Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Comparing file transfer and encryption performance of Java
Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
File Transfer Performance: Receiving 5000 4500 Time in Milliseconds 4000 3500 C# -> C# 3000 C# -> Java 1.5 beta Java 1.5 beta -> C# 2500 Java 1.5 beta -> Java 1.5 beta 2000 Java 1.4.2 -> Java 1.4.2 1500 PureC# -> PureC# 1000 500 0 1Kb 10Kb 100Kb 1Mb File Size Fig. 7: The results of the file transfer performance of the applications for sending a file, including the results for the 10 Mb file 10.4 Discussion of the results When we compare the two Java versions, being 1.4.2 and 1.5 beta, we donât see much of a difference in performance. Java 1.5 beta doesnât seem to be more performant then Java 1.4.2, at least, for sending and receiving files over TCP that is. Sending and receiving files happens at about the same speed. The small differences in the data can be explained as noise in the data. C# seems to be a bit slower in receiving files then the two Java versions. It is clear though that, by looking at the receiving of files in the non-buffered C# version (PureC#), C# can be made a lot faster when the TCP packets are being handled by the .NET Framework, by using the TcpClient class, instead of programmatically. It is possible that the buffered C# version is slower because of the fact that each packet is handled twice. Once by the .NET Framework and once by the program (which reads all incoming data into packets of 5120 bytes), reducing the C# performance. 42
