Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Darwin’s birth February 1809 First Edition of Origin of Species 1859 Darwin’s book “On the Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection” was never on the Index of Prohibited books. Darwin’s evolutionary theory was not mentioned in the Syllabus of errors. Certainly there were great difficulties for Believers in the Bible to reconcile the two. Darwin himself probably came to be what we would call an agnostic. Genesis 1 clearly points to God commanding that the “earth bring forth living creatures according to their kinds...” There didn’t seem to be any delay in this process. Darwin proposed that variety of species came from “Natural Selection” over many generations and not simply by “Divine Decree” as suggested by the Bible. Darwin went further and suggested common ancestry descending from a “tree of life” that he sketched in his pages. How should a believer in the truth of Sacred Scripture approach such scientific theories? In this piece the origin of non human life and later the origin of the human species will be examined. From the outset two principles have to be insisted on. Firstly it is the same God who created us is the same God who inspired the Bible and calls us to life in Christ. The “Laws of Nature” cannot contradict “Inspired Revelation.” If science truly discovers something about our world, then it will be in harmony with the truth of faith. As the Universal Catechism puts it: “...many scientific studies... have splendidly enriched our knowledge of... the development of life-forms and the appearance of man. These discoveries invite us to even greater admiration for the greatness of the Creator, prompting us to give thanks...” [CCC 283]. The second principle is that the Church will not decide whether Darwin’s theory is true or not, rather that will be a scientific question. Rather, the teaching office of the Church decides whether such a view of the world is compatible with Catholic Faith. That “the sun goes round the earth” does not contradict Catholicism; that “the earth goes round the sun” (Galileo) does not contradict Catholicism; that “there are no privileged observers” (Einstein) does not contradict Catholicism. Which of these three views of the world is true (if any) is a purely scientific question. Can Darwin’s theories be shown not to contradict Catholic Faith? Again Darwin’s theory has been added to over the years. Some have insisted that it should lead to eugenics and the destruction of those who are “not so fit.” Maria Stopes and Adolf Hitler come into this category. Clearly such Darwinism is not compatible with Catholicism. Others have taken Darwin’s theory to prove that “there is no God.” Again such Darwinism contradicts the Catholic Faith, and so on. We must leave aside Darwinisms, in order to ask whether the theory of the “origin of the species by means of natural selection”, promulgated 150 years ago, is in contradiction to the Catholic Faith. It may still be false and some reputable scientists believe it to be false, but is it compatible? Regarding “the days” of creation, both the Psalm 90 and the 1Peter agree that “with the Lord one day is as a thousand years.” If the species took longer than “a day” to form and appear then perhaps Darwin’s theories may be compatible with Catholic Faith. In addition when Gen 1 says that “God rested on the seventh day from all his work” no believer imagined God “heading for a sleep.” Something more than a “video camera” account is being expressed in Gen 1. Perhaps the first book of the Bible is expressing the “vertical” reason and purpose of Creation while evolution explains the “horizontal” of creation and its space-time sequence. As for the tradition of the Church, the idea that new yet-unseen species could appear was not so difficult for St Thomas Aquinas. In principle this was possible. In fact as Darwin theories are growing acceptance, Catholicism is insisting that creation is not like a clock which God wound up and allowed to run its course (Deism). God’s providence and care supports the Universe at all times from falling into nothingness. God is always the answer to “Why is there something rather than just, nothing.” God’s relationship with Creation cannot be simplified to the “setting up of the space-time continuum.” God has a permanent care over the world- a universe that God set up. Last year Pope Benedict is reported to have insisted that if the theory of evolution is reasonable then we are forced to ask where does this reasonableness come from? Why is it that the Universe is so reasonable, so comprehensible to rational minds? Every reasonable, rational thought requires a reasonable rational thinker. Pope Benedict is insistent that if there is an “evolutionary principle” which is reasonable then it should point us to the reasonableness of a Creator God. If the theory of evolution is rational and true then it still points to a reasonable Creator God. The German Adult Catechism (whose editors include the former Cardinal Ratzinger and the present Cardinal Kasper) puts it this way: “Faith in creation and evolutionary theory do not conflict in principle.. They answer quite different questions...” Humourous anecdote Quantum Mechanics relies on probability. The scientist who brought us Relativity, Einstein couldn’t accept this. He is reported as saying: “I cannot believe God plays dice.” Another atomic physicist retorted– “don’t tell God what to do.” This shows two things: Some scientists believe in God, some don’t. Secondly not all scientific theories are “fixed.”