* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Case Study #2 Understanding the Disease and
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Case Study #2 Understanding the Disease and Pathophysiology 1. Open abdomen is a medical technique, also referred to as laparotomy, in which the fascia of the abdomen is left open in order to avoid intraabdominal pressure and hypertension. An open abdomen is not usually left “open” for longer than 4872 hours. Some patients suffering from severe visceral edema cannot be closed and need to wait a few weeks for a skin graft to cover the abdomen. Intraabdominal pressure, sepsis and severe abdominal trauma can all lead to abdominal compartment syndrome (1). Open abdomen is a way to alleviate these etiologies and prevent further consequences (2). 2. Nutritional implications of these surgeries include: a. The patient will not be able to use his GI tract until it is connected once again into a closed system. Therefore, this patient should be placed on parenteral feeding. The hypermetabolic stress response of severe trauma will greatly increase his protein needs. The patient will need a central line to receive his nutrients because he will be receiving all of his nutritional needs intravenously. Since he has lost a portion of his stomach and a portion of his jejunum, he may still need to be on peripheral parenteral nutrition. This is because he will be eating smaller meals and his GI tract will not have adapted to a shorter small intestine, therefore it will be harder for him to absorb all of the nutrients he needs PO (3). b. Some potential nutritional complications include the risk of obstruction, abdominal discomfort and diarrhea which may lead to malabsorption, early satiety, and impaired digestion and absorption. Anemia may occur due to the loss of acid secretion and rapid transport of minerals. This may lead to osteoporosis and vitamin and mineral deficiencies. B12 deficiency may cause megaloblastic anemia due to a decrease in gastric juices, resulting in reduced intrinsic factor and B12 malabsorption (3). c. Severe liver trauma can lead to general metabolic distress. The liver is integral to the breakdown and utilization of all macronutrients, the storage and use of vitamins and minerals, bile creation, and countless other metabolic processes. Therefore, severe liver trauma can result in adverse effects on nutritional status.(3) 3. Anasarca is characterized by extreme widespread swelling or massive edema due to effusion of fluid into intracellular space. It’s a common condition among the critically ill population. The increase in fluid volume can lead to hypoalbuminemia (dilution effect) which may partially account for the low albumin levels indicated in the labs (1). The patient may appear to be malnourished due to low albumin levels when in reality there are many other contributing factors. This can also affect the interpretation of his nutritional status because weight gain and loss will be hard to assess due to the bloating the patient is experiencing. (4) 4. Stages of the Metabolic Stress Response to Trauma: a. The metabolic stress response to trauma has been described as a progression through three phases: the Ebb Phase, the Acute Flow Phase, and the Adaptive Flow Phase, often considered a Recovery/Resolution phase. The Ebb Phase occurs immediately after an injury. Hypovolemia, shock and tissue hypoxia may occur. Decreased cardiac output, oxygen consumption, insulin production and body temperature are also likely consequences. This phase takes place within the first 24 hours after trauma, so for this patient the Ebb Phase occurred after his gunshot wound and his surgeries. This patient is most likely in the ICU at this point of the metabolic stress response and doctors are working to prevent the patient from entering multiple organ failure. These stages do not always occur linearly (3,5). As previously indicated, surgery could cause the patient to revert back to the Ebb Phase. b. The Flow Phase may be broken down into two stages: Acute and Adaptive. The Acute Flow Phase is characterized by increased cardiac output, oxygen consumption, body temperature, energy expenditure and total body protein catabolism. There is an increase in the production of catecholamines, glucagon and cortisol as well as an increase in the production of glucose from gluconeogenesis and lipolysis. This phase takes place 2 days to one week after the trauma incident. Based on the patients glucose and body temperature levels, he seemed to be in the Acute Flow Phase from day four to day six and then again on day ten (3). c. The Adaptive portion of the Flow Phase is considered a recovery period. Increased hormone levels begin to diminish, normoglycemia ensues, and anabolic processes take precedence (3). During the recovery phase, the body normalizes in metabolism and is well into the healing process if everything is going smoothly. The patient will be anabolic. This occurs 1 week to 1 month after the trauma. The patient seemed to begin the recovery phase at day seventeen to twenty three. 5. An acute phase protein is a secretory protein found in the liver that is employed in the event of a traumatic injury or infection such as chronic inflammation, tissue damage, acute infection or a burn. This may result in loss of lean body mass and increased net negative nitrogen balance. Creactive Proteins help to identify when the acute hypermetabolic period of the inflammatory response decreases. They are considered nonspecific markers and show any type of inflammation and increase in the initial stages of acute stress, generally 46 hours following surgery (3). Understanding the Nutrition Therapy 6. Some changes that occur in protein metabolism include an overall decrease in protein synthesis and an increase in proteolysis. However, there is an increase in production of positive acute phase proteins such as creactive proteins. Changes that occur in fat metabolism include increased lipolysis, hepatic synthesis and ketone production. This can lead to fatty liver and a high TAG level in the blood. Changes that occur in carbohydrates are increased GNG (which receives glycerol from lipolysis), increased lactate production, and increased blood glucose levels (3). Other nutrient changes from metabolic stress include a change in substrate utilization to about: 55% calories from carbohydrates, 20% of calories from fat (not to exceed 2.5 g/kg), 25% calories from protein (1.52.0 g/kg), and fluid intake of 3040 mL/kg (6). 7. Specific nutrients that should be considered are: Vitamin A, Vitamin C, Zinc, Selenium, Vitamin E, Arginine, Glutamine, and Omega3 fatty acids. a. Glutamine is recommended because it helps cells grow and recover quickly. Specifically, the enterocytes lining the GI tract prefer glutamine as an energy source. White blood cells and fibroblasts will also utilize this amino acid. It plays an important role in wound healing and preservation of lean body mass. The recommendation for glutamine in a trauma patient is 1000 to 3000 mg daily. b. Arginine is recommended because of its role in fighting bacteria, providing aid to the immune system. It is also an important component of infection free wound healing. The recommendation for arginine in a trauma patient is 17 to 25 g. c. Omega3 fatty acid is recommended because of their antiinflammatory properties. They help Tcells and natural killer cells to be more effective in the body. The recommendation for omega3 fatty acids in a trauma patient is 1400 mg EPA and 1000 mg DHA daily (6). d. Vitamin E and Selenium offer antioxidant properties that may also be helpful in the healing process. 8. The first step in the decisionmaking process of determining a route of nutrition support is evaluating the condition of the GI tract. If the patient’s gut is in working order, utilizing it is preferred over IV nutrition. Mr. Perez has endured several GI surgeries and was not able to absorb nutrients through the gut until Day 11 of his hospital stay. In general, enteral nutrition is a good choice if the patient is hemodynamically stable and no longer requires large amounts of fluids to remain that way. Placement of a nasojejunal tube very early after trauma occurs, such as during the first surgery, is ideal but not always realistic (3). While the patient was receiving all needs though TPN, the usage of additional TF can promote gut health and GI motility. However, as the patient is currently unable to fulfill all caloric and nutritional needs through TF, PN should be continued until the patient can tolerate TF of 5075% of goal rate. Nutrition Assessment 9. See Adime Note 10. Excess fluid intake and retention due to anasarca and TPN treatment may distort the patient’s weight measurements. This swelling is evident in Mr. Perez, who is currently experiencing an increase in weight from 102 kg to 110 kilograms (7). The patient’s weight will likely fluctuate on a daily basis due to varied fluid retention. Calculation of Nutrient Requirements 11. Energy needs: i. IBW: 166# ii. %IBW:135% iii. ABW: (225# 166#) x .25+166#= 181# → 82.3 kg a. MifflinSt. Jeor: BEE X 1.61.8 for severe stress 10(82.3kg) + 6.25( 177.8cm) 5(29 yrs)+ 5= 28703229 kcal We picked MifflinSt.Jeor because it is more accurate than the HBE equation. We used the activity factor of 1.61.8 because he is under severe stress. b. IJEE used because he is ventilator dependent 1784 11(29 yrs) + 5(102.3 kg) + 244+ 239= 2460 kcal IretonJones was selected as it accounts for the fact that our patient is on the ventilator. This would lower his calorie needs as he is not spontaneously breathing, and explain the lower value. c. Protein needs: used 1.61.8 because he needs more protein because he had surgery. Protein is needed for wound healing and nitrogen balance. 1. 1.61.8 g/ kg x ABW (82.3kg)= 132148 g 12. Indirect calorimetry measures the type and rate of substrate utilization. An individual’s energy requirements are estimated by gas exchange measurements, specifically oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production. It is noninvasive and may be combined with other techniques to evaluate energy expenditure (8). 13. Indirect calorimetry should be used to determine energy requirements in critically ill patients. Indirect calorimetry can be performed as the patient’s health status changes, which allows for a more accurate assessment of energy requirements. Chest tubes, acidosis and use of supplemental oxygen may produce inaccurate results for indirect calorimetry (3). We do not have a diet history for the patient so we cannot judge how many calories the patient usually consumes. Equations can be helpful to get a general idea of our patients needs but because of the severe trauma our patient has sustained, the indirect calorimeter would give us a more accurate estimate so we can make sure the Mr. Perez gets the nutrients he needs. Using a metabolic cart measurement may be the best way to ensure the patient is getting the proper amounts of nutrients to support a healthy recovery from his injuries. 14. The results yielded from the indirect calorimeter were much higher than the values given by the two equations in #11. Compared to the indirect calorimetry values of day 4 (3657 kcal) and day 10 (3765 kcal), all of these estimates were too low by about 1,000 kcal. Patient's ABW was used during calculations, which was lower than his actual body weight and may be the source of the error. The equations give only estimates of patient needs, not exact measurements like the indirect calorimeter. This could also account for the calorie difference. When measuring indirect calorimetry, N balance should also be measured. For every 1g of nitrogen excreted, about 6L of oxygen is consumed and about 4.8L of CO2 are produced (9). In a trauma patient experiencing proteolysis, there is likely an increase in urinary N. While we do not have a UUN lab value for out patient, his BUN level is high. This may account for the difference in calories. 15. RQ values: Day 4: 0.76 and Day 10: 0.70. a. These values mean that the patient is not getting enough calories and may be experiencing prolonged malnutrition, therefore he is using his body stores for energy. His body is metabolizing lipids and proteins which is not ideal when he is recovering from such a severe surgery. This is because he needs to use protein in order to aid in wound healing (3). 16. Elevated energy expenditure in this patient is caused by the severe trauma the patient has undergone in the past several days, including a gunshot wound and an open abdomen. Not only has he sustained massive tissue damage, his body is also hypermetabolic due to the stress response. The endocrine system produces the stress hormones glucagon, catecholamines, and glucocorticoids which helps raise the metabolic rate (3). Intake Domain 17. Carbohydrates received daily: 300g x 3.4 kcal = 1020 kcal; Amino Acids received daily: 170 g x 4 kcal = 680 kcal; Lipids received from propofol daily: 1.1 kcal/mL x 35 ml/hr x 22 hrs = 847kcal; Total calories received daily: 680 kcal + 1020 kcal + 847 kcal= 2547 kcal Mr. Perez was receiving 75 mL/hr every day for 22 hours which give him a total of 1650mL. 18. The calculations in #17 are much lower than the values given by the metabolic cart on hospital day 4. These lower values are due to the fact that the patient is on a ventilator which is also demonstrated by the values given by the Ireton Jones Energy Equation in #11. The patient’s hospital course indicates that his dextrose was increased to 350 g per day and his protein was increased to 180 g per day. We would recommend increasing his carbohydrate intake to 500 g per day to raise his RQ value and increase his caloric intake while ensuring the carbohydrate infusion rate remains at 3.4, well under the limit for critically ill patients (5mg/kg/min) (5). 19. The patient was receiving propofol at an infusion rate of 35 mL/hour. Propofol is a type of anesthetic given to patients. It is administered as part of a lipid emulsion and provides about 1.1 kcal per mL. In the case the patient is receiving about 847 kcal from lipids per day from propofol. (1.1 kcal/mL X 35 ml/hr X 22 hrs) (7,10). This meets the patient’s daily needs, indicating that there is no need for additional lipids in his parenteral nutrition formula. 20. Enteral feeding was started to attempt to bring the patient back to a normal method of intake via the gut. Total parenteral feeding through central vascular access carries higher risks of infection, pneumothorax, and arterial puncture. If the patient’s GI tract is able to properly absorb the nutrients his body needs, enteral feeding is ideal to avoid these potential setbacks (3). 21. Impact is a metabolic stress formula that contains immunomodulatory ingredients (11). It also contains arginine as a free amino acid. It is considered an elemental formula, meaning that nutrients are broken down into smaller components. For example, protein is available in the form of free amino acids. This helps to reduce the workload of digestion. This is fitting for this patient as the GI tract is still highly compromised (6,12,13). The patient started on 10 mL/hr and then was advanced to 15 mL/hr. Impact contains 1.5 kcal/mL, 37% carbohydrate, 38% fat and 25% of protein. If the patient is receiving enteral nutrition for 20 hr/d enteral nutrition represents 300450 kcal a day depending on the 10 or 15 mL/hr speed. Based on the indirect calorimetry measurement for this patient enteral nutrition is accounting for 8.2% 12.2% of his daily caloric needs. 22. Inadequate fluid intake (NI3.1), Increased protein needs (NI5.1), Inadequate proteinenergy intake (NI 5.3), increased nutrient needs (NI 5.1). Clinical Domain 23. ***citation for all (3). Parameter Normal Value Patients Value Reason for Abnormality Nutrition Implication Albumin 3.55 g/dL 1.4 (day 4) and 1.9 (day 10) g/dL Anasarca leads to While low serum widespread inflammation albumin levels may be and volumic dilution of an indicator of blood proteins malnutrition, Albumin is a negative widespread edema acute phase protein such as in this patient meaning its production is may distort the value limited in a time of and discredit that metabolic stress. Due to indication our patients condition, Indicators of there will be decreased morbidity and mortality production of this help identify patients protein negatively who are at increased affecting his lab values. risk of trauma/ illness Prealbumin 1635 mg/dL 3 (day 4) and 5 (day 10) mg/dL Sensitive proteinenergy balance indicator Responds to nutrition intervention Also a negative acute phase protein Stress reaction will decrease prealbumin levels May indicate a proteinenergy imbalance, although not always reliable Glucose 70110 mg/dL 164140 mg/dL Glucose is elevated in a metabolic state as gluconeogenesis is a prominent metabolic pathway. Lipolysis provides glycerol as a substrate. There is also less insulin present due to metabolic stress High blood glucose can lead to poor wound healing. Insulin may need to be adjusted in order to control these levels BUN 818 mg/dL BUN could be elevated because he is on a high protein diet to support wound healing. The patient is also experiencing excessive protein catabolism as a result of metabolic stress (3) GI bleeding may also Increased protein intake is necessary to combat excessive protein catabolism (3) 2325 mg/dL cause high BUN levels ALT 436 U/L 435 U/L Medication may increase levels Increases with inflammation and severe muscular, bone, intestinal, or liver damage (3) Ensure proper energy and protein intake to support healthy and timely healing processes AST 035 U/L 190 U/L Medications such as antibiotics or stains may increase levels of AST AST is used to help monitor liver function in patients with TPN (3) Ensure proper energy and protein intake to support healthy and timely healing processes Alk Phos 30120 U/L 540 U/L Infection and cholestasis can increase serum alkaline phosphatase levels (3) Increased protein intake may be necessary to support liver recovery (3) Creactive protein <1.0 mg/dL 245 U/L Creactive protein is a positive acute phase protein and therefore is produced more in metabolic stress. An increase in CRP is associated with trauma and infection A high creactive protein level means that all negative acute phase proteins are not accurate markers of nutrition 24. Case Study Guidelines from Scholar says it is not necessary to answer this 25. Altered GI function (NC1.4), Impaired nutrient utilization (NC2.1). Nutrition Diagnosis 26. Increased protein needs related to hypermetabolic stress and wound healing and as evidenced by abdominal gunshot wound, open abdomen, and GI surgeries (NI5.1). Altered GI function related to modified ability to digest and absorb nutrients as evidenced by resection of proximal jejunum and stomach (NC1.4). Nutrition Intervention 27. a. Formula/solution (ND2.2.1) Change PN rx to provide 75% of protein and energy requirements. Pt to receive 1.0L of a 10% amino acid solution providing 100g PRO and 400kcal, 500g dextrose to provide 1700kcal and 80g IV lipids per day to provide 720kcals. i. Goal: PN tolerance Formula/solution (ND2.1.1) b. Initiate EN providing remaining 25% of protein and energy requirements. Pt to receive Impact 1.5 at goal rate of 20ml/hr to provide 41g PRO and 660kcal. Begin TF at 50% goal rate and increase incrementally as tolerated i. Goal: TF tolerance Total Nutrition support to provide: 3480kcal and 141g PRO Goals: Wt Maintenance TF an PN tolerance Continued abdominal and GI healing allowing for increase in EN Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation 28. The standard recommendations for monitoring the nutritional status of a patient receiving nutritional support are to check the patient’s in’s and out’s, check patient’s daily weight and lab values for hydration status, check patients urine for sugar, acetone, and protein levels, check liver function, and check acid/base balance. Look at the patient to check visual clues of nutrition status. If these things are not within normal limits, reevaluate nutritional support (5). 29. Mr. Perez’s blood glucose level on day 4 is 107185 dL/mg. Hyperglycemia is important to be aware of in critically ill patients because of the hypermetabolic response their bodies are going through. The patients are experiencing an increase in glucose production and uptake and an increase in epinephrine which hinders insulin release in the body. With continual breakdown of energy stores in the body and low insulin levels, glucose can easily build up in the body which can lead to ketoacidosis. Mr. Perez was put on an insulin drip to bring down his blood glucose levels and reverse the hyperglycemia. (3) [ADIME Note required] References 1. Nutr Clin Pract. 2012 Aug;27(4):4928. Epub 2012 Jun 19. The open abdomen: definitions, management principles, and nutrition support considerations. Friese RS. University of Arizona, College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ 857275063, USA. [email protected] 2. Ivatury RR, Kolkman KA, Johansson K. Management of open abdomen. Acta clinica Belgica. Supplementum. 2007(1):206209. 2. www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/003103.htm 3. Mahan LK, EscottStump S. Krause’s Food and Nutrition Therapy. 13th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Saunders Elesevier; 2012. 4. Goodheart, Clyde. Medical Writers. Metabolic Stress. http://www.goodheartmedwriters.com/SAMPLESPDF/metabolism.pdf. Accessed November 4, 2012. 5. Cochran, Brittany. Critical Care Nutrition: Metabolic Stress, Trauma, Burns Lecture Notes. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Tech; HNFE 4125. 6. LifeExtention. Trauma and Wound Healing The Theraputic Role of Nutrition. http://www.lef.org/protocols/health_concerns/trauma_02.htm Accessed November 4, 2012. 7. US National Library of Medicine. Swelling. 23 October, 2012. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/003103.htm. Accessed October 30, 2012. 8. Ferrannini E. The theoretical bases of indirect calorimetry: a review. Institute of Clinical Physiology. 1988 (37); 287301. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0026049588901102. Accessed November 12, 2012. 9. Gropper S, Smith J, Groff J. Advanced Nutrition and Human Metabolism. 5th Ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning; 2009. 10. Drug Information Online. Propofol. http://www.drugs.com/propofol.html Accessed November 11, 2012. 11. Parrish CR, McCray S. Enteral feeding: dispelling myths. Practical Gastroenterology. 2003;27(9):3351. 12. University of Michigan. Patient Food and Nutrition Services Enteral Products. 2012. www.med.umich.edu. Accessed October 29, 2012. 13. Phillips EM, Short N, Turner C et al. PeptideBased formula: the nutraceuticals of enteral feeding. ECPN. 2005; 4044. scihealth.org. Accessed November 14, 2012.