Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Developmental Synaptopathies Associated with TSC, PTEN and SHANK3 Mutations Project Overview October 7, 2015 Kira A. Dies, ScM, CGC Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs Service Translational Neuroscience Center Boston Children’s Hospital Overview of Developmental Synaptopathies Consortium (DSC) • 10 site consortium funded by NCATS, NIMH, NINDS and NICHD • 5 year grant • Focusing on three well-established genetic syndromes that are associated with high penetrance for ASD/ID caused by TSC1/2, PTEN and SHANK3 mutations and disruptions in shared molecular pathways Developmental Synaptopathies Consortium (DSC) What is a Synaptopathy? • The dysfunction of connectivity in the brain: these disruptions in synaptic structure and function are major determinants of the resulting brain disease or disorder. • Synaptic function and connectivity are implicated in: - communication - interpersonal interactions - functioning and processing Developmental Synaptopathies Consortium (DSC) RDCRN Executive Committee Scientific Advisory Board Wendy Chung, MD, PhD (Columbia U) Anthony Wynshaw-Boris, MD, PhD (Case) Helen Tager-Flusberg, PhD (BU) Catherine Stoodley, PhD (American U) Michael Aman, PhD (Ohio State U) MRI Coordinating Center Simon Warfield, PhD (BCH) Mustafa Sahin, MD, PhD Principal Investigator Administrative Unit Joseph Buxbaum, PhD (Mt. Sinai), Director Rajna Filip-Dhima, MS (BCH), Project Manager Kira Dies, ScM, CGC (BCH), Regulatory Manager Sahin Buxbaum Eng Hardan Kolevzon Krueger Filip-Dhima Dies Bebin Bernstein Berry-Kravis Frazier Kaufmann Martinez Northrup Powell Soorya Thurm Wu TSC Alliance PTEN Foundation PTEN World PTEN Life PMS Foundation Seaver Foundation Lead Psychologists Thomas Frazier, PhD (CC) Deborah Pearson, PhD (UTH) Audrey Thurm, PhD (NIH) Training Hope Northrup, MD (UTH) Kira Dies, ScM, CGC (BCH) PTEN Clinical Pilot Study TSC Longitudinal Study Project Leader Darcy Krueger, MD, PhD (CCHMC) Co-Investigators Mustafa Sahin, MD, PhD (BCH) Martina Bebin, MD (UAB) Joyce Wu, MD (UCLA) Hope Northrup, MD (UTH) PMS Longitudinal Study Project Leader Alex Kolevzon, MD (Mt Sinai) Co-Investigators Mustafa Sahin, MD, PhD (BCH) Audrey Thurm, PhD (NIH) Elizabeth Berry-Kravis, MD, PhD / Latha Soorya, PhD (Rush) Jon Bernstein, MD (Stanford) Craig Powell, MD, PhD (UTSW) PTEN Longitudinal Study Project Leader Charis Eng, MD, PhD (CC) Co-Investigators Thomas Frazier, PhD (CC) Antonio Hardan, MD (Stanford) Mustafa Sahin, MD, PhD (BCH) Julian Martinez, MD (UCLA) DMCC Project Leader Antonio Hardan, MD (Stanford) Co-Investigators Mustafa Sahin, MD, PhD (BCH) Charis Eng, MD, PhD/Thomas Frazier, PhD (CC) Julian Martinez, MD (UCLA) Overall Goals of the DSC • Long term goal: • mechanistic analysis of three genetic disorders with high penetrance of ASD/ID to shed light on molecular pathways and targets relevant to ASD/ID: Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC1 and TSC2 genes), PTEN hamartoma syndrome and Phelan-McDermid syndrome (PMS; SHANK3 gene) • The short-term goals are: • (1) to better characterize the neurodevelopmental phenotype of these three groups of patients longitudinally • (2) identify biomarkers that predict risk for disease severity/progress. ASD genes to date Using traditional approaches Buxbaum, J The problem in Autism: 500-1000 susceptibility genes Broad-spectrum Drugs for subcategories Treatment(s)? One drug for every gene TUBEROUS SCLEROSIS COMPLEX What is Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC)? • Multi-system disease • Causes hamartomas (benign growths) in brain, eye, skin, kidneys, and heart • Autosomal dominant (TSC1 and TSC2 genes) • Usually presents with seizures, cognitive impairment, autism • Incidence: 1: 6,000-10,000 Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for Tuberous Sclerosis Complex 11 Major Features • Hypomelanotic macules (≥3; at least 5mm diameter) • Angiofibroma (≥3) or fibrous cephalic plaque • Ungual fibromas (≥2) • Shagreen patch • Multiple retinal hamartomas • Cortical dysplasias (≥3 )* • Subependymal nodule (≥2) • Subependymal giant cell astrocytoma • Cardiac rhabdomyoma • Lymphangiomyomatosis (LAM)** • Angiomyolipomas (≥2)** 6 Minor Features • “Confetti” skin lesions • Dental enamel pits (≥3) • Intraoral fibromas (≥2) • Retinal achromic patch • Multiple renal cysts • Nonrenal hamartomas Definite TSC: 2 major features or 1 major feature with 2 minor features Possible TSC: either 1 major feature or >2 minor features * includes tubers and cerebral white matter radial migration lines ** a combination of the 2 Major clinical features LAM and angiomyolipomas without Other features does not meet criteria for a Definite Diagnosis Clinical Features of Tuberous Sclerosis Dermatologic Findings Hypomelanotic macules Facial angiofibromas Clinical Features of Tuberous Sclerosis Dermatologic Findings Ungual fibromas Shagreen patches Cephalic plaques Clinical Features of Tuberous Sclerosis Central Nervous System Findings Subependymal nodules, Cortical tubers, SEGAs Seizures, Intellectual disability/developmental delay Clinical Features of Tuberous Sclerosis Renal Findings Angiomyolipomas, Cysts, RCCs Clinical Features of Tuberous Sclerosis Cardiac and Lung Findings Cardiac rhabdomyoma on prenatal ultrasound Lymphangioleiomyomatosis Frequency of Disease Phenotype Observed Among TSC Patients Phenotype Cortical tuber Facial angiofibroma Renal angiomyolipoma Subependymal nodule Cardiac rhabdomyomas Ungual fibroma Frequencies ~90% >75% >80% ~80% ~50% 20-80% Genetic Aspects of TSC • • • • • Autosomal dominant inheritance Two-thirds of cases sporadic One-third of cases familial Variable expression Common in the population with approximately 1:6,000-10,000 individuals affected Genetic Testing of TSC: Current Status • Sanger sequencing identifies a mutation in 75% to 90% of the individuals with a definite clinical diagnosis of TSC1 • In 10% to 25% of patients with TSC, there is no mutation identified (NMI) in either TSC1 or TSC22 • Incorporating new DNA-sequencing technologies into the standard genetic assessment for patients with TSC can increase the detection rate of mutations in TSC3 Current Methods for TSC Genetic Testing3 Mutation type Technique used Point mutations and small insertions/ deletions Genomic DNA sequencing of coding regions and neighboring splice sites Intragenic deletions and duplications Analysis by multiplex ligationdependent probe amplification (MLPA) Chromosomal rearrangements Oligonucleotide and SNP array analyses SNP=single polynucleotide polymorphism. 1. 2. 3. Crino P. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;125:317-332. Northrup H, Krueger D. Pediatr Neurol. 2013;49:243-254. Mayer K et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014:22(2): e1-e4. Rare splice mutations, located deep in introns, or mutations in promoter regions are not detected by current DNA-based diagnostics3 NGS Identifies Mosaic Mutations in Patients With TSC • NGS analysis of genomic DNA, including promoter regions, all exons, and most of the intronic regions of 46 TSC NMI patients, revealed that1 – Mutations in TSC1 and TSC2 occur in over 50% of NMI patients with TSC – Mosaic and splice region mutations were common Ultra-deep pyrosequencing DNA analysis of blood samples of 38 NMI patients with TSC revealed2 – Two TSC2 mutations —each at 5.3% read frequency in different patients— consistent with mosaicism • 1. 2. Type of mutation identified by NGS in NMI patients with TSC1 (N=46) Pathogenic variants 22 Mosaic mutations 11 Splice-site mutation 10 Deletion in TSC2 promoter 1 Heterozygous mutations in TSC1 and TSC2 missed by previous analyses 2 Tyburczy ME. Presented at: 2013 International Research Conference on TSC and Related Disorders. June 20-23,2013; Washington DC, USA. Qin W et al. Hum Genet. 2010;127:573-582. Timeline of TSC Discoveries TSC2 von Recklinghausen cardiac myomata in newborn Insulin signaling Rapamycin tx brain tumors pathway Many clinical trials Linkage to chromosome 9 mTOR Genetic Heterogeneity mTOR Bourneville Rapamycin trial for kidney and lung TSC1 108 years 1862 1879 1997 1987 1993 2008 2003 2001 2006 2014 Simplified TSC pathway Growth Factors Energy Level Akt AMP TSC2 AMPK TSC1 rheb mTOR S6K S6 Protein synthesis Cell growth Rapamycin • Naturally occurring substance • Discovered in 1965 • Binds mTOR and inhibits its action, thus preventing cell division and growth Major Clinical Trials with mTOR inhibitors in TSC • 2007 • 2008 • 2009 • 2010 • 2011 • 2012 • 2013 PTEN HAMARTOMA TUMOR SYNDROME PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome (PHTS) • Any patient with germline PTEN mutation – Cowden syndrome – Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome (BRRS) – Proteus-like syndrome • Areas of greatest clinical concerns – Increased malignancy risks – Benign tumors – Neurodevelopmental issues Genomic Medicine Institute Benign Growths in PHTS • Skin and mucosa – Trichilemmomas (hair follicle bumps) – Keratoses (rough patches) on extremities – Papules on tongue, gums, inside nose – Lipomas (fatty bumps) – Fibromas • Lhermitte-Duclos (benign tumor of the cerebellum) • GI polyps • Uterine fibroids, other genitourinary tumors • Genitourinary malformations • Benign breast disease • Thyroid nodules/goiter/ Hashimoto’s thyroiditis • Vascular anomalies/ hemangiomas Genomic Medicine Institute Key Mucocutaneous Features Trichilemmoma Gum papillomas More keratoses Palmar pits and keratoses Tongue papillomas Patients provided consent for photographs Genomic Medicine Institute Where’s the gene? • Nelen et al, 1996, Nature Genetics letter: linkage to 10q2223 in 12 CS families, 4 with LDD • Strict inclusion criteria per International Cowden Consortium Pathognomonic criteria Major criteria Minor criteria Mucocutaneous lesions • Facial trichilemmomas • Acral keratoses • Papillomatous papules Macrocephaly Breast cancer Non-medullary thyroid cancer Adult-onset Lhermitte-Duclos disease (LDD) Mental retardation (IQ < 75) Goiter GI Hamartomas Lipomas Fibrocystic breast disease Fibromas GU tumor or malformation Operational diagnosis given to a person with: 1. Mucocutaneous lesions alone if: a. > 6 facial papules, > 3 being trichilemmomas, or b. Cutaneous facial papules + oral papillomas, or c. Oral papillomas + acral keratoses, or d. > 6 palmoplantar keratoses 2. 2 major criteria, one being macrocephaly or LDD 3. 1 major + 3 minor criteria 4. 4 minor criteria Tumor Suppressor Gene Found at 10q23 • LOH at 10q23 noted in prostate cancers, glioblastoma • Li et al, Science 1997: PTEN mutations in somatic glioblastoma, prostate, breast cancer cell lines – Protein tyrosine phosphatase domain – Homologous to chicken tensin • 2 weeks later: Steck et al, Nature Genetics – MMAC1, “Mutated in Multiple Advanced Cancers” – Glioma, prostate, kidney and breast carcinoma cell lines or tumors Cancer Risks in PHTS Tan et al, 2011 Bubien et al, 2013 Nieuwenhuis et al, 2013 Number of patients 368 146 180 Median age (yrs) 39 36 32 Female breast 85% 77% 67% Thyroid 35% 38% Women: 25% Men: 6% Renal 34% Elevated in women, N insufficient for further analysis Women: 9% Men: 2% Endometrial 28% Elevated, N insufficient for further analysis 21% Colorectal 9% Elevated in men, N insufficient for further analysis Women: 17% Men: 20% Melanoma 6% Elevated, N insufficient for further analysis Men: 2% Lifetime cancer risks* *To age 70 by Tan et al and Bubien et al; to age 60 by Nieuwenhuis et al Genomic Medicine Institute Updated Screening Recommendations Cancer General population risk Lifetime Risk with PHTS (Average age) Old Risk Data/ Screening Guidelines New Screening Guidelines Breast 12% ~85% (40s) 25-50%; begin mammograms at age 30 Starting at age 30: annual mammogram; consider MRI for patients with dense breasts Thyroid 1% 35% (30s/40s) 10%; begin annual ultrasounds at age 18 Annual ultrasound at dx age Endometrial (uterine) 2.6% 28% (40s/50s) ?5-10%; no recommendations Starting at age 30: annual endometrial biopsy or transvaginal ultrasound Renal cell (kidney) 1.6% 34% (50s) ?elevated; no recommendations Starting at age 40: renal imaging every 2 years Colon 5% 9% (40s) ??; no recommendations Starting at age 40: colonoscopy every 2 years Melanoma 2% 6% (40s) ??; no recommendations Annual dermatologic examination Tan et al, Clin Cancer Res 2012 Genomic Medicine Institute Neurodevelopmental Aspects of PHTS • Increase in developmental delays in children – Spectrum from mild to severe – Some require special education, others excel in school classes • Increased risks for autism spectrum disorders • New research: specific deficits in motor and executive function • Recommend thorough developmental evaluation in children • Macrocephaly (large head size) very common Genomic Medicine Institute White matter hypo-intensities PTEN ASD PTEN ASD Control PTEN-ASD also had poorly developed white matter Slow Processing Speed and Working Memory Deficits Also show reductions in Full Scale IQ (p<.001) White matter abnormalities drive cognitive deficits PHELAN-MCDERMID SYNDROME Rare mutations in autism Phelan-McDermid Syndrome global developmental delay intellectual disability absent or severely delayed speech hypotonia dysmorphic features The SHANK3 gene Phelan-McDermid syndrome is caused by deletions or mutations of the SHANK3 gene on chromosome 22q SHANK3 is a master scaffolding protein which forms a framework for the connections between brain cells Previous Phenotyping Research Studies Physical and neurological exam Renal ultrasound Clinical Genetics Evaluation Electroencephalography Medical and Psychiatric History Laboratory bloodwork Echocardiography Height and weight measurement Electrocardiography Head circumference Domain Measure Global Cognitive Ability Mullen Scales for Early Learning or Stanford Binet-5 Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales Mullen and Vineland Subscales Macarthur Bates Communication Developmental Inventory Mullen and Vineland Subscales Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Pervasive Developmental Disorders Behavior Inventory Repetitive Behavior Scales-Revised Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form Aberrant Behavior Checklist Sensory Profile Questionnaire- Short Form Adaptive Behavior Language Motor Functioning Autism Symptoms Other Symptoms Demographic/Genetic Results Sample Size 32 Male : Female 18:14 Age (years) 1.7- 45.4 (X = 8.8) Deletion Size (Mb) .058 (point) – 8.5 Soorya et al., 2013 Rearrangement N % Terminal deletion 21 66 Ring 22 6 19 Unbalanced translocation 2 6 Point mutations 2 6 Interstitial deletion 1 3 ASD and IQ diagnostic classifications 15.60% 9.40% Autism ASD non-ASD 75% Nonverbal IQ classification (n=30) Average (IQ 100-110) Mild intellectual disability (IQ 50-55 to 70) Moderate intellectual disability (IQ 35-40 to 50-55) Severe intellectual disability (IQ 20-25 to 35-40) Profound intellectual disability (IQ < 20-25 Soorya et al., 2013 N % 1 3 3 7 16 3.3 10 10 23.3 53.3 * *Phelan & McDermid, 2012 Kolevzon et al., 2015 Association between deletion size and phenotypic variables Phenotypic variable N Deletion size Number of dysmorphic features 32 .474* BCa confidence interval# Lower Upper .145 .738 Number of medical comorbidities 32 .386* .022 .640 Nonverbal IQ estimate 29 -.332 -.640 .112 Gross motor skills (Vineland) 31 -.402† -.728 .036 Fine motor skills (Vineland) 31 -.123 -.473 .254 Expressive language skills (Vineland) 32 -.184 -.531 .199 Receptive language skills (Vineland) 32 -.231 -.553 .154 Qualitative abnormalities in reciprocal social interactions (ADI-R) 30 .466* .073 .723 Qualitative abnormalities in communication (ADI-R) 30 .498* .091 .740 Restricted, repetitive, and stereotyped patterns of behavior (ADI-R) 30 -.229 -.592 .214 *significant at .05 level (two-tailed test) significance at .05 level †approached Soorya et al., 2013 Refining the neurobehavioral phenotype PMS: n=27 ASD/ID: n=38 ASD: n=23 Mieses et al., IMFAR 2014 Diffusion Tensor Imaging Reduced myelination in areas of the brain associated with language (superior longitudinal fasciculus; the genu of the corpus callosum; Broca’s area) and social functioning (medial temporal white matter) for the PMS group relative to controls. N = 10 Wang & Lim, unpublished Reversal of motor deficits in Shank3-deficient mice (Het) after treatment with IGF-1 Bozdagi et al, 2013 Effect of IGF-1 on Synaptic Deficits Bozdagi et al, 2013 A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Crossover Trial of IGF1 in Children with Phelan-McDermid Syndrome Placebo wash-out 12 weeks Placebo 12 weeks 4 weeks IGF-1 IGF-1 Baseline Demographic Characteristics Subject Chronological Age (months) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 177.4 103.7 66.3 64.6 109.7 91.8 172.7 71.1 61.8 Kolevzon et al., 2014, Mol Autism Estimated Mental Age Equivalent (months) 8.5 10.3 11.3 12.3 36 7 30.5 31 9.3 Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale Composite Standard Score 29 47 52 43 61 50 31 51 45 Effects of IGF-1 on Social Withdrawal N = 9; t = -2.107; p = 0.040 Kolevzon et al., 2014, Mol Autism Effects of IGF-1 on Repetitive Behavior N = 9; t = -2.077; p = 0.042 Kolevzon et al., 2014, Mol Autism Adverse Events Kolevzon et al., 2014, Mol Autism Constipation Sedation Decreased appetite Periobital / facial swelling Diarrhea URTI Sleep Disturbance Increased appetite Mood changes Increased thirst Increased phlegm Teeth grinding Cough Hand flapping Increased bowel movements Increased chewing/biting Decreased visual acuity Lethargy/decreased energy Cooler temp/sweating Runny nose/congestion Irritability Gait changes Stomach virus Anxiety Increased urine frequency Fever Increased energy Gagging Increased thirst Conjunctivitis Erythema / swollen eyes Vomiting Rash Nose swelling Warmer body temperature Hair loss Increased aggression Hypoglycemia IGF-1 (N) 4 1 2 1 1 5 7 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 2 3 1 1 0 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 7 Placebo (N) 3 0 3 0 2 5 2 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 1 2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 Thank you to all of our supporters! THE DEVELOPMENTAL SYNAPTOPATHIES CONSORTIUM (U54NS092090) IS PART OF NCATS RARE DISEASE CLINICAL RESEARCH NETWORK (RDCRN), AN INITIATIVE OF THE OFFICE OF RARE DISEASE RESEARCH (ORDR). THIS CONSORTIUM IS FUNDED THROUGH COLLABORATION BETWEEN NCATS, AND THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE (NINDS) OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH. THE CONTENT OF THIS PUBLICATION IS SOLELY THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHORS AND DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE OFFICIAL VIEWS OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH