* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download DNB Group - Digital, Regulation and Macro Challenges
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
DNB Group - Digital, Regulation and Macro Challenges Bjørn Erik Næss, CFO Morgan Stanley European Financials Conference London, March 26th AGENDA • DNB ambitions – deliver on financial promises • DNB’s customers digital behaviour – impact for DNB • DNB in a tough regulatory environment – DNB well prepared for the future Basel 4 • DNB in a changing macro environment 2 Financial ambitions - 2016 and 2017 Return on equity > 12 per cent Min. 14% CET1-ratio* as capital plateau 3 * Based on transitional rules > 50% dividend when capital plateau is reached DNB delivers healthy profit growth Pre-tax operating profit and ROE NOK billion 40 Pre-tax operating profit before impairment 22.0 % Impairment of loans and guarantees 35 Return on equity 13.8 % 30 28.7 10.0 % 25 20 15 0.0 % 15.1 10 5 0 4 20.0 % -10.0 % 1.6 0.2 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 -20.0 % Strong capital accumulation CET1-ratio and Equity capital 15.0 15.1 Per cent, NOK million Equity 14.0 13.6 CET1-ratio transition rules FL CET1-Basel 3/CRD IV 13.0 158,723 12.7 101,403 12.1 12.0 11.8 10.7 11.0 10.0 9.2 9.4 8.5 9.0 8.0 2009 5 2010 2011 2012 FL CET1-Basel 3/CRD IV = Best estimate for DNB’s future Fully loaded CET Basel 3 / CRD IV 2013 2014 AGENDA • DNB ambitions – deliver on financial promises • DNB’s customers digital behaviour – impact for DNB • DNB in a tough regulatory environment – DNB well prepared for the future Basel 4 • DNB in a changing macro environment 6 Present in all channels Mobile Internet banking Chat In-store outlets Bank i butikk – bank services in-store outlets 24h Telephone banking 7 Branches (also open on Saturdays) Our customers prefer online banking Share of customer traffic Sales digital vs. traditional Savings agreements Manual 14% Mobile bank, 42% Manual, 50% SMS, 25% Internet bank, 30% Digital 11% Call Center, 2% 8 Digital, 50% Digital 86% Insurance Branch office, 1% Car loans Consumer loans Manual, 36% Digital, 64% Manual 89% Modernising the way we do banking - we expect 50-70 per cent reduction in manual transactions Average number of manual transactions in pilot branches (rebased) Key takeaways 100 • Fundamentally changing the way we operate our branches: o Eliminating manual cash-services o Moving manual banking transactions to digital channels 39 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 9 • Continued reduction in number of branches Continuous efficiency improvements in distribution - number of branches reduced by more than 40% since 2007 Development in number of DNB branches in Norway 244 Key takeaways • Optimising the balance between branches and digital presence • Customers are embracing digital banking • Efficiency gains by reducing cost–to–serve through use of digital channels 137 2007 10 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Increasing our cost/income ambition Cost/income DNB vs peer groups Per cent C/I ambition for 2017 European banks (top 50)* Nordic peer group DNB 75.0 ~40% 70.0 65.0 60.0 55.0 50.0 45.0 40.0 2005 11 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Combination of top line growth and cost focus AGENDA • DNB ambitions – deliver on financial promises • DNB’s customers digital behaviour – impact for DNB • DNB in a tough regulatory environment – DNB well prepared for the future Basel 4 • DNB in a changing macro environment 12 DNB is well positioned for new capital requirements 15.1% 13.6% 13 % 12.7% DNB’s regulatory CET1-ratio 11.8% 12 % 1.0% 10 % 1.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 4.5% 4.5% 4.5% 4.5% 2014 Conservation Buffer Countercyclical Buffer 2015 2016 Systemic Risk Buffer CET1-transition rules 9% 2.0% 2013 CET1 Minimum Requirement SIFIs Fully loaded CET1/CRD IV 13 DNB already well prepared for a tougher future regime Mortgage risk weights 50% DNB risk weights – transition rules 40% 80% Future risk weights – Basel 4 ? ??? 30% 20% Current IRB risk weights 20% 0% 0% DNB 14 ??? 60% 40% 10% RW Corporate risk weights 100% Nordea LGD Floor 20% SHB SEB PD Floor 0.2% Swedbank Danske Pillar 2 requirement DNB Nordea RW SHB SEB Swedbank Danske PD/LGD Floors Strong capital position vs. peers Capital adequacy figures as at 31 December 2014 – comparison with Nordic peers Leverage ratio 42.3% 25.1% Leverage Basis 6.0% 4.1% DNB Group Danske Bank RWAs (as % of total assets) 23.3% 4.8% 21.7% 4.3% SEB Common Equity Tier 1 ratio, transitional rules Nordea 19.5% 17.1% 4.5% 3.7% Swedbank Handelsbanken Common Equity Tier 1 ratio, Basel III 21.2 % Risk Weighted Basis 18.3 %* 12.7 %15.1% DNB 15 15.1 % 11.7 % Danske Bank 16.3 % 20.4 % 15.7 % 10.1 % 10.4 % 10.6 % SEB Nordea Swedbank 8.7 % Handelsbanken * DNB’s risk weights are conservatively set due to requirements from the Norwegian FSA. Applying average risk weights on mortgages and corporate portfolio as used by Swedish peers would increase DNB’s CET1 ratio. AGENDA • DNB ambitions – deliver on financial promises • DNB’s customers digital behaviour – impact for DNB • DNB in a tough regulatory environment – DNB well prepared for the future Basel 4 • DNB in a changing macro environment 16 Slower Economic Growth in Norway is Expected – Exports, private and public consumption will ensure a soft landing GDP growth and unemployment Year on year, per cent Mainland GDP growth 7% Unemployment rate 6% 5% 4.3 4% 3.5 3% 2.5 2.5 2% 1% 0% -1% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 -2% 17 Source: Statistics Norway/DNB Markets forecasts 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015e 2016e 2017e 2018e Scenario: Lower oil price - What if oil price would stay at $50/bbl.? GDP growth and unemployment Year-on-year, per cent Main assumptions and a downside $50/bbl.-scenario by DNB Markets 7% Mainland GDP 6% GDP $50/bbl-scenario Unemployment Unempl. $50/bbl-scen. 5% 5.2 4% 4.3 3% 2.5 2% 1% 0.6 0% -1% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2010 2011 2012 -2% 18 Sources: Statistics Norway, forecast and scenario by DNB Markets as of 29 Jan 2015 2013 2014 2015e 2016e 2017e 2018e Two powerful tools to ensure a stable macro development Monetary policy Higher interest rates in Norway than in the rest of Europe Fiscal policy Large public wealth gives ample leeway to smooth business cycles Central bank rates National budget structural, non-oil deficit Per cent ECB 2015 prices, NOK billion Sweden Norway 7 250 6 200 Structural, non-oil deficit 4 per cent return on the fund capital 58 5 150 4 100 3 2 50 1 0 2008 2008 19 0 2010 2010 2012 2012 2014 2014 2016e 2016 Source: Thomson Datastream, DNB Markets 2018e 2018 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015e Both income and capital ratios build up are sensitive to currency fluctuations Factors affecting the CET1 ratio USD/NOK 2016 effect, bps 9.00 8.50 8.00 +6% 7.50 + 15% +15% 7.00 +45 bps NOK/USD NOK/EUR Currency effects 6.50 6.00 ÷ 15% 5.50 31/12/2014 30/9/2014 * MTM: mark-to-market 30/6/2014 31/3/2014 31/12/2013 20 NOK/USD NOK/EUR ÷ 45 bps The financial ambition of 12% ROE stay firm Lending volumes expected to grow at an annual rate of around 3-4 per cent, subject to stable exchange rates Stable development in volume-weighted spreads Commissions and fees – underlying growth of 5 per cent Flat nominal costs throughout 2015 (excluding restructuring costs) Impairment expected to stay below normalised levels 1) in 2015 1) Normalised levels are around 20 bps of EaD (exposure at default), which corresponds to losses of approx. NOK 4 billion. 21 Thank you DISCLAIMER CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS The statements contained in this presentation may include forward-looking statements such as statements of future expectations. These statements are based on the management’s current views and assumptions and involve both known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Although DNB believes that the expectations reflected in any such forward-looking statements are reasonable, no assurance can be given that such expectations will prove to have been correct. Actual results, performance or events may differ materially from those set out or implied in the forward-looking statements. Important factors that may cause such a difference include, but are not limited to: (i) general economic conditions, (ii) performance of financial markets, including market volatility and liquidity (iii) the extent of credit defaults, (iv) interest rate levels, (v) currency exchange rates, (vi) changes in the competitive climate, (vii) changes in laws and regulations, (viii) changes in the policies of central banks and/ or foreign governments, or supra-national entities. DNB assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement. 23