Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
CA 208 Logic Ex7 Given a (specific) language of FOPL with CONST = {j,k,m}, VARS = {x,y,z} and PRED = {student¹, broke¹, happy¹, like²}, prove the following in the Natural Deduction proof system: {like(j,m)} |- x like(x,m) {like(j,m)} |- y like(y,m) {like(j,m)} |- x like(j,x) {like(j,m)} |- x y like(x,y) {x y (like(x,y)} |- y x like(y,x) {x y (like(x,y)} |- like(m,m) {x y (like(x,y)} |- x like(x,x) {x (student(x) broke(x)), student(k)} |- broke(k) {x y (like(x,y) happy(y)), like(k,j)} |- happy(j) {x (student(x) broke(x)), x (broke(x) happy(x))} |- z (student(z) happy(z)) Translate the FOPL inferences above into corresponding sentences in English (assume that j translates to John, m to Mary and k to Kate while the predicate symbols translate into the corresponding English verbs (like), nouns (student) and adjectives (broke, happy)). 1 CA 208 Logic Ex7 Axiomatise (i.e. describe) the following situation in FOPL with CONST = {j,k,m}, VARS = {x,y,z} and PRED = {as_old_as², taller²} Kate is as old as John. John is as old Mary. Everybody is as old as themselves. If x is as old as y, and y is as old as z, then x is as old as z. Kate is taller than John. John is taller than Mary. Nobody is taller than themselves. If x is taller than y, and y is taller than z, then x is taller than z. Translate the following into FOPL and prove the resulting formulas from the axiomatisation above in the Natural Deduction proof system: Kate is as old as Kate. Kate is as old as Mary. John is not taller than John. Kate is taller than Mary. 2