* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download International Monetary Arrangements
Pensions crisis wikipedia , lookup
Non-monetary economy wikipedia , lookup
Balance of trade wikipedia , lookup
Currency War of 2009–11 wikipedia , lookup
Modern Monetary Theory wikipedia , lookup
Money supply wikipedia , lookup
Interest rate wikipedia , lookup
Currency war wikipedia , lookup
Global financial system wikipedia , lookup
Foreign-exchange reserves wikipedia , lookup
Monetary policy wikipedia , lookup
Balance of payments wikipedia , lookup
Exchange rate wikipedia , lookup
International Monetary Arrangements Introduction What were the various international monetary system that existed from late 1800’s to the present? How did adjustments to external balances occur under these systems? What are the discussions around international monetary reform? The Gold Standard Operated from 1870 to 1914 Each country defined the gold content of its currency Could exchange a piece of paper for gold Primary function of central bank was to preserve parity between currency and gold by buying or selling gold at official parity price Price of each currency in terms of gold The Gold Standard Since each currency was known and fixed, exchange rates between countries were also fixed Little to no inflation Fixed exchange rates gave significant security to overseas business Some costs also associated with gold standard Gold Standard & Monetary Policy Country’s monetary base consisted of gold or currency backed by gold Any balance of payments imbalance at current fixed exchange rate would set into motion a correction process to correct the imbalance Gold Standard & Monetary Policy Balance of payments deficit Rest of world accumulates more dollars than desired Gold outflows from US to rest of world Occurred automatically as dollars become cheaper in foreign exchange market Traders could make small profit purchasing gold at fixed price with cheaper dollars Exchange rate would be stable in short run Gold Standard & Monetary Policy Long run would not hold without other adjustments Outflow of gold causes monetary base to fall or grow at slower rate Change in money supply would affect interest rate and aggregate demand to correct balance of payments deficit Opposite is also true (inflow of gold) Gold Standard & Monetary Policy Under current system Contractionary money – decrease in money supply’s growth rate Expansionary money – increase in money supply’s growth rate Under gold standard Would actually have a decrease or increase in money supply Makes domestic economic relatively unstable But, fixed exchange rate and long run stable prices Macroeconomics & Gold Standard Assume economy is expanding Higher income in domestic economy leading to increased level of imports Higher domestic prices make imports relatively cheaper Balance of payments deficit at current fixed exchange rate Demand for foreign exchange increases causing gold to flow out of country (A to B) Foreign Exchange Market Macroeconomics & Gold Standard Gold outflow causes country’s money supply to decrease Consumption and investment decline as interest rates increase Aggregate demand decreases Output and price level fall Recession in domestic economy in order to bring external balance back into balance at the fixed exchange rate Domestic Economy Macroeconomics & Gold Standard Decrease in consumption spending leads to decrease in imports Domestic goods become relatively cheaper Exports increase Balance of payments improves Outflows of gold decline (eventually to zero) Money supply stabilized (stops falling) at lower level Domestic economy completes automatic adjustment Gold Standard – Costs & Benefits Benefits 1. Adjustment of price level and output to an external imbalance is completely automatic Country only needs to be willing to buy and sell gold at stated price No question what would happen if experience an external imbalance Gold Standard – Costs & Benefits Benefits 2. Long run price stability for economy Average inflation rate for US during gold standard was 0.1 percent Costs 1. Does not guarantee short run price stability Could have inflation some years and deflation others Could vary significantly from year to year Deflation as common as inflation Gold Standard – Costs & Benefits Costs 2. Overall balance of payments position heavily influences country’s money supply Balance of payments deficit means contracting money and contracting economy Balance of payments surplus means overheated economy with inflation With completely fixed exchange rates came extremely unstable GDP growth rate Bretton Woods System After gold standard ended, exchange rates were extremely unstable Desire for some form of international monetary system was desirable Conference in Bretton Woods, NH 44 countries met to create a new international monetary system Press referred to it as the “Bretton Woods” System Bretton Woods System Gold Exchange Standard US dollar tied to gold but all other foreign currencies tied to dollar Countries agreed to creation of International Monetary Fund (IMF) International monetary institution Bretton Woods System Purpose 1. 2. Countries’ strong desire for a monetary system with fixed exchange rates Design a method to decouple the link between balance of payments and money supply Necessary to link currencies to something other than gold Bretton Woods System Solutions 1. Price of gold fixed at $35 2. US to maintain fixed price US would exchange dollars for gold at stated price without limitation or restrictions Other currencies fixed to US dollar Meant other currencies fixed in relation to one another No longer necessary to sacrifice internal balance to maintain external balance Bretton Woods System Faults Logically impossible to have balanced balance of payments in both short and long run Long run balancing important for sustaining monetary system Government had to actively intervene in the foreign exchange market Governments would have to buy or sell domestic or foreign currency to keep domestic currency from appreciating or depreciating Bretton Woods System Example Country in a recession with balance of payments deficit Policies to obtain external and internal balances did not match Internal balance requires expansionary monetary or fiscal policy Would make external deficit worse Bretton Woods System Example (cont.) Government might choose to fight recession and sell accumulated foreign exchange to keep exchange rate fixed Once domestic economy recovers, can reestablish external balance Only if country had sufficient international reserves could it deal with internal balance ignoring external balances in short run Bretton Woods System Example (cont.) If country kept pursuing policies that were inconsistent with external and internal balances, country might have no choice but to devalue currency In this occurred in many countries, then no longer have a fixed exchange rate Need mechanism to encourage countries to maintain policies producing external balance and stable exchange rates Mechanism unclear in Bretton Woods system International Monetary Fund They were to oversee the reconstruction of the world’s international payments system Also allowed for creation of a pool of reserved from which funds could be drawn by countries with temporary payments imbalances International Monetary Fund Pool of funds Each country in IMF assigned a quota of money to contribute to pool One quarter of quota in gold, the rest in that country’s currency A country could borrow up to ¼ of its quota at anytime without restrictions A country trying to borrow more came with restrictions International Monetary Fund IMF restricted borrowing government to pursue monetary and fiscal policies consistent with long run external balance Most borrowing counties carried external deficits so required tighter policies Once own reserves were used, country was limited on pursuing inconsistent policies IMF loans are short term to be paid back in three to five years International Monetary Fund Loans from IMF to countries have problems If country has serious imbalances, may be difficult to correct in short run Policies to correct imbalances may lead to short run economic contraction Cost of lost output may be high IMF often involved in solution to country not performing well – IMF not popular Demise of Bretton Woods Problems developed with Bretton Woods 1. Not symmetrical A country with balance of payment deficit must follow policies to fix problem or no new loans A country with balance of payments surpluses could not be dealt with Could not force country to pursue policies to correct surpluses Demise of Bretton Woods Problems developed with Bretton Woods 2. All currencies fixed to dollar, but US developed persistent balance of payments deficits Foreign banks increased holding of dollars Surplus countries had to sell domestic currency for dollars to keep domestic currency from appreciating Foreign central banks holding amount of dollars larger than US stock of gold at $35/ounce Demise of Bretton Woods End of Bretton Woods US faced with choices 1. 2. 3. Change macroeconomic policies to reduce or eliminate external deficit Have foreign central banks demand gold in exchange for dollars held Devalue dollar and let it float against gold and other currencies US chose to devalue dollar ending system Post Bretton Woods Era Two options since breakup of Bretton Woods 1. 2. Clean float – government essentially leaves exchange rate alone and lets market determine value of currency Fix or peg exchange rate to the currency of another country or group of countries Clean Floats Decide internal balances are more important than external balances Set monetary and fiscal policy to achieve acceptable levels of economic growth and inflation Resulting mix determines current and capital account balances Monetary policy is very effective and fiscal policy is less so Leads to exchange rate value inconsistent with PPP Clean Floats Macroeconomic policy mix could lead to real appreciation of currency where the economy is doing well Might cause significant hardship of tradable goods portion of economy Exporters could lose business because of overvaluation of exchange rate Clean Floats Policy mix could lead to depreciated exchange rate Could lead to boom in tradable goods sectors Imports become more expensive Country’s goods become cheaper so exports rise If at full employment, resources need to come from somewhere Clean Floats Policy mix could lead to depreciated exchange rate (cont.) Prices and output increase Can lead to decreasing prices in non-tradable goods sector Letting exchange rate find its own level maybe optimal, but not costless Tradeoff is overall internal balance versus potential hardship for certain parts of the economy Pegging the Exchange Rate If international trade is significant portion of GDP, then ignoring external balances may not be optimal Country may wish to peg exchange rate Country sets value of nominal exchange rate against another country’s Likely to choose a country with whom it trades a significant amount and/or has large cross border financial flows Pegging the Exchange Rate If the pegged rate is credible, it creates security for investors and traders However, if currency it is pegged against is floating, then that currency is still changing Value against other currencies changes as the other country’s exchange rate changes Pegging the Exchange Rate Example – Mexico wishes to peg peso to US dollar In long run, Mexico’s inflation rate must match that of the US Mexico must keep domestic real interest rates similar to those of US to keep capital from flowing between the countries Mexico cannot use policies to target internal balance Pegging the Exchange Rate Example – Mexico wishes to peg peso to US dollar (cont.) If conditions in Mexico are similar to US then fairly costless. If conditions in Mexico are different from US, must choose to focus on external or internal (no peg) balance Price of pegging currency is willingness to sometimes sacrifice internal balance to keep fixed exchange rate Pegging the Exchange Rate Internal versus external balance choice may be partially avoided 1. Fix exchange rate in real terms instead of nominal terms In long run real exchange rate is what matters Government could periodically change nominal rate based on changes in inflation between the countries Could peg real exchange rate and keep some control over macroeconomic policies Pegging the Exchange Rate Fix exchange rate in real terms instead of nominal terms (cont.) 1. Still uncertainty in nominal rate Governments may target a rate of devaluation to keep it somewhat constant Still requires some changes in nominal rates Domestic policy may diverge from other country causing inflation rates to diverge Generally more certain that free float Pegging the Exchange Rate Internal versus external balance choice may be partially avoided 2. Fix country’s currency to basket of currencies If depreciates against one currency in basket, my appreciate against another Long run may be more stable than fixing to one currency Pegging the Exchange Rate 2. Fix country’s currency to basket of currencies (cont.) Problems a. b. c. Construction of basket is not clear: how many currencies, which currencies, etc. Should government tell which currencies are in the basket? More difficult for private markets to handle a. Traders exposed to more risk than fixed rate Options for Monetary Reform Current System Problems Businesses dislike floating exchange rates since volatility increases risk 1. Can choose between taking risk or protection through hedging – neither of which are costless Current system forces businesses to implicitly forecast exchange rates Options for Monetary Reform Current System Problems Floating exchange rates impose externality of world economy 2. Varying exchange rates make international trade and investment riskier Higher risk and higher costs lead to less of that activity Lower total volume of trade and investment with volatile exchange rates Options for Monetary Reform Current System Problems Governments have similar views as business 3. Overvalued currency can hurt tradable goods sector Undervalued currency can create a boom that cannot be sustained Collapse in currency can cause microeconomic crisis Options for Monetary Reform Why not change the system? Note figure 18.3 Horizontal axis shows level of cooperation in international system Left – set own policies for internal balance Right – complete cooperation Vertical axis shows degree of rules in system Top – rigid rules Bottom – much discretion (no agreed upon rules) Exchange Rate Map (Fig. 18.1) Exchange Rate Map Gold Standard 1. Rigid rules since each country defined currency in terms of gold Significant discretion – no need to coordinate policies Took monetary policy out of government control Other trade policies could be freely set Exchange Rate Map Bretton Woods System 2. More rules but less rigid than gold standard Obligations with IMF Required more cooperation Countries with imbalances had to fix them Fixing imbalances often required working with other countries Exchange Rate Map Current System 3. No rules Each country can pursue their own choices of policies Countries are free to target internal balances Exchange Rate Map Why no new system? Movement toward more stable exchange rates requires more rules and/or more cooperation Moving toward gold standard takes away monetary policy so unlikely Increasing cooperation in almost impossible if there are no rules Unlikely to move from current system