Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Identifying Science and Business Issues: The Case of Nanotechnology Dr. Danial Wayner, Director General National Institute for Nanotechnology, Edmonton Steacie Institute for Molecular Sciences, Ottawa The Case of Nanotechnology Contents • Catching the nanotechnology wave • Managing emerging technologies • Business opportunities in nanotechnology • What government can do The Case of Nanotechnology Nanoresearch vs Nanotechnology Nanoresearch • research at the atomic, molecular or macromolecular levels to: – create and use structures, devices and systems that have novel properties and functions with critical length scales typically under 100 nm – provide fundamental understanding of phenomena and materials at the nanoscale in 1, 2 or 3 dimensions The Case of Nanotechnology Nanoresearch vs Nanotechnology Nanotechnology • useful applications of nanoscience/engineering knowledge and discoveries – integration into existing technologies – new applications based on transformational or revolutionary discoveries Complexity (# of nanocomponents) The Case of Nanotechnology atoms macro/supra molecules molecules networks systems organism self-organizing Assemblies organ Biological Complexity tissue cell Integrated Nanosystems •Artificial organs/tissue •Chemical information systems integrated with electronics •Adaptive materials organelle protein DNA nucleic/ amino acid 0.1 www nano materials 1 10 electronics/ photonics 100 bulk materials 103 106 Length Scale (nm) 107 >108 Non-Bio Complexity The Case of Nanotechnology Catching the nanotechnology wave • What is the wave? – most of what we hear and see is nanoresearch – there are increasing incremental improvements to traditional technologies (e.g. nanocomposites) – some discoveries suggest discontinuities in product development, manufacturing paradigms – there is a feeling that we are on the verge of something revolutionary but it is still not well defined • Hype versus Reality – the research and investment communities are fueling unreasonable expectations The Case of Nanotechnology The Case of Nanotechnology Catching the nanotechnology wave • How do we know it is coming? – It is underpinned by many years of research – It builds on a succession of high profile reports – It requires significant capital investment in infrastructure and capacity building – it promises economic impact on optimistic timescales The Case of Nanotechnology Catching the nanotechnology wave • Nanotechnology fits this description well: – It is based on many years of basic research in physics, chemistry and biology. And several major areas of nanotechnology still require substantial scientific research before commercial ‘technologies’ will emerge. – there are many parallels with the biotech revolution – Future nanotech research and production facilities will require massive investments – There are an increasing number of startups even though markets are not yet clearly defined The Case of Nanotechnology Catching the nanotechnology wave • Trying to catch the wave is risky! • Anxiety over IP, wealth generation leads to: – Taking a new ‘technology’ out of a university or government lab and into a ‘start-up’ company before major research problems are resolved – products without markets, markets without products – unanticipated problems in scale up, moving from prototypes to production – incomplete understanding of the value chain – low ROI – if not managed well, disillusionment/backlash (dot coms, photonics) The Case of Nanotechnology Managing Technology Risk – Some Science Policy Issues • National S&T priorities – defines strengths, weaknesses, opportunties, threats at a national level – provides a framework within which funding decisions may be taken (critical mass) – creates opportunity for organizational synergies • Technology Clusters – regional clusters of competing and collaborating firms, associated with university and government research facilities to share the risk and the rewards – well developed receptor capacity – spin-offs when necessary but not necessarily spin-offs The Case of Nanotechnology Managing Technology Risk – Some Science Policy Issues • Funding – Provide long term funding of research into nanoscience in both the universities and government labs, e.g., NINT – Provide other incentives to SME’s (contracts vs grants) • Outreach/education – closing the gap between science and business/investors • Nano Environmental, Ethical, Economic, Legal, Social Implications (NE3LS) – public rejection can derail technologies (e.g. GM foods) – developing a NE3LS capacity at this early stage is an opportunity for Canada to establish a competitive edge in a global economy The Case of Nanotechnology NINT: Collaborative Model NRC Province+UofA NINT: Building NRC CrossAppointments NRC/UofA Shared Nanotech Facility • Research Programs • Industry Partnership Facility $20M $20M $12M/a CrossAppointments $40M University Aligned Nanotech Research Programs $40M The Case of Nanotechnology Business opportunities in nanotechnology • Short Term (less disruptive) – Nanomaterials – Nanotools – Nano-electromechanical systems • Long Term (more disruptive) – Nanoelectronics/quantum computing – Bionanotechnology/personalized health care – Integrated Nanosystems/Convergent Technologies