* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download ppt50
Occupancy–abundance relationship wikipedia , lookup
Restoration ecology wikipedia , lookup
Habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup
Introduced species wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical ecology wikipedia , lookup
Island restoration wikipedia , lookup
Biodiversity action plan wikipedia , lookup
Ecological fitting wikipedia , lookup
Latitudinal gradients in species diversity wikipedia , lookup
Chapter 50 Community Ecology Chapter 50 Climate and the Distribution of Ecological Communities Communities are assemblages of large numbers of species that all interact with each other. Areas with different climatic characteristics contain different ecological communities. Climate types are classified using the Koeppen Classification System. • Categorizes climate types based on annual temperature and precipitation, as well as variations occurring in these two variables. • Examples: tropical wet forests, subtropical deserts, temperate grasslands, temperate forests, boreal forests, and tundra. (Fig. 50.1) Figure 50.1 Climate and the Distribution of Ecological Communities Productivity is positively correlated with temperature and humidity. Communities have a characteristic pattern or type of disturbance. How Predictable Are Community Assemblages? Two views of community dynamics exist. • Clements believed that communities are stable, integrated, orderly, and predictable entities. • Gleason believed communities are neither stable nor predictable, but a matter of history and chance. • Historical and experimental data support Gleason’s view. (Fig. 50.9) Figure 50.2a Climate characteristics 40 Belém, Brazil Temperature (ºC) Average: HIGH 30 Very low variation 20 50 Variation: VERY LOW 40 30 Variation 20 10 0 J F M A M J J Month A S O N D Precipitation (cm) Annual total: HIGH Variation: HIGH Figure 50.2b Appearance Figure 50.3 Dense, dry air descends, warms, and absorbs moisture 30ºN Dry Hadley cell Cooled air is pushed poleward Wet Equator Warm air rises and cools, dropping rain Dry 30ºS Atmosphere (not to scale) Figure 50.4a Climate characteristics 40 Temperature (ºC) Average: HIGH Yuma, Arizona 30 20 Variation Variation: MODERATE 10 (Freezing) 0 20 10 0 J F M A M J J Month A S O N D Precipitation (cm) Annual total: VERY LOW Variation: LOW Figure 50.4b Appearance Figure 50.5a Climate characteristics 40 Temperature (ºC) Average: MODERATE Variation: MODERATE (Freezing) Denver, Colorado 30 20 10 0 20 J F M A M J J Month A S O N D Precipitation (cm) 10 Annual total: LOW 0 Variation: MODERATE Figure 50.5b Appearance Figure 50.6a Climate characteristics 40 Chicago, Illinois Temperature (ºC) Average: MODERATE Variation: MODERATE (Freezing) 30 20 10 0 20 J F M A M J Month J A S O N D Precipitation (cm) 10 Annual total: MODERATE 0 Variation: LOW Figure 50.6b Appearance Figure 50.7a Climate characteristics 40 Dawson, Yukon, Canada Temperature (ºC) Average: LOW Variation: VERY HIGH (Freezing) 30 20 10 0 Precipitation (cm) –10 20 –20 10 Annual total: LOW –30 0 Variation: LOW J F M A M J Month J A S O N D Figure 50.7b Appearance Figure 50.8a Climate characteristics 40 Barrow, Alaska Temperature (ºC) Average: VERY LOW Variation: HIGH (Freezing) 30 20 10 0 Precipitation (cm) –10 20 –20 10 Annual total: VERY LOW –30 0 Variation: LOW J F M A M J Month J A S O N D Figure 50.8b Appearance Figure 50.9 EXPERIMENT TEST ON COMMUNITY STRUCTURE Clement hypothesis: Biological communities have a predictable composition. REJECTED Plankton species (numbered rather than named, for simplicity) 1. Construct 12 identical ponds. Fill at the same time with sterile water so that there are no preexisting organisms. 2. After one year, examine water samples from each pond under the microscope. Count the number of plankton species in each sample. 10 11 1234 Ponds 12 1 2 3 456789 1 3. Plot results. 10 20 30 40 50 60 Total species in each pond 35 31 38 35 39 31 35 30 31 37 33 34 Gleason hypothesis: The composition of biological communities is largely a matter of chance. SUPPORTED Figure 50.9 EXPERIMENT TEST ON COMMUNITY STRUCTURE 1. Construct 12 identical ponds. Fill at the same time with sterile water so that there are no preexisting organisms. Clement hypothesis: Biological communities have a predictable composition. REJECTED Plankton species (numbered rather than named, for simplicity) 10 11 1234 Ponds 12 1 2 3 45 6 7 8 9 1 10 2. After one year, examine water samples from each pond under the microscope. Count the number of plankton species in each sample. 3. Plot results. 20 30 40 50 60 Total species in each pond 35 31 38 35 39 31 35 30 31 37 33 34 Gleason hypothesis: The composition of biological communities is largely a matter of chance. SUPPORTED How Predictable Are Community Assemblages? Disturbance and change in ecological communities. • Disturbance is any event that removes some individuals or biomass from a community. • The characteristic type of disturbance found in a community is known as its disturbance regime. • Important management decisions hinge on understanding the disturbance regimes of any community. (Fig. 50.10a–c) Figure 50.10a Giant sequoias after a fire Figure 50.10b Fire scars in the growth rings Figure 50.10c Reconstructing history from fire scars Number of fires per century 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 400 800 Years A.D. 1200 1600 2000 How Predictable Are Community Assemblages? Succession • Succession is the recovery and development of communities after a disturbance occurs. • Primary succession removes all organisms and soil, while secondary succession leaves soil intact. • A distinct sequence of communities develops as succession proceeds. (Fig. 50.11) • Succession is greatly impacted by the particular traits of the species involved, how species interact, the short-term weather conditions, and the overall environmental conditions. • Glacier Bay, Alaska provides an excellent case study in succession. (Fig. 50.12a,b) Figure 50.11 Old field Disturbance ends, site is invaded by short-lived weedy species. Pioneering species Weedy species replaced by longer-lived herbaceous species and grasses. Early successional community Shrubs and short-lived trees begin to invade. Mid-successional community Short-lived tree species mature; longlived trees begin to invade. Late-successional community Long-lived tree species mature. Climax community Figure 50.11 Old field Disturbance ends, site is invaded by short-lived weedy species. Pioneering species Weedy species replaced by longer-lived herbaceous species and grasses. Early successional community Shrubs and short-lived trees begin to invade. Mid-successional community Short-lived tree species mature; longlived trees begin to invade. Late-successional community Long-lived tree species mature. Climax community Figure 50.12a Hypothesis 1: Only one successional pathway occurs in Glacier Bay. Proposed successional pathway: Soils exposed less than 20 years: willow and Dryas 20 km Soils exposed 45-80 years: sitka alder, scattered cottonwood N Soils exposed 100 years: sitka alder, scattered spruce Soils exposed 150-200 years: dense sitka spruce and western hemlock Alaska Glacier Bay Direction of glacial retreat Figure 50.12b Hypothesis 2: Three distinct successional pathways occur in Glacier Bay. Spruce PATHWAY 1 Alder Early-mid successional Late-mid successional Climax Hemlock Cottonwood PATHWAY 2 No hemlock? ? Early successional Mid-successional Late-successional PATHWAY 3 Climax No hemlock? ? Early successional Mid-successional Late-successional Climax Figure 50.12 b.1 Hypothesis 2: Three distinct successional pathways occur in Glacier Bay. Spruce PATHWAY 1 Alder Early-mid successional Late-mid successional Climax Hemlock Cottonwood Figure 50.12 b.2 Hypothesis 2: Three distinct successional pathways occur in Glacier Bay. PATHWAY 2 No hemlock? ? Early successional Mid-successional Late-successional Climax Figure 50.12 b.3 Hypothesis 2: Three distinct successional pathways occur in Glacier Bay. PATHWAY 3 No hemlock? ? Early successional Mid-successional Late-successional Climax Species Diversity in Ecological Communities Quantifying diversity can be simple or complex. Research has focused on why some communities are more diverse than others and why diversity is important. (Fig. 50.14) Figure 50.14 Tropical forest Canopy Boreal forest Canopy Subcanopy Epiphytes Vines Understory trees and shrubs Understory shrubs Species Diversity in Ecological Communities On a global scale, a latitudinal gradient of species diversity exists for most taxa. • Species diversity declines as latitude increases. (Fig. 50.13) • Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain this gradient, but no simple answer exists. Figure 50.13 Number of vascular plant species per 10,000 km2 10000 60º 8000 30º 0º 6000 Equator 30º 4000 60º 2000 0 0 10 20 30 40 Latitude (degrees North or South) 50 60 Species Diversity in Ecological Communities Communities with high diversity are more productive, more resistant, and more resilient than those with low diversity. (Fig. 50.16a,b) Figure 50.15 1 species per plot 24 species per plot Total plant cover (%) 65 55 45 35 25 1 2 4 6 8 12 Number of plant species per plot 24 Figure 50.16 a,b Change in biomass: One year before drought to peak of drought (a) Resistance to disturbance Completely resistant 0.0 – 0.5 –1.0 –1.5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of plant species before drought (b) Resilience after disturbance Change in biomass: Before drought to four years after 0.35 0.00 Completely resilient –0.35 –0.70 0 5 10 15 20 Number of plant species 2 years after drought Essay 50.1, Figure 1, left Shading indicates burned areas Lake Yellowstone Park boundary Essay 50.1, Figure 1, right Box 50.1, Figure 1 Community 1 Community 2 Community 3 Species richness: 6 6 5 Species diversity: 0.59 0.78 0.69 A B C Species D E F Applying Ideas, Question 1 40 30 Temperature (ºC) 20 10 40 30 20 10 0 J F M A M J J Months A S O N D Precipitation (cm)