Download Preoperative local staging of endometrial cancer: transvaginal

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Preoperative local staging of
endometrial cancer:
Transvaginal sonography vs. Magnetic resonance imaging
L. SAVELLI, et al.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 560–566
Reporter:
Supervisor:
Medical student: 吳長哲 Attending: 陳志堯醫師
Introduction

Endometrial carcinoma is the most frequent female pelvic
malignancy, with a further rise in its incidence.

Definitive staging is based on surgical pathology, 20% of
clinical estimation is incorrect.

Accurate pre-op staging assists in planning the appropriate
treatment, turning for specialized center, counseling
properly, and avoiding unnecessary morbidities.

This issue is more relevant as less invasive laparoscopy is
emerging.
Introduction

Myometrial infiltration & cervical involvement

MRI, CT, Transvaginal sonography (TVS)

A meta-analysis in Radiology (1999)

Transvaginal probes with higher frequencies (5.0-9.0
MHz), and thus better resolution.

Prospective study comparing high-frequency TVS and
contrast-enhanced MRI in pre-op staging of endometrial
carcinoma.
Methods

74 patients with histological diagnosis were enrolled
prospectively. All of them received MRI and TVS,
then underwent surgical staging.

Both MRI and TVS were performed by expert
specialists, with consensus on techniques and reading
criteria. Both groups were blinded to each other.
Ia
Ib
Ic
IIb
Results
Results
Discussion

Contrast-enhanced MRI and TVS perform equally
well in evaluation of myometrial invasion, whereas
TVS shows a trend towards better performance in
detection of cervical tumor spread.

TVS could potentially be first-line imaging modality
in pre-op local staging of endometrial cancer, when
MRI would be second-line technique in patients with
poor quality of TVS or the need for precise staging.
Discussion

Strengths of this study:





Prospective design
Relative large number of patients
Expert specialists and operator blindedness
Consensus on criteria and techniques
Possible confounding factors:



Obesity
Presence of myomas or adenomyosis
Uterine corpus axial or retroverted in relation to the cervix
Thanks for Your Attention!!