from the morphological level to the semantic one http://www.ruscorpora.ru/search-main.html Search engine for PolUKR • • • • choose the direction of the search (Ua>Pl or Pl<Ua) search conditions for both languages (RvonW) 3 levels of search: exact form (lemma) with the morphological choice using Poliqarp-like tag formulas (for advanced users) idea of subcategories (either a POS or a SUBPOS can be selected, but not both; similarly, one cannot select all subcategories of a POS), cf. aliases in IPI PAN corpus • alternative is ensured through tick-off boxes, so that one can choose EITHER „VERB finite past” OR „NOUN dative neutral” OR sth else, etc.) • restrictions on choice within 1 of 10 POS VERB NOUN infinitive participle I non-finite form finite form general proper name pro-noun 1-2 person pro-noun 3 person ADJECTIVAL adjective, participle I and cardinal numeral pro-adjective indeclinable adjective NUMERAL genderic non-genderic ADVERB PARTICLE PROPOSITION CONJUNCTION INTERJECTION aspect perfective imperfective mood imperative indicative person first second third case nominative genetive dative accusative instrumentative locative vocative case nominative genetive dative accusative instrumentative locative gender masculine feminina neutral pluralia tantum number singular plural gender masculine feminina neutral number singular plural case nominative genetive dative accusative instrumentative locative gender masculine feminina neutral tense present future past gender masculine feminine neutral number singular plural Built-in restrictions on search category mood OR tense OR person gender gender pluralia tantum case vocative none can be selected (active) only if the following category/value(s) have been selected by the user: finite form finite form AND past tense OR adjective AND singular number OR pro-adjective AND singular number OR pro-noun 1-2 person AND singular number OR pro-noun 3 person AND singular number OR ЧИСЛІВНИК родовий AND singular number NOUN general OR NOUN proper name NOUN general OR NOUN proper name indeclinable adjective OR ADVERB OR PARTICLE OR PROPOSITION OR CONJUNCTION OR INTERJECTION Literature • INTERA unified tagset project www.elda.org/intera • Tomas Erjavec et al. Multext-East specifications for Slavic languages, Budapest, 2003. • Jan Hajič. Positional Tags: Quick Reference (Czech „HM” Morphology), 2000. • Adam Przepiórkowski and Marcin Woliński. A Flexemic Tagset for Polish. In: The Proceedings of the Workshop on Morphological Processing of Slavic Languages, EACL 2003. http://nlp.ipipan.waw.pl/~adamp/Papers/2003-eacl-ws12/ws12.pdf • Elena Paskaleva. Balcan South-East Corpora Aligned to English. In: The Proceedings of the Workshop on Common Natural Language Processing Paradigm for Balkan Languages, EACL 2003 • Широков В.А et al. Корпусна лінгвістика. Київ: Довіра, 2005.