Survey							
                            
		                
		                * Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Beginning of Life Early Earth= not a friendly place Atmosphere was mostly methane, nitrogren, water vapor, and ammonia… nearly no oxygen  The earth was very hot with many volcanoes exploding at once  Many thunder and lightning storms  Alexander Oparin  Believed that life began in the oceans.  He believed that sun and lightening made organic molecules form.  Rain then washed these molecules into the oceans and made a primordial soup. Oparin’s hypothesis Rain + earth’s heat + lightning + CO2= life’s first lipid membrane in a shape of a sphere  The small sphere of lipid membrane is called a protocell.  These were located in the ocean and were the very first beginnings of life.  Was he right?  Miller & Urey tested Oparin’s hypothesis Water vapor, ammonia, methane, Hydrogen Add electricity Cool mixture to produce liquid Collect & analyze The Miller-Urey Experiment Organic molecules appear here After one week…  They found: Carbohydrates, amino Acids, and other small ORGANIC (living) molecules  Small protocells   This evidence supported Oparin’s hypothesis. Prokaryotes evolved to become eukaryotes by endosymbiosis: Big cells swallow little cells that perform specific functions Prokaryote ingests aerobic bacteria Prokaryote Aerobic bacteria ingests produces energy cyanobacteria inside prokaryote  Mitochondria Cyanobacteria contains photosynthetic pigments  chloroplasts The very first cells were autotrophs They made their energy from the sun. Because they were doing photosynthesis, they were releasing oxygen into the atmosphere. This allowed more complicated life to evolve. Two other possible theories of where life began Space! Hydrothermal vents Spontaneous Generation  Believed that simple living organisms could come into being by spontaneous generation.  non-living objects can give rise to living organisms.  It was common “knowledge” that simple organisms like worms, beetles, frogs, and salamanders could come from dust, mud, etc., and food left out, quickly “swarmed” with life. Terms to Know Prefix for life? Bio- Word for beginning? Genesis Biogenesis=beginning with life Prefix for without? A- Abiogenesis Life beginning from a non living thing Spontaneous generation = abiogenesis Some believed that bees could form if you left meat under your house for 23 days Virgil-Roman Poet Others believed that if you left dirty clothes out for 7 days rats would form Jan Baptista van Helmont- physician in 1600s Early Thoughts? Spontaneous Generation- the idea nonliving material can produce life  1668- Francesco Redi  Disproved the idea that decaying meat produced maggots (immature flies)  Disproved the spontaneous generation of large organisms.  The first true experiment? Open Jars Francesco Redi -1600s Italian scientist Disproves spontaneous generation Closed Jars Even with different types of meat closed jars=no maggots Did this show that life did not come from non-life? Vital Source  Scientists thought that there must be a vital source in the air that makes microscopic organisms grow. In the mid 1800’s Louis Pasteur designed an experiment that disproved the spontaneous generation of microorganisms.  In his experiment air, but not microorganisms could touch the broth.  Louis Pasteur  French Scientist, who in 1859 finally disproved spontaneous generation Pasteur’s Experiment Biogenesis  This experiment led to the idea that:  Living organisms come only from other organisms.  But how did life START on Earth?  How ago? does life come from non-life 4.6 billion years Molecules of the Atmosphere Carbon Dioxide Hydrogen Cyanide (HCN) Create your own Primordial Soup Cans Include: 1. Ingredients 2. How to make it  An early theory of evolution was proposed by Jean Lamarck  Lamarck proposed organisms acquired traits during their lifetime and passed them on to their offspring. This is known as Lamarckism.  What is wrong with this theory? Lamarck’s Theory  Individuals can evolve to adapt to changing conditions (acquired traits) Darwin’s Theory Traits that help in survival are passed on to offspring  Traits that do not help in survival are lost from the gene pool  Darwin’s Theory of Natural Selection 1. There is variation in individuals. 2. Living things overreproduce. 3. There is a struggle to survive. 4.Those that survive are the most fit. Who was Charles Darwin?  How Does  Evolution Really Work?  How do we know Evolution Happens? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewtw_ nZUIDQ  Why does evolution matter now?  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWumllRPLI