Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Anticoagulation and cancer Not as straightforward as it looks ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE How common is it? • • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE Up to15% estimated clinically apparent >50% at post-mortem in some tumour types Huntershill hospice study • 298 hospice in-patients with advanced • • • • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE cancer Screened for lower limb venous obstruction using a light reflection rheograph 52% DVT 17% bilateral 9% symptomatic and confirmed (Doppler and - or V/Q scan) Case history – Mrs D • • • • • • 42 year old, 2/52 vague abdominal discomfort Presented with perforated sigmoid carcinoma Liver metastases at laparotomy Post-operative PE treated initially with tinzaparin, 10/10/5 warfarin. Tinzaparin stopped INR 11, recurrent bouts of dyspneoa Scared, breathless ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE Case history – Mrs P • 72 year old, stomach cancer • Wants to stay at home with daughters • • • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE popping in Manages to potter about house Overnight develops big, uncomfortable right leg Can’t get out of chair to get to toilet unaided Anticoagulation and cancer • • • • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE Pathophysiology Management: problems and solutions What about prophylaxis? Draw up a protocol? pathophysiology • 1865: Trousseau - “..a particular condition • • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE of the blood which predisposes it to spontaneous coagulation” Predicted his own death when he developed a left arm thrombosis Risk is in addition to that from other contributory factors often found such as surgery, immobility, infection, old age Increased risk due to cancer alone • Incidence of VTE higher in cancer vs non- • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE cancer patients in studies of: - surgical patients - non-surgical patients - post-mortem studies Occult malignancy is 7-8 times more common in patients with VTE with no apparent cause Prandoni P Integral to cancer growth • • • • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE Patients with cancer and VTE have a 3 fold lower 1 year survival than cancer patients without VTE (multi-factorial) Evidence suggests activation of coagulation enhances cancer growth and metastasis Evidence suggests treatment with anticoagulation improves survival (lung cancer) Current FRAGMATIC trial to repeat these smaller studies (5000U Fragmin vs placebo in lung cancer patients) Simon Noble Coagulation abnormalities • Abnormalities of coagulation are found in • • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE over 90% of cancer patients if sensitive indicators are sought Low-grade activation of coagulation at presentation of malignancy which worsens with progressive disease Evidence of chronic, low-grade disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Huntershill study (87 patients) • • • • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE Fibrinogen; 66% raised levels, 4.38g/dl (NR 1.7-3.5) Fragment 1+2; 71% raised levels, 1.9 nmol/l (NR 0.57 – 1.31) TAT; 89% raised levels, 10.3 microg/l (NR 1 – 4.1) Fibrinogen lower in patients with DVT (p = 0.04) Mirrors disease activity • Fibrinogen, platelet count, Fibrino-peptide- • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE A, and D-dimer have all been suggested as useful tumour growth markers but are rather non-specific Not useful predicting thrombotic events i.e. don’t use D-dimer as a test for DVT in a patient with active cancer (it’ll be raised) Pathophysiology-summary • • • • • • • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE Secretion of cancer procoagulant/tissue factor by tumour/host cells Consumption of clotting factors Compensatory increase in production Leads to disseminated intravascular coagulation Platelet activation/thrombocytopenia Reduced protein C, antithrombin III Liver dysfunction The upshot… • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE Thus cancer patients have an increased risk of clotting and bleeding Standard VTE management • Immediate treatment with heparin (usually • • • • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE LMWH) Whilst commencing warfarin loading (10mg/10mg/5mg) Loading dose lower in elderly (3mg) When INR is in therapeutic range stop LMWH (5 days LMWH) Treat for 3-6 months according to site of VTE Problems with cancer patients • With warfarin: 3 x rate of recurrent VTE • • • despite therapeutic INR With warfarin: 6.2 x rate of major bleeding Risks increase with extent of cancer Risk of VTE persists as long as active cancer persists ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE More problems • • • • • • • • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE Drug interactions Malnutrition (particularly of Vitamin K) Vomiting Liver dysfunction Poor venous access Invasive procedures and chemo related thrombocytopenia often require interruption of anticoagulant Lead to unpredictable and poor anticoagulant control Lesions liable to bleeding Low molecular weight heparin • renal excretion • few drug interactions • steady, predictable pharmacokinetics from • • • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE weight adjusted dose high subcutaneous bioavailability long half life no need for monitoring (except platelets initially) Secondary prevention with LMWH vs warfarin Lee A et al. NEJM 2003; 349:146-153 • • • • • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE LMWH vs coumarin prospective rct 8% vs 15.7% recurrent VTE No significant difference in bleeding ECOG 3,4 excluded Study conditions Secondary prevention with LMWH vs warfarin Meyer G et al Arch Int Med 2002; 162; 1729-1735 • • • • • • • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE LMWH vs coumarin prospective rct Combined outcome event; major bleeding or recurrent VTE in 3 months 10% vs 21% 6/71 warfarin; fatal bleed 0/67 LMWH; fatal bleed 17 warfarin all cause deaths vs 8 LMWH deaths ECOG 3+4 included A common sense approach – use LMWH if… • Advanced disease • Liver metastasis (or other cause of liver • • • • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE dysfunction) Malabsorption Likely problem with changing medication regimes High bleeding risk The first hint of a problem with warfarin Patients won’t like the injections • Some don’t • Qualitative interviews; palliative care • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE patients on long term LMWH showed minimal problems and some positive feelings about “having the best treatment” and “not being written off”Simon Noble Many learn to self inject Specific problems • Brain tumour (primary or secondary) • One smallish observational study showed • • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE no increase risk of bleeding with tight INR control Sensible to use LMWH to minimise risk of over-anticoagulation ! Melanoma and renal tumours are very vascular – reluctant to anticoagulate at all if brain secondaries Specific problems • • • • • • • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE Actively bleeding lesions (or high risk) Suggest bd LMWH to even out peaks and troughs IVC filter Thrombocytopenia Weigh up risk and benefits on individual patient LMWH has least risk of over-anticoagulation IVC filter IVC filters • Can be very useful if • • • • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE anticoagulation is contraindicated Long term risk of bilateral leg oedema Procedure involved Expense, therefore consider prognosis Usual judgement is 3 months or more expected prognosis example • 65 yr old nun with endometrial carcinoma • Treated with progestagens • Presented with 3 months h/o progressive • • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE breathlessness, can’t walk across room V/Q multiple PEs Continuous minor bleeding from tumour (manageable, but increased bleed wouldn’t be) example • Stopped progestagens • Placed IVC filter • Over next 3 months patient’s • • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE breathlessness improved to the extent she was now walking down to the shops and back and going out for trips 14 months did well Disease progression, leg oedema and died about 18 months after I first saw her summary • • • • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE Clinical decision making with minimal evidence, but there is some Important to attempt “decision making” rather than knee jerk reaction Discuss options with patient if possible to prevent “paternalistic approach” Often requires a “bespoke regime” Future options? • Oral anti-thrombin agent Ximegalotran • Looked promising, company withdrawn • • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE (deaths due to liver disease) Pentasaccharides and heparinoids Danaparoid = choice in heparin induced thrombocytopenia What about prophylaxis? ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE • • • • • Hickman lines? Chemotherapy? Orthopaedic surgery Abdomino-pelvic surgery Don’t forget for palliative procedures • • Spinal cord compression? Acute reversible episodes – hypercalcemia? - pneumonia? Prophylaxis in the patients with advanced disease • Still little evidence • Some qualitative data to suggest patient • • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE want to be involved in the decision Simon Noble However, what about the patient who is not going to improve their performance status? (i.e. in bed in hospital, in bed at home) – nothing reversible Currently we wouldn’t recommend prophylaxis in that situation Risks/benefits • • • • • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE LMWH safer, effective daily subcutaneous injection but no monitoring needed Occasionally – IVC filter ?how long to treat still individual decision Case histories – what would you do? • • • • • • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE 42 year old, 2/52 vague abdominal discomfort Presented with perforated sigmoid carcinoma Liver metastases at laparotomy Post-operative PE treated initially with tinzaparin, 10/10/5 warfarin. Tinzaparin stopped INR 11, recurrent bouts of dyspneoa Scared, breathless • 72 year old, stomach • • • • cancer Wants to stay at home with daughters popping in Manages to potter about house Overnight develops big, uncomfortable right leg Can’t get out of chair to get to toilet unaided Protocol • Literature review – currently underway for secondary and primary prevention as part of APM Science Committee Task Group Noble and Johnson • • • • ST CATHERINE’S HOSPICE Prevalence and Pathophysiology General considerations for cancer patients Secondary prevention Primary prevention