Download Mixed Logic Circuit Design

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Microprocessor wikipedia , lookup

Transmission line loudspeaker wikipedia , lookup

Flexible electronics wikipedia , lookup

Field-programmable gate array wikipedia , lookup

Electronic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Control system wikipedia , lookup

Curry–Howard correspondence wikipedia , lookup

Digital electronics wikipedia , lookup

CMOS wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Mixed Logic Circuit Design
Benjamin Suan
Presentation for
High-Speed and Low Power VLSI
Course: 97.575
Instructor: Dr. Maitham Shams
Contents
Introduction
– Background Information
Discussion
– Logic style sample comparisons
– Mixed logic circuit design
Project Proposal
– Project time-line
Introduction
Mixed Logic Circuits
– Relatively new area of research
– Circuits composed of more than one logic type
Reason to Use
– Each logic type has different advantages /
disadvantages
– By implementing two logics, gain advantages of both
Current Trends
Industry Trend
Lower power
Higher speed
Smaller area
Research Trend
Recent papers published in mixed logic design
Papers focused on PTL / CMOS circuits
Background
Standard CMOS Characteristics
Most commonly used logic in VLSI design
Ease of use, well developed synthesis methods
High noise margins
Low power consumption
No static power dissipation
Good current driving capabilities
Background cont’d
Pass Transistor Logic Characteristics
Widely used alternative to complementary CMOS
Fewer transistors are required for a given function
Reduced number of transistors means there is
lower capacitance
Dedicated buffers need to be inserted to boost
driving strength
Logic Comparison
M. Kontiala, M. Kuulusa and J. Nurmi, “Comparison of Static
Logic Styles for Low-Voltage Design” Electronics, Circuits and
Systems, 2001. ICECS 2001. The 8th IEEE International
Conference on , Volume: 3 , 2001
Logic Comparison cont’d
Full Adder Implementation
Propagation Delay Results
Power Dissipation Results
Power Delay Products
Discussion of Results
SCMOS has the best characteristics for
low voltage speed and power dissipation
No real motivation to develop mixed
circuits with these other types of logic
CMOS and PTL
CMOS and CPL Behavior
Results from adder
simulation
– CPL has lower power
dissipation across all
supply voltages
– CPL has lower delay
time across all supply
voltages
Mixed PTL/CMOS Logic
PTL/CMOS logic circuits will be superior
Better area, power and delay compared to
conventional CMOS or PTL
Low power, high performance design
driven by PTL cell selection and synthesis
technique to produce the mixed structure
Mixed PTL/CMOS Example
Pass-transistor/CMOS Collaborated Logic: The Best Of Both
Worlds
Yamashita, S.; Yano, K.; Sasaki, Y.; Akita, Y.; Chikata, H.; Rikino, K.;
Seki, K.; VLSI Circuits, 1997. Digest of Technical Papers., 1997
Symposium on , 12-14 Jun 1997 Page(s): 31 -32
Design assigned selector functions to PTL
AND/OR logic functions mapped to CMOS
Design Example
Design based on this Boolean equation:
Out1 = B * A’ + C * A ( I’ * F’ + D’ ) *
( D + ( H + E’) * ( E + G ))
Out2 = B’ + ( I’ + F’ + D’ ) *
( D + ( H + E’) * ( E + G )))’
Design Example cont’d
Design Example cont’d ii
Experimental Results
Experimental Results cont’d
Benchmark simulations show
the mixed circuits have better
characteristics than pure PTL
or CMOS
– 20% in area vs. CMOS
– 40% in power vs. CMOS
Design flexibility
– ↑% of PTL, ↓ power but ↑ area
Design Project Plan
Implement an algorithm in PTL
For mixed logic design, implement MUX
and XOR/XNOR type logic functions in
PTL and the remaining functions in Static
CMOS
Compare and discuss power consumption
and delay
Design Project Plan cont’d
Schedule
April 1 - 12
Logic Synthesis Technique / Background Research
April 13 – 19
Design Phase / Schematic Capture
April 20 – 30
Simulation / Project Presentation
May 1 – 5
Report / Documentation
References
Yamashita, S.; Yano, K.; Sasaki, Y.; Akita, Y.; Chikata, H.; Rikino, K.; Seki, K., “Passtransistor/CMOS Collaborated Logic: The Best Of Both Worlds” VLSI Circuits, 1997.
Digest of Technical Papers., 1997 Symposium on , 12-14 Jun 1997 Page(s): 31 -32
Geun Rae Cho; Chen, T., “On the impact of technology scaling on mixed PTL/static
circuits” Computer Design: VLSI in Computers and Processors, 2002. Proceedings.
2002 IEEE International Conference on , 2002
Page(s): 322 -326
M. Kontiala, M. Kuulusa and J. Nurmi, “Comparison of Static Logic Styles for LowVoltage Design” Electronics, Circuits and Systems, 2001. ICECS 2001. The 8th IEEE
International Conference on , Volume: 3 , 2001
Geun Rae Cho; Chen, T.; “ Mixed. PTL/static logic synthesis using genetic algorithms
for low-power applications” Quality Electronic Design, 2002. Proceedings.
International Symposium on , 2002
Page(s): 458 -463
Congguang Yang; Ciesielski, M., “Synthesis for mixed CMOS/PTL logic”
Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition 2000.
Proceedings , 2000 Page(s): 750
Yano, K.; Yamanaka, T.; Nishida, T.; Saitoh, M.; Shimohigashi, K.; Shimizu, A., “A 3.8
ns CMOS 16×16 multiplier using complementary pass transistor logic” Custom
Integrated Circuits Conference, 1989., Proceedings of the IEEE 1989 , 15-18 May
1989 Page(s): 10.4/1 -10.4/4