* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download 529-exam 3
Survey
Document related concepts
Fire ecology wikipedia , lookup
Latitudinal gradients in species diversity wikipedia , lookup
Plant breeding wikipedia , lookup
Restoration ecology wikipedia , lookup
Biogeography wikipedia , lookup
Island restoration wikipedia , lookup
Plant defense against herbivory wikipedia , lookup
Biodiversity action plan wikipedia , lookup
Habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup
Introduced species wikipedia , lookup
Ecological fitting wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical ecology wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Biol 529 - Plant Ecology 20 December 2002 Exam 3 Instructions: Answer ONLY 4 of the following 9 questions. Each answer is equally weighted at 25%. The questions are in 4 clusters. Answer only 1 question from each cluster. As usual, read through the entire exam first, choose your questions, and then begin answering (please number them with the number of the question). Enjoy and happy solstice holidays. I. Answer only one question of #1 or #2: 1. Discuss how plants interact with each other. Give examples from competition for negative interactions like competition and from positive interactions. Many ecologists claim that specific outcomes depend on context. Take competition as an example and discuss the what ‘context’ means with respect to competition for soil resources between two plants species. 2. Herbivores can have a great impact on plants and their communities. Discuss how herbivores can influence the structure of a plant community (structure = composition and abundance). Among a number of theories about how plants respond to herbivores, 2 theories are current, apparency theory and resource availability theory. Discuss one of these theories and provide detail about the types of plant responses. II. Answer only one question of #3 or #4: 3. The individualistic and organismic hypotheses concerning plant communities have had many different reincarnations throughout their history. Whittaker claimed, for example, he couldn't find distinct communities along gradients, while Daubenmire criticized him for not looking at sites lacking disturbance and examining population structure to see what was going to happen. In all these cases, arguments seem to depend upon assumptions of two features: degree of stability and degree of integration of the community. a) choose either the individualistic or organismic hypothesis; b) defend or criticize it; and c) elaborate on concepts of integration and stability in your discussion. 4. All the new ways of examining plant communities, e.g., shifting mosaic, gap-phase or patch dynamics, all call into question our historical view of dominance and climax. Bormann and Likens in their Hubbard Brook experiment, for example, found that the tree species they observed following disturbance could be placed into various syndromes combining a number of life history characteristics, their two extremes being "exploitive" vs "conservative" species. Similarly, Bazzaz worked with early successional herbaceous and woody species and determined they distinguished readily into "early" vs "late" successional life history syndromes. a) how do the "early" or "exploitive" species achieve dominance? b) how do the "late" or "conservative" species achieve dominance? In your discussion, mention in what physiological and life historical ways these two distinct syndromes differ. In other words, discuss the concepts of dominance and climax with regard to these new interpretations of plant communities. III. Answer only one question of #5 or #6: 5. Fire-prone habitats have always been problematic for community theorists. Clements, for example referred to chaparral as an example of a disclimax or pseudoclimax, a community prevented from reaching climax by fire. a) discuss the role of fire as a community level process; b) explain what is meant by "regime"; c) compare and contrast it to other disturbances, is there a fire regime that's distinct from a disturbance regime; d) do species in fire habitats fit the categorizations of those in other disturbance regimes, e.g. conservative vs exploitive, as in the Hubbard Brook deciduous forest. 6. Connell and Slatyer synthesized decades of work on successional mechanisms and came up with three classes: facilitation, tolerance, and inhibition. Discuss these ideas and also some of the criticisms of their work that Pickett and associates put forward. Pickett and associates also provided a ‘framework’ for explaining succession. Explain their framework. IV. Answer only one question of #7 or #8 or #9: 7. Invasive species are resulting in a world-wide homogenization of Earth's flora. Discuss some ideas developing about invasives, what makes a good invasive, what characteristics of communities prevent or permit invasion. How might invasives influence ecosystem processes? Do invasive species fit into preexisting ecological concepts or theories, succession, patchdynamics, or will entirely new ones need to be developed (if existing, discuss; if new, then why)? 8. One issue that confronts ecologists interested in management and conservation is the appropriate application of ecological principles. What are the major issues for managers? Discuss this by using two categories, general problems and constraints to management. For managers of a natural reserve in an urban area, discuss what context means with respect to problems and constraints. Give examples of an ecological principle and its application. 9. Cultural perspectives can shade our understanding of natural systems. Fully discuss this issue by contrasting our historic ways of approaching natural systems ("balance of nature") with the contemporary paradigm ("flux of nature"). Interpret examples from community theory and from management (you could invent the management examples) that might fit into these contrasts.