* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download GeriPharmacology_final 4472KB Feb 23 2016 09:38:36 PM
Drug design wikipedia , lookup
Pharmaceutical marketing wikipedia , lookup
Neuropsychopharmacology wikipedia , lookup
Compounding wikipedia , lookup
Psychedelic therapy wikipedia , lookup
Specialty drugs in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Pharmacokinetics wikipedia , lookup
Neuropharmacology wikipedia , lookup
Drug discovery wikipedia , lookup
Psychopharmacology wikipedia , lookup
Pharmaceutical industry wikipedia , lookup
Adherence (medicine) wikipedia , lookup
Polysubstance dependence wikipedia , lookup
Prescription costs wikipedia , lookup
Intravenous therapy wikipedia , lookup
Pharmacognosy wikipedia , lookup
Electronic prescribing wikipedia , lookup
Geriatric PharmacologyWhen More is Not Better Nathan R. Harmon, DO,CMD, CAQ- Geriatrics, Hospice and Palliative Medicine Disclosures • No Financial Disclosures Goals • Review elements unique to Geriatric Pharmacology • Define Polypharmacy • Discuss medications potentially to avoid – Beers List – STOPP and START • Discuss a methodology in approaching medication use in Geriatrics • Review a case related to geriatric pharmacology Factors Influencing Drug Effects in the Elderly • Multiple Co-existing illnesses, medications may worsen other conditions – CHF (diuretics) CKD AKI • Increased sensitivity to dosing/adverse effects • Pharmacologic changes with aging Pharmacokinetics • • • • • What the Body does to the drug Absorption Distribution Metabolism Excretion Body Composition Changes with Aging Age Group Body Wt (kg) Body Fat (kg) Muscle Mass (kg) 20-29 80 15 24 30-49 81 19 20 60-69 79 23 17 70-79 80 25 13 Volume of Distribution (Vd) • We lose muscle (water) as we age – Water soluble medications (digoxin) are not stored, but enter bloodstream quicker – Reach steady state faster; higher serum concentration for a given dose • We gain adipose as we age – Lipid soluble medications (diazepam) are stored, less than expected initial serum concentration, but leach out over greater time • Protein (albumin) bound medications (phenytoin) higher serum concentration with malnourishment Vd of Diazepam Age Volume of Distribution Hepatic Metabolism • Phase I – oxidative (cytochrome P450 family) – Declines with aging • Medications take longer to be metabolized • More susceptible to multiple medications competing for metabolism Renal Function • Due to decreased muscle mass, Cr alone is not a good predictor of renal function • MDRD not validated in patients > 70 • Renal dosing of medications should be done using Cockroft-Gault Half Life • t ½ ~ Vd / Clearance • Aging – Increased Vd (for lipophilic medications) – Decreased Clearance – Longer half-life Pharmacodynamics • What the Drug does to the body • In general, more sensitive to effects of medications – Lower than normal doses may be therapeutic The “Physics” of Geriatric Pharmacotherapy • Therapeutic Inertia – drugs continued in the absence of clear benefit – “De-prescribing” • Therapeutic Momentum – drugs added for questionable indications – Insomnia • The Prescribing Cascade – Drugs added to treat side effects from other drugs Gurwitz, J., “Drug Therapy in Older Persons: Beliefs, Myths and Challenges”, Harvard 31st Annual Review of Geriatric Medicine, 2015. Prescribing Cascade Metoclopramide (Reglan) Extrapyramidal Effects Levodopa treatment Gurwitz, J., “Drug Therapy in Older Persons: Beliefs, Myths and Challenges”, Harvard 31st Annual Review of Geriatric Medicine, 2015. Prescribing Cascade Nifedipine for HTN Increased Edema, Impaired bladder emptying, Constipation Over active Bladder Antimuscarinic Added Laxative Added Gurwitz, J., “Drug Therapy in Older Persons: Beliefs, Myths and Challenges”, Harvard 31st Annual Review of Geriatric Medicine, 2015. Prescribing Cascades • • • • NSAIDs HTN Anti-hypertensives Thiazides Gout Gout therapy Glucocorticoids Hypoglycemics Cholinesterase inhibitors Anticholinergics for urinary incontinence I think you may be challenged by polypharmacy. Polypharmacy Defined • Use of ‘multiple’ drugs • More than 5 (9) medications – >50% Medicare beneficiaries have 3 or more chronic medical conditions – 36-37% Community dwelling elders on 5 or more medications – 50% vitamin and/or dietary supplement – 40% NH patients on 9 or more medications • Use of more drugs than are Medically Necessary – Not indicated, not effective, or therapeutic duplication – Used to treat complication of another drug of marginal benefit • “Extreme polypharmacy” (20 or more) Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014 (Jan);13(1). (NIH Public Access) Polypharmacy -- How did we get here? • • • Great and important changes in medicine. – New tools which are quite powerful • Cancer medications • Beta blockers and ace inhibitors • Control of metabolic disorders – Lipids – Diabetes – osteoporosis – Attempts to standardize our care • Guidelines Aging population – Multiple chronic illnesses – Living longer Increased specialization – Multiple prescribers. Consequences of Polypharmacy • DDI’s – Hospitalized patients • 5-9 meds50% risk of DDI • 20 or more meds100% risk of DDI • Community Dwelling elderly 50% • Non adherence – 43-100% in Community Dwelling elderly – 4 or more medications 35% – Patients over 65 only 40% had 100% concordance between Brown Bag and Pharmacy Records. • Caskie et al. Exp Aging Res. 2006;32(1):79-103 Consequences of Polypharmacy • Observational Studies suggest it is a bad thing • Associated with multiple co-morbidities and frailty – Meds are of value – There is some under-prescribing – We do not have a robust science “BAD” Drugs • Beers List • STOPP/START Criteria Beers Criteria: History and Utilization Original 1991 – Nursing home pts PIMs – Potentially Inappropriate Medications QA/QI Updates 1997 All elderly; adopted by CMS in 1999 for nursing home regulation 2003 Era of generalization to Med D 2012 Further adoption into quality measures 2015 Updated recommendations with drugs to avoid d/t renal function, and select drug-drug interactions Designations of Quality and Strength of Evidence: ACP Guideline Grading System, GRADE Quality High Evidence • Moderate Evidence • Consistent results from well-designed, well-conducted studies that directly assess effects on health outcomes (2 consistent, higher-quality RCTs or multiple, consistent observational studies with no significant methodological flaws showing large effects) Sufficient to determine effects on health outcomes, but the number, quality, size, or consistency of included studies, generalizability , indirect nature of the evidence on health outcomes Low Evidence • • Insufficient to assess effects on health outcomes because of limited number or power of studies, large and unexplained inconsistency between higher-quality studies; important flaws in study design or conduct, gaps in the chain of evidence Or lack of information on important health outcomes Designations of Quality and Strength of Evidence: ACP Guideline Grading System, GRADE Strength of Recommendation Strong Benefits clearly > risks and burden OR risks and burden clearly > benefits Weak Benefits finely balanced with risks and burden Insufficient Insufficient evidence to determine net benefits or risks Beers List • Only 40% of the categories of medications listed have High Quality evidence • Alternatives to medications are not given • Medications may be appropriate in certain clinical situations – Digoxin, Spironolactone for CHF • Does give medications to avoid for certain clinical situations STOPP/START Criteria • The STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons’ potentially inappropriate Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment) • STOPP might work better than Beers to identify meds that result in negative outcomes, such as hospital admission. • But as with Beers criteria, there is no convincing evidence that using the START/STOPP criteria reduces morbidity, mortality, or cost. • Use these lists to identify red flags that might require intervention, not as the final word on medication appropriateness; look at the total patient picture. Gallagher P, O’Mahony D. STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons’ potentially inappropriate Prescriptions): application to acutely ill elderly patients and comparison with Beers’ criteria. Age Ageing 2008;37:673-9. Barry PJ, Gallagher P, Ryan C, O’Mahony D. START (screening tool to alert doctors to the right treatment)―an evidence-based screening tool to detect prescribing omissions in elderly patients. Age Ageing 2007;36:632-8. ADE’S-Common Drug Classes • • • • • • • Cardiovascular drugs NSAIDs Hypoglycemics 2nd Gen Antipsychotics Anticoagulants and Antiplatelet agents Antihistamines (medications “PM”) Anticholinergics Drug Comparison Charts RxFiles 10th Ed., 2014. ADE’s-Risk Factors • • • • • • • Age>84 Low BMI 6 or more Chronic Illnesses CrCl <50 mL/min 9 or more medications 12 or more medication doses/day Prior ADE Drug-Drug Interactions • http://www.uptodate.com • Example of medications – See Case later De-prescribing • Stopping Wisely •“…as complicated as starting a new medication” An Approach • Patient goals • Safety – Any possible ADE’s – DDI – High risk medications • Anticholinergics • Efficacy – Medical goals in relation to time to benefit and prognosis – Evidence base for elderly • Complexity and cost – Compliance Case • 85 y/o WF presents to establish care – – – – – – – – – – Alzheimer’s disease diagnosed two years ago COPD CAD (40% RCA in FL after presenting with dyspnea and edema) HLD HTN (160/90 on 2 ED visits) CHF UI Depression DJD Constipation Case • PMH – Ex-smoker • Lives alone – Housekeeper for heavy cleaning and laundry – Daughter helps with checkbook and shopping Case • BP 130/60 sitting • Height 62 inches • Weight 137 lbs 120/55 standing – BMI 25.1 • Mildly antalgic gait and uses cane • Bright alert, slightly vague A Patient • • • • FEV1 55% Pred, SpO2 92% Cr 1.1/K+ 5.0 EF 45% LDL 85 Brown Bag Meds (21) • Amlodipine 10 mg q AM • Atorvastatin 10 mg q PM • Fluticasone/salmeterol 100/50 bid • Oxybutynin 15 mg q AM • Donepezil 10 mg q AM • Fluoxetine 20 mg qAM + 10 mg (1/2) prn agitation and stress • Meloxicam 7.5 mg qAM • Ranitidine 150 mg bid • Ibuprofen 200 mg q hrs prn • ASA 81 mg daily • Proventil HFA prn • Ipratropium/Albuterol neb 2-4 times a day • Multi Vit qAM • Vit C qAM • Miralax 1 tsp/8 oz H2O qAM • Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen 5/325 tid • Lisinopril 40 mg daily • Metoprolol 25 mg bid • Lasix 40 mg daily • KCL 20 meq daily • Tylenol PM qhs Comments Brown Bag Meds Re-organized Category Category CV/HTN --Amlodipine --Lisinopril --Metoprolol --Lasix --Atorvastatin --Aspirin Psychiatric --Fluoxetine --Donepezil Respiratory --Fluticasone/Salmeterol --Proventil HFA --Ipratroprium/Albuterol GI --Ranitidine --Miralax Musculoskeletal --Ibuprofen --Hydrocodone/Acetominophen --Meloxicam --Tylenol PM Misc --Oxybutynin --MVI --Vit C --KCL Comments Safety • • • • Any possible ADE’s DDI High risk medications Anticholinergics Patient goals • Atorvastatin – Time to benefit 2 years – Safe to discontinue with LE < 1 year and improve QOL • JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:691-700. Drug-Drug Interactions • http://www.uptodate.com Summary • Geriatric Pharmacology – Physiological changes affect distribution, metabolism and clearance – Consider Polypharmacy • Redundant Medications • Group by system or condition – Beers list, STOPP/START, Common ADEs/DDIs – Make use of outpatient lists, pharmacy consultation – Deprescribing – Patient preference, Goals of Care, Life Expectancy, Medication Efficacy, DDI’s, ADE’s Questions References • As cited in presentation