Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics (MRLC) Consortium Great Lakes Regional Data Exchange Land Cover / Land Use Chicago, IL April 27, 2005 Steve Raber NOAA Coastal Services Center Outline • • • • MRLC Overview The National Land Cover Database (NLCD) Partners and contributions NOAA Coastal Change Analysis Program (CCAP) • Future plans MRLC Consortium History • Formed in 1993 • Multi-agency (federal) • Original members: USGS, EPA, NOAA, USFS • Administered by USGS EROS Data Center Original objective: To leverage resources toward the purchase of Landsat 5 imagery for the conterminous U.S. … for use in the development of land cover products. MRLC Consortium Background 1990’s • National LC mapping programs of the 1990’s – Coastal Change Analysis Program (C-CAP); NOAA Coastal Services Center; focus on critical coastal habitats – Gap Analysis Program (GAP); National Biological Survey (NBS), later USGS; focused on maintaining bio-diversity – National Land Cover Data (NLCD); directed by USGS and EPA; focused on comprehensive (wall-to-wall) mapping of the US • Minimal cross-agency collaboration except for purchase of imagery • NLCD 1992 mapping (aka “MRLC ’92”) kicked-off • MRLC members added in mid-1990’s: NASA, BLM MRLC Consortium NLCD 1992 • USGS / EPA focused – wall-to-wall land cover mapping of conterminous U.S. • • • • Minimal participation by other agencies Circa 1992 imagery – best available (single scenes) Mapping based on EPA regions Traditional image processing methods – Significant subjectivity • Some contracts awarded • Work completed circa 2000 MRLC Consortium NLCD 1992 Lessons Learned • Successful mapping effort – – – – – – Proved wall-to-wall mapping could be accomplished Image archive developed Pre-processing refined Partnerships with industry fostered National awareness built Broad-based user community fostered • Accuracy assessment conducted by EPA – Decent results at Anderson Level 1 (~70 % accurate) • Mixed reviews from users • Consistency and repeatability issues and concerns – Need for better approach in future identified NLCD 2001 True MRLC Collaboration Circa 2001 • C-CAP, GAP, and NLCD all utilizing similar classification schemes, yet doing their own thing • MRLC Consortium presents opportunities – Vision to bring mapping programs into alignment – Landsat costs at all-time low (unprecedented) – Promising new semi-automated techniques • Improve repeatability, consistency, and accuracy • USGS EROS Data Center (EDC) – Promotes vision for National Land Cover “Database” – Partnership model to accomplish all mapping – Other mapping programs contribute while maintain own identity MRLC / NLCD 2001 New Purpose = Win / Win • Leverage each agency’s strengths • Slight modifications to each classification scheme (CCAP, GAP, NLCD) • Work toward own objectives, while developing the NLCD • Improved quality – Adoption of new semi-automated techniques - maintains consistency / repeatability – Mapping zones based on eco-regions – Three-season imagery NLCD 2001 • • • • • Water – Open Water – Perennial Ice/Snow Developed – Developed, Open Space – Low Intensity – Medium Intensity – High Intensity Forests – Deciduous – Evergreen – Mixed Barren(Rock/Sand/Clay) Non-Vascular – Lichens* – Moss* Classification Scheme • Shrubland – Dwarf Shrub* – Shrub • Grasslands/Herbaceous – Herbaceous – Sedge Herbaceous* • Agriculture – Pasture/Hay – • Cultivated Crops Wetlands – Woody Wetlands – Emergent Herbaceous Wetlands MRLC Expanded Partners Meeting, March 2005 • US Geological Survey (USGS) – EDC; Collin Homer, MRLC Chair – GAP – NAWQA • • • • • • • • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) US Forest Service (USFS) Bureau of Land Management (BLM) National Park Service (NPS) US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFW) National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) US Office of Surface Mining (OSM) NLCD 2001 - Status Capturing Coastal Changes Coastal Change Analysis Program (C-CAP) • Conceived in the late 1980’s • Implemented as a NOAA program in the mid 1990’s via grants and cooperative agreements • Project-based mapping until 2000 Original objective: To improve scientific understanding of the linkages between coastal wetland habitats, adjacent uplands, and living marine resources C-CAP Re-tooling Aligning with MRLC / NLCD • 1999 -- C-CAP review identified the need to: • Leverage other national efforts • Focus on applications – customer orientation • Standardize, create consistency, timely delivery • 2000 -- collaborative discussions with USGS and MRLC • Classification and techniques modified to accommodate NLCD C-CAP Geography C-CAP Classification Scheme Focus on the Coast Water – – Wetlands Open Water Perennial Ice / Snow Developed, – – – – Open Space Developed, Low Intensity Developed, Medium Intensity Developed, High Intensity Forest – – – Deciduous Evergreen Mixed Bare Land Shrubland – – Dwarf Shrub Scrub / Shrub Grassland – – – – – – Palustrine Forested Palustrine Scrub / Shrub Palustrine Emergent Estuarine Forested Estuarine Scrub / Shrub Estuarine Emergent Unconsolidated Shore Aquatic Bed – – Estuarine Aquatic Bed Palustrine Aquatic Bed Agriculture – – Cultivated land Pasture / Hay Alaska Only – – – Sedge / Herbaceous Lichens Moss C-CAP Philosophy Focus on the Coast • Focus on: – Coastal habitats and resources – Change detection and analysis – Accuracy and quality • Minimize duplication of effort • Guided by user input and interactions • Target audience: resource managers and decisionmakers • Partnerships are critical • Work with private industry – Day-to-day technical mapping – Faster, better, and more consistent C-CAP Status “Coastal NLCD” 2004 Contracts 2005-2006 Contracts NLCD Zones Looking Forward • First priority – Complete national baseline of land cover and change data, in collaboration with MRLC – Focus on the user community / constituency – outreach and coordination • Develop high-resolution solutions • Pursue regional updates every five years (with caveats …) • Continue integrating into broader NOAA and National Map initiatives For more information … [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] C-CAP: www.csc.noaa.gov/landcover MRLC: www.mrlc.gov EPA (MRLC): www.epa.gov/mrlc/about