Download Title of Presentation - Homepage | Six Countries Program

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Identifying Science and Business Issues:
The Case of Nanotechnology
Dr. Danial Wayner, Director General
National Institute for Nanotechnology, Edmonton
Steacie Institute for Molecular Sciences, Ottawa
The Case of Nanotechnology
Contents
• Catching the nanotechnology wave
• Managing emerging technologies
• Business opportunities in nanotechnology
• What government can do
The Case of Nanotechnology
Nanoresearch vs Nanotechnology
Nanoresearch
• research at the atomic, molecular or
macromolecular levels to:
– create and use structures, devices and systems that
have novel properties and functions with critical
length scales typically under 100 nm
– provide fundamental understanding of phenomena
and materials at the nanoscale in 1, 2 or 3
dimensions
The Case of Nanotechnology
Nanoresearch vs Nanotechnology
Nanotechnology
• useful applications of nanoscience/engineering
knowledge and discoveries
– integration into existing technologies
– new applications based on transformational or
revolutionary discoveries
Complexity (# of nanocomponents)
The Case of Nanotechnology
atoms
macro/supra
molecules
molecules
networks
systems
organism
self-organizing
Assemblies
organ
Biological
Complexity
tissue
cell
Integrated Nanosystems
•Artificial organs/tissue
•Chemical information systems
integrated with electronics
•Adaptive materials
organelle
protein
DNA
nucleic/
amino
acid
0.1
www
nano
materials
1
10
electronics/
photonics
100
bulk materials
103 106
Length Scale (nm)
107
>108
Non-Bio
Complexity
The Case of Nanotechnology
Catching the nanotechnology wave
• What is the wave?
– most of what we hear and see is nanoresearch
– there are increasing incremental improvements to
traditional technologies (e.g. nanocomposites)
– some discoveries suggest discontinuities in product
development, manufacturing paradigms
– there is a feeling that we are on the verge of something
revolutionary but it is still not well defined
• Hype versus Reality
– the research and investment communities are fueling
unreasonable expectations
The Case of Nanotechnology
The Case of Nanotechnology
Catching the nanotechnology wave
• How do we know it is coming?
– It is underpinned by many years of research
– It builds on a succession of high profile reports
– It requires significant capital investment in infrastructure
and capacity building
– it promises economic impact on optimistic timescales
The Case of Nanotechnology
Catching the nanotechnology wave
• Nanotechnology fits this description well:
– It is based on many years of basic research in physics,
chemistry and biology. And several major areas of
nanotechnology still require substantial scientific
research before commercial ‘technologies’ will emerge.
– there are many parallels with the biotech revolution
– Future nanotech research and production facilities will
require massive investments
– There are an increasing number of startups even though
markets are not yet clearly defined
The Case of Nanotechnology
Catching the nanotechnology wave
• Trying to catch the wave is risky!
• Anxiety over IP, wealth generation leads to:
– Taking a new ‘technology’ out of a university or
government lab and into a ‘start-up’ company before
major research problems are resolved
– products without markets, markets without products
– unanticipated problems in scale up, moving from
prototypes to production
– incomplete understanding of the value chain – low ROI
– if not managed well, disillusionment/backlash (dot coms,
photonics)
The Case of Nanotechnology
Managing Technology Risk – Some Science Policy Issues
• National S&T priorities
– defines strengths, weaknesses, opportunties, threats at a
national level
– provides a framework within which funding decisions
may be taken (critical mass)
– creates opportunity for organizational synergies
• Technology Clusters
– regional clusters of competing and collaborating firms,
associated with university and government research
facilities to share the risk and the rewards
– well developed receptor capacity
– spin-offs when necessary but not necessarily spin-offs
The Case of Nanotechnology
Managing Technology Risk – Some Science Policy Issues
• Funding
– Provide long term funding of research into nanoscience in both
the universities and government labs, e.g., NINT
– Provide other incentives to SME’s (contracts vs grants)
• Outreach/education
– closing the gap between science and business/investors
• Nano Environmental, Ethical, Economic, Legal, Social
Implications (NE3LS)
– public rejection can derail technologies (e.g. GM foods)
– developing a NE3LS capacity at this early stage is an
opportunity for Canada to establish a competitive edge in a
global economy
The Case of Nanotechnology
NINT: Collaborative Model
NRC
Province+UofA
NINT: Building
NRC
CrossAppointments
NRC/UofA
Shared
Nanotech
Facility
• Research
Programs
• Industry
Partnership
Facility
$20M
$20M
$12M/a
CrossAppointments
$40M
University
Aligned
Nanotech
Research
Programs
$40M
The Case of Nanotechnology
Business opportunities in nanotechnology
• Short Term (less disruptive)
– Nanomaterials
– Nanotools
– Nano-electromechanical systems
• Long Term (more disruptive)
– Nanoelectronics/quantum computing
– Bionanotechnology/personalized health care
– Integrated Nanosystems/Convergent Technologies