* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Extinction Processes
Overexploitation wikipedia , lookup
Maximum sustainable yield wikipedia , lookup
Storage effect wikipedia , lookup
Restoration ecology wikipedia , lookup
Island restoration wikipedia , lookup
Ecological fitting wikipedia , lookup
Wildlife corridor wikipedia , lookup
Biodiversity action plan wikipedia , lookup
Holocene extinction wikipedia , lookup
Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project wikipedia , lookup
Occupancy–abundance relationship wikipedia , lookup
Mission blue butterfly habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup
Assisted colonization wikipedia , lookup
Reconciliation ecology wikipedia , lookup
Extinction debt wikipedia , lookup
Decline in amphibian populations wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical ecology wikipedia , lookup
Habitat destruction wikipedia , lookup
Habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup
Ch. 7 Extinction Processes Why are some species rare? • Restricted to uncommon habitat • specialists ~ cave dwelling species • habitat is rare ~ vernal pools • poor competitors, can only persist in habitat with few competitors • Limited to small geographic range • geographic barriers ~ islands, mountain ranges, lakes • locally adapted ~ specific soil type • Occur at low population densities • big things need more space • require scarce or dispersed resources ~ apex predators • fitness increases at lower densities • Check out the Venn diagram in your book, page 132 • if you are restricted to uncommon habitat, in a small geographic range, and you need a lot of space, you’ll be really rare. How rarity increases vulnerability • More vulnerable to stochastic environmental changes • a single major change can encompass a narrowly distributed species’ entire range • 75% of extinctions since 1600 were island species • More vulnerable to habitat changes • habitat specialists more vulnerable than generalists, even in the same habitat • can’t seek refuge elsewhere or be “rescued” by neighboring populations • More vulnerable to genetic problems • skewed sex ratios • genetic drift, inbreeding, bottlenecks • reduced ability to adapt to changes What makes species vulnerable to human-induced change? • Limited adaptability and resilience • low reproductive capacity • limited dispersal capability • stringent habitat requirements • Human attention • tasty • unpopular and persecuted • Ecological Overlap • competing with humans for habitat ~ grasslands, rivers, coasts • Large Home-ranges • bound to run into trouble somewhere • sensitive to fragmentation • tend to be large and disliked by people • Evolutionarily unprepared for introduced predators, exotics, diseases, or over exploitation ~ especially true for island spp. Population Structure • Population ~ group of individuals of the same species occupying a given area at the same time • arbitrarily ~ political boundary • demographically ~ age structure and demographic parameters differ • genetically ~ different alleles, little gene flow Metapopulations • A population of populations • Species with patchy distributions • Each patch of habitat is a different population • Occasionally, individuals move between patches, but this is infrequent because non-habitat presents a barrier • species that will move through non-habitat, or have general requirements don’t show metapopulation structure because gene flow too high ~ “patchily distributed populations” Types of subpopulations • Sources • produce a net surplus of individuals • emigrants disperse to other patches • Sinks • do not produce enough individuals to maintain themselves • rely on dispersers from other patches • Rescue effect: Sources rescue sink populations from going extinct • Patch may be a source some years and a sink others • Ecological traps: Attractive sinks • Individuals prefer these patches even though they will lose fitness there • Associated with humans manipulating perception of habitat quality Metapopulation dynamics • Turnover ~ Populations appear and disappear, winking in and out of existence • • • • colonization ~ an appearance local extinction ~ a disappearance may be fast or slow may be patch wide (disturbance or succession) or vary by species • core subpopulations ~ persist a long time • generally large patches/populations • generally sources • satellite subpopulations ~ those that wink in and out • generally smaller • generally sinks • Particularly useful concept in fragmented areas Population Viability Analysis (PVA) • Answer questions about population size, persistence, and management • Model • • • • dependent variables ~ population size independent variables ~ habitat measures, weather, harvest/take parameters ~ birth, death, and reproductive rates accounts for variation in time and space • model randomly selects a value for each parameter from the range of probable values • useful for small populations where chance matters more • Steps • Single projection for a specified period • Repeat 500+ times (each time, different parameter values) • Calculate proportion of projections that included threshold you are interested in (75% of the projections predict population of 100 individuals in 10 years) Stochasticities of Extinction • Demographic stochasticity results from random variation in reproduction and survival. • • • • small populations skewed sex ratios Allee effects Population size, sex ratio, age structure, birth and death rates for sexes and ages • Environmental stochasticity results from random variation in habitat quality • climate and water • species interactions • more difficult to model, usually limited to a few key variables Stochasticities of Extinction • Catastrophes • occur randomly • discrete events • modeled by killing a proportion of the population outright, rather than continuously effecting birth/death rates • Genetic stochasticity results from random variation in gene frequencies • • • • drift bottlenecks inbreeding not important for short-term PVAs Be Mindful • Demographic, environmental, catastrophic, and genetic stochasticities are interactive • one may multiply the effects of the other • feedback loops, or snowballing -> extinction vortex • Slow, incremental losses can lead to global extinction