Download Health Insider: More breast cancer patients should keep their

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Health Insider: More breast
cancer patients should keep
their healthy breasts, study says
Karen Kaplan
Los Angeles Times
September 7, 2014
http://www.freep.com/article/20140907/FEATURES08/309070011/breast-cancer-mastectomy
Too Many
• Too many women with breast cancer are sacrificing too
many healthy breasts for too little benefit, new research
suggests.
• After learning that they have an early stage cancer in
one breast, some women decide to remove not only the
affected breast but the other one as well.
• Many patients believe that they can reduce their future
risk of breast cancer by having the procedure, which is
called a contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. (In
addition, some may think they will get a better result with
breast reconstruction surgery if they have both breasts
worked on at the same time.)
Benefit = Increased Survival
• In reality, women who opted for CPM did not live longer
than women who decided to treat their cancers with
more conservative breast-conserving surgery and
radiation treatment.
• Data on 189,734 breast cancer patients from California
show that the 10-year survival rate for women who had
both breasts removed was 81.2%, according to a study
in Wednesday’s edition of the Journal of the American
Medical Association (JAMA).
• That was statistically indistinguishable from (and, in fact,
less than) the 83.2% 10-year survival rate for women
who had breast-conserving surgery and radiation. (Both
groups fared better than women who opted for a single
mastectomy; their 10-year survival rate was 79.9%.)
CPM Is Growing at 14%/year
• The popularity of CPM is growing at a rate of 14% a
year, the JAMA study found. In 1998, only 2% of women
whose breast cancers were Stage 0, Stage 1, Stage 2 or
Stage 3 decided to have both breasts removed. By 2011,
that figure was 12.3%.
• “The increase in bilateral mastectomy use despite the
absence of supporting evidence has puzzled clinicians
and health policy makers,” wrote the study authors, who
were from the Stanford University School of Medicine
and the Cancer Prevention Institute of California.
“Although fear of cancer recurrence may prompt the
decision for bilateral mastectomy, such fear usually
exceeds the estimated risk.”
The Economics – Hazard
Functions
Probability of Death
1.00
0.95
0.90
Probability
• What is
probability of
being alive after
Z years?
• Obviously it falls.
• We can compare
functions,
although we
won’t do it here.
0.85
0.80
0.75
Both
Normal
0.70
One
0.65
0.60
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Years
Article does not show intermediate values – these are
guesses, but we know the end values
http://jama.jamanetwork.com.proxy.lib.wayne.edu/article.aspx?articleid=1900491
The Economics – MB, MC
$
• What are MB of
removing a healthy
organ?
• Marginal benefits.
Why?
• What are MC of
removing a healthy
organ?
• “Optimal amount”?
MB
MC
0
% of those in risk group
100