Download 4b_Fish_Effects_Five

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Myxobolus cerebralis wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Fish Effects
Five-year Plan
Chinook Salmon
Outline





Management and Regulatory Context
RMP objectives
Specific questions for the next five years
Highlights of SF Bay/Delta fish effects work
Priorities
Management Context

SF Bay is critical habitat for:




Estuarine fish (e.g., Delta
smelt)
Marine fish (e.g., herring &
anchovies)
Anadromous fish (e.g., Chinook
salmon, steelhead, sturgeon)
9 endangered species reside
in Bay
Delta Smelt
Herring
Management Context

Many SF Bay fish are in decline:
Source: CDFG and Delta Smelt Action Plan (2005)
Shiner surfperch
Management
Context
Delta Smelt near screen

Invasive asian clam
Reasons for decline are unclear:
Water diversions
 Invasive species
 Loss of habitat

 Contaminants
Invasive cyclopoid copepod
Regulatory Context

Few fish effect standards/guidelines exist

NOAA 1 ppm PAH threshold for sediments
Regulatory Context

Few fish effect standards exist

Basin Plan narrative objective:

Delta smelt
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic
substances in concentrations that are lethal to or
that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic
organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are
not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased
reproductive success of resident or indicator species.
Chinook salmon in Santa Clara Valley watershed
RMP Objectives and
Management Questions

4.0 Characterize ecological and human health risks
due to pollution of the Estuary ecosystem




4.1 Which chemicals pose ecological and human health
risks and should be monitored?
4.2 What ecological and human health risks exist due to
Bay pollution?
4.3 Are management actions effective in reducing
ecological and human health risks due to Bay pollution
4.4 What are the most cost-effective indicators of
ecological and human health risks to support decisionmaking
Specific
Questions for
the Next 5
Years

Selenium & splittail
Source: Dr. Teh UC-Davis
Are pollutants, individually or in
combination, reducing viability of fish
populations?
Source: Dr. David Ostrach of UC-Davis
Specific
Questions
English sole


Are pollutants, individually or in
combination reducing viability of fish
populations?
What are appropriate thresholds for
PAHs in sediments to protect fish?
Specific
Questions
English sole



Are pollutants, individually or in
combination reducing viability of fish
populations?
What are appropriate thresholds for
contaminants in sediments?
What are cost-effective indicators for
monitoring fish effects?
Previous Fish Effects
Work


Relatively few marine fish effects studies
At PAH and PCB contaminated sites in Bay
(Spies and Rice 1988), Starry flounder
had:
Higher incidence of AHH
 Poorer egg survival, decreased fertilization,
and decreased embryo success

Previous Fish Effects
Work

Field study of SF
bay fish and
reference site

Source: Stehr et al. 1997 Ecotoxicology 6, 35-65
Increase in liver
lesions in SF Bay
fish correlated to
higher PCB, PAH,
and pesticide
concentration
RMP Fish Effects Work

RMP-funded work

Myers et al. 2002


Significant increase in liver lesions in white
croaker; difficult to correlate to contaminants to
effects
Spies et al. 2006

Study of effect of contaminants on growth,
fitness and reproduction of shiner surfperch.


Skewed sex ratio; few histopathological effects; EROD
somewhat ambiguous
Kelley et al. on-going

Evaluation of hormones/contaminants in shiner
surfperch/staghorn sculpin
Endocrine Disruption in SF Fish
Shiner surfperch
Pacific staghorn sculpin
Source: K. Kelley CSU-LB
Priorities for Fish Effects

Link current effects work to populationlevel evaluations
Identify fish effects
 Identify suitable biomarkers of effects
 Apply models to translate individual effects to
population-level effects

Priorities for Fish Effects

High priority pollutants
PAHs
 PCBs
 Endocrine disruptors
 Others?


Lower priority pollutants
Legacy pesticides
 Trace metals
 Others?

Priorities for Fish Effects

Evaluate thresholds for decision-making
in the Bay


PAH threshold
Implement use of fish effect indicators in
S&T triennial sportfish monitoring
Liver lesions
 Gonad histopathology
 Incidence of parasites
 Others?
