* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Evolution as Genetic Change
Viral phylodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Dominance (genetics) wikipedia , lookup
Dual inheritance theory wikipedia , lookup
Fetal origins hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Heritability of IQ wikipedia , lookup
Koinophilia wikipedia , lookup
Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup
Hardy–Weinberg principle wikipedia , lookup
Polymorphism (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Group selection wikipedia , lookup
Genetic drift wikipedia , lookup
Evolution as Genetic Change 16.2 Evolution as Genetic Change Natural selection can affect phenotypes in a population in 3 ways Directional Selection Stabilizing Selection Disruptive Selection Directional Selection Higher fitness at ONE END of curve than at the other # of Individuals in the population All phenotypes in population shift toward HIGHER FITNESS Traits of Population DIRECTIONAL SELECTION Selection Pressure (Against Phenotype) Low Fitness High Fitness New graph shifts in the DIRECTION of Higher Fitness Directional Selection Example: Darwin’s Finches # Birds in Population # Birds in Population Beak Size Beak Size Small seeds become scarce. Only large seeds are available. irds with LONGER beaks gather food, survive and reproduce Average Beak Size INCREASES B Stabilizing Selection Higher fitness at the CENTER of the curve Middle Stays THE SAME # of Individuals in the population Ends get NARROWER EXAMPLE- birth weight of human babies Smaller than average babies = less likely to be healthy Larger than average babies = less likely to be healthy Traits of Population STABILIZING SELECTION Selection Pressure (Against Phenotype) Low Fitness High Fitness Low Fitness New graph is STABILIZED in the middle Stabilizing Selection Example: Human Birth Weight # Babies in Population # Babies in Population Birth Weight Birth Weight Smaller babies are LESS healthy. Larger babies are LESS healthy. verage Sized Babies become Most Common A Disruptive Selection Higher fitness at TWO ENDS of the curve Middle phenotype DECREASES in frequency Can result in 2 subgroups # of Individuals in the population EXAMPLE- large seeds and small seeds become more common and there are few medium seeds Both birds with small beaks and large beaks are best adapted to eat those seeds Traits of Population DISRUPTIVE SELECTION Selection Pressure (Against Phenotype) High Fitness Low Fitness High Fitness New graph is DISRUPTED in the middle. Disruptive Selection Example: Darwin’s Finches Middle-sized seeds disappear. Only very large and very small seeds are left. # Birds in Population # Birds in Population Beak Size Beak Size Average-sized beaks are least common. Birds with VERY LARGE beaks and VERY SMALL beaks are best adapted. This can result in 2 subgroups. Types Of Selection With Bird Beaks http://player.discoveryeducation.com/index.cfm?guidAssetId=7016E4B0-0335-42A9-BF3E-BB21D2A4D9C8 Which Type of Selection Is It? Genetic Drift RANDOM change in allele frequency Happens by CHANCE EVENTS Happens in SMALL POPULATIONS NOT NATURAL SELECTION (Not related to fitness) Coin Flip 1,000 times How many Heads? 10 times How many Heads? Bottleneck Effect A large percentage of a population IS KILLED or prevented from REPRODUCING INCREASES genetic drift Bottleneck Effects Northern Elephant Seals Bottleneck Event = HUMAN HUNTING (1890s) Population decreased to 20 Seals Now… have have 30,000 seals With Reduced VARIATION from Bottleneck The Founder Effect The Founder Effect Example: The Cocklebur Main population with LOTS OF VARIATION (many different colors) A FEW hitch a ride to an area where there are no cockleburs. …and start a NEW POPULATION Let’s get out of here! The Founder Effect They are the FOUNDERS. Their VARIATION gives rise to the variation in the entire NEW POPULATION We made it! Woo! Now let’s get reproducing! I miss yellow… Founder Effect A type of Genetic Drift after a SUBGROUP breaks away to form a new population From Your Articles: Amish Communities in Pennsylvania Ellis-van Creveld syndrome EXTRA fingers + toes Abnormal TEETH + nails A hole in the HEART The Founder Effect Ellis-von Creveld Syndrome A recessive disorder Founders? SAMUEL KING AND HIS WIFE - 1744 Chance Events and Genetic Drift RANDOM DISASTERS Rock Slide Tsunami Volcano Eruption Meteor Impact Nuclear War Etc. GENETIC EQUILIBRIUM DEFINITION: When allele frequencies in a population DON’T CHANGE NO EVOLUTION HAPPENS Hardy-Weinberg Principle States that allele frequencies in a population will remain CONSTANT as long as 5 things are true… Hardy-Weinberg Principle States that allele frequencies in a population will remain constant as long as 5 things are true… Random Mating Everyone gets an EQUAL chance to pass on alleles NO mate selecting Hardy-Weinberg Principle States that allele frequencies in a population will remain constant as long as 5 things are true… 2. Large Population Less effect of GENETIC DRIFT Hardy-Weinberg Principle States that allele frequencies in a population will remain constant as long as 5 things are true… 3. No Movement Into or Out of the Population No MIGRATION Keep GENE POOL separate Hardy-Weinberg Principle States that allele frequencies in a population will remain constant as long as 5 things are true… 4. No Mutations No NEW alleles in the population Hardy-Weinberg Principle States that allele frequencies in a population will remain constant as long as 5 things are true… 5. No Natural Selection All genotypes have equal FITNESS No ADVANTAGES for anyone