Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Office hours 304A Stanley Hall next week 3-4pm Monday Nov 24 Heritability in exptal organisms Genetically identical Genetically different Heritability in exptal organisms e t Genetic variance = total var - “environmental var” g = t - e Heritability H2 = g/t http://www.sciam.com/media/inline/15DD5B0E-AB4123B8-2B1E53E8573428C5_1.jpg http://www.twinsrealm.com/othrpics/twins16.jpg http://www.twinsrealm.com/ot hrpics/sarahandsandra.jpg http://www.twinsinsurance.net/images/twins.jpg Heritability in humans: MZ twins Mean each pair = zi Each individual = zij 2 (z z) ij = t2 Within pairs mean sq = T 2 (z z ) ij i = w2 Total mean sq = N Between pairs mean sq = (zi - z)2 N-1 = b2 h2 = b2 w2 t2 mRNA expression Significance of heritability? all progeny P1 P2 progeny, marker genotype P1 progeny, marker genotype P2 How to find genetic determinants of naturally varying traits? Thus far, we have only found linkage to a marker. The causal variant is still unknown. Mapping imprecision wide mapped interval Mapping imprecision wide mapped interval You should now know from the first problem set why the LOD score is highest for markers close to the causal variant locus… Mapping imprecision wide mapped interval But why not just look at the single marker with the best LOD score? Single best locus isn’t the answer True distance 30 cM Diseasecausing mutation Restriction fragment length polymorphism observed recombination fraction = 1/8 = 12.5 cM this is our observation The observed number of recombinants is just a point estimate, with some error associated. True variant is “under” peak Fig. 11.17 Submergence tolerance in rice Variation in submergence tolerance QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. http://www.a2mediagroup.com/data/images/news/categories/riceplant.jpg Linkage mapping me™ and a ed) decompressor see this picture. intolerant tolerant Finding the causative variant Finding the causative variant QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. Finding the causative variant QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. Transgenic test QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. http://www.plantsci.cam.ac.uk/Haseloff/SITEGRAPHICS/Agrotrans.GIF Transgenic test From Prof. Garriga problem set QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. http://www.plantsci.cam.ac.uk/Haseloff/SITEGRAPHICS/Agrotrans.GIF Transgenic test QuickTime™ and a Uncompressed) decompressor needed to see this picture. Time™ and a ssed) decompressor see this picture. Transgenic test Time™ and a ssed) decompressor see this picture. Transgenic test Only expressed upon submergence Time™ and a ssed) decompressor see this picture. Transgenic test Expressed all the time… Now in a real crop strain Swarna INTOL x IR49830 TOL F1 x Swarna INTOL Check for Sub1A+ Now in a real crop strain Swarna INTOL x IR49830 TOL F1 x Swarna INTOL B1 x Swarna INTOL Check for Sub1A+ Now in a real crop strain Swarna INTOL x IR49830 TOL F1 x Swarna INTOL B1 x Swarna INTOL B2 x Swarna INTOL … Now in a real crop strain Swarna INTOL x IR49830 TOL F1 x Swarna INTOL B1 x Swarna INTOL B2 x Swarna INTOL … Result: Sub1A in Swarna genome Common in plant breeding Wild: resistant to fungus Cultivated: bred for yield, etc. QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. http://www.anbg.gov.au/cpbr/program/sc/barl_mole.htm “Naturally genetically modified” QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. Every linkage study faces this problem What is the causative variant linked to the marker? How to formulate a guess? How to formulate a guess? Here a very obvious hypothesis. Often not such a large gain or loss. QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor Fine-mapping Fig. 11.17 Fine-mapping: new markers Fig. 11.17 Fine-mapping: new markers Between two humans, 1 polymorphism every 1000 bp; linkage study probably started with a tiny fraction of total. Fine-mapping: new markers Position of true causal variant A simulation of a qualitative trait in a large mouse cross; sparse marker set Best marker Fine-mapping: new markers Position of true causal variant Peak looks pretty close—why bother improving resolution? Best marker Fine-mapping: new markers Position of true causal variant Because you have to hunt through by hand to find the causal gene, and test experimentally. The smaller the region, the better. Best marker Fine-mapping: new markers Position of true causal variant Increased marker density Fine-mapping: new markers Position of true causal variant Why did the LOD score go up? A. B. C. D. More markers increases multiple testing, which boosts LODs in the region. Closer markers have more significant linkage, increasing their LODs. Peak is narrower, so LODs increase in the region. The LOD score scales with the number of markers, so actually it isn’t different if you normalize correctly. What do functional (e.g. disease-causing) variants look like? Rearrangements/large gain and loss QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. Rearrangements/large gain and loss Coding variants Fig. 7.25 http://homepages.strath.ac.uk/~dfs99109/BB310/CFTRgene.jpg Coding variants Fig. 2B http://homepages.strath.ac.uk/~dfs99109/BB310/CFTRgene.jpg Coding variants New amino acid Fig. 2B http://homepages.strath.ac.uk/~dfs99109/BB310/CFTRgene.jpg Coding variants Premature STOP Fig. 2B http://homepages.strath.ac.uk/~dfs99109/BB310/CFTRgene.jpg Coding variants Regulatory change, not coding! Fig. 2B http://graphics.jsonline.com/graphi cs/badger/img/may02/5martin506.j pg Nucleotide repeat diseases Fig. 11.13 http://geneticsmodules.duhs.duke.edu/Design/Print.asp Nucleotide repeat diseases Fig. 7A,B Think about it: most identified variants are rare alleles with strong effect. Most likely to be coding changes. Old school Promoter variants Fig. 9.22 Promoter variants Fig. 9.22 Promoter mutations can cause misregulation and disease/phenotype. Promoter variants DOC Promoter variants Subtle single-nucleotide promoter variants probably very common, but hard to find. Stay tuned. DOC