* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download ppt - NRAO
Hubble Deep Field wikipedia , lookup
Aquarius (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Astronomical unit wikipedia , lookup
International Ultraviolet Explorer wikipedia , lookup
Observational astronomy wikipedia , lookup
High-velocity cloud wikipedia , lookup
Stellar kinematics wikipedia , lookup
Malmquist bias wikipedia , lookup
Perseus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Star formation wikipedia , lookup
Orion Nebula wikipedia , lookup
The distance to nearby star-forming regions New science enabled by micro-arcsecond astrometry Socorro, July 21, 2009 Laurent Loinard Centro de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica, UNAM Morelia, Michoacán Main Collaborators: Rosy Torres (UNAM) Luis F. Rodriguez (UNAM ) Amy Mioduszewski (NRAO) The Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) Brewster Washington North Liberty Iowa Hancock New Hampshire Owens Valley California Mauna Kea Hawaii St. Croix Virgin Islands Kitt Peak Arizona Los Alamos New Mexico Pie Town New Mexico Fort Davis Texas All observations presented here are phased-referenced and at 3.6 cm Absolute astrometry VLBA (at 3.6 cm): o Angular resolution: 1 milli-arcsecond (mas) o Absolute astrometry precision: 50 micro-arcseconds (as) o Phase calibration (and, therefore, astrometry) is relative to quasars Perfect instrument for astrometry Possible origins of motion for Galactic astronomical sources: o Trigonometric parallax ( = 1/d ) o Proper motion of large scale origin (Galactic rotation, cluster dynamics, etc..) of small-scale origin (e.g. orbital motions in multiple systems) What the VLBA can do for you… + = d(pc) (mas) (mas yr -1) 1 2 1000 500 2000 1000 5 10 20 50 100 200 500 1,000 2,000 5,000 10,000 200 100 50 20 10 5 2 1 0.5 0.2 0.1 400 200 100 40 20 10 4 2 1 0.4 0.2 (Proper motions calculated for v = 10 km/s) Recall: the absolute astrometry precision of the VLBA is better 0.05 mas Rationale (I) While main sequence stellar evolution is reasonably well-understood, our comprehension of the birth and pre-main sequence evolution of stars is significantly poorer. o Accurate observational data are needed to constrain the models. o Distance errors dominate the error budget Rationale (II) Much of what we know about star-formation is based on observations of just a handful of nearby sites of star-formation (Taurus, Ophiuchus, Orion, etc.) Improving the distance estimate for those few regions will have a significant impact on star-formation studies. Those regions are within 1 few hundred parsecs, well within the reach of the VLBA. Those regions contain adequate non-thermal sources. The nearest star-forming regions: ``The Gould belt’’ Measure the distance to several young stars in nearby star-forming regions to obtain an accurate estimate of the distances to those star-forming sites. Up until now, 4+ regions have been studied: Taurus, Ophiuchus, Perseus, Orion, and a bit of Serpens. T Tauri Loinard et al. 2007 d = 147.6 +/- 0.6 pc -- 0.5% precision… Other sources in Taurus Star Distance (pc) T Tau 147.6 +/- 0.6 Hubble 4 128.5 +/- 0.6 HDE283572 130.8 +/- 0.5 HP Tau 161.2 +/- 0.9 V773 Tau 134.2 +/- 3.7 d = 141 pc d = 128.5 +/- 0.6 pc d = 130.8+/- 0.5 pc Torres et al. 2007, 2009a, 2009b Taurus (more interesting…) East: 160 pc 3D Structure L1495: 130 pc South: 145 pc Torres et al. 2008 Taurus (more interesting…) Ballesteros-Paredes et al. (1999) CO data: Ungerechts & Thaddeus (1988) With this orientation nearly along the Galactic center-Galactic anticenter direction, tidal forces due to the Galactic potential oppose gravity and cloud collapse (Ballesteros-Paredes 2009). This may help explain the low star-forming efficiency of Taurus. What does that tell us about early stellar evolution? HP Tau (A small coeval group) (Torres et al. 2009) -ophiuchus • Debate: is it at 120 pc (as claimed recently) or at 160 pc (as traditionally thought)?? Knude & Hog 1999 -ophiuchus • Debate: is it at 120 pc (as claimed recently) or at 160 pc (as traditionally thought)?? • So far, two stars observed (S1 and DoAr21) - more to come… d = 121.89 -5.32+5.83 pc d = 116.90 -6.41+7.20 pc Loinard et al. 2008 Ophiuchus mean distance… d = 120 +/- 4 pc But… 4 pc Haro1-14c: 111 +/- 19 pc Encrenaz et al. 1975 I16293: 178 +/- 30 pc Schaefer et al. 2008 Imai et al. 2007 Orion Perseus Hirota et al. 2008 d = 235 +/- 18 pc The nearest star-forming regions: Gould’s belt 141 +/- 10 pc 235 +/- 18 pc 120 +/- 4 pc From 200 to 400 pc… 414 +/- 7 pc Conclusions • The VLBA can measure the distance to star-forming regions in the Gould Belt to very good precision. • Taurus is, on average, at about 141 pc (but with significant depth). • Ophiuchus is at 120 pc, Orion is at 414 pc, Perseus is at 235 pc. •We are working on Serpens. Perspectives? East: 160 pc L1495: 130 pc South: 145 pc Torres et al. 2008 What is we had 50 stars rather than 5? 3D Structure Perspectives (I) With 10 times more sensitivity (after the VLBA sensitivity upgrade is complete), it should become possible to truly map out the distribution of star-forming regions around the Sun. Of course, better sensitivity also implies closer calibrators, and better calibration E.g.: Taurus (of course), Orion is much larger than the Orion Nebula, It is not clear if all of Perseus is at the same distance (NGC1333 vs. IC 348), Ophiuchus streamers, etc.. (Note that these regions tend to be heavily obscured, so optical experiments are unlikely to improve significantly the situation: the VLBA results will be used for decades to comoe). Obtain a list of more than a hundred stars with well-measured parameters (luminosity, age, spectral type, etc.) 100 pc Perspectives (I) With 10 times more sensitivity (after the VLBA sensitivity upgrade is complete), it should become possible to truly map out the distribution of star-forming regions around the Sun. Of course, better sensitivity also implies closer calibrators, and better calibration E.g.: Taurus (of course), Orion is much larger than the Orion Nebula, It is not clear if all of Perseus is at the same distance (NGC1333 vs. IC 348), Ophiuchus streamers, etc.. (Note that these regions tend to be heavily obscured, so optical experiments are unlikely to improve significantly the situation: the VLBA results will be used for decades to comoe). Obtain a list of more than a hundred stars with well-measured parameters (luminosity, age, spectral type, etc.) Perspectives (II) If there is sufficient fraction of binaries, get well-measured masses However… we have observed pretty much all the known non-thermal emitters in star-forming regions. Need first to identify new sources Solution: a multi-beam VLBA search thanks to the new software correlator. Thanks! Back to T Tauri : a triple system T Tau N Duchene et al. 2002 The bright compact radio source detected at the VLBA is T Tau Sb. What about orbital motions? Orbital motions in the Sa/Sb system IR Data VLBA Data Recent Keck observations: Courtesy Gail Shaeffer Orbital motions: V773 Tau Duchene et al. 2003 Source V773Tau (a spectroscopic binary in a quadruple system) First six VLBA observations (of 18) Very accurate mass determinations of ALL the members of that system Source V773Tau (a spectroscopic binary in a quadruple system) Relation between orbital phase and flux