* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Chapter 14 Pricing Strategies and Tactics
Yield management wikipedia , lookup
Transfer pricing wikipedia , lookup
Gasoline and diesel usage and pricing wikipedia , lookup
Revenue management wikipedia , lookup
Dumping (pricing policy) wikipedia , lookup
Perfect competition wikipedia , lookup
Pricing science wikipedia , lookup
Service parts pricing wikipedia , lookup
Price, forming of price on drugs Business Use of Demand Curves Firms can find analysis of their products’ demand curves useful as it helps them: • Work out how changing their prices will affect their revenue • Assess how consumers will react to changes in price Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 14 - 2 Price and Demand • In general, the higher the price charged for a good or service, the lower the quantity that will be demanded of that product • This relationship is not necessarily simple • Let’s look at an example Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Demand Analysis 50 Quantity Demanded 1000 Total Revenue 50000 100 800 80000 150 400 60000 200 300 60000 Price Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Demand Analysis • At £100 per unit, the firm earns £80000 revenue • If price rises to £150 per unit, revenue falls to £60000 • This helps the firm find its revenue maximising price Price Quantity Demanded Total Revenue 50 1000 50000 100 800 80000 150 400 60000 200 300 60000 Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Demand Analysis • At any price below £100 per unit, the firm earns more by raising its price • At prices over £100 per unit, the firm’s revenue falls • The revenue maximising price is at around £100 per unit Price Quantity Demanded Total Revenue 50 1000 50000 100 800 80000 150 400 60000 200 300 60000 Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Pricing Strategy • how does a company decide what price to charge for its products and services? • what is “the price” anyway? doesn’t price vary across situations and over time? • some firms have to decide what to charge different customers and in different situations • they must decide whether discounts are to be offered, to whom, when, and for what reason Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 14 - 7 Price vs. Nonprice Competition • In price competition, a seller regularly offers products priced as low as possible and accompanied by a minimum of services. • In nonprice competition, a seller has stable prices and stresses other aspects of marketing. • With value pricing, firms strive for more benefits at lower costs to consumer. • With relationship pricing, customers have incentives to be loyal-- get price incentive if you do more business with one firm. Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 14 - 8 Nonprice Competition • some firms feel price is the main competitive tool, that customers always want low prices • other firms are looking for ways to add value, thereby being able to avoid low prices • sometimes prices have to be changed in response to competitive actions • many firms would prefer to engage in nonprice competition by building brand equity and relationships with customers Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 14 - 9 Relationship Pricing • Uses price as a method to build long-term relationships with the best customers • Focuses on giving better deals to better customers • Goal is to price relative to the value of the customer to the firm, while building loyalty and stimulating repeat buying Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 14 - 10 The Price Determination Process • In pricing, an organization first must decide on its pricing goal. • The next step is to set the base price for a product. • The final step involves designing pricing strategies that are compatible with the rest of the marketing mix. • Many strategic questions must be answered: • Will our company compete on the basis of price or other factors? • What kind of discount schedule (if any) should be adopted? Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 14 - 11 The Process: An Illustration SELECT PRICING OBJECTIVE SELECT METHOD OF DETERMINING THE BASE PRICE: Cost-plus pricing Price based on both demand and costs Price set in relation to market alone DESIGN APPROPRIATE STRATEGIES: Price vs. nonprice competition Skimming vs. penetration Discounts and allowances Freight payments One price vs. flexible price Psychological pricing Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Leader pricing Everyday low vs. high-low pricing Resale price maintenance 14 - 12 Pricing Strategies Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Penetration Pricing Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Penetration pricing strategy: involves the use of a relatively low entry price as compared with competitive offerings; based on the theory that this initial low price will help secure market acceptance • Price set to ‘penetrate the market’ • ‘Low’ price to secure high volumes • Typical in mass market products – chocolate bars, food stuffs, household goods, etc. • Suitable for products with long anticipated life cycles • May be useful if launching into a new market Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 14 - 15 Market Skimming Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Market Skimming Many are predicting a fire sale in laptops as supply exceeds demand. • High price, Low volumes • Skim the profit from the market • Suitable for products that have short life cycles or which will face competition at some point in the future (e.g. after a patent runs out) • Examples include: Playstation, jewellery, digital technology, new DVDs, etc. Copyright: iStock.com Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Value Pricing Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Value Pricing • Price set in accordance with customer perceptions about the value of the product/service • Examples include status products/exclusive products Companies may be able to set prices according to perceived value. Copyright: iStock.com Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Loss Leader Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Loss Leader • Goods/services deliberately sold below cost to encourage sales elsewhere • Typical in supermarkets, e.g. at Christmas, selling bottles of gin at £3 in the hope that people will be attracted to the store and buy other things • Purchases of other items more than covers ‘loss’ on item sold • e.g. ‘Free’ mobile phone when taking on contract package Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Psychological Pricing Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Psychological Pricing • Used to play on consumer perceptions • Classic example - £9.99 instead of £10.99! • Links with value pricing – high value goods priced according to what consumers THINK should be the price Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Going Rate (Price Leadership) Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Going Rate (Price Leadership) • In case of price leader, rivals have difficulty in competing on price – too high and they lose market share, too low and the price leader would match price and force smaller rival out of market • May follow pricing leads of rivals especially where those rivals have a clear dominance of market share • Where competition is limited, ‘going rate’ pricing may be applicable – banks, petrol, supermarkets, electrical goods – find very similar prices in all outlets Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Tender Pricing Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Tender Pricing • Many contracts awarded on a tender basis • Firm (or firms) submit their price for carrying out the work • Purchaser then chooses which represents best value • Mostly done in secret Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Price Discrimination Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Price Discrimination Prices for rail travel differ for the same journey at different times of the day • Charging a different price for the same good/service in different markets • Requires each market to be impenetrable • Requires different price elasticity of demand in each market Copyright: iStock.com Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Destroyer Pricing/Predatory Pricing Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Destroyer/Predatory Pricing • Deliberate price cutting or offer of ‘free gifts/products’ to force rivals (normally smaller and weaker) out of business or prevent new entrants • Anti-competitive and illegal if it can be proved Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Absorption/Full Cost Pricing Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Absorption/Full Cost Pricing • Full Cost Pricing – attempting to set price to cover both fixed and variable costs • Absorption Cost Pricing – Price set to ‘absorb’ some of the fixed costs of production Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Marginal Cost Pricing Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Marginal Cost Pricing • Marginal cost – the cost of producing ONE extra or ONE fewer item of production • MC pricing – allows flexibility • Particularly relevant in transport where fixed costs may be relatively high • Allows variable pricing structure – e.g. on a flight from London to New York – providing the cost of the extra passenger is covered, the price could be varied a good deal to attract customers and fill the aircraft Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Marginal Cost Pricing • Example: Aircraft flying from Bristol to Edinburgh – Total Cost (including normal profit) = £15,000 of which £13,000 is fixed cost* Number of seats = 160, average price = £93.75 MC of each passenger = 2000/160 = £12.50 If flight not full, better to offer passengers chance of flying at £12.50 and fill the seat than not fill it at all! *All figures are estimates only Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Contribution Pricing Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Contribution Pricing • Contribution = Selling Price – Variable (direct costs) • Prices set to ensure coverage of variable costs and a ‘contribution’ to the fixed costs • Similar in principle to marginal cost pricing • Break-even analysis might be useful in such circumstances Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Target Pricing Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Target Pricing • Setting price to ‘target’ a specified profit level • Estimates of the cost and potential revenue at different prices, and thus the break-even have to be made, to determine the mark-up • Mark-up = Profit/Cost x 100 Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Cost-Plus Pricing Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Cost-Plus Pricing • Calculation of the average cost (AC) plus a mark up • AC = Total Cost/Output Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Influence of Elasticity Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Influence of Elasticity • Any pricing decision must be mindful of the impact of price elasticity • The degree of price elasticity impacts on the level of sales and hence revenue • Elasticity focuses on proportionate (percentage) changes • PED = % Change in Quantity demanded/% Change in Price Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Influence of Elasticity • Price Inelastic: • % change in Q < % change in P • e.g. a 5% increase in price would be met by a fall in sales of something less than 5% • Revenue would rise • A 7% reduction in price would lead to a rise in sales of something less than 7% • Revenue would fall Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Influence of Elasticity • Price Elastic: • % change in quantity demanded > % change in price • e.g. A 4% rise in price would lead to sales falling by something more than 4% • Revenue would fall • A 9% fall in price would lead to a rise in sales of something more than 9% • Revenue would rise Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Price Quotations • List prices: Established prices normally quoted to potential buyers • Market price: Price that an intermediary or final consumer pays for a product after subtracting any discounts, rebates, or allowances from the list price Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 19-47 Discounts and Allowances • Quantity discount: The more you buy, the cheaper it becomes-- cumulative and non-cumulative. • Trade discounts: Reductions from list for functions performed-- storage, promotion. • Cash discount: A deduction granted to buyers for paying their bills within a specified period of time, (after first deducting trade and quantity discounts from the base price) Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 14 - 48 • Reductions from List Price •Cash discount: price reduction offered to a consumer, industrial user, or marketing intermediary in return for prompt payment of a bill •2/10 net 30, a common cash discount notation, allows consumers to subtract 2 percent from the amount due if payment is made within 10 days Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 19-49 Calculating a Cash Discount 3/10, NET 30 Percentage to be deducted if bill is paid within specified time Number of days from date of invoice in Number of days from which bill must be date of invoice after paid to receive cash which bill is overdue discount 1/7, NET 30 Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 14 - 50 • Trade Discounts: payment to a channel member or buyer for performing marketing functions; also known as a functional discount Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 19-51 • Quantity discount: price reduction granted for a large-volume purchase •Justified on the grounds that large orders reduce selling expenses, storage, and transportation costs •Cumulative quantity discounts reduce prices in amounts determined by purchases over stated time periods •Non-cumulative quantity discounts provide one-time reductions in the list price Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 19-52 • Allowances •Trade-in: credit allowance given for a used item when a new item is purchased •Promotional allowance: advertising or promotional funds provided by a manufacturer to other channel members in an attempt to integrate the promotional strategy within the channel • Rebates: refund for a portion of the purchase price, usually granted by the product’s manufacturer Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 19-53 THANK YOU FOR ATTENTION! Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 14 - 54