* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Mhlongo_S - Energy Postgraduate Conference
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Impact of Inhibitors Associated with Lignocellulose Hydrolysate on CBP Yeast and Enzyme Activity Sizwe Mhlongo Energy Postgraduate Conference 2013 INTRODUCTION Figure 1: Plantation of sugar cane, wheat and maize Agricultural waste from plant biomass (sugar cane bagasse, wheat straw and maize plant) can be converted to biofuel Hydrolysis and fermentation Figure 2: Schematic representation of lignocellulose showing cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin (Mussato and Teixeira, 2010) PRETREATMENT Acid catalysed steam pretreatment Figure 3: Major components of lignocellulose biomass and hydrolysis products (Almedia et al, 2007) HYDROLYSIS AND FERMENTATION BiologicallyMediated Event Processing Configuration (each box represents a bioreactor - not to scale) Enzyme O production 2 SSCF SSF SHF O2 O2 CBP SHF: Separate Hydrolysis and Fermentation Substrate hydrolysis SSF: Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation Hexose fermentation SSCF: Simultaneous Saccharification and co-Fermentation Pentose fermentation CBP: Consolidated Bioprocessing • Challenges in achieving CBP • Lack of an ideal microorganism : cellulolytic and ethanologenic phenotypes • Bioreactor environment: Inhibitors from lignocellulose hydrolysate HYDROLYSIS AND FERMENTATION Recent CBP Strain developments • Cell associated activity of S. fibuligera BGL1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Den Haan et al, 2007) • Expression of T. reesei EG2 in S. cerevisiae (Brevnova et al, 2011) • Recombinant yeast strains showing high activity of cellobiohydrolases Sc [T.e. cbh1-T. r. CBM-C] and Sc [C.l. cbh2b] (Ilmen et al, 2011) • However performance of these strains in an industrial process, utilizing lignocellulose biomass is dependent on bioreactor environment BIOREACTOR ENVIRONMENT Effect of inhibitors in the cell and mechanism of action Figure 4: Schematic presentation of known mechanisms of furans, weak acids and phenolic compound in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Almedia et al, 2007) TOXICITY ASSAYS • Maximum sub-lethal inhibitor concentration allowing cell growth and enzyme production • Preparation of different individual inhibitor concentrations • Assessment of growth profile and enzyme activity in the presence of different inhibitors • Determining the level of toxicity for each inhibitory compound on yeast strain • Expected outcomes • Determine inhibitors that are most toxic to microbial growth and enzyme production • Define feed rate of inhibitors that can allow fermentation to proceed ENZYME-INHIBITOR RELATIOSHIP • Isolation and partial purification of cellulases, assess the inhibition mechanism on enzymes • Hydrolysis of substrate by isolated cellulase enzymes in the presence of varying inhibitor concentration • Expected outcomes • Determine enzyme-inhibitor relationship (inhibition or deactivation) • Identification of the most toxic inhibitors on enzyme activity and therefore select pretreatment conditions that limit the formation of the toxic inhibitors • Required enzyme ratios for optimum hydrolysis REDOX BALANCE AND GENE EXPRESSION • Investigate the impact of furans, weak acids and phenolics on the redox balance in yeast cells • Gene expression analysis (genes required for growth during inhibition stress) Figure 5: Schematic representation showing furfural and hydroxymethyl furfural (HMF) conversion to furfuryl alcohol and furfural dimethyl alcohol (FDM) (Liu et al, 2006). ACKNOWLEDGEMENT • Supervisor and co-supervisors: • Prof. van Zyl • Prof. Bloom • Dr Den Haan • • NRF for funding Stellenbosch University