* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Interactions Within Communities (III)
Overexploitation wikipedia , lookup
Introduced species wikipedia , lookup
Unified neutral theory of biodiversity wikipedia , lookup
Latitudinal gradients in species diversity wikipedia , lookup
Molecular ecology wikipedia , lookup
Biodiversity action plan wikipedia , lookup
Island restoration wikipedia , lookup
Habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup
Occupancy–abundance relationship wikipedia , lookup
Ecological fitting wikipedia , lookup
Interactions Within Communities (III) December 3, 2010 Text p. 676-680 Re-Visit: Mullerian Mimicry • Predators and prey can protect themselves through mimicry • Unrelated species that resemble each other and are all poisonous or “distasteful” • Why Mullerian? If predator is confused between 2 species, means both are more likely to survive • To understand competition, must look at the ecological niche Ecological Niche • The use of, and interaction with, abiotic and biotic resources in its environment Habitat = organism’s “address” Ecological Niche = organism’s “occupation” Ecological Niche • Can include: – Prey – Predators – Reproductive methods – Temperature range – Habitat – Behaviour Fundamental Niche • Biological characteristics of the organism and the set of resources individuals in the population are theoretically capable of using under ideal conditions • Ideal conditions – Abundant resources – No competition from other species Realized Niche • What the organism actually uses under prevailing environmental conditions • Because of competition with other organisms for similar resources, a species can only use a portion of its fundamental niche Competition • Interaction within communities • May be detrimental to one or both species • Two Types: – Interspecific – interactions between individuals of different species for an essential common resource that is in limited supply – Intraspecific – interactions between individuals of the same species or population competing for resources in their habitats Interspecific Competition • Purpose: to restrict population growth • 2 Types: – Interference competition – Exploitative competition Interference Competition • Aggression between individuals of different species, fighting over the same resource • Typically detrimental to both individuals of the different species involved • Asymmetric – one species has an advantage over the other Exploitative Competition • Consumption of resources by two species, but one species may limit resource availability to other species • One species more efficiently uses a resource Reduction in Survival Principle of Competitive Exclusion • THEORY: if resources are limited, no two species can remain in competition indefinitely Species A Niche Species B Niche Competition Heavy competition leads to competitive exclusion – one species must go Gause • Russian Ecologist G.F. Gause • Competitive Exclusion aka Gause’s Principle – Two species with similar requirements could not coexist in the same community Paramecium sp. Red Squirrel Grey Squirrel Introduced between 1876-1929 Related Types of Interspecific Competition • Apparent competition – 2 species share a predator – The two prey can compete with each other to make themselves less available for consumption • Scramble competition – Inadequate resource for both species – Receive equal amounts, but not enough Results of Interspecific Competition • Population size of weaker competitor could decline • One species could change behaviour to survive using different resources • Individuals in one population could migrate where resources are more plentiful Resource Partitioning • Avoidance or reduction of competition for similar resources by different species through the use of non-overlapping ecological niches Anolis sp. A. carolinensis - Leaves and adjacent twigs A. distichus - Trunks and large branches A. angusticeps -Small twigs at great heights A. sagrei - Partly terrestrial - Small and large low perches Schoener, 1968 Foxtail Indian Mallow Smartweed Evolutionary Adaptation • Interspecific competition is driving force for species to evolve adaptations for continued survival Classic Interspecific Competition Example: Connell’s Field Experiments The Keystone Species • Plays a critical role in the community • Impact is greater than expected, based on its size or abundance • Predator-Prey – usually is a predator acting on prey with no other predators • Good target species for conservation Intraspecific Competition • Individuals of same population (and species) competing for same resources – Food – Shelter – Mates • As population density increases there is more competition among individuals for resources and growth rate slows • Classic territorial behavioural Last 3 Days